On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour

Linguistic Approaches to Literature

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 1-242

  Simpson, Paul ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85200003955     PISSN: 15693112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (290)

1. Alexander, R. J. (1997). Aspects of Verbal Humour in English. Tubingen: Günter Narr Verlag.
2. All England Law Reports 959; Volume 1, 1998, web: http://gladstone.butterworths.co.uk
3. Allen, W. (1975). Getting Even. London: Star Books.
4. Allen, W. (1995). Woody Allen on Woody Allen: In Conversation with Stig Björkman. London: Faber and Faber.
5. Ashenden, S. & Owen, D. (Eds.). (1999). Foucault contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory. London: Sage Publications.
6. Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. Attardo, S. (1997). The Semantic Foundations of Cognitive Theories of Humor. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 10 (4), 395–420.
8. Attardo, S. (2000a). Irony as relevant appropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793–826.
9. Attardo, S. (2000b). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. RASK: Internationalt tidsskrift for sprog og kommunikation, 12, 3–20.
10. Attardo, S. (2000c). On the pragmatic nature of irony and its rhetorical aspects. In E. Nemeth (Ed.), Pragmatics in 2000: Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference (pp. 52–66). Antwerp: IPrA.
11. Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis [Humor Research Monographs 6]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Attardo, S. & Raskin, V. (1991). Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 4 (3–4), 293–347.
13. Attardo, S., Attardo, P., Baltes, P., & Petray, M. J. (1994). The linear organisation of jokes: analysis of two thousand texts. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 7 (1), 27–54.
14. Aubouin, E. (1948). Technique et psychologie du comique. Marseilles: OFEP.
15. Auden, W. H. (1952). Notes on the Comic. Thought, XXVII, 66–69.
16. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. London: Clarendon Press.
17. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays [Trans. Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist]. Austin: University of Texas Press.
18. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
19. Barendt, E., Lustgarten, L., Norrie, K., & Stephenson, H. (1997). Libel and the Media: The Chilling Effect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Basu, S. (1999). Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 7 (4), 378–403.
21. Bauman, R. (1983). Let your Words be Few: Symbolism of Speaking and Silence among Seventeenth-Century Quakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Benson, J. D. & Greaves, W. S. (Eds.). (1985). Systemic Perspectives on Discourse Vol. 1: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
23. Berger, A. A. (1997). The Art of Comedy Writing. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
24. Bermel, A. (1982). Farce: A History from Aristophanes to Woody Allen. New York: Simon and Schuster.
25. Bex, A. (1996). Parody, meaning and literary genre. Journal of Literary Semantics, 25 (3), 225–244.
26. Bhatia, V. J. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Longman.
27. Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1991). On the exploitation of computerised corpora in variation studies. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 204–220). London: Longman.
28. Bindman, D., Ekserdjian, D., & Palin, W. (Eds.). (2001). Hogarth’s Election Entertainment: Artists at the Hustings [Volume published to accompany an exhibition at Sir John Soane’s Museum, London]. London: Apollo Magazine Publications.
29. Bradford, R. (1997). Stylistics [The New Critical Idiom Series]. London: Routledge.
30. Brown, J. (1956). Eight types of pun. PMLA, 71, 14–26.
31. Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Burton, D. (1980). Dialogue and Discourse: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Modern Drama Dialogue and Naturally Occurring Conversation. London: RKP.
34. Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (1992). News as Social Practice. Florianópolis, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
35. Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. & Coulthard, M. (Eds.). (1996). Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
36. Campbell, O. J. (1971). The Elizabethan satyr-satirist and his satire. In Paulson (1971a), 80–112.
37. Candlin, S. (2000). New dynamics in the nurse-patient relationship? In Sarangi & Coulthard (Eds.), 230–245.
38. Carpenter, H. (2000). That was Satire that was: The Satire Boom of the 1960s. London: Victor Gollancz.
39. Carrell, A. (1997a). Humor communities. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 10 (1), 11–24.
40. Carrell, A. (1997b). Joke competence and humor competence. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 10 (2), 173–185.
41. Carretta, V. (1983). The Snarling Muse: Verbal and Visual Political Satire from Pope to Churchill. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
42. Carstyn, R. (1981). Irony and parody and the use-mention distinction. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 10 (1), 24–35.
43. Carstyn, R. & Noh, E. (1995). A truth-functional account of metalinguistic negation with evidence from Korean. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 1–26.
