On decomposing inflection class features: Syncretism in Russian noun inflection

Explorations in Nominal Inflection

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 189-227

  Müller, Gereon ^a  

^a IDS Mannheim   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85119649218     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Aissen, Judith 2003 Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, 435-483.
2. Alexiadou, Artemis this volume Inflectional Class, Gender, and DP Internal Structure.
3. Alexiadou, Artemis & Gereon Müller 2004 Class Features as Probes. Ms., Universität Stuttgart and IDS Mannheim.
4. Anderson, Stephen 1992 A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Aronoff, Mark 1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
6. Aronoff, Mark 1994 Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
7. Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett 2002 Case Syncretism in and out of Indo-European. In Mary Andronis et al. (eds.), The Main Session. Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 15-28. Chicago.
8. Bailyn, John Frederick 2003 Genitive Case is (Always) Quantificational. Ms., SUNY at Stony Brook.
9. Bailyn, John Frederick & Andrew Nevins 2003 The Form of Russian Genitive Plurals. Ms., SUNY at Stony Brook and MIT.
10. Bernstein, Judy 1993 Topics in the Syntax of Nominal Structure across Romance. Doctoral dissertation, CUNY.
11. Bierwisch, Manfred 1967 Syntactic Features in Morphology: General Problems of So-Called Pronominal Inflection in German. In To Honour Roman Jakobson, 239-270. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
12. Blevins, James 1995 Syncretism and Paradigmatic Opposition, Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 113-152.
13. Bobaljik, Jonathan 2002 Syncretism without Paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 53-85. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Carstairs, Andrew 1987 Allomorphy in Inflection. London: Croom Helm.
15. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew 1998 Paradigm Structure: Inflectional Paradigms and Morphological Classes. In A. Spencer & A. Zwicky (eds.), Handbook of Morphology, 322-334. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
17. Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
18. Chomsky, Noam 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
19. Chomsky, Noam 2000 Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step, 89-155. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
20. Chomsky, Noam 2001 Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale. A Life in Language, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
21. Chomsky, Noam 2002 Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
22. Comrie, Bernard 1978 Morphological Classification of Cases in the Slavonic Languages, The Slavonic and East European Review 56, 177-191.
23. Corbett, Greville & Norman Fraser 1993 Network Morphology: A DATR Account of Russian Nominal Inflection, Journal of Linguistics 29, 113-142.
24. Crosswhite, Katherine 2000 Sonority-Driven Reduction. Ms. University of Rochester. To appear in Proceedings of BLS 26.
25. Cubberley, Paul 2002 Russian. A Linguistic Introduction, 313-331. (Chapter "Dialects".) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. DiSciullo, Anna-Maria & Edwin Williams 1987 On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
27. Eisenberg, Peter 2000 Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik. Band 1: Das Wort. Stuttgart: Metzler.
28. Embick, David 1998 Voice Systems and the Syntax/Morphology Interface. In H. Harley (ed.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect (MITWPL 32), 41-72 Cambridge, Mass.
29. Fanselow, Gisbert 1991 Minimale Syntax. Habilitation thesis, Universität Passau.
30. Franks, Steven 1995 Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Fraser, Norman & Greville Corbett 1994 Gender, Animacy, and Declensional Class Assignment: A Unified Account for Russian. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994, 123-150. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. Gunkel, Lutz 2003 Syncretism and Case Underspecification in Polish Noun Paradigms. In P. Banski & A. Przepiórkowski (eds.), Generative Linguistics in Poland: Morphosyntactic Investigations. (Proceedings of the GLiP-5 Conference held in Warsaw, Poland, 30 November - 1 December 2002), 47-62. Warsaw: Inst. Podstaw Informatyki PAN.
33. Gvozdanović, Jadranka 1991 Syncretism and Paradigmatic Patterning of Grammatical Meaning. In F. Plank (ed.), Paradigms, 133-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34. Halle, Morris 1994 The Russian Declension: An Illustration of the Theory of Distributed Morphology. In J. Cole & C. Kisseberth (eds.), Perspectives in Phonology, 29-60. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
35. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz 1993 Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, 111-176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
36. Hankamer, Jorge & Judith Aissen 1974 The Sonority Hierarchy. In A. Bruck, R. Fox & M. Labaly (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, 131-145. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
37. Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer 1999 Distributed Morphology, GLOT International 4/4, 3-9.
38. Isačenko, Alexander 1975 Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. München: Max Hueber Verlag.
39. Jakobson, Roman 1962a Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In Selected Writings. Vol. 2, 23-71. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
40. Jakobson, Roman 1962b Morfologičeskije Nabljudenija. In Selected Writings. Vol. 2, 154-181. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
41. Kenstowicz, Michael 1994 Sonority-Driven Stress. Ms. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
42. Kenstowicz, Michael & Jerzy Rubach 1987 The Phonology of Syllabic Nuclei in Slovak, Language 63, 463-497.
