Quantification of functional mitral valve regurgitation in patients with congestive heart failure: Comparison of electron-beam computed tomography with cardiac catheterization

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 728-739

  Lembcke, Alexander ^a,b,c   Borges, Adrian C ^a   Dohmen, Pascal M ^a   Hoffmann, Udo ^b   Hermann, Kay Geert A ^a   Kroencke, Thomas J ^a   Fischer, Thomas ^a   Hamm, Bernd ^a   Enzweiler, Christian N H ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Catheters and catheterization; Computed tomography (CT); Echocardiography; Electron beam; Heart; Mitral valve; Regurgitation

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRON BEAM; ELECTRON BEAM TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 9244251563     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200412000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Carabello BA. The relationship of left ventricular geometry and hypertrophy to left ventricular function in valvular heart disease. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(Suppl 2):S132-S138
2. Pietras RJ, Wolfkiel CJ, Veselik K, et al. Validation of ultrafast computed tomographic left ventricular volume measurements. Invest Radiol. 1991;26:28-34.
3. Baik HK, Budoff MJ, Lane KL, et al. Accurate measures of left ventricular ejection fraction using electron beam tomography: a comparison with radionuclide angiography, and cine angiography. Int J Card Imaging. 2000;16:391-398.
4. Schmermund A, Rensing BJ, Sheedy PF, et al. Reproducibility of right and left ventricular measurements by electron-beam CT in patients with congestive heart failure. Int J Cardiol Imaging. 1998;14:201-209.
5. Enzweiler CN, Becker CR, Felix R, et al. [Diagnostic value of electronbeam computed tomography (EBT). I. Cardiac applications.] Rofo. 2004;175:27-36.
6. Lembcke A, Wiese TH, Enzweiler CN, et al. Quantification of mitral valve regurgitation by left ventricular volume and flow measurements using electron beam computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:385-391.
7. Kaminaga T, Naito H, Takamiya M, et al. Quantitative evaluation of mitral regurgitation with ultrafast CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18:239-242.
8. Wolfkiel CJ, Ferguson JL, Chomka EV, et al. Determination of cardiac output by ultrafast computed tomography. Am J Physiol Imaging. 1986;1:117-123.
9. Becker C, Schatzl M, Feist H, et al. [Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography] Rofo. 1999;170:99-104.
10. Hillis LD, Firth BG, Winniford MD. Comparison of the thermodilution and indocyanine green dye in low cardiac output or left-sided regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:1201-1202.
11. Brogan WC, Glamann DB, Lange RA, et al. Comparison of single and biplane ventriculography for determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1079-1082.
12. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Ballew DW, et al. The use of biplane angiocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J. 1960;60:762-776.
13. Wynne J, Green LH, Mann T, et al. Estimation of left ventricular volumes in man from biplane cineangiograms filmed in oblique projections. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41:726-732.
14. Sellers RD, Levy MJ, Amplatz K, et al. Left retrograde cardioangiography in aquired cardiac disease: technique, indications and interpretations in 700 cases. Am J Cardiol. 1964;14:437-447.
15. Grossman W, Dexter L. Profiles in valvular heart disease. In: Grossmann W, ed. Cardiac Catheterization and Angiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger;1980:305-324.
16. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, et al. Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:167-184.
17. Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, et al, for the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:777-802.
18. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
19. Hundley WG, Li HF, Willard JE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation. Comparison with invasive techniques. Circulation. 1995;92:1151-1158.
20. Bolger AF, Eigler NL, Maurer G. Quantifying valvular regurgitation: Limitations and inherent assumptions of Doppler techniques. Circulation. 1988;78:1316-131.
21. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358-367.
22. Simpson IA, de Belder MA, Kenny A, et al. How to quantitate valve regurgitation by echo doppler techniques. Br Heart J. 1995;73(Suppl 2):1-9.
23. Croft CH, Lipscomb K, Mathis K, et al. Limitations of qualitative angiographic grading in aortic or mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:1593-1598.
24. Lopez JF, Hanson S, Orchard RC, et al. Quantification of mitral valvular incompetence. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1985;11:139-152.
25. de Bono D. Complications of diagnostic catheterisation: results from 34,041 patients in the United Kingdom confidential enquiry into cardiac catheter complications. The Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London. Br Heart J. 1993;70:297-300.
26. Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, et al. Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology. 2002;223:789-797.
27. Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, et al. MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology. 2002;223:263-269.
28. Kondo C, Caputo GR, Semelka R, et al. Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity encoded cine NMR imaging: in vivo an in vitro evaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:9-16.
29. Meier D, Maier S, Boesiger P. Quantitative flow measurements on phantoms and on blood vessels with MR. Magn Reson Med. 1988;8:25-34.
30. Taylor AM, Pennel DJ. Valvular Heart Disease. In: Bogaert J, Duerinckx AJ, Rademakers FE, eds. Magnetic Resonance of the Heart and the Great Vessels. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer, 1999;205-221.
31. Kivelitz DE, Enzweiler CNH, Wiese TH, et al. Determination of left ventricular function parameters and myocardial mass: comparison of MR1 and EBT. Rofo. 2000;172:244-250.
32. Jaschke W, Gould RG, Assimakopoulos PA, et al. Flow measurements with a high-speed computed tomography scanner. Med Phys. 1987;14:238-243.
33. Garrett JS, Lanzer P, Jaschke W, et al. Measurement of cardiac output by cine computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:657-661.
34. Doriot PA, Dorsaz PA, Dorsaz L, et al. Is the indicator dilution theory really the adequate base of many blood flow measurement techniques? Med Phys. 1997;24:1889-1898.
35. Ludman PF, Coats AJS, Poole-Wilson PA, et al. Measurement accuracy of cardiac output in humans: indicator-dilution technique versus geometric analysis by ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1482-148.
36. Rumberger JA, Bell MR. Measurement of myocardial perfusion and cardiac output using intravenous injection methods by ultrafast (cine) computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 1992;27(Suppl 2):S40-S46.
37. Nishikawa T, Dohi S. Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:142-153.
38. Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, et al. Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126:1001-1004.
39. Sommers MS, Woods SL, Courtade MA. Issues in methods and measurement of thermodilution cardiac output. Nurs Res. 1993;42:228-233.
40. Pohle K, Dimmler A, Feyerer R, et al. Quantification of aortic valve calcification with electron beam tomography: a histomorphometric validation study. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:230-234.
41. Willmann JK, Kobza R, Roos JE, et al. ECG-gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of mitral valve disease: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2662-2669.
42. Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:653-661.
43. Mahnken AH, Henzler D, Klotz E, et al. Determination of cardiac output with multislice spiral computed tomography: a validation study. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:451-454.
44. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:119-128.
45. Lembcke A, Wiese TH, Schnorr J, et al. Image quality of noninvasive coronary angiography using multislice spiral CT and electron-beam CT - intraindividual comparison in an animal model. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:357-364
46. Knollmann FD, Cangoz T, Cesmeli E, et al. Gauging effective spatial resolution in multirow helical cardiac computed tomography with a dynamic phantom. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:13-19.
47. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:223-229.