Class features as probes

Inflectional Identity

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 101-155

  Alexiadou, Artemis ^a   Müller, Gereon ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

decomposed; Evidence; fusional; syncretism; transparadigmatic

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190043762     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199219254.003.0005     Document Type: Chapter

References (124)

1. Ackema, Peter, and Ad Neeleman (2003) ‘Context-sensitive spell-out’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21: 681-735.
2. Aissen, Judith (2003) ‘Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21: 435-83.
3. Alexiadou, Artemis (2001) Functional Structure in Nominals. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Alexiadou, Artemis (2004) ‘Inflectional class, gender, and DP internal structure’, in G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.), Explorations inNominal Inflection. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21-49.
5. Liliane Haegeman, and Melitta Stavrou (2001) ‘On nominal functional projections: Noun morphology, movement and ellipsis’, in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 16, pp. 1-8.
6. Anastasiadi-Simeonidi, Anna, Angela Ralli, and Despoina Hila-Markopoulou (eds.) (2003) Gender. Athens: Patakis (In Greek).
7. Anderson, Stephen (1992) A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Aronoff, Mark (1994) Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Babiniotis, George (1986) Brief History of the Greek Language. Athens: Athens University Press.
10. Bachrach, Asaf, and Michael Wagner (2005) ‘The prosody of adjunction vs. complementation: The case of diminutives in Brazilian Portuguese’, Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
11. Baerman, Matthew (2005a) ‘Directionality and (un)natural classes in syncretism’. Language 80: 807-24.
12. Baerman, Matthew (2005b): ‘The limits of morphological underspecification’, Ms., University of Surrey.
13. Dunstan Brown, and Greville Corbett (2002) ‘Case syncretism in and out of Indo-European’, in M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, and S. Neuvel (eds.), The Main Session. Papers from the 37th Meeting, vol. 1, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 15-28.
14. Bailyn, John Frederick, and Andrew Nevins (2003) ‘The form of Russian genitive plurals’, Ms., SUNY at Stony Brook and MIT.
15. Bayer, Josef (1988) ‘Fortschritte der Syntaxtheorie’. Linguistische Berichte 117: 410-26.
16. Bernstein, Judy (1993) Topics in the syntax of nominal structure across Romance. PhD thesis, CUNY.
17. Bierkandt, Lennart (2006) ‘Kasusmorphologie des Diyari. Ein Ansatz im Rahmen der Distribuierten Morphologie’, in G. Müller and J. Trommer (eds.), Subanalysis of Argument Encoding in Distributed Morphology, vol. 84 of Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, Universität Leipzig.
18. Bierwisch, Manfred (1967) ‘Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German’, in To Honor Roman Jakobson. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, pp. 239-70.
19. Blevins, James (2000) ‘Markedness and blocking in German declensional paradigms’, in B. Stiebels and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Lexicon in Focus. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, pp. 83-103.
20. Blevins, James (2004) ‘Inflection classes and economy’, in G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 51-95.
21. Bobaljik, Jonathan (2002) ‘Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994', in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 53-85.
22. Bonet, Eulália (1991) Morphology after syntax. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
23. Borer, Hagit (2004) Structuring Sense. An Exo-Skeletal Trilogy, vols 1 and 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Cahill, Lynne, and Gerald Gazdar (1999) ‘German noun inflection’, Journal of Linguistics 35: 1-42.
25. Carstairs, Andrew (1986) ‘Macroclasses and paradigm economy in German nouns’. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 39: 3-11.
26. Carstairs, Andrew (1987) Allomorphy in Inflection. London: CroomHelm.
27. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1994) ‘Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast’. Language 70: 737-87.
28. Chomsky, Noam (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Chomsky, Noam (1970) ‘Remarks on nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company, pp. 184-221.
30. Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Chomsky, Noam (2000) ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework’, in R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89-155.
