Professional Discourse

Professional Discourse

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-275

  Gunnarsson, Britt Louise ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190331806     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (177)

1. Adams Smith, D. E. (1990), ‘Source and derived discourse’, in M. A. K. Halliday, J. Giddons and H. Nicholas (eds), Learning, keeping and using language, volume II. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins, pp. 415-433.
2. Altenberg, B. (1998), ‘Connectors and sentence openings in English and Swedish’, in S. Johansson and S. Oksefjell (eds), Corpora and crossSwales, J. M.linguistic research: theory, method, and case studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 115-143.
3. Ammon, U., ed. (2001), The dominance of English as a language of science. Effects on other languages and language communities. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Andersson, H. (2007), Interkulturell kommunikation inom sjukvården. Den kommunikativa situationen för invandrare på svenska arbetsplatser 1: intervjuer. (TeFa nr 45.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
5. Andersson, H. and Nelson, M. (2005), ‘Communication at work. The communicative situation of immigrants at Swedish workplaces’, in B. Swales, J. M.L. Gunnarsson (ed.), The Immigrant and the Workplace. (TeFa nr 41.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 27-46.
6. Auer, P., ed. (1998), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. London: Routledge.
7. Austin, J. L. (1976), How to do things with words. The William James Lectures 1955. Second edition. London, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Bäcklund, I. (1998), Metatext in professional writing: A contrastive study of English, German and Swedish. Texts in European writing communities 3. (TeFa nr 25.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
9. Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Nickerson, C., eds (1999), Writing business: Genres, media and discourses. New York: Longman.
10. Bartlett, F. C. (1932), Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Barton, D. (1991), ‘The social nature of writing’, in D. Barton and R. Ivanic (eds), Writing in the Community. Written Communication Annual. An International Survey of Research and Theory. Volume 6. Newbury park, London, New Delhi, pp. 1-13.
12. Bazerman, C. (1988), Shaping written knowledge. The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
13. Bazerman, C. and Paradis, J., eds (1991), Textual dynamics of the professions. Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
14. Behtoui, A. (2006), Unequal opportunities. The impact of social capital and recruitment methods on immigrants and their children in the Swedish labour market. Linköping studies in art and science no. 369, Linköping.
15. Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N. (1995), Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Bhatia, V. K. (1993), Analysing genre. Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
17. Boissevain, J. (1987), ‘Social network’, in U. Ammon, N. Dittmar and K. J. Mattheier (eds), Sociolinguistics: An International handbook of the science of language and society. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, pp. 164-169.
18. Börestam, U. (2005), ‘Culture and culture again. An interSwales, J. M.Nordic merger in the banking sector’, in B. Swales, J. M. L. Gunnarsson (ed.), Communication in the Workplace. (TeFa nr 42.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 60-77.
19. Boréus, K. (2006), ‘Discursive discrimination: A typology’, European Journal of Social Theory, no. 3.
20. Bransford, J. D. and Franks, J. J. (1971), ‘The abstraction of linguistic ideas’, Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331-350.
21. Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. P. and Franks, J. J. (1972), ‘Sentence memory. A constructive versus interpretative approach’, Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.
22. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987), Politeness: some universals in language usage. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Carli, A. and Ammon, U. eds (2007), Linguistic inequality in scientific communication today. AILA Review, volume 20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins.
24. Castells, M. (1999), The information age. Economy, society and culture. Vol. 1-3. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
25. Charrow, R. P. and Charrow, V. R. (1979), ‘Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions’, Columbia Law Review, 79 (7), 1306-1374.
26. Culver, J. D., Gerr, F. and Frumkin, H. (1997), ‘Medical information on the internet: A study of an electronic bulletin board’, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12 (8), 466-470.
27. Dale, W. (1977), Legislative drafting: A new approach. A comparative study of method in France, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. London: Butterworths.
28. Daneš, F. (1970), ‘Zur linguistischen Analyse der Textstruktur’, Folia linguistica, 4, 72-78.
29. Danet, B. (1997), ‘Speech, writing and performativity: an evolutionary view of the history of constitutive ritual’, in B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell and B. Nordberg (eds), The construction of professional discourse. London and New York: Longman, pp. 13-41.
