Determination of cardiac output with multislice spiral computed tomography: A validation study

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 451-454

  Mahnken, Andreas H ^a   Henzler, Dietrich ^a   Klotz, Ernst ^b   Hennemuth, Anja ^b   Wildberger, Joachim E ^a   Günther, Rolf W ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Computed tomography; Heart

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CARDIOVASCULAR PERFORMANCE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EVALUATION; HEART OUTPUT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; INDICATOR DILUTION CURVE; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; SWINE; TECHNIQUE; THERMODILUTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 3242780900     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000128655.58691.14     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Herfkens RJ, Axel L, Lipton MJ, et al. Measurement of cardiac output by computed transmission tomography. Invest Radiol. 1982;17:550-553.
2. Garrett JS, Lanzer P, Jaschke W, et al. Measurement of cardiac output by cine computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:657-661.
3. Wolfkiel CJ, Ferguson JL, Chomka EV, et al. Determination of cardiac output by ultrafast computed tomography. Am J Physiol Imaging. 1986;1:117-123.
4. Ludman PF, Coats AJ, Poole-Wilson PA, et al. Measurement accuracy of cardiac output in humans: indicator-dilution technique versus geometric analysis by ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1482-1489.
5. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Hennemuth A, et al. Measurement of cardiac output from a test-bolus injection in multislice computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2498-2504.
6. Thompson HK, Starmer CF, Whalen RE, et al. Indicator transit time considered as gamma variate. Circ Res. 1963;14:502-515.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
8. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2002;106:2051-2054.
9. Willmann JK, Mayer D, Banyai M, et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2003;229:465-474.
10. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Bankier AA, et al. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology. 2000;214:363-371.
11. Choe YH, Phyun LH, Han BK. Biphasic and discontinuous injection of contrast material for thin-section helical CT angiography of the whole aorta and iliac arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:454-456.
12. Kaminaga T, Naito H, Takamiya M, et al. Quantitative evaluation of mitral regurgitation with ultrafast CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18:239-242.
13. Botero M, Lobato EB. Advances in noninvasive cardiac output monitoring: an update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001;15:631-640.
14. Ng HW, Coleman N, Walley TJ, et al. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients. Clin Intensive Care. 1993;4:217-221.
15. Marik PE. Pulmonary artery catheterization and esophageal doppler monitoring in the ICU. Chest. 1999;116:1085-1091.
16. Nishikawa T, Dohi S. Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:142-153.