Fixing the Codex? Global Food-Safety Governance Under Review

Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 267-300

  Hüller, Thorsten ^a   Maier, Matthias Leonhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85193410773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. R Merkle, Der Codex Alimentarius der FAO und WHO: Die Entwicklung von Codex-Standards und deren Auswirkungen auf das Europäische Gemeinschaftsrecht und die nationalen Lebensmittelrechte (Bayreuth: Verlag PCO, 1994)
2. D Eckert, ‘Die neue Welthandelsordnung und ihre Bedeutung für den internationalen Verkehr mit Lebensmitteln’ (1995) 22 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht 363
3. DG Victor, Effective Multilateral Regulation of Industrial Activity: Institutions for Policing and Adjusting Binding and Nonbinding Legal Commitments (Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998)
4. GG Sander, ‘Gesundheitsschutz in der WTO—eine neue Bedeutung des Codex Alimentarius im Lebensmittelrecht?’ (2000) 3 Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien 335
5. DG Victor, ‘The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organisation: an Assessment after Five Years’ (2000) 32 New York University Journal of international Law and Politics 865
6. F Veggeland and SO Borgen, ‘Negotiating International Food Standards: The World Trade Organization’s Impact on the Codex Alimentarius Commission’ (2005) 18 Governance 675
7. E Boutrif, ‘The New Role of Codex Alimentarius in the Context of WTO/SPS Agreement’ (2003) 14 Food Control 81.
8. P Bereano and E Peacock, ‘To Eat or Not to Eat? An Obscure UN Agency tries to Provide an Answer’ (2004) GRAIN Seedling, Apr, at 12.
9. UP Thomas, The Codex Alimentarius and Environment-related Food Safety: the Functioning of the Global Standards (Geneva: EcoLomics International, 2004), at 12
10. DL Post, ‘Standards and Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Food Safety Standards in Developing Countries’ (2005) 598 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 168.
11. S Poli, ‘The European Community and the Adoption of International Food Standards within the Codex Alimentarius Commission’ (2004) 10 European Law Journal 613 at 630.
12. L Sklair, ‘Democracy and the Transnational Capitalist Class’ (2002) 581 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 144 at 150–1.
13. DG Victor, K Raustiala and EB Skolnikoff (eds), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice (Laxenburg and Cambridge, Mass: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, MIT Press, 1998)
14. EL Miles et al., Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2001)
15. R Blackhurst, ‘The Capacity of the WTO to Fulfil Its Mandate’ in AO Krueger (ed), The WTO as an International Organisation (Chicago, ill: University of Chicaco Press, 1998).
16. DE Buckingham et al., The International Co-ordination of Regulatory Approaches to Products of Biotechnology (Saskatoon: Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, 1999), at 48.
17. A Weinberg, ‘Science and Trans-Science’ (1972) 10 Minerva 209.
18. Consumer International, Codex Alimentarius for Consumers, (London: Consumers International, 2000), at 19.
19. N Avery, M Drake and T Lang, Cracking the Codex: An Analysis of Who Sets World Food Standards (London: National Food Alliance, 1993)
20. M Powell, Science in Sanitary and Phytosanitary Dispute Resolution (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1997)
21. L Rosman, ‘Public Participation in International Pesticide Regulation: When the Codex Commission Decides, Who Will Listen?’ (1993) 12 Virginia Environmental Law Journal 329
22. A Herwig, ‘Transnational Governance Regimes for Foods Derived from Biotechnology and their Legitimacy’ in G Teubner (ed), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004
23. S Suppan, ‘Governance in the Codex Alimentarius Commission’ in Consumers International (ed), Decision Making in the Global Market: Trade, Standards and the Consumer (London: Consumers International, 2005).
24. P Nanz and J Steffek, ‘Assessing the Democratic Quality of Deliberation in International Governance: Criteria and Research Strategies’ (2005) 40 Acta Politica 368
25. I Shapiro and R Hardin, Political Order. Nomos XXXVII (New York & London: New York UP, 1996), at 258–261.
26. G. Skogstad, ‘The WTO and Food Safety Regulatory Policy Innovation in the European Union’ (2001) 39 Journal of Common Market Studies, 485
27. T Bernauer, Genes, Trade, and Regulation: The Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2003)
28. AR Young, ‘Political Transfer and ‘Trading Up’? Transatlantic Trade in Genetically Modified Food and U.S. Politics’ (2003) 55 World Politics 457.