32. Chomsky, Noam (2001a) ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’, Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
33. Chomsky, Noam (2001b) ‘Derivation by phase’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale. A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1-52.
34. Chomsky, Noam (2005) ‘On phases’, Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
35. Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Cinque, Guglielmo (1993) ‘On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP’. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 3.2: 21-40.
37. Comrie, Bernard (1978) ‘Morphological classification of cases in the Slavonic languages’. The Slavonic and East European Review 56: 177-91.
38. Corbett, Greville (1991) Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Corbett, Greville and Norman Fraser (1993) ‘Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection’. Journal of Linguistics 29: 113-42.
40. Danon, Gabi (1996) The syntax of determiners in Hebrew. Master’s thesis, Tel-Aviv University.
41. de Lacy, Paul (2002) ‘Maximal words and the Maori passive’, in J. McCarthy (ed.), Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 495-512.
42. DiSciullo, Anna-Maria, and Edwin Williams (1987) On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Eisenberg, Peter (2000) Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik. Band 1: Das Wort. Stuttgart: Metzler.
44. Eisenberg, Peter and Ulrike Sayatz (2004) ‘Left of number: Animacy and plurality in German nouns’ Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 97-120.
45. Embick, David (1998) ‘Voice systems and the syntax/morphology interface’, in H. Harley (ed.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect, vol. 32, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 41-72.
46. Embick, David (2000) ‘Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect’. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 185-230.
47. Frampton, John (2002) ‘Syncretism, impoverishment, and the structure of person features’, in M. Andronis, E. Debenport, A. Pycha, and K. Yoshimura (eds.), Papers from the Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting, vol. 38, Chicago, pp. 207-22.
48. Franks, Steven (1995) Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Fraser, Norman, and Greville Corbett (1994) ‘Gender, animacy, and declensional class assignment: A unified account for Russian’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 123-50.
50. Gallmann, Peter (1998) ‘Case underspecification in morphology, syntax and the lexicon’, in A. Alexiadou and C. Wilder (eds.), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 141-75.
51. Groos, Anneke, and Henk van Riemsdijk (1981) ‘Matching effects in free relatives’, in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi, (eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Pisa: Suola Normale Superiore, pp. 171-216.
52. Gunkel, Lutz (2003) ‘Syncretisms and case underspecification in Polish noun paradigms’, in P. Banski and A. Przepiórkowski (eds.), Generative Linguistics in Poland: Morphosyntactic Investigations (Proceedings of the GLiP-5 Conference held inWarsaw, Poland, 30 November-1 December 2002). Warsaw: GLiP, pp. 47-62.
53. Haegeman, Liliane (1998) ‘Gender and word markers inWest Flemish’, Ms., University of Lille.
54. Hale, Ken (1973) ‘Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: An Australian example’, in T. Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics 11. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 401-58.
55. Halle, Morris (1992) ‘The Latvian declension’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 33-47.
56. Halle, Morris (1994) ‘The Russian declension: An illustration of the theory of Distributed Morphology’, in J. Cole and C. Kisseberth (eds.), Perspectives in Phonology. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 29-60.
57. Halle, Morris (1997) ‘Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission’, in B. Bruening, Y. Kang, and M.McGinnis (eds.), Papers at the Interface, vol. 30,MITWPL, pp. 425-49.
58. Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz (1993) ‘Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection’, in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-76.
59. Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz (1994) ‘Some key features of Distributed Morphology’, in A. Carnie, H. Harley, and T. Bures (eds.), Papers on Phonology and Morphology, vol. 21 of MITWorking Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 275-88.
60. Harbour, Daniel (2003) ‘The Kiowa case for feature insertion’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 543-78.
61. Harley, Heidi (1994) ‘Hug a tree: Deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy’, in A. Carnie and H. Harley (eds.), MITWPL 21: Papers on Phonology and Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 275-88.
