Picturing the Uncertain World: How to Understand, Communicate, and Control Uncertainty through Graphical Display

Picturing the Uncertain World: How to Understand, Communicate, and Control Uncertainty through Graphical Display

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 1-264

  Wainer, Howard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85199650166     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (159)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, D.C.:American Psychological Association.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
3. Author (2005). 2005 College-Bound Seniors: Total Group Profile Report. New York: College Board.
4. Bachi, R. (1978). Proposals for the development of selected graphical methods. In Graphic Presentation of Statistical Information: Papers Presented at the 136th Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
5. Beckner, W. (1983). The Case for the Smaller School. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
6. Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate:A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 57, 289-300.
7. Berry, S. M. (2002). One Modern Man or 15 Tarzans? Chance, 15(2), 49-53.
8. Bertin, J. (1969). La Semiologie Graphique. Paris: Mouton.
9. Bertin, J. (1973). Semiologie Graphique, 2nd Ed. The Hague: Mouton-Gautier. In English, Semiology of Graphics, translated by William Berg and Howard Wainer, Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.
10. Bertin, J. (1977). La Graphique et la Traitement Graphique de l’Information Paris: Flammarion. In English, Graphics and Graphic Information Processing, translated by William Berg; Howard Wainer, Technical Editor. Elmsford, N. Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 1981.
11. Biemer, P. P., and Stokes, S. L. (1989). The Optimal Design of Quality Control Samples to Detect Interviewer Cheating. Journal of Official Statistics, 5(1), 23-39.
12. Bonferroni, C. E. (1935). Il Calcolo delle Assicurazioni su Gruppi di Teste. In Studii in Onore del Prof. Salvatore Ortu Carboni. Rome. Pages 13-60.
13. Bowen, W. G., and Bok, D. (1998). The Shape of the River. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press.
14. Braun, H., and Wainer, H. (2004). Numbers and the Remembrance of Things Past. Chance, 17(1), 44-48.
15. Bureau of the Census (2004). Statistical Abstract of the United States 2004-5. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office (http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-04.html).
16. Bursuck, W. D., Rose, E., Cowen, S., and Yahaya, M. A. (1989). Nationwide Survey of Postsecondary Education Services for College Students with Learning Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 56, 236-245.
17. Carnevale, A. (1999). Strivers. Wall Street Journal, August 31.
18. Chernoff, H., and Lehman, E. L. (1954). The Use of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Chi-Square Tests for Goodness of Fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(3), 579-586.
19. Chevallier, V. (1871). Notice Nécrologique sur M. Minard, Inspecteur Général des Ponts et Chausées, en Retraite. Annales des Ponts et Chausées, 2 (Ser. 5, No. 15), 1-22.
20. Cleary, A. (1968). Test Bias: Prediction of Grades of Negro and White Students in Integrated Colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 115-124.
21. Cleveland, W. S. (1994), The Elements of Graphing Data, 2nd Ed. Summit, N.J.: Hobart.
22. Cleveland, W. S., and McGill, R. (1984). Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 531-554.
23. Cole, N. S., and Zieky, M. J. (2001) The New Faces of Fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 369-382.
24. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2001). The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
25. Daston, L., and Galison, P. (1992). The Image of Objectivity. Representations, 40, 81-128.
26. De Moivre, A. (1730). Miscellanea Analytica. London: Tonson and Watts.
27. Dimsky, Y. I., Mittenberg, W., Quintar, B., Katell, A. D., and Golden, C. J. (1998). Bias in the Use of Standard American Norms with Spanish Translations of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Assessment, 5, 115-121.
28. Dreifus, C. (2006). A Conversation with Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard. New York Times, July 4, F2.
29. Dunn, F. (1977). Choosing Smallness. In J. Sher (Ed.), Education in Rural America: A Reassessment of Conventional Wisdom. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
30. Dyson, F. (2004). A Meeting with Enrico Fermi, Nature 427, 297.
31. Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (1977). Rudiments of Numeracy. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 140, 277-297.
32. Elder, C. (1997). What Does Test Bias Have to do with Fairness? Language Testing, 14, 261-277.
33. Elliott, R. (1987). Litigating Intelligence. Dover, Mass.: Auburn House.
34. Feller, W. (1968). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
35. Fisher, R. A. (1936). Has Mendel’s Work Been Rediscovered? Annals of Science, 1, 115-137.
36. Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., and Williams, C. B. (1943). The Relation between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 12, 42-58.