44. Chatman, S. (2001). Parody and style. Poetics Today, 22 (1), 25–39.
45. Chiaro, D. (1992). The Language of Jokes: Analysing Verbal Play. London: Routledge.
46. Clark, A. (1993). Diaries. London: Phoenix.
47. Clark, J. R. (1983). Introduction. Thalia: Studies In Literary Humor, 5 (1), 3–4.
48. Clark, J. R. (1991). The Modern Satiric Grotesque: And its Traditions. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
49. Clark, J. R. & Motto, A. L. (1986). Modern Gothic: The Satiric Grotesque. Studies in Contemporary Satire, 13, 5–15.
50. Coates, J. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. Beckenham, England: Croom Helm.
51. Connery, B. (1995). The persona as pretender and the reader as constitutional subject in Swift’s Tale. In Gill (Ed.), 159–180.
52. Connery, B. & Combe, K. (Eds.). (1995). Theorising Satire: Essays in Literary Criticism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
53. Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Cook, G. (2000). Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Coulthard, M. (1992). Forensic discourse analysis. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis (pp. 242–258). London: Routledge.
56. Coulthard, M. (2000). Whose text is it? On the linguistic investigation of authorship. In Sarangi & Coulthard (Eds.), 242–258.
57. Crone, T. (1989). Law and the Media: An Everyday Guide for Professionals [Third edition]. Oxford: Focal Press.
58. Cruse, D. A. (1977). The Pragmatics of Lexical Specificity. Journal of Linguistics, 13, 153–164.
59. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Crystal, D. (1998). Language Play. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
61. Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: RKP.
62. Culler, J. (1988). On Puns: The Foundation of Letters. Oxford: Blackwell.
63. Culpeper, J. (1998). (Im)politeness in dramatic dialogue. In Culpeper et al. (Eds.), 83–95.
64. Culpeper, J., Short, M., & Verdonk, P. (Eds.). (1998). Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context. London: Routledge.
65. Cummings, L. (2002). Why we need to avoid theorising about rationality: A Putnamian criticism of Habermas’s epistemology. Social Epistemology, 16 (2), 117–131.
66. Curcó, C. (1995). Some observations on the pragmatics of humorous interpretations: A relevance theoretic approach. UCL Papers in Linguistics, 7, 27–47.
67. Curcó, C. (1996a). The implicit expression of attitudes, mutual manifestness, and verbal humour. UCL Papers in Linguistics, 8, 89–99.
68. Curcó, C. (1996b). Relevance theory and humorous interpretations. In Hulstijn & Nijholt (Eds.), 53–68.
69. Curcó, C. (1998). Indirect echoes and verbal humour. In V. Rouchota & A. Jucker (Eds.), Current Issues in Relevance Theory (pp. 305–325). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
70. Dane, J. (1980). Parody and satire: A theoretical model. Genre, 13, 145–59.
71. Davies, C. (1988). The Irish joke as a social phenomenon. In Durant & Miller (Eds.), 44–65.
72. Delabastita, D. (Ed.). (1997a). Traductio: Essays on Punning and Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
73. Delabastita, D. (1997b). Introduction. In Delabastita (1997a), 1–22.
74. Dentith, S. (2000). Parody [The New Critical Idiom Series]. London: Routledge.
75. Dixon, S. & Falvey, D. (1999). Gift of the Gag: The Explosion in Irish Comedy. Belfast: The Blackstaff Press.
76. Draitser, E. (1994). Techniques of Satire: The Case of Saltykov-Scedrin. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
77. Durant, J. & Miller, J. (Eds.). (1988). Laughing Matters: A Serious Look at Humour. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical.
78. Dyer, G. (1997). British Satire and the Politics of Style: 1789–1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
80. Eaton, T. (1978). Literary semantics: modality and ‘style’ Journal of Literary Semantics, 7 (1), 5–28.
81. Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
82. Ehrenpreis, I. (1962). Swift: The Man, his Works, the Age [Three volumes]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83. Elliott, R. C. (1971). The satirist and society. In Paulson (1971a), 205–216.
84. Emmott, C. (1997). Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Emmott, C. (2003). Reading for pleasure: A cognitive poetic analysis of ‘twists in the tale’ and other plot reversals in narrative texts. In J. Gavins & G. Steen (Eds.), Cognitive Poetics in Practice (pp. 145–159). London: Routledge.
