Fragmentation(s) of International Law: On Normative Integration as Authority Allocation

The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 99-120

  Broude, Tomer ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85191798241     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. JL Goldsmith and EA Posner, ‘A Theory of Customary International Law’ (1999) 66 University of Chicago Law Review 1113
2. JL Goldsmith and EA Posner, The Limits of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2005).
3. H Bull, The Anarchical Society (New York, Columbia University Press, 1977)
4. AC Cutler, ‘The “Grotian Tradition” in International Relations’ (1991) 17 Review of International Studies 41.
5. J Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
6. C MacLachlan, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 279.
7. S Shaw and R Schwartz, ‘Trade and Environment in the WTO: State of Play’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade 129.
8. T Broude, ‘Taking “Trade and Culture” Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law’ (2005) 26 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 623.
9. T Voon, ‘UNESCO and theWTO: A Clash of Cultures’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 635.
10. M Hirsch, ‘Conflicting Obligations in International Investment Law: Investment Tribunals’ Perspective’, elsewhere in this volume (p 323).
11. C Droege, ‘The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict’ (2007) 40(2) Israel Law Review 310
12. Gross, ‘Human Proportions: Are Human Rights the Emperor’s New Clothes of the International Law of Occupation?’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 1.
13. Y Shany, The Competing Jurisdiction of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2003)
14. Lavranos, ‘Concurrence of Jurisdiction between the ECJ and other International Courts and Tribunals’ (2005) European Environmental Law Review, part I.
15. N Lavranos, I Canor and A Cohen elsewhere in this volume (on pp 217, 237 and 265, respectively).
16. J Pauwelyn, ‘WTO Compassion or Superiority Complex? What to Make of the WTO Waiver for “Conflict Diamonds”?’ (2003) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law 1177.
17. T Broude, International Governance in the World Trade Organization: Judicial Boundaries and Political Capitulation (London, Cameron and May, 2004).
18. P Mahoney, ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights’ (1990) 11 Human Rights Law Journal 57
19. L Bartels, ‘The Separation of Powers in the WTO: How to Avoid Judicial Activism’ (2004) 53(4) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 861
20. P Kooijmans, ‘The ICJ in the 21st Century: Judicial Restraint, Judicial Activism, or Proactive Judicial Policy’ (2007) 56(4) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 741.
21. JC Dernbach, ‘Achieving Sustainable Development: The Centrality and Multiple Facets of Integrated Decisionmaking’ (2003) 10 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 247.
22. JP Trachtman, ‘Trade and… Problems, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Subsidiarity’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 32
23. JP Trachtman, ‘Institutional Linkage: Transcending “Trade and…”’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 77.
24. JP Trachtman, ‘The Domain ofWTODispute Resolution’ (1999) 40 Harvard International Law Journal 333, discussing normative linkages with WTO law in terms relating to the authority of the WTO.
25. LR Helfer and A-M Slaughter, ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’ (1997) 107 Yale Law Journal 273, 372
26. W Burke-White, ‘A Community of Courts: Toward a System of International Criminal Law Enforcement’ (2002) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law 1.
27. DA Gantz, ‘An Appellate Mechanism for Review of Arbitral Decisions in Investor-State Disputes: Prospects and Challenges’ (2006) 39 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 39
28. F Ortino, A Sheppard and H Warner (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues, vol I (London, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2006)
29. A Qureshi, ‘A Possible Appellate System’ in P Muchlinski, F Ortino and C Schreuer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008, forthcoming).
30. SD Franck, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions’ (2005) 73 Fordham Law Review 1521.
31. Y Shany ‘Similarity in the Eye of the Beholder: Revisiting the Application of Rules Governing Jurisdictional Conflicts in the Lauder/CME cases’, in A Rovine (ed), International Arbitration and Mediation (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 2008, forthcoming).
32. Y Shany, ‘Contract Claims vs Treaty Claims: Mapping Conflicts between ICSID Decisions on Multisourced Investment Claims’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 835.
33. E-U Petersmann, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1997) 271-84.
34. M Orellana, ‘The EU and Chile Suspend the Swordfish Case Proceedings at the WTO and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea’ ASIL Insights, February 2001, available at http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh60.htm
35. M Orellana, ‘The Swordfish Dispute between the EU and Chile at the ITLOS and the WTO’ (2002) 71 Nordic Journal of International Law 55.
36. LR Helfer, ‘Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking’ (2004) 29 Yale Journal of International Law 26.
37. RV Fiorentino, L Verdeja and C Toqueboeuf, The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements: 2006 Update, WTO Discussion Paper No 12 (2007), available at http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/discussion_papers12a_e.pdf, at 1.
38. J Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in theWTO:HowFar CanWe Go?’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 535, 541
39. JP Trachtman, ‘Book Review: ‘Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTOLaw Relates to Other Rules of International Law’ by Joost Pauwelyn’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law 855.
40. Y Shany, ‘Capacities and Inadequacies: A Look at the Two Separation Barrier Cases’ (2005) 38 Israel Law Review 230.
41. T Broude, ‘The Legitimacy of the ICJ’s Advisory Competence in the Shadow of the Wall’ (2005) 38 Israel Law Review 189and sources cited therein.
42. T Broude, ‘Elements of the Principle of Integration in WTO Jurisprudence: Another Look at the Shrimp Cases’ in ILA Report, above n 20.