30. DudleySwales, J. M.Evans, T. (1986), ‘Genre analysis: an investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations’, in M. Coulthard (ed.), Talking about text. Birmingham, UK: English Language Research, Birmingham University.
31. DudleySwales, J. M.Evans, T. (1989), ‘An outline of the value of genre analysis in LSP work’, in C. Laurén and M. Nordman (eds), Special Language: From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines. Clevedon, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Multilingual Matters Ltd, pp. 72-79.
32. Duszak, A. and Urszulska, O., eds (2004), Speaking from the margin. Global English from a European perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
33. Enkvist, N. Swales, J. M.E. (1974), ‘Några textlingvistiska grundfrågor’, in U. Teleman and T. Hultman (eds), Språket i bruk. Lund: Liber läromedel, pp. 172-206.
34. Erickson, F. and Schultz, J. (1982), The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press.
35. Faigley, L. (1985), ‘Nonacademic writing: The social perspective’, in L. Odell and D. Goswani (eds), Writing in nonacademic settings. New York, London: Guilford Press, pp. 231-248.
36. Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997), ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction. Discourse Studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, Volume 2. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 258-284.
37. Fant, L. (1992), ‘Scandinavians and Spaniards in negotiation’, in A. Sjögren and L. Janson (eds), Culture and management. In the field of ethnology and business administration. Botkyrka, Sweden, pp. 125-153.
38. Fillmore, C. (1987), Fillmore’s case grammar: a reader. R. Dirven and G. Radden (eds). (Studies in descriptive linguistics 16.) Heidelberg: Groos.
39. Fishman, J. A. (1970), Sociolinguistics. A brief introduction. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers.
40. Fletcher, J. K. (1999), Disappearing acts. Gender. power and relational practice at work. Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT Press.
41. Flower, L. S. and Hayes, J. R. (1984), ‘Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing’, Written Communication, 1, 120-160.
42. Fredrickson, K. M. (1995), American and Swedish written legal discourse: The case of court documents. (Ph.D. thesis. Department of Linguistics.) Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
43. Gee, J., Hull, G. and Lankshear, C. (1996), The New Work Order. London: Allen and Unwin.
44. Gibson, E. J. and Levin, H. (1975), The Psychology of Reading. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: MIT Press.
45. Goffman, E. (1974), Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
46. Granger, S. and Tyson, S. (1996), ‘Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non- native, J. M.native EFL speakers of English’, World Englishes, 15 (1), 17-27.
47. Grice, P. (1975), ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
48. Grimes, J. E. and Glock, N. (1970), ‘A Saramaccan narrative pattern’, Language, 46, 408-425.
49. Grönroos, C. (1990), Service management and marketing. Managing the moments of truth in service competition. Massachusetts and Toronto: Lexington Books.
50. Gumperz, J. J. (1968), ‘The speech community’, in International encyclopedia of the social sciences. London, New York: Macmillan, pp. 381-186.
51. Gumperz, J. J. (1982a), Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Gumperz, J. J. (1982b), Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Gumperz, J. J. (1992), ‘Contextualization and understanding’, in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229-252.
54. Gumperz, J. J. (1999), ‘On interactional sociolinguistic method’, in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and managements settings. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 453-471
55. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1982), Lagtexters begriplighet. En språkfunktionell studie av medbestämmandelagen. Lund: Liber Förlag.
56. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1984), ‘Functional comprehensibility of legislative texts: Experiments with a Swedish act of parliament’, Text, 4 (1-3), 71-105.
57. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1989), ‘Text comprehensibility and the writing process. The case of laws and law making’, Written Communication, 6 (1), 86-107.
58. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1992a), ‘Linguistic change within cognitive worlds’, in G. Kellermann and M. D. Morrissey (eds), Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang, pp. 205-228.
59. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1992b), Skrivande i yrkeslivet. En sociolingvistisk studie. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
60. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1993), ‘Pragmatic and macrothematic patterns in science and popular science: A diachronic study of articles from three fields’, in M. Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: theory and practice. London and New York: Pinter Publishers, pp. 165-179.
61. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1997a), ‘On the sociohistorical construction of scientific discourse’, in B. -L Gunnarsson, P. Linell and B. Nordberg (eds), The construction of professional discourse. London and New York: Longman, pp. 99-126.
62. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1997b), ‘The writing process from a sociolinguistic viewpoint’, Written Communication, 14 (2), 139-188.
63. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (1998), ‘Academic discourse in changing context frames: The construction and development of a genre’, in P. Evangelisti Allori (ed.), Academic discourse in Europe. Thought processes and linguistic realisations. Rome: Bulzoni, pp. 19-42.
64. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2000), ‘Discourse, organizations and national cultures’, Discourse Studies, 2(1), 5-34.
65. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2001a), ‘Expressing criticism and evaluation during three centuries’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2 (1), 115-139.
66. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2001b), ‘Swedish, English, French or German - the language situation at Swedish universities’, in U. Ammon (ed.), The dominance of English as a language of science. Effects on other languages and language communities. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 229-316.
67. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2001c), ‘Swedish Tomorrow - A product of the linguistic dominance of English?’, in S. Boyd and L. Huss (eds), Managing multilingualism in a European nationSwales, J. M.state. Challenges for Swedish. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd, pp. 51-69.
68. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2004a), ‘The multilayered structure of enterprise discourse’, Information Design Journal+Document Design, 12 (1), 36-48.
69. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2004b), ‘Orders and disorders of enterprise discourse’, in C. Gouveia, C. Silvestre and L. Azuaga (eds), Discourse, communication and the enterprise. Linguistic perspectives. (Centre for English Studies.) Lisbon: University of Lisbon, pp. 17-39.
70. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2005a), ‘The organization of enterprise discourse’, in A. Trosborg and P. E. Flyvholm Jørgensen (eds), Business discourse. Texts and contexts, Linguistic Insights no. 19. Studies in Language and Communication. Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 83-109.
71. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2005b), ‘Medical discourse: Sociohistorical construction’, in Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd Edition, Vol 7, eds K. Brown. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 709-716.
72. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2005c), ‘The verbal construction of organizations’, in B. Swales, J. M.L. Gunnarsson (ed.), Communication in the workplace, (TeFa nr 42.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 78-90.
73. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2005d), ‘IckeSwales, J. M.verbal representation i vetenskapliga artiklar’, in B. Melander, G. BergmanSwales, J. M. Claeson, O. Josephson, L. Larsson, B. Nordberg and C. Östman (eds), Språk i tid. (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 303-314.
74. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2006a), ‘From a national to an international writing community. The case of economics in Sweden’, in J. Bamford and M. Bondi (eds), Managing interaction in professional discourse. Intercultural and interdiscoursal perspectives. Roma: Officina Edizioni, pp. 23-45.
75. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2006b), ‘Swedish companies and their multilingual practices’, in J. C. PalmerSwales, J. M. Silveira, M. F. RuizSwales, J. M. Garrido and I. Fortanet-Gómez, J. M. Gómez (eds), International and intercultural business communication. Theory, research and teaching. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 243-263.
76. Gunnarsson, B. -L. (2008), ‘Professional communication’, in Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd Edition, Vol 4: Second and Foreign Language Education, eds N. Van Deusen-Scholl, J. M. Scholl and N. H. Hornberg. New York: Springer Science, pp. 83-95.
77. Gunnarsson, B. -L., Bäcklund, I. and Andersson, B. (1995), ‘Texts in European writing communities’, in Gunnarsson, B. -L., and I. Bäcklund (eds), Writing in academic contexts. (TeFa nr 11.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 30-53.
78. Gunnarsson, B. -L. and Edling, L. (1985), Laganvändning på kommunnivå. (FUMS rapport nr 127.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
79. Gunnarsson, B. -L and Jämtelid, K. (1999), ‘Översättning och parallellskrivning - flerspråkig textproduktion inom ett internationellt storföretag’, in Svenskans beskrivning 23. Lund: Lund University Press, pp. 134-142.
80. Gunnarsson, B. –L Linell, P. and Nordberg, B., eds (1997), The construction of professional discourse. London and New York: Longman.
81. Gunnarsson, B. -L, and Näslund, H. (1987), Facktexter under 1900Swales, J. M.talet 1. Projektpresentation och materialbeskrivning. (FUMS rapport nr 135.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
82. Gunnarsson, B. -L., Näslund, H. and Melander, B. (1994), ‘LSP in a historical perspective’, in M. Brekke, Ö. Andersen, T. Dahl, and J. Myking (eds), Applications and implications of current LSP research. Volume II. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, pp. 878-915.