86. Esar, E. (1952). The Humor of Humor. New York: Horizon.
87. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.
88. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
89. Fairclough, N. (Ed.). (1995). Critical Language Awareness. Harlow: Longman.
90. Fairclough, N. (1996). Technologisation of discourse. In Caldas-Coulthard & Coulthard (Eds.), 71–83.
91. Farb, P. (1973). Word Play: What Happens when People Talk. London: Jonathan Cape.
92. Federal and State Caselaw (1986: 85-1480). (flynt w/12 falwell), web: lexisnexis@prod.lexisnexis.com.
93. Federal and State Caselaw (1988: 86-1278). (larry flynt), web: lexisnexis@prod.lexisnexis.com.
94. Fletcher, M. D. (1987). Contemporary Political Satire. Boston: University Press of America.
95. Forabosco, G. (1992). Cognitive aspects of the humor process: The concept of incongruity. Humor: the International Journal of Humor Research, 5 (1–2), 45–68.
96. Forman, M. (1996). The People versus Larry Flynt, web: www.imdb.com.
97. Foucault, M. (1984). Truth and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 51–75). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
98. Foucault, M. (1986). What is an author? In H. Adams & L. Searle (Eds.), Critical Theory Since 1965 (pp. 138–148). Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.
99. Fowler, H. W. (1965). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage [Second edition]. Edited and revised by Sir Ernest Gowers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
100. Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
101. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
102. Francus, M. (1994). The Converting Imagination: Linguistic Theory and Swift’s Satiric Prose. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
103. Freedman, A. (1994). ‘Do as I say’: The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In Freedman & Medway (Eds.), 191–210.
104. Freedman, A. & Medway, P. (Eds.). (1994). Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
105. Freud, S. (1976 [1905]). Jokes and their Manifestation in the Unconsciousness. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
106. Fromkin, V. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27–52.
107. Fromkin, V. (Ed.). (1973). Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. The Hague: Mouton.
108. Fromkin, V. (Ed.). (1980). Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand. New York: Academic Press.
109. Fry, W. F. Jr. (1963). Sweet Madness: A Study of Humor. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books.
110. Fry, W. F. Jr. & Salameh, W. (Eds.). (1987). Handbook of Humor and Psychotherapy: Advances in the Clinical Use of Humor. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.
111. Frye, N. (1971 [1953]). The mythos of winter: irony and satire. In Paulson (1971a), 233–248.
112. Galtung, J. & Ruge, M. (1973). Structuring and Selecting News. In S. Cohen & J. Young (Eds.), The Manufacture of News: Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media (pp. 62–72). London: Constable.
113. Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.
114. Garland, N. (1988). Political Cartooning. In Durant & Miller (Eds.), 75–89.
115. George, W. (1989). Teaching Satire and Satirists. English Journal, 78 (3), 38–43.
116. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3–15.
117. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
118. Gibbs, R. W. Jr., O’Brien, J. E., & Dolittle, S. (1995). Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speaker’s intentions and irony comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 187–203.
119. Gill, J. E. (Ed.). (1995). Cutting Edges: Postmodern Critical Essays on Eighteenth Century Satire [Tennessee Studies in Literature, 37]. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
120. Giora, R. (1988). On the informativeness requirement. Journal of Pragmatics, 12 (5–6), 547–565.
121. Giora, R. (1991). On the cognitive aspects of the joke. Journal of Pragmatics, 16 (5), 465–485.
122. Giora, R. & Fein, O. (1999). Irony comprehension: the graded salience hypothesis. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 12 (4), 425–436.
123. Givón, T. (1993). English Grammar: A Function-based Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
124. Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge.
125. Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25 (1–2), 1–29.
126. Goldstein, J. H. & McGhee, P. (Eds.). (1972). The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues. New York: Academic Press.
127. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & P. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics Volume 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
128. Griffin, D. (1994). Satire: A Critical Reintroduction. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. Grundy, P. (1995). Doing Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
129. Gruner, C. (1988). Prior attitude and understanding of editorial satire. Psychological Reports, 63, 54.
130. Gruner, C. (1997). The Game of Humor: A Comprehensive Theory of Why we Laugh. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
131. Habermas, J. (1979). What is universal pragmatics? In Communication and the Evolution of Society (pp. 1–68). [Ed. and Trans. T. McCarthy]. London: Heinemann.
132. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action [Trans. C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
133. Hall, G. (2002). The Year’s Work in Stylistics 2001. Language and Literature, 11 (4), 357–372.
134. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
135. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar [Second edition]. London: Edward Arnold.
136. Halsbury’s Laws of England; 3. Moral Rights, web: http://disraeli.butterworths.co.uk
137. Hammond, Mary (forthcoming). Monsters and metaphors: Buffy the Vampire Slayer, the old world and TV audiences. In R. Pearson & S. G Jones (Eds.), Essays on Cult Television. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
138. Hammond, Mike (forthcoming). The Big Show: British Cinema Culture in the Great War.
139. Haslett, M. (2003). Pope to Burney, 1714–1779. London: Palgrave.
140. Heller, E. L. (1974). Towards a general typology of the pun. Language and Style, 7 (4), 271–282. [Reprinted in M. Ching, M. Haley, & R. Lunsford (Eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Literature (pp. 304–318). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.]
141. Heller, J. (1986 [1955]). Catch-22. London: Corgi Books.
142. Hendrickson, G. L. (1927). Satura tota nostra est. Classic Philology, XXII, 46–60.
143. Henman, L. (2001). Humor as a coping mechanism: lessons from POWs. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14 (1), 83–94.
144. Hidalgo Downing, L. (2000). Negation, Text Worlds and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Fiction. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
145. Hillenbrand, F. K. M. (1995). Underground Humour in Nazi Germany 1933–1945. London: Routledge.
146. Hockett, C. F. (1977a [1967]). Where the tongue slips, there slip I. In C. F. Hockett (Ed.), The View from Language: Selected Essays 1948–1974. (pp. 226–256). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
147. Hockett, C. F. (1977b [1973]). Jokes. In C. F. Hockett (Ed.), The View from Language: Selected Essays 1948–1974 (pp. 257–289). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
148. Hogan, P. J. (1994). Muriel’s Wedding, web: http://us.imbd.com
149. Howes, C. (1986). Rhetorics of attack: Bakhtin and the aesthetics of satire. Genre, 18, 215–243.
150. Hulstijn, J. & Nijholt, A. (Eds.). (1996). Automatic Generation of Verbal Humor [Proceedings of the Twelfth Twente Workshop on Language Technology]. Enschede: Universiteit of Twente.
151. Hutcheon, L. (1985). A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. London and New York: Methuen.
152. Hutcheon, L. (1994). Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London and New York: Routledge.
153. It’s a Bad, Bad, Bad, Bad, Movie, web: http://www.rinkworks.com/badmovie
154. Jones, A. (2001). Film of the Week: This is Spinal Tap. Radio Times Magazine, 31st March–6th April, p. 57.
155. Kane, T. R., Suls, J., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1977). Humour as a tool of social interaction. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It’s a Funny Thing, Humour [Welsh Branch, British Psychological Society] (pp. 13–16). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
156. Keith-Spiegel, P. (1972). Early conceptions of humor: varieties and issues. In Goldstein & McGhee (Eds.), 4–36.
157. Kermode, M. (2001). [Interview with the author, 21st July]. Southampton, England.
158. Klingender, F. D. (Ed.). (1944). Hogarth and English Caricature. London: The Curwen Press.
159. Knox, R. A. (1971). On humour and satire. In Paulson (1971a), 52–65.
160. Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
161. Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
162. Latta, R. L. (1999). The Basic Humor Process [Humor Research 5]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
163. Laver, J. (1975). The communicative functions of phatic communion. In A. Kendon, R. M. Harris, & M. R. Key (Eds.), Organisation of Behaviour in Face to Face Interaction (pp. 215–240). The Hague: Mouton.
164. Legman, G. (1975). No Laughing Matter: Rationale of the Dirty Joke [2nd series]. New York: Breaking Point.
165. Lemke, J. (1985). Ideology, intertextuality, and the notion of register. In Benson & Greaves (Eds.), 275–294.
166. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
167. Lew, R. (1997). Towards a taxonomy of linguistic jokes. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 31, 123–152.
168. Lewis, W. (1971). The greatest satire is nonmoral. In Paulson (1971a), 66–79.
169. Mack, M. (1951). The Muse of Satire. Yale Review, XLI, 80–92.
170. Mackay, R. (1996). Mything the point: A critique of objective stylistics. Language and Communication, 16 (1), 81–93.
171. MacMahon, B. (1995). The Freudian slip revisited: A case of mistaken identity in Finnegans Wake. Language and Communication, 15 (4), 289–328.