43. Kiparsky, Paul 1973 "Elsewhere" in Phonology. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 93-106. New York: Academic Press.
44. Kiparsky, Paul 1982 From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations. Vol. 1, 131-175. Dordrecht: Foris.
45. Leskien, August 1955 Handbuch der altbulgarischen Sprache. (7th edn.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
46. Lieber, Rochelle 1992 Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Lumsden, John 1992 Underspecification in Grammatical and Natural Gender, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 469-486.
48. Matthews, Peter 1974 Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. McCreight, Katherine & Catherine Chvany 1991 Geometric Representation of Paradigms in a Modular Theory of Grammar. In F. Plank (ed.), Paradigms, 91-111. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
50. Müller, Gereon 1997 Beschränkungen für Binomialbildung im Deutschen, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 16, 5-51.
51. Müller, Gereon 2000 Elemente der optimalitätstheoretischen Syntax. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
52. Müller, Gereon 2002 Remarks on Nominal Inflection in German. In Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds.), More than Words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, 113-145. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
53. Müller, Gereon 2003 Zwei Theorien der pronominalen Flexion im Deutschen (Versionen Standard und Mannheim). Deutsche Sprache 30, 328-363.
54. Müller, Gereon 2004a Syncretism and Iconicity in Icelandic Noun Declensions: A Distributed Morphology Approach. Ms., IDS Mannheim. To appear in Yearbook of Morphology 2004.
55. Müller, Gereon 2004b A Distributed Morphology Approach to Syncretism in Russian Noun Inflection. In Olga Arnaudova, Wayles Browne, Maria Luisa Rivero, & Danijela Stojanovic (eds.), Proceedings of FASL 12, 353-373. Michigan Slavic Publications.
56. Neidle, Carol 1988 The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
57. Nesset, Tore 1994 A Feature-Based Approach to Russian Noun Inflection. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 2, 214-237.
58. Noyer, Rolf 1997 Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York: Garland Publishing.
59. Oltra Massuet, Isabel 1999 On the Notion of Theme Vowel: A New Approach to Catalan Verbal Morphology. Master of science thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
60. Plank, Frans 1979 Ikonisierung und De-Ikonisierung als Prinzipien des Sprachwandels, Sprachwissenschaft 4, 121-158.
61. Plank, Frans 2002 The Basic Questions of Inflection Classes, With Hints Towards Answers to Some. Ms., Universität Konstanz.
62. Prince, Alan 1996 Elsewhere and Otherwise, GLOT International 1, 23-24.
63. Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky 1993 Optimality Theory. Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Book ms., Rutgers University.
64. Ross, John 1980 Ikonismus in der Phraseologie, Zeitschrift für Semiotik 2, 39-56.
65. Shapiro, Michael 1969 Aspects of Russian Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: Slavica Publishers.
66. Steins, Carsten 1998 Against Arbitrary Features in Inflection: Old English Declension Classes. In W. Kehrein & R. Wiese (eds.), Phonology and Morphology of the Germanic Languages, 241-265. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
67. Stump, Gregory 2001 Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Trommer, Jochen 2001 Distributed Optimality. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Potsdam.
69. Wiese, Bernd 1996 Iconicity and Syncretism. On Pronominal Inflection in Modern German. In R. Sackmann (ed.), Theoretical Linguistics and Grammatical Description, 323-344. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
70. Wiese, Bernd 1999 Unterspezifizierte Paradigmen. Form und Funktion in der pronominalen Deklination, Linguistik Online 4.
71. Wiese, Bernd 2001 Zur lateinischen Deklination: Die Form-Funktions-Beziehung. Ms., IDS Mannheim.
72. Williams, Edwin 1994 Remarks on Lexical Knowledge, Lingua 92, 7-34.
73. Williams, Edwin 1997 Blocking and Anaphora, Linguistic Inquiry 28, 577-628.
74. Wunderlich, Dieter 1996 Minimalist Morphology: The Role of Paradigms. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995, 93-114. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
75. Wunderlich, Dieter 1997 Der unterspezifizierte Artikel. In C. Dürscheid, K. H. Ramers & M. Schwarz (eds.), Sprache im Fokus, 47-55. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
76. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich 1984 Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
77. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich 1998 Drei Ebenen der Struktur von Flexionsparadigmen. In R. Fabri, A. Ortmann & T. Parodi (eds.), Models of Inflection. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
78. Zifonun, Gisela 2001 Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich: Das Pronomen, Teil 1: Überblick und Personalpronomen. Amades working paper 4/01, IDS Mannheim.
79. Zifonun, Gisela 2003 Aspekte deutscher Reflexivkonstruktionen im europäischen Vergleich: Pronominale Paradigmen und NP-interne Reflexiva. In L. Gunkel, G. Müller & G. Zifonun (eds.), Arbeiten zur Reflexivierung, 267-300. Tübingen: Narr.
80. Zifonun, Gisela, Ludger Hoffmann, Bruno Strecker et al. 1997 Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter.
81. Zwicky, Arnold 1970 Class Complements in Phonology, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 262-264.
82. Zwicky, Arnold 1985 How to Describe Inflection. In M. Niepokuj, M. V. Clay, V. Nikiforidou & D. Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 372-386. BLS, Berkeley, University of California.
83. Zwicky, Arnold 1991 Systematic versus Accidental Phonological Identity. In F. Plank (ed.), Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection, 113-132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.