Correspondence between three olfactory tests and suprathreshold odor intensity ratings

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 124, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1072-1077

  Koskinen, Sari ^a   Vento, Seija ^b   Malmberg, Henrik ^c   Tuorila, Hely ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b JORVI HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Anosmia; Cross Cultural Smell Identification Test; European Test of Olfactory Capabilities; Hyposmia; Sniffin' Sticks

Indexed keywords

BUTANOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANOSMIA; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROSS CULTURAL SMELL IDENTIFICATION; CULTURAL FACTOR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EUROPEAN TEST OF OLFACTORY CAPABILITIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMELL TEST; SNIFFIN STICKS; SUPRATHRESHOLD ODOR INTENSITY RATING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODORS; OLFACTION DISORDERS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 8744314926     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480410015776     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Leopold DA, Bartels S. Evaluation of olfaction. J Otolaryngol 2002; 31: S18-23.
2. Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM. Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 288: 2307-12.
3. Doty RL. Olfaction. Annu Rev Psychol 2001; 52: 423-52.
4. Vento SI, Simola M, Ertama L, Malmberg H. Sense of smell in long-standing nasal polyposis. Am J Rhinol 2001; 15: 159-63.
5. De Wijk R, Cain W. Odor quality: discrimination versus free and cued identification. Percept Psychophys 1994; 56: 12-8.
6. Doty RL, Smith R, McKeown DA, Raj J. Tests of human olfactory function: principal component analysis suggests that most measure a common source of variance. Percept Psychophys 1994; 56: 701-7.
7. Tuorila H, Koskinen S. Olfactory identification and detection tests in the prediction of odor and flavor intensity ratings in the elderly and young. Chem Senses 2003; 28: E62.
8. Amoore JE, Ollman BG. Practical test kits for quantitatively evaluating the sense of smell. Rhinology 1983; 21: 49-54.
9. Amoore JE, O'Neill RS. Clinical olfactometry: improved convenience in squeeze-bottle kits; and a portable olfactometer. Chem Senses 1986; 11: 576-7.
10. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. 'Sniffin' Sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 1997; 22: 39-52.
11. Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW. Development of the 12-Item Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 353-6.
12. Thomas-Danguin T, Rouby C, Sicard G, Vigoroux M, Farget V, Johansson A, et al. Development of the ETOC: A European Test of Olfactory Capabilities. Rhinology 2003; 41: 142-51.
13. Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen CM, et al. Multicenter investigation of 1036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 257: 205-11.
14. Koskinen S, Kälviäinen N, Tuorila H. Perception of chemosensory stimuli and related responses to flavored yogurts in the young and elderly. Food Qual Pref 2003; 14: 623-35.
15. Koskinen S, Kälviäinen N, Tuorila H. Flavor enhancement as a tool for increasing pleasantness and intake of a snack product among the elderly. Appetite 2003; 41: 87-96.
16. Cain WS, Rabin MD. Comparability of two tests of olfactory functioning. Chem Senses 1989; 14: 479-85.
17. Temmel AFP, Quint C, Schickinger-Fischer B, Klimek L, Stoller E, Hummel T. Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 635-41.