172. MacMahon, B. (2001). The effects of word-substitution in slips of the tongue, Finnegans Wake and The Third Policeman. English Studies, 82 (3), 231–246.
173. Marnette, S. (2001). The French théorie de l’énonciation and the study of speech and thought presentation. Language and Literature, 10 (3), 243–262.
174. Martin, J. R. (1985). Process and text: two aspects of human semiosis. In Benson & Greaves (Eds.), 248–274.
175. Martin, J. R. (1986). Grammaticalising ecology: The politics of baby seals and kangaroos. In Threadgold et al. (Eds.), 225–267.
176. Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: Structure and System. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
177. Martin, J. R., Matthiesson, C., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
178. McCarthy, T. (1979). Translator’s introduction. In Habermas, vii–xxiv.
179. McGhee, P. E. (1972). On the cognitive origins of incongruity humor: Fantasy assimilation versus reality assimilation. In Goldstein & McGhee (Eds.), 61–80.
180. McGhee, P. E. (1983). Humor development: Toward a life span approach. In McGhee & Goldstein (1983a), 109–134.
181. McGhee, P. E. & Goldstein, J. H. (Eds.). (1983a). Handbook of Humor Research Volume 1: Basic Issues. New York: Springer Verlag.
182. McGhee, P. E. & Goldstein, J. H. (Eds.). (1983b). Handbook of Humor Research Volume 2: Applied Studies. New York: Springer Verlag.
183. Miller, C. R. (1994). Genre as social action. In Freedman & Medway (Eds.), 23–42.
184. Miller, J. (1988). Jokes and joking: A serious laughing matter. In Durant & Miller (Eds.), 5–16.
185. Montgomery, M. (1999). Speaking sincerely: public reactions to the death of Diana. Language and Literature, 8 (1), 5–33.
186. Morgan, D. (1999). Monty Python Speaks! London: Ted Smart.
187. Morgan, P. (2001). The semantics of an impeachment: Meanings and models in a political conflict. In R. Dirven, R. Frank, & C. Ilie (Eds.), Language and Ideology Volume 2: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches (pp. 77–105). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
188. MORI, web: http://www.mori.com/polls
189. Morreall, J. (Ed.). (1987). The Philosophy of Humor and Laughter. Albany: The State University of New York Press.
190. Mulkay, G. (1988). On Humour: Its Nature and its Place in Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
191. Nagel, J. (1974). Catch-22 and angry humor: A study of the normative values of satire. Studies in American Humor, 1 (2), 99–106.
192. Nash, W. (1985). The Language of Humour. Harlow: Longman.
193. Neale, S. (2000). Genre and Hollywood. London: Routledge.
194. Nilsen, D. L. F. (1988). Satire – the necessary and sufficient conditions – some preliminary observations. Studies in Contemporary Satire, 15, 1–10.
195. Nilsen, D. L. F. (1994). Satirical devices in Gulliver’s Travels. Nebraska Language Arts Bulletin, 6 (2), 17–20.
196. Nokes, D. (1985). Jonathan Swift: A Hypocrite Reversed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
197. Nokes, D. (1987). Raillery and Rage: Studies in Eighteenth Century Satire. Sussex: The Harvester Press.
198. Norrick, N. (1993). Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
199. Nussbaum, F. (1984). The Brink of All We Hate. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
200. Okada, N. (2001). Linguistic Approaches to the Analysis of Humour in Modern English Dramatic Comedy. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Lancaster, UK.
201. Oppliger, P. A. & Zillmann, D. (1997). Disgust in humor: Its appeal to adolescents. Humour: The International Journal of Humor Research, 10 (4), 421–437.
202. Paulson, R. (Ed.). (1971a). Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
203. Paulson, R. (1971b). Introduction. In Paulson (1971a), ix–xv.
204. Payne, D. C. (1995). Comedy, satire, or farce? On the generic difficulties of Restoration dramatic satire. In Gill (Ed.), 1–22.
205. Peel, J. (1999). Family Album. Radio Times Magazine. January 9–16, p. 21.
206. Pfaff, K. & Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1997). Authorial intentions in understanding satirical texts. Poetics, 25, 45–70.
207. Philo, G. (1983). Bias in the Media. In D. Coates & G. Johnston (Eds.), Socialist Arguments (pp. 130–145). Oxford: Martin Robertson.