83. Gunnarsson, B. -L. and Skolander B. (1991), Fackspråkens framväxt: terminologi och ordförråd i facktexter från tre sekler 1. Projektpresentation och materialbeskrivning. (FUMS rapport nr 154.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
84. Habermas, J. (1971), Borgerlig offentlighet. Oslo: Gyldendal.
85. Hayes, J. R. and Flower, L. (1980), ‘Identifying the organization of writing processes’, in L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (eds), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 3-30.
86. Hoey, M. (1983), On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.
87. Hofstede, G. (1994), Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. London: Harper Collins.
88. Holmes, J. (2000), ‘Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace’, Discourse Studies, 2 (2), 159-185.
89. Holmes, J. (2005), ‘Story Swales, J. M. telling at work: A complex discursive resource for integrating personal, professional and social identities’. Discourse Studies, 7 (6), 671-700.
90. Holmes, J. (2006), Gendered talk at work. Constructing gender identity through workplace discourse. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
91. Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003), Power and politeness in the workplace. A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Pearson Education.
92. Holmes, J., Stubbe, M. and Vine, B. (1999), ‘Constructing professional identity: “doing power” in policy units’, in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds), Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 351-385.
93. Huckin, T. (1987), ‘Surprise value in scientific discourse’. Paper presented at the CCC Convention, Atlanta, Georgia, March, 1987.
94. Hudson, R. A. (1996), Sociolinguistics. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Hull, G. ed. (1997), Changing work, changing workers: Critical perspective on language, literacy and skills. Albany: State University of New York Press.
96. Hymes, D. (1974), Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
97. Isaksson, M. (2005), ‘Ethos and pathos representations in mission statements: Identifying virtues and emotions in an emerging business genre’, in A. Trosborg and P. E. Flyvholm Jørgensen (eds), Business discourse. Texts and contexts, Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 111-138.
98. Jämtelid, K. (2001), ‘Multilingual text production at an international company’, in F. Mayer (ed.), Language for special purposes: Perspectives for the new millennium. Volume 2. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, pp. 797-805.
99. Jämtelid, K. (2002), Texter och skrivande i en internationaliserad affärsvärld. Flerspråkig textproduktion vid ett svenskt storföretag. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.
100. Johansson, C. (2003), Visioner och verkligheter. Kommunikationen om företagets strategier. (Department of Information Sciences.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
101. Källgren, G. (1979), Innehåll i text. Stockholm: Studentlitteratur.
102. Kankaanranta, A. (2005a), ‘English as a corporate language: Company-internal e-mail messages written by Finns and Swedes’, in B.-L. Gunnarsson (ed.), Communication in the workplace. (TeFa nr 42.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 42–59.
103. Kankaanranta, A. (2005b), ‘Hej Seppo, could you pls comment on this!’ Internal Email Communication in Lingua Franca English in a Multinational Company. (Centre for Applied Language Studies.) Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
104. Karlsson, A.M. (2006), En arbetsdag i skriftsamhället. Ett etnografiskt perspektiv på skriftanvändning i vanliga yrken. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
105. Karlsson, A.M. (2007), ‘Text, situation, praktik. Om ramar och resurser för tolkning av texter i arbetsrelaterade skrifthändelser’, in B.L. Gunnarsson and A.M Karlsson (eds), Ett vidgat textbegrepp. (TeFa nr 46.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 27-40.
106. Kaufer, D. S. and Carley, K. M. (1993), Communication at a distance. The influence of print on sociocultural organization and change. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
107. Kintsch, W. (1978), ‘Comprehension and memory of text’, in W. K. Estes (ed.), Handbook of learning cognitive processes. Vol 6: Linguistic functions in cognitive processes. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
108. Kintsch, W. and van Dijk, T. A. (1978), ‘Toward a model of text comprehension and production’, Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
109. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981), The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
110. Kong, K. C. C. (2002), ‘Managing the ambiguous and conflicting identities of “upline” and “downline” in a network marketing firm’. Discourse Studies, 4 (1), 49-74.
111. Kotler, P. (1991), Marketing Management. Analysis, planning, implementation and control. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Corporation.
112. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J. and Wong, V. (1999), Principles of marketing. London: Prentice Hall Europe.