29. J Falke with K Plett, Institutionen zur Risikobewertung und zum Risikomanagement im In- und Ausland: Analyse der vorhandenen Konzepte, Umsetzung und Erfahrungenüber den Aufbau solcher Institutionen sowie daraus zu ziehende Schlussfolgerungen (Bremen: Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik an der Universität Bremen, 2002)
30. E Millstone and P van Zwanenberg, ‘The Evolution of Food Safety Policy-making Institutions in the UK, EU and Codex Alimentarius’ (2002) 36 Social Policy & Administration 593.
31. C Gerstetter and ML Maier, Risk Regulation, Trade and Internationa Law: Debating the Precautionary Principle in and around the WTO (Bremen: Sfb ‘Staatlichkeit im Wandel’, 2005).
32. DA Wirth, ‘The Role of Science in the Uruguay Round and NAFTA Trade Disciplines’ (1994) 27 Cornell International Law Journal 817 at 834
33. VR Walker, ‘Keeping the WTO from Becoming the ‘‘World Trans-science Organization’’: Scientifc Uncertainty, Science Policy, and Factfinding in the Growth Hormones Dispute’ (1998) 31 Cornell Journal of International Law 251.
34. E Millstone et al., Science in Trade Disputes Related to Potential Rrisks: Comparative Case Studies (Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, 2004)
35. National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983), at 19–20.
36. JW Bridges and O Bridges, ‘Hormones as Growth Promoters: the Precautionary Principle or a Political Risk Assessment?’ in EEA (ed), Late lessons from Early Warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896–2000 (Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2002), at 150.
37. J Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung (Frankfurt aM: Suhrkamp, 1992), at 187 ff.
38. R Fisher and W Ury, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (London: Arrow, 1981).
39. A Gutmann and D Thompson, Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard UP, 1996).
40. O Gerstenberg and C Sabel, ‘Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. An Institutional Ideal for Europe?’ in C Joerges and R. Dehousse (eds), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market (Oxford: OUP, 2002, 289) esp. at 292.
41. JS Wilson and T Otsuki, Global Trade and Food Safety: Winners and Losers in a Fragmented System (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2001).
42. G Majone, ‘What Price Safety? The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Marketing Studies 89
43. S Pardo Quintillán, ‘Free Trade, Public Health Protection and Consumer Information in the European and WTO Context: Hormone-treated Beef and Genetically Modified Organisms’ (1999) 33 Journal of World Trade 147.
44. N Perdikis, ‘A Conflict of Legitimate Concerns or Pandering to Vested Interests? Conflicting Attitudes Towards the Regulation of Trade in Genetically Modified Goods—The EU and the US’ (2000) 1 Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 51
45. GE Isaac, ‘The SPS Agreement and Agri-food Trade Disputes: The Final Frontier’ (2004) 5 Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 43.
46. J-C Bureau and S Marette, ‘Accounting for Consumers’ Preferences in International Trade Rules’ (paper presented at the National Research Council Conference on Incorporating Science, Economics, Politics and Culture in Sanitary-Phytosanitary and International Trade, Irvine, Cal, 25–27 Jan 1999).
47. A Buchanan, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford & New York: OUP, 2004), at 314.
48. J Peel, Risk Regulation Under the WTO SPS Agreement: Science as an International Normative Yardstick? (New York: NYU School of Law, 2004).
49. A Herwig, Taking Pluralism Seriously: How the WTO Should Regulate Food Safety and Consumer Choice Aspects of Trade in Genetically Modified Foods (JsD thesis, New York University School of Law, 2005)
50. A Cosbey, A Forced Evolution? The Codex Alimentarius Commission, Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle (Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2000), at 9
51. H Heclo, Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden (New Haven, Conn: Yale UP, 1974) at 305.
52. ML Maier, Negotiating Greenhouse Gas Emission Limits in the European Union (Florence: Project report, European University Institute, 2002).
53. C Sabel, ‘Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development’ in N Smelser and R Swedberg (eds), Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1994), at 137.