37. Fleming, J., and Garcia, N. (1998). Are Standardized Tests Fair to African Americans? Predictive Validity of the SAT in Black and White Institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 471-495.
38. Fowler, W. J., Jr. (1995). School size and student outcomes. Pages 3-25 in H. J. Walberg (Series Ed.) and B. Levin, W. J. Fowler, Jr., and H. J. Walberg (Vol. Eds.), Advances in Education Productivity. Vol. 5, Organizational Influences on Productivity. Greenwich, Conn.: Jai Press.
39. Freedle, R. O. (2003). Correcting the SAT’s Ethnic and Social-Class Bias: A Method for Reestimating SAT Scores. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 1-43.
40. Friendly, M. (2002). Visions and Re-Visions of Charles Joseph Minard. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27(1),. 31-51.
41. Friendly, M., and Denis, D. (2005). The Early Origins and Development of the Scatterplot? Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41, 103-130.
42. Friendly, M., and Wainer, H. (2004). Nobody’s Perfect. Chance, 17(2), 48-51.
43. Funkhouser, H. G. (1937). Historical Development of the Graphic Representation of Statistical Data. Osiris, 3, 269-404.
44. Funkhouser, H. G., and Walker, H. M. (1935). Playfair and His Charts, Economic History, 3, 103-109.
45. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditory Genius: An Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences. Macmillan: London.
46. Galton, F. (1889). Natural Inheritance. London: Macmillan.
47. Galton, F. (1892). Finger Prints. London: Macmillan.
48. Galton, F. (1893). The Decipherment of Blurred Fingerprints. London: Macmillan.
49. Galton, F. (1895). Fingerprint Directories. London: Macmillan.
50. Geballe, B. (2005). Bill Gates’ Guinea Pigs. Seattle Weekly, 1-9.
51. Gelman, A. (2003). Forming Voting Blocs and Coalitions as a Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Theoretical Explanation for Political Instability. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2(1), article 13.
52. Gelman, A., Katz, J. N., and Bafumi, J. (2004). Standard Voting Power Indexes Don’t Work: An Empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 657-674.
53. Gelman, A., Katz, J. N., and Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). The Mathematics and Statistics of Voting Power. Statistical Science, 17(4), 420-435.
54. Gelman, A., and Nolan, D. (2002). Teaching Statistics: A Bag of Tricks. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
55. Goddard, H. H. (1913). The Binet Tests in Relation to Immigration. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 18, 105-107.
56. Harness, H. D. (1837). Atlas to Accompany the Second Report of the Railway Commissioners, Ireland. Dublin: Irish Railway Commission.
57. Hauser, R. M., and Featherman, D. L. (1976). Equality of Schooling: Trends and Prospects. Sociology of Education, 49, 92-112.
58. Herrnstein, R. J., and Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, New York: Free Press.
59. Herschel, J.F.W. (1833). On the Investigation of the Orbits of Revolving Double Stars. Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, 5, 171-222.
60. Hoaglin, D. C., and Tukey, J. W. (1985) Checking the Shape of Discrete Distributions. Chapter 9, pp. 345-416, in David C. Hoaglin, Frederick Mosteller, and John W. Tukey (Eds.), Exploring Data Tables, Trends and Shapes. New York: Wiley.
61. Howley, C. B. (1989). Synthesis of the Effects of School and District Size:What Research Says about Achievement in Small Schools and School Districts. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 4(1), 2-12. http://www.collegeboard.com/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2005/links.html http://www.edwardtufte.com (NEW section) contains a reproduction of Minard’s graphic of Hannibal’s March as well as an English translation of Chevallier’s obituary of Minard, his father-in-law.
62. Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice. Nobel Prize Lecture, December 8, Stockholm, Sweden. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahneman-lecture.html
63. Keller, J. B. (1977). A Theory of Competitive Running. Pages 172-178 in S. P. Ladany and R. E. Machol (Eds.), Optimal Strategies in Sports. North-Holland: The Hague.
64. Kierkegaard, S. (1986). Either/or. New York: Harper & Row.
65. Laplace, Pierre Simon (1810). Mémoire sur les Approximations des Formulas qui Sont Functions de Trés-Grand Nombres, et sur Leur Application aux Probabilities. Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences Mathématiques et Physiques de l’Institut de France, Année 1809, 353-415, Supplément, 559-565.