113. Kucer, S. L. (1985), ‘The making of meaning: Reading and writing as parallel processes’, Written Communication, 3 (2), 317-336.
114. Labov, W. (1972), Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
115. Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967), ‘Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experiences’, in J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. (Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting. American Ethnological Society.) Seattle and London.
116. Landqvist, H. (2001), Råd och ruelse. Moral och samtalsstrategier i Giftinformations centralens telefonrådgivning. (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk 55.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
117. Latour, B. (1988), ‘Drawing things together’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds), Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press, pp. 19-68.
118. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986), Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
119. Lemke, J. L. (1999), ‘Discourse and organizational dynamics: website communication and institutional change’. Discourse and Society, 10 (1), 21-47.
120. Lemke, J. L. (2002), ‘Travels in hypermodality’, Visual Communication, 3, 299-325.
121. Levin, A. (1997), Kognitiva och pragmatiska mönster i professionella texter från svenska, engelska och tyska skrivmiljöer. Texter i europeiska skrivsamhällen 1. (TeFa nr 20.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
122. LeVine, P. and Scollon, R. eds (2004), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
123. Levinson, S. C. (1983), Pragmatics. Cambridge, London etc.: Cambridge University Press.
124. Linde, C. (1999), ‘The transformation of narrative syntax into institutional memory’. Narrative inquiry, 9 (1), 139-74.
125. Louhiala-Salminen, L. (1995) ‘Drop me a fax, will you?’: A study of written business communication. (Reports from the Department of English 10.) Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, pp. 1-115.
126. Lurija, A. R. (1976), Basic problems of neurolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
127. Luzon, M. M. J. (2002), ‘A genre analysis of corporate home pages’, LSP and Professional Communication, 2 (1), 41-56.
128. Marra, M. and Holmes, J. (2004), ‘Affiliation workplace narratives and business reports: Issues of definition’. Text, 24 (1), 59-78.
129. Mauranen, A. (1993), Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: a textlinguistic study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
130. Melander, B. (1989), Facktexter under 1900Swales, J. M.talet 3. Resultat från kognitiv textanalys. (FUMS rapport nr 148). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
131. Melander, B. (1991), Innehållsmönster i svenska facktexter. (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk 28.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
132. Melander, B. (1993), From interpretation to enumeration of facts: On a change in the textual patterns of Swedish LSP texts during the 20th century. (TeFa nr 7.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
133. Melander, B., Swales, J. and Fredrickson, K. (1997), ‘Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the US and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities’, in A. Duszak (ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 251-272.
134. Morris, C. W. (1938), Foundations of the theory of signs. Vol 1 (2). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
135. Myers, G. (1988), ‘Every picture tells a story: Illustrations in E. O. Wilson’s Sociobiology’, Human Studies, 11, 235-269.
136. Myers, G. (1989). ‘The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles’, Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 1-35.
137. Myers, G. (1990), Writing biology. Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
138. Nationalencyklopedin, Femte bandet. Höganäs: Bokförlaget Bra Böcker. 1991.
139. Näslund, H. (1991), Referens och koherens i svenska facktexter. (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk 29.) Uppsala: Uppsala University.
140. Nelson, M. (2008), ‘ “Jag kopierar andras mejl”. Om andraspråkstalares skrivstrategier i yrkeslivet’, in J. Granfeldt, G. Håkansson, M. Källkvist and S. Schlyter (eds), Språkinlärning, språkdidaktik och teknologi. (ASLA:s skriftserie 21.) Lund, pp. 163-181.
141. Nelson, M. and Andersson, H. (2005), ‘Andraspråkstalare i arbetslivet. Data från intervjuer och fallstudier’, in U. Börestam and B-L. Gunnarsson (eds), Språk och kultur i det multietniska Sverige. (TeFa nr 44.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 84-97.
142. Nelson, M. (2007), ‘Professionella och socialiserande kommunikativa aktiviteter. Andraspråkstalande kvinnor och män i arbete’, in B-L. Gunnarsson, S. Entzenberger and M. Ohlsson (eds), Språk och kön i nutida och historiskt perspektiv. (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk 71.) Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 287-298.
