English for Occupational Purposes: One Language?

English for Occupational Purposes: One Language?

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-227

  Kim, Dan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187383174     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (109)

1. Abbot, G. (1981). Encouraging communication in English: A paradox. ELTJournal, 35(3), 228-230.
2. Allen, J. P. B., & Widdowson, H. (1978). 1974 and later years. English in Focus Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bachman, L. (1981). Formative evaluation in ESP program development. In R. Mackay &J. D. Palmer (Eds.), Language for Specific Purposes: Program Design and Evaluation (pp. 106-119). Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Eriglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Bandura, A. (2000). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of Principles of Organization Behavior. Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Barber, C. (1962) Some measurable characteristics of modern English prose. In Contributions to English Syntax and Phonology. Reprinted in J. M. Swales (ed.). (1985). Episodes in ESP (pp. 1-21). Oxford:Pergamon.
7. Blue, G. (1988). Individualising academic writing tuition. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Academic Writing: Process and Product (ELT Document, 131). London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.
8. Brauchle, P. E., & Wright, D. W. (1993). Training work teams. Training & Development, 47, 65-68.
9. Brindley, G. P. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Brinton, D. M., Snow, A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based Second Language Instruction. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
11. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Harlow, England New York:Longman.
12. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Harlow, England New York: Longman.
13. Campbell, C. P. (1984). Procedures for developing and validating vocational training programs. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 21(4), 31-42.
14. Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language Learning Tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Candlin, C. (1993, April). ESP in the Workplace and the Community:Discourse, Social Change and the Impact on the ESP Teacher. Paper presented at the annual RELC Seminar, Singapore.
16. Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advancess in Mixed-method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms. New Directions for Evaluation no. 74 (pp. 19-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
18. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.
20. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1998). Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Dominguez, G. A., & Rokowski, P. E. (2002). Bridging the gap between English for academic and occupational purposes. ESP World, 2(1).
22. Dudley-Evans, T. (1997, November). An Overview of ESP in the 1990s.Paper presented at the Japan Conference on English for Specific Purposes, Japan.
23. Dudley-Evans, T., & Stjohn, M. J. (1999). Developments in English far Specific Purposes: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Dumaine, B. (1990, May 7). Who needs a boss? Fortune, 52, 52-60.
25. Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. (1990). Research on the learning style characteristics of selected racial and ethnic groups. Reading, Writing and Learning Disabilities, 6, 261-280.
26. Edwards, N. (2000). Language for business: Effective needs assessment, syllabus design and materials preparation in a practical ESP case study. English far Specific Purposes, 19, 291-296.
27. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
28. English Village. (2006). Retrieved December 2, 2007, from http://english-village.gg.go.kr/eng/about/overview.jsp
29. Ewer, J., & Hughes-Davies, E. (1971). Further notes on developing an English programme for students of science and technology. In J. Swales (Ed.), Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon.
30. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (pp. 47-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-323.
32. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational Research: An Introduction (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
33. GilleyJ. W., Eggland, S. A., & Gilley, A. M. (2002). Principles of Human Resource Development (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
34. Gordon