Experimental methods for simulation semantics

Human Cognitive Processing

Volumn 18, Issue , 2007, Pages 277-301

  Bergen, Benjamin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190103142     PISSN: 13876724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/hcp.18.19ber     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Bailey, D. (1997). When Push Comes to Shove: A Computational Model of the Role of Motor Control in the Acquisition of Action Verbs. Unpublished UC Berkeley Ph.D. Thesis.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
3. Bergen, B., Narayan, S., & Feldman, J. (2003). Embodied verbal semantics: Evidence from an image-verb matching task. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
4. Bergen, B., Chang, N., & Narayan, S. (2004). Simulated Action in an Embodied Construction Grammar. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
5. Bergen, B. & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. John Benjamins.
6. Bergen, B., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31.
7. Bergen, B. & Wheeler, K. (2005). Sentence Understanding Engages Motor Processes. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
8. Brodal, P. (1998). The central nervous system: structure and function. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Buccino, G, Binkofski, F., Fink, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 400-404.
10. Chan, A. (ms). Embodied verbal semantics in English and Chinese: Evidence from a verb-image matching task.
11. Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Craver-Lemley, C. & Arterberry, M. (2001). Imagery-induced interference on a visual detection task. Spatial Vision, 14, 101-119.
13. Denis, M. & Cocude, M. (1989). Scanning visual images generated from verbal descriptions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 293-307.
14. Ehrsson, H. H., Geyer, S., & Naito, E. (2003). Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part specific motor representations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3304-3316.
15. Feldman, J. & Narayanan, S. (2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385-392.
16. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
17. Gibbs, R. (2005). Embodiment in Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.
18. Glenberg, A. & Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
19. Glenberg, A. & Robertson, D. (2000). Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379-401.
20. Gravetter, F. & Wallnau. L. (2006). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (7th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
21. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301-307.
22. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Kaschak, M. & Glenberg, A. (2000). Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical. Constructions in Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 508-529.
24. Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M. E., Blanchard, A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94, B79-B89.
25. Kosslyn, S., Ball, T., & Reiser, B. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47-60.
26. Kosslyn, S., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 2, 635-642.
27. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
28. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
29. Landauer, T., Foltz, P., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
30. Langacker, R. W. (1986). Abstract motion. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 455-471.
31. Lindsay, S. (2003). Visual priming of language comprehension. Unpublished University of Sussex Master's Thesis.
32. Lotze, M., Montoya, P., Erb, M., Hülsmann, E., Flor, H., Klose, U., Birbaumer, N., & Grodd, W. (1999). Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(5), 491-501
33. Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1389-1400.
34. Mattes, S., Leuthold, H., & Ulrich, R. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1175-1191.
35. May, R. (1985). Logical Form. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36. Narayan, S., Bergen, B., & Weinberg, Z. (2004). Embodied Verbal Semantics: Evidence from a Lexical Matching Task. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
37. Narayanan, S. (1997). KARMA: Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect. Unpublished UC Berkeley Ph.D. Thesis.
38. Nyberg, L., Petersson, K.-M., Nilsson, L.-G., Sandblom, J., Åberg, C., & Ingvar, M. (2001). Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions. NeuroImage, 14, 521-528.
39. Perky, C. W. (1910). An experimental study of imagination. American Journal of Psychology, 21, 422-452.
40. Porro C., Francescato, M., Cettolo, V., Diamond, M., Baraldi, P., Zuian, C., Bazzocchi, M., & di Prampero, P. (1996). Primary motor andsensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 7688-7698.
41. Pulvermüller, F., Haerle, M., & Hummel, F. (2001). Walking or Talking? Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing. Brain and Language, 78, 143-168.
42. Richardson, D., Spivey, M., Edelman, S., & Naples, A. (2001). “Language is spatial”: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract spatial representations of verbs. Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 873-878). Mawhah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Richardson, D., Spivey, M., McRae, K., & Barsalou, L. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767-780.
44. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.
45. Romaiguère, P., Hasbroucq, T. Possamai, C., & Seal, J. (1993). Intensity to force translation: A new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 197-201.
46. Segal, S. & Gordon, P. (1969). The Perky Effect revisited: Blocking of visual signals by imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28, 791-797.
47. Simon, J. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
48. Stanfield, R. & Zwaan, R. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153-156.
49. Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 211-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 273-281.
51. Tseng, M. & Bergen, B. (2005). Lexical Processing Drives Motor Simulation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
52. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
53. Wheeler, M., Petersen, S., & Buckner, R. (2000). Memory's echo: Vivid remembering reactivates sensory specific cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the U.S.A., 97, 11125-11129.
54. Zwaan, R., Stanfield, R., & Yaxley, R. (2002). Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects? Psychological Science, 13, 168-171.