62. Harley, Heidi and Rolf Noyer (2003) ‘Distributed Morphology’, in L. Cheng and R. Sybesma (eds.), The Second GLOT International State-of-the-Article Book. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 463-96.
63. Harris, James (1991) ‘The exponence of gender in Spanish’. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 27-62.
64. Isačenko, Alexander (1975) Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. München: Max Hueber Verlag.
65. Jakobson, Roman (1962a) ‘Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus’, in Selected Writings, vol. 2. The Hague and Paris: Mouton, pp. 23-71.
66. Jakobson, Roman (1962b) ‘Morfologičeskije nabljudenija’, in Selected Writings, vol. 2. The Hague and Paris: Mouton, pp. 154-81.
67. Johnston, Jason (1996) Systematic homonymy and the structure of morphological categories. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
68. Josefsson, Gunlög (2001) ‘The meaning of lexical classes’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 218-31.
69. Kibrik, Aleksandr (1979) ‘Canonical ergativity and Daghestan languages’, in F. Plank (ed.), Ergativity. London: Academic Press, pp. 61-77.
70. Kiparsky, Paul (1973) "‘Elsewhere” in phonology’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Academic Press, pp. 93-106.
71. Krifka, Manfred (1995) ‘Swahili’, in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow,W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, vol. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 1397-418.
72. Leskien, August (1955) Handbuch der altbulgarischen Sprache. 7 edn. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
73. Lumsden, John (1992) ‘Underspecification in grammatical and natural gender’. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 469-86.
74. Mackridge, Peter (1985) Modern Greek. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
75. Marantz, Alec (1995) ' “Cat” as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in Distributed Morphology’, Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
76. McCreight, Katherine (1988) Multiple case assignments. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
77. Müller, Gereon (2002) ‘Remarks on nominal inflection in German’, in I. Kaufmann and B. Stiebels (eds.), More than Words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 113-45.
78. Müller, Gereon (2004) ‘On decomposing inflection class features: Syncretism in Russian noun inflection’, in G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 189-227.
79. Müller, Gereon (2005) ‘Syncretism and iconicity in Icelandic noun declensions: A Distributed Morphology approach’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2004. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 229-71.
80. Müller, Gereon (2006a) ‘Notes on paradigm economy’, in G. Müller and J. Trommer (eds.), Subanalysis of Argument Encoding in DistributedMorphology, vol. 84 of Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, Universität Leipzig.
81. Müller, Gereon (2006b) ‘Pro-drop and impoverishment’, in P. Brandt and E. Fuß (eds.), Form, Structure, and Grammar. A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 93-115.
82. Neidle, Carol (1988) The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
83. Nesset, Tore (1994) ‘A feature-based approach to Russian noun inflection’. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 2: 214-37.
84. Noyer, Rolf (1992) Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
85. Noyer, Rolf (1998) ‘Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness’, in S. Lapointe, D. Brentari, and P. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Palo Alto, CA: CSLI, pp. 264-85.
86. Noyer, Rolf (2005) ‘A constraint on interclass syncretism’, in G. Booij and J. vanMarle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2004. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 273-315.
87. Oltra Massuet, Isabel (1999) On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. Master of science thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
88. Plank, Frans (1979) ‘Ikonisierung und De-Ikonisierung als Prinzipien des Sprachwandels’. Sprachwissenschaft 4, 121-58.
89. Plank, Frans (1991) ‘Rasmus Rask’s dilemma’, in F. Plank (ed.), Paradigms. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 161-96.
90. Ralli, Angela (1994) ‘Feature representations and feature-passing operations: The case of Greek nominal inflection’, in Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on English & Greek. University of Thessaloniki: School of English, Dept. of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, pp. 19-46.
91. Ralli, Angela (2002) ‘The role of morphology in gender determination: Evidence fromModern Greek’. Linguistics 40: 519-51.
