MRI scanning and incus fixation in vibrant soundbridge implantation

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 969-972

  Todt, Ingo ^a   Seidl, Rainer Otis ^a   Mutze, Sven ^a   Ernst, Arne ^b  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UKB Berlin ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Implantable hearing system; MRI; Vibrant Soundbridge

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DEVICE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; IMPLANTATION; INCUS; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; STAPES;

AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; INCUS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSSICULAR PROSTHESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 8544256332     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00017     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Portnoy WM, Mattucci K. Cochlear implants as a contradiction to magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100: 195-7.
2. Applebaum EL, Valvassori GE. Further studies on the effect of magnetic resonance imaging fields on middle ear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:801-4.
3. Todt I, Seidl RO, Ernst A. Exclusion criteria in semi-implantable hearing aids. Assoc Res Otorhinolaryng, 25th Midwinter Meeting, 2002, Abstract 209.
4. Blödow A, Todt I, Seidl RO, et al. Auditory neuropathy: from VORP to CI. 4th Int Sympos Electr Impl Otology & Convent Hearing Aids, Toulouse, 2003, Abstract 65.
5. Hunyadi S, Werning JW, Lewin JS, et al. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on a new electromagnetic implantable middle ear hearing device. Am J Otol 1997;18:328-31.
6. Schuknecht HF. Pathology of the ear, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1993:37-40.
7. Lippy WH, Schuring AG. Solving ossicular problems in stapedectomy. Laryngoscope 1983;93:1147-50.
8. Krieger LW, Lippy WH, Schuring AG, et al. Revision stapedectomy for incus erosion: long-term hearing. Otol Head Neck Surg 1998;119:370-3.
9. Lesinski SG. Causes of conductive hearing loss after stapedectomy or stapedotomy: a prospective study of 279 consecutive surgical revisions. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:281-8.
10. Shellock FG. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:295-9.
11. Weber BP, Goldring JE, Santogrossi T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1998;19:584-90.
12. Heller JW, Brackmann DE, Tucci DL, et al. Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1996;17:724-9.
13. Sonnenburg RE, Wackym PA, Yoganandan N, et al. Biophysics of cochlear implant/MRI interactions emphasiEing bone biomechanical properties. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1720-5.