208. Pollard, A. (1970). Satire [The Critical Idiom Series]. London: Routledge.
209. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
210. Popper, K. (1994). The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. London: Routledge.
211. Private Eye magazine, web: http://www.private-eye.co.uk
212. Radio Times magazine, web: www.radiotimes.com/weblinks
213. Rahilly, J. (2003). The contribution of clinical phonetics to the investigation of oracy problems in the classroom. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17 (3), 241–256.
214. Randolph, M. C. (1971). The structural design of the Formal Verse satire. In Paulson (1971a), 171–189.
215. Raskin, V. (1981. Script-based lexicon. Quaderni di Semantica, 2 (1), 25–34.
216. Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.
217. Raskin, V. (1987). Linguistic heuristics of humor: A script-based semantic approach. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 65, 11–25.
218. Rawson, C. (1994). Satire and Sentiment 1660–1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
219. Redfern, W. (2000). Puns: More Senses than One [Second edition]. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
220. Reiner, Rob (1984). This is Spinal Tap. web: http://us.imbd.com
221. Rose, M. (1993). Parody: Ancient, Modern and Post-modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
222. Ross, A. (1998). The Language of Humour. London: Routledge.
223. Ruch, W., Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1993). Towards an empirical investigation of the General Theory of Verbal Humor. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 6 (2), 123–136.
224. Russo, M. (1994). The Female Grotesque: Risk, Excess and Modernity. New York: Routledge.
225. Sacks, H. (1973). On some puns: With some intimations. In R. W. Shuy (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects [Report of the Twenty-third Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies] (pp. 135–144). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
226. Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (pp. 337–353). London: CUP.
227. Sacks, H. (1978). Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In J. Shenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organisation of Conversational Interaction (pp. 249–275). New York: Academic Press.
228. Sarangi, S. & Coulthard, M. (Eds.). (2000). Discourse and Social Life. Harlow: Longman.
229. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
230. Schank, R. & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
231. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge: University Press.
232. Searle, J. R. (1971). What is a speech act? In J. Searle (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language [Oxford Readings in Philosophy] (pp. 39–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
233. Searle, J. R. (1975). The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6, 319–332.
234. Searle, J. R. (1976). The classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 5, 1–24.
235. Semino, E. (1997). Language and World Creation in Poems and other Texts. Harlow: Longman.
236. Semino, E., Short, M., & Wynne, M. (1999). Hypothetical words and thoughts in contemporary British narratives. Narrative, 7 (3), 307–334.
237. Shappeck, M. (2002). The ironic layering of The Onion: A linguistic and semiotic analysis of text and image. Unpublished paper presented to the 14th Conference of the International Society for Humor Studies, Bertinoro, Italy.
238. Sherzer, J. (1978). Oh! That’s a pun and I didn’t mean it. Semiotica, 22 (3/4), 335–350.
239. Short, M., Freeman, D., van Peer, W., & Simpson, P. (1998). Stylistics, criticism and mythrepresentation again: Squaring the circle with Ray Mackay’s subjective solution for all problems. Language and Literature, 7 (1), 39–50.
240. Short, M., Wynne, M., & Semino, E. (1999). Reading reports: discourse presentation in a corpus of narratives, with special reference to news reports. In H.-J. Diller, E. Otto, & G. Stratmann (Eds.), English via Various Media (pp. 39–65). Heidelberg: Winter.
241. Sibley, G. (1995). Satire from Quintilian to Joe Bob Briggs: A new look at an old word. In Connery & Combe (Eds.), 57–72.
242. Simpson, P. (1990). Modality in literary-critical discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse (pp. 63–94). New York: Sage Publications.
243. Simpson, P. (1992). The pragmatics of nonsense: Towards a stylistics of Private Eye’s ‘Colemanballs’. In M. Toolan (Ed.), Language, Text and Context: Essays in Stylistics (pp. 281–305). London: Routledge.
244. Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.
245. Simpson, P. (1997). Language through Literature. London: Routledge.
246. Simpson, P. (1998). Odd talk: studying discourses of incongruity. In Culpeper et al. (Eds.), 34–53.
247. Simpson, P. (2000). Satirical humour and cultural context: with a note on the curious case of Father Todd Unctuous. In A. Bex, M. Burke, & P. Stockwell (Eds.), Contextualised Stylistics: In Honour of Peter Verdonk (pp. 243–266). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
248. Smith, N. (2001). Review of Muriel’s Wedding. BBCi: Film Reviews, web: http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/01/26/muriels_wedding_(1994_review_shtml
249. Spalding, H. D. (1976). A Treasure Trove of American Jewish Humor. Middle Village, NY: Jonathan David.
250. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.
251. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1989). On verbal irony. UCLA Papers in Linguistics, 1, 96–118.
252. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition [Second edition]. Oxford: Blackwell.
253. Steen, G. (1999). Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes, 28 (2), 109–120.
254. Steen, G. (2002). Towards a procedure for metaphor identification. Language and Literature: Special Issue on Metaphor Identification, 11 (1), 17–33.
255. Stockwell, P. (2000). The Poetics of Science Fiction. London: Longman.
256. Stockwell, P. (2001). Towards a critical cognitive poetics? In A. Combrink & I. Biermann (Eds.), Poetics, Linguistics and History: Discourses of War and Conflict (pp. 510–528). Potchefstroom: Potchefstroom University Press.
257. Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
258. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
259. Swift, J. (1985 [1726]). Gulliver’s Travels. London: Penguin.
260. Swift, J. (1986 [1729]). A Modest Proposal. In M. H. Abrams (Ed.), The Norton Anthology of English Literature (pp. 2174–2180). New York: Norton.
261. Swift, J. (1939–1968 [1737]). Proposal for giving Badges to the Beggars of Dublin. In H. Davis (Ed.), The Prose Works of Jonathan Swift [Volume 13] (pp. 131–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
262. Tannen, D. (1979). What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New Directions in Discourse Processing (pp. 137–182). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
263. Taylor, R. (2001). Review of Plan 9 from Outer Space. In Not Coming To A Theater Near You, web: http://www.notcoming.com/reviews/plan9.html
264. The Onion, web: www.theonion.com
265. Thompson, J. O. (Ed.). (1982). Monty Python: The Complete and Utter Theory of the Grotesque. London: British Film Institute Publishing.
266. Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing Functional Linguistics. London: Edward Arnold.
267. Threadgold, T., Grosz, E. A., Kress, G., & Halliday, M. A. K. (Eds.). (1986). Semiotics Ideology Language. Sydney: Pathfinder Press.
268. Toolan, M. (1996). Total Speech: An Integrational Linguistic Approach to Language. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
269. Travers, P. (2002). Review of Muriel’s Wedding. Rolling Stone magazine, web: http://www.rollingstone.com/mv_reviews
270. van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In Caldas-Coulthard & Coulthard (Eds.), 32–70.
271. van Noppen, J.-P. (2003). Review of Walsh, C. 2001. Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church, and Organisations. Language and Literature, 12 (2), 177–180.
272. van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.
273. van Peer, W. (1993). Typographic foregrounding. Language and Literature, 2 (1), 49–61.
274. Veatch, T. (1998). A Theory of Humor. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 11 (2), 161–215.
275. Veisbergs, A. (1997). The contextual use of idioms, wordplay, and translation. In Delabastita (1997a), 155–176.
276. Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction. London: Frances Pinter.
277. Wales, K. (1993). The Cat’s Whiskers: Facts, Stories, Jokes, Poems. London and Basingstoke: Pan MacMillan Children’s Books.
278. Walsh, C. (2003). From capping to intercision: metaphors of mind control in the young adult science fiction of John Christopher and Philip Pullman. Language and Literature [Special Issue on Science Fiction], 12 (3), 233–251.
279. Weinbrot, H. (1988). Eighteenth-century Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
280. Weiner, E. J. (1996). Why is a riddle not like a metaphor? In Hulstijn & Nijholt (Eds.), 111–119.
281. Weiner, E. J. & De Palma, P. (1993). Some pragmatic features of lexical ambiguity and simple riddles. Language and Communication, 13 (3), 183–193.
282. Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Longman.
283. White, S. (Ed.). (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
284. Winner, E. (1988). The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
285. Wood, E. (1958). Plan 9 from Outer Space, web: www.imdb.com
286. Wood, M. (1994). Radical Satire and Print Culture, 1790–1822. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
287. Worcester, D. (1940). The Art of Satire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
288. Wright, T. (1865). A History of Caricature and Grotesque in Literature and Art. London: Virtue Brothers and Co.
289. Ziv, A. (1984). Personality and Sense of Humor. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
290. Ziv, A. (1988). Humor’s role in married life. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 1 (3), 223–229.