92. Ritter, Elizabeth (1991) ‘Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 26. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 37-62.
93. Ritter, Elizabeth (1993) ‘Where’s gender?' Linguistic Inquiry 24: 795-803.
94. Ruge, Hans (1986) Grammatik des Neugriechischen. Köln: Romiosini.
95. Sauerland, Uli (1996) ‘The late insertion of Germanic inflection’, Generals paper, MIT.
96. Shapiro, Michael (1969) Aspects of Russian Morphology. Cambridge, MA: Slavica Publishers.
97. Shlonsky, Ur (2000) ‘The form of the Semitic noun phrase: An antisymmetric, non N-movement account’, Ms., University of Geneva.
98. Sichel, Ivy (2002) ‘Phrasal movement in Hebrew adjectives and possessives’, in Dimensions ofMovement: From Remnants to Features. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 297-339.
99. Siloni, Tal (1997) Noun Phrases and Nominalizations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
100. Stechow, Arnim von (2005) ‘LF in einem Phasenmodell’, Ms., Universität Tübingen.
101. Sternefeld, Wolfgang (2004) ‘Feature checking and case agreement in German DPs’, in G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 269-99.
102. Stump, Gregory (2001) Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
103. Trommer, Jochen (2005a) ‘A derivational approach to matching effects in free relative constructions’, Ms., Universität Leipzig.
104. Trommer, Jochen (2005b) ‘A feature-geometric approach to Amharic verb classes’, Ms., Universität Leipzig.
105. Trommer, Jochen (2006) ‘Head-level and chain-level constraints on spellout’, in J. Costa and M. C. F. Silva (eds.), Studies on Agreement. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
106. van Hout, Angelique, and Tom Roeper (1998) ‘Events and aspectual structure in Derivational Morphology’. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 175-220.
107. Wasow, Tom (1977) ‘Transformations and the lexicon’, in P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
108. Wiese, Bernd (1999) ‘Unterspezifizierte Paradigmen. Form und Funktion in der pronominalen Deklination’. Linguistik Online 4. (www.linguistik-online.de/3_99).
109. Wiese, Bernd (2000) ‘Warum Flexionsklassen? Über die deutsche Substantivdeklination’, in R. Thieroff, M. Tamrat, N. Fuhrhop, and O. Teuber (eds.), Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 139-53.
110. Wiese, Bernd (2001) ‘Zur lateinischen Deklination: Die Form-Funktions-Beziehung’, Ms., IDS Mannheim.
111. Wiese, Bernd (2004) ‘Categories and paradigms: On underspecification in Russian declension’, in G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 321-72.
112. Wiese, Richard (1996) The Phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
113. Williams, Edwin (1994) ‘Remarks on lexical knowledge’. Lingua 92: 7-34.
114. Williams, Edwin (1997) ‘Blocking and anaphora’. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 577-628.
115. Wunderlich, Dieter (1996) ‘Minimalist morphology: The role of paradigms’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 93-114.
116. Wunderlich, Dieter (1999) ‘German noun plural reconsidered’, Ms., Universität Düsseldorf.
117. Wunderlich, Dieter (2004) ‘Is there any need for the concept of directional syncretism?' in G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.), Explorations inNominal Inflection. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 373-95.
118. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich (1984) Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
119. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich (1998) ‘Drei Ebenen der Struktur von Flexionsparadigmen’, in R. Fabri, A. Ortmann, and T. Parodi (eds.), Models of Inflection. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
120. Zifonun, Gisela (2003) ‘Aspekte deutscher Reflexivkonstruktionen im europäischen Vergleich: Pronominale Paradigmen und NP-interne Reflexiva’, in G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.), Arbeiten zur Reflexivierung. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 267-300.
121. Zwicky, Arnold (1970) ‘Class complements in phonology’. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 262-64.
122. Zwicky, Arnold (1985) ‘How to describe inflection’, in M. Niepokuj, M. V. Clay, V. Nikiforidou, and D. Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th AnnualMeeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. BLS, Berkeley, University of California, pp. 372-86.
123. Zwicky, Arnold (1991) ‘Systematic versus accidental phonological identity’, in F. Plank (ed.), Paradigms. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 113-32.
124. Zwicky, Arnold (2000) ‘Describing syncretism: Rules of referral after 15 years’, Ms., Stanford University.