143. Nickerson, C. (2000), Playing the corporate language game. An investigation of the genres and discourse strategies in English used by Dutch writers working in multinational corporations. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
144. Norris, S. and Jones, R. H. (2005), Discourse in action. Introducing mediated discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
145. Oliveira, M. C. L. (2004), ‘Language, technology and modernity: A study of interaction in a call center’, in C. Gouveia, C. Silvestre and L. Azuega (eds), Discourse, Communication and the Enterprise. Linguistic Perspectives. (Centre for English Studies.) Lisbon: University of Lisbon, pp. 65-78.
146. Pan, Y., Scollon, S. W. and Scollon, R. (2002), Professional communication in international settings. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
147. Peng, J. (1987), ‘Organizational features in chemical engineering research articles’, ELR Journal, 1, Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham, pp. 79-116.
148. Persson, O., Stern, P. and Gunnarsson, E. (1992), ‘Swedish economics on the international scene’, in L. Engwall (ed.), Economics in Sweden. An evaluation of Swedish research in economics. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 104-126.
149. Peters, T. J. and Waterman, R. H. (1982), In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper and Row.
150. Petersen, M. and Shaw, P. (2002), ‘Language and disciplinary differences in a biliterate context’, World Englishes, 21 (3), 357-374.
151. Qvortrup, L. (2002), The hypercomplex society. New York: P. Lang Publishing Co.
152. Rossipal, H. (1978), Funktionale Textanalyse. Denotation und Konnotation als Textwirkungsmittel. (German department.) Stockholm: Stockholm University.
153. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994), ‘Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse’, English for Specific Purposes, 13 (2), 149-170.
154. Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C., eds (1999), Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
155. Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. (1977), ‘Scripts, plans and knowledge’, in P. N. Johnson-Laird (ed.), Thinking. Readings in cognitive science. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 421-432.
156. Schiffrin, D. (1994), Approaches to discourse. Oxford UK, Cambridge USA: Blackwell Publishers.
157. Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1984), Strukturell der Lebenswelt, Bd. 2. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
158. Searle, J. R. (1969), Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
159. Shaw, P. (2004), ‘Sentence openings in academic economics articles in English and Danish’. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 3 (2), 67-84.
160. Silva, J. R. G., Oliveira, M. C. L. and Zaltzman, C. (2004), ‘Communication with customers and the quality of public services. The case of a Brazilian company’, in C. Gouveia, C. Silvestre and L. Azuega (eds), Discourse, Communication and the Enterprise. Linguistic Perspectives. (Centre for English Studies.) Lisbon: University of Lisbon, pp. 43-63.
161. Sörlin, M. (2000), Skrivande i sex europeiska företag. En studie av professionellt skrivande på banker och ingenjörsbyråer i Sverige, England och Tyskland. Texter i europeiska skrivsamhällen 4. (TeFa nr 36.) Stockholm: Stockholm University.
162. Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L. and Voss, J. F. (1979), ‘Text processing of domainSwales, J. M.related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275-290.
163. Swales, J. M. (1981), Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, UK: University of Aston.
164. Swales, J. M. (1990), Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
165. Swales, J. M. (1998), Other floors, other voices: a textography of a small university building. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
166. Swales, J. M. and Rogers, P. S. (1995), ‘Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement’. Discourse and Society, 6 (2), 223-242.
167. Tannen, D. (2005), ‘Interactional sociolinguistics’, in U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier and P. Trudgill (eds), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society. Second edition. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 76-88.
168. Tarone, E. (1980), ‘Communication strategies, foreigner talk and repair in interlanguage’, Language Learning, 30 (2), 417-432.
169. Thorndyke, P. W. (1977), ‘Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse’, Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.
170. Valle, E. (1999), A collective intelligence. The life sciences in the Royal Society as a scientific discourse community 1665-1965. Anglicana Turkuensia No 17. Turku: University of Turku.
171. van Dijk, T. A. (1977), ‘Context and cognition. Knowledge frames and speech act comprehension’, Journal of Pragmatics, 1, 211-232.
172. van Dijk, T. A. (1993), ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’, Discourse and Society, 4 (2), 249-285.
173. van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. (1983), Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
174. Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T. and Spilich, G. J. (1980), ‘Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651-667.
175. Waldinger, R. D. and Lichter, M. I. (2003), How the other half works: Immigration and the social organization of labor. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
176. Wiberg, M. ed. (2005), The interaction society. Practice, theories and supportive technologies. Hershey, London etc: Information Science Publishing.
177. Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. eds (2001), Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.