66. Larson, R. L. (1991). Small Is Beautiful: Innovation from the Inside Out. Phi Delta Kappan, March, 550-554.
67. Leonard, D. K., and Jiang, J. (1999). Gender Bias and the Predictions of the SATs: A Cry of Despair. Research in Higher Education, 40, 375-407.
68. Lewis, H. (2002). Olympic Performance and Population. Chance, 15(4), 3.
69. Lord, F. M., and Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
70. MacEachren, A. M. (1992). Visualizing Uncertain Information. Cartographic Perspectives, 13, 10-19.
71. MacEachren, A. M. (1994). Visualization Quality and the Representation of Uncertainty. Chapter 4 in Some Truth with Maps: A Primer on Symbolization and Design. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Cartographers.
72. Maeroff, G. I. (1992). To Improve Schools, Reduce Their Size. College Board News, 20(3), 3.
73. Mann, C. C. (1993) How Many Is too Many? Atlantic Monthly, February, http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/93feb/mann1.htm
74. Marey, E. J. (1878). La Méthode Graphique dans les Sciences Expérimentales et Particuliérement en Physiologie et en Médecine. Paris: Masson.
75. Mathews, J. (2003) The Bias Question. The Atlantic Monthly, November, 130-140.
76. McGill, R., Tukey, J. W., and Larsen, W. (1978). Variations of Box Plots. The American Statistician, 32(1), 12-16.
77. Meserole, M. (Ed.) (1993). The 1993 Information Please Sports Almanac. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
78. Miller, R. G. (1966). Simultaneous Statistical Inference. New York: McGraw-Hill.
79. Moore, H. L. (1911). Laws of Wages: An Essay in Statistical Economics, New York: The Macmillan Co. Reprinted Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1967.
80. Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J. W. (1968). Data analysis, Including Statistics. Pages 80-203 in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
81. Patel, M. Dorman, K. S., Zhang, Y-H., Huang, B-L., Arnold, A. P., Sinsheimer, J. S., Vilain, E., and McCabe, E. R. B. (2001). Primate DAX1, SRY, and SOX9: Evolutionary Stratification of Sex-Determination Pathway. American Journal of Human Genetics, 68, 275-280.
82. Pearson, B. Z. (1993). Predictive Validity of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) for Hispanic Bilingual Students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15, 342-356.
83. Pearson, K. (1892). The Grammar of Science. London: Walter Scott.
84. Pearson, K. P. (1930). The Life, Letters and Labors of Francis Galton. Volume III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Petermann, A. (1852). Distribution of the Population. Census of Great Britain, 1851. Lithograph, crayon shading in the British Library.
86. Pfeffermann, D., and Tiller, R. (2006). Small-Area Estimation with State-Space Models Subject to Benchmark Constraints. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 1387-1397.
87. Playfair, W. (1801). The Commercial and Political Atlas, Representing, by means of Stained Copper-Plate Charts, The Progress of the Commerce, Revenues, Expenditure, and Debts of England, during the Whole of the Eighteenth Century. Facsimile reprint edited and annotated by Howard Wainer and Ian Spence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
88. Playfair, W. (1801/2005). The Statistical Breviary; Shewing on a Principle Entirely New, the Resources of Every State and Kingdom in Europe; Illustrated with Stained Copper-Plate Charts, Representing the Physical Powers of Each Distinct Nation with Ease and Perspicuity. Edited and introduced by Howard Wainer and Ian Spence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
89. Playfair, W. (1821). A Letter on Our Agricultural Distresses, Their Causes and Remedies. London: W. Sams.
90. Quetelet, A. (1832). Recherches sur le Penchant au Crime aux Différens Ages, Nouveaux Mémoires de l’Académie Royales des Sciences et Belle-Lettres de Bruxelles, 7, 1-87.
91. Ramist, L., Lewis, C., and McCamley-Jenkins, L. (1994). Student Group Differences in Predicting College Grades: Sex, Language and Ethnic Group. New York: The College Board.
92. Rebhorn, L. S., and Miles, D. D. (1999). High-Stakes Testing: Barrier to Gifted Girls in Mathematics and Science. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 313-319.
93. Reckase, M. D. (2006). Rejoinder: Evaluating Standard Setting Methods Using Error Models Proposed by Schulz. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(3), 14-17.
