Influences of carbon sources and their concentrations on shoot proliferation and rooting of 'Hosui' Japanese pear

HortScience

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1681-1683

  Kadota, Masanori ^a,b   Niimi, Yoshiji ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Agriculture   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hyperhydricity; Pyrus pyrifolia N.; Sorbitol; Sucrose

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; MALTOSE; PLANTS (BOTANY); SUGAR (SUCROSE);

CARBON SOURCES; HYPERHYDRICITY; JAPANESE PEAR;

FRUITS;

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON; CONCENTRATION; FRUCTOSE; FRUITS; GLUCOSE; PLANTS; SUCROSE;

PYRUS COMMUNIS; PYRUS PYRIFOLIA;

EID: 9244240839     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.39.7.1681     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bieleski, R.L. 1982. Sugar alcohols, p. 158-290. In: F.A. Loewus and W. Tanner (eds.). Encyclopedia of plant physiology. new ser. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
2. Blanc, G., N. Michaux-Ferrière, C. Teisson, L. Lardet, and M.P. Carron. 1999. Effects of carbohydrate addition on the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 59:103-112.
3. Buah, J.N., Y. Kawamitsu, S. Yonemori, M. Hayashi, and S. Murayama. 2000. Effects of various carbon sources and their combinations on in vitro growth and photosynthesis of banana plantlets. Plant Prod. Sci. 3:392-397.
4. Daigny, G., H. Paul, R.S. Sangwan, and B.S. Sangwan-Norreel. 1996. Factors influencing secondary somatic embryogenesis in Malusxdomestica Borkh. (cv 'Gloster 69'). Plant Cell Rpt. 16:153-157.
5. De Paiva, V.B. and W.C. Otoni. 2003. Carbon sources and theirosmotic potential in plant tissue culture: Does it matter?. Sci. Hort. 97:193-202.
6. Fuentes, S.R.L., M.B.P. Calheiros, J. Manetti-Filho and L.G.E. Vieira. 2000. The effects of silver nitrate and different carbohydrate sources on somatic embryogenesis in Coffea canephora. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 60:5-13.
7. García J.L., J. Troncoso, R. Sarmiento, and A. Troncoso. 2002. Influence of carbon source and their concentration on the in vitro development of olive zygotic embryos and explants raised from them. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 69:95-100.
8. Garin, É., M. Bernier-Cardou, N. Isabel, K. Klimaszewska, and A. Plourde. 2000. Effect of sugars, amino acids, and culture technique on maturation of somatic embryos of Pinus strobes on medium with two gellan gum concentrations. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 62:27-37.
9. Jain, R.K., M.R. Davey, E.C. Cocking, and R. Wu. 1997. Carbohydrate and osmotic requirements for high-frequency plant regeneration from protoplast-derived colonies of indica and japonica rice varieties. J. Expt. Bot. 48:751-758.
10. Jasik, J. and G.J. De Klerk. 1997. Anatomical and ultrastructural examination of adventitious root formation in stem slices of apple. Biol. Plant. 39:79-90.
11. Kadota, M., T. Hirano, and K. Imizu 2001. Double-phase culture using sorbitol increases in vitro shoot proliferation and reduces hyperhydricity in Japanese pear. Sci. Hort. 89:207-215.
12. Kadota, M., T. Hirano, K. Imizu, and Y. Niimi. 2002. Pyroligneous acid improves in vitro rooting of Japanese pear cultivars. HortScience 37:194-195.
13. Kadota, M. and Y. Niimi. 2002. Effects of cytokinin types and their concentrations on shoot proliferation and hyperhydricity in in vitro pear cultivar shoots. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult.
14. Karhu, S.T. 1997. Sugar use in relation to shoot induction by sorbitol and cytokinin in apple. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 122:476-480.
15. Kozai, T. 1991. Micropropagation under photoautotrophic conditions, p. 447-469. In: P.C. Debergh and R.H. Zimmerman (eds.). Micropropagation: Technology and application. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
16. Lloyd, G. and B. McCown. 1981. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Proc. Intl. Plant Prop. Soc. 30:421-427.
17. Loiseau, J., C. Marche, and Y.L. Deunff. 1995. Effects of auxins, cytokinins, carbohydrates and amino acids on somatic embryogenesis induction from shoot apices of pea. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 41:267-275.
18. Marino, G., G. Bertazza, E. Magnanini, and A.D. Altan. 1993. Comparative effects of sorbitol and sucrose as main carbon energy sources in micropropagation of apricot. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 34:235-244.
19. Marino, G., E. Magnanini, S. Battistini, and B. Righetti. 1991. Effect of hormones and main carbon enegy sources on in vitro propagation of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cvs. 'San Castrese' and 'Portici'. Acta Hort. 293:355-362.
20. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15:478-497.
21. Pua, E.C. and C. Chong. 1984. Requirement for sorbitol (D-glucitol) as carbon source for in vitro propagation of Malus robusta No. 5. Can. J. Bot. 62:1545-1549.
22. Pua, E.C. and C. Chong. 1985. Regulation of in vitro shoot and root regeneration in 'Macspur' apple by sorbitol (D-glucitol) and related carbon sources. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110:705-709.
23. Thorpe T.A. and T. Murashige. 1968. Starch accumulation in shoot-forming tobacco callus cultures. Science 160:421-422.