94. Robinson, A. H. (1982). Early Thematic Mapping in the History of Cartography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Rogosa, D. (2005). “A School Accountability Case Study: California API Awards and the Orange County Register. Margin of Error Folly.” Pages 205-226 in R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending Standardized Testing. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
96. Rosen, G. (February 18, 2007). Narrowing the Religion Gap. New York Times Sunday Magazine, February 18, 11.
97. Rosenbaum, S., Skinner, R. K., Knight, I. B., and Garrow, J. S. (1985). A Survey of Heights and Weights of Adults in Great Britain. Annals of Human Biology, 12(2), 115-127.
98. Savage, S. (in press). The Flaw of Averages. New York: John Wiley & Son.
99. Schmid, C. F. (1983). Statistical Graphics: Design Principles and Practices. New York: John Wiley & Son.
100. Smith, R. L. (1988). Forecasting Records by Maximum Likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 331-338.
101. Stein, T. (2003). AOL’s Death March: The New Media Giant’s Internet Offensive Recalls Napoleon’s Ill-Fated Russian Campaign. Wired, November, 62-63.
102. Stigler, S. (1986). The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
103. Stigler, S. (1987). The Science of Uncertainty. The 404th Convocation Address at The University of Chicago. The University of Chicago Record, 15 October, 22(1), 4-5.
104. Stigler, S. (1997). Regression Toward the Mean, Historically Considered. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 6, 103-114.
105. Stigler, S. (1999). Statistics on the Table. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
106. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Doubleday.
107. Thoreau, H. D. (1968). The Writings of Henry David Thoreau: Journal, Vol. 2, 1850-September 15, 1851. Bradford Torrey (Ed.). New York: AMS Press. From the 1906 edition.
108. Tryfos, P., and Blackmore, R. (1985). Forecasting Records. Journal of the American Statistical Association., 80, 46-50.
109. Tufte, E. R. (1983/2000). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.
110. Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning Information. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.
111. Tufte, E. R. (1996). Visual Explanations. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.
112. Tufte, E. R. (2006). Beautiful Evidence. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.
113. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
114. United States Memorial Council & United State Holocaust Memorial Museum (1997). Hidden History of the Kovno Ghetto. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. It is from this source that all the included displays are drawn.
115. Unwin, A., Theus, M., and Hofmann, H. (2006). Graphics of Large Datasets:Visualizing a Million. Springer-Verlag: New York.
116. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1986). Memorandum for General Distribution from I. Schreiner and K. Guerra, Subject “Falsification Study” (September 1982 through August 1985).
117. van der Waerden, B. L. (1968). Mendel’s Experiments. Centaurus, 12, 275-288.
118. Van Dorn, W. G. (1991). Equations for Predicting Record Human Performance in Cycling, Running and Swimming Cycling Science, September & December, 13-16.
119. Vars, F., and Bowen, W. (1998). Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores, Race, and Academic Performance in Selective Colleges and Universities. In C. Jencks and M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White Test-Score Gap. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
120. Vasilescu, D., and Wainer, H. (2005). Old Mother Hubbard and the United Nations: An Adventure in Exploratory Data Analysis (with Discussion). Chance, 18(3), 38-45.
121. Viadero, D. (2006). Smaller not Necessarily Better, School-Size Study Concludes. Education Week, June 7, 25(39), 12-13.
122. Wainer, H. (1984). How to Display Data Badly. American Statistician, 38, 137-147.
123. Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding Graphs and Tables. Educational Researcher, 21, 14-23.
124. Wainer, H. (1993). Tabular Presentation. Chance, 6(3), 52-56.
125. Wainer, H. (1996). Depicting Error. American Statistician, 50(2), 101-111.
126. Wainer, H. (1997). Improving Tabular Displays: With NAEP Tables as Examples and Inspirations. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 1-30.
127. Wainer, H. (2000a). Kelley’s Paradox. Chance, 13(1), 47-48.
128. Wainer, H. (2000b). Visual Revelations: Graphical Tales of Fate and Deception from Napoleon Bonaparte to Ross Perot. 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
129. Wainer, H. (2001). New Tools for Exploratory Data Analysis: III. Smoothing and Nearness Engines. Chance, 14(1), 43-46.
130. Wainer, H. (2003c). La Diffusion de Quelques Idées: A Master’s Voice. Chance, 16(3), 58-61.
131. Wainer, H. (2003a). A Graphical Legacy of Charles Joseph Minard: Two Jewels from the Past. Chance, 16(1), 56-60.
132. Wainer, H. (2003b). How Long is Short? Chance, 16(2), 55-57.
133. Wainer, H. (2004). Curbstoning IQ and the 2000 Presidential Election. Chance, 17(4), 43-46.
134. Wainer, H. (2005a). Graphic Discovery: A Trout in the Milk and Other Visual Adventures. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
135. Wainer, H. (2005b). Stumbling on the Path Toward the Visual Communication of Complexity. Chance, 18(2), 53-54.
136. Wainer, H. (2006). Using Graphs to make the Complex Simple: The Medicare Drug Plan as an Example, Chance, 19(2), 55-56.
137. Wainer, H. (2007). Galton’s Normal Is too Platykurtic. Chance, 20(2), 57-58.
138. Wainer, H. (2007). Improving Data Displays: The Media’s and Ours. Chance, 20(3), 8-16.
139. Wainer, H. (2007). Insignificant Is not Zero: Rescoring the SAT as an Example. Chance, 20(1), 55-58.
140. Wainer, H. (2007). The Most Dangerous Equation. American Scientist, 95 (May-June), 249-256.
141. Wainer, H., and Brown, L. (2007). Three Statistical Paradoxes in the Interpretation of Group Differences: Illustrated with Medical School Admission and Licensing. Chapter 26, pp. 893-918, in C. R. Rao and S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 27, Psychometrics. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
142. Wainer, H., Bridgeman, B., Najarian, M., and Trapani, C. (2004). How Much Does Extra Time on the SAT Help? Chance, 17(2), 19-24.
143. Wainer, H., and Clauser, B. (2005). Truth is Slower than fiction: Francis Galton as an illustration. Chance, 18(4), 52-54.
144. Wainer, H., and Friendly, M. (2004). Nobody’s Perfect. Chance, 17(2), 48-51.
145. Wainer, H., and Gelman, A. (2007). A Catch-22 in Assigning Primary Delegates. Chance, 20(4), 6-7.
146. Wainer, H., Gesseroli, M., and Verdi, M. (2006). Finding What Is not There Through the Unfortunate Binning of Results: The Mendel Effect, Chance, 19(1), 49-52.
147. Wainer, H., and Koretz, D. (2003). A Political Statistic. Chance, 16(4), 45-47.
148. Wainer, H., Njue, C., and Palmer, S. (2000). Assessing Time Trends in Sex Differences in Swimming and Running (with Discussions). Chance, 13(1), 10-15.
149. Wainer, H., and Skorupski, W. P. (2005). Was It Ethnic and Social-Class Bias or Was It Statistical Artifact? Logical and Empirical Evidence against Freedle’s Method for Reestimating SAT scores. Chance, 18(2), 17-24.
150. Wainer, H., and Steinberg, L. S. (1992). Sex Differences in Performance on the Mathematics Section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A Bidirectional Validity Study. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 323-336.
151. Wainer, H., and Zwerling, H. (2006). Logical and Empirical Evidence that Smaller Schools do not Improve Student Achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 300-303.
152. Walker, H. M., and Durost, W. N. (1936). Statistical Tables: Their Structure and Use. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
153. Wigdor, A., and Garner, W. (Eds.). (1982). Ability Testing: Uses, Consequences, and Controversies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
154. Williams, V.S.L., Jones, L. V., and Tukey, J. W. (1994). Controlling Error in Multiple Comparisons with Special Attention to the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Technical Report No. 33. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: National Institute of Statistical Sciences.
155. Willingham, W. W., and Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and Fair Assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
156. Willingham, W. W., Lewis, C., Morgan, R., and Ramist, L. (1990). Predicting College Grades: An Analysis of Institutional Trends over Two Decades. New York: The College Board.
157. Willingham, W. W., Pollack, J. M., and Lewis, C. (2000). Grades and Test Scores: Accounting for Observed Differences. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
158. Yost, D. S., Shaw, S. F., Cullen, J. P., and Bigaj, S. J. (1994). Practices and Attitudes of Postsecondary LD Service Providers in North America. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 631-640.
159. Zuriff, G. E. (2000). Extra Examination Time for Students with Learning Disabilities: An Examination of the Maximum Potential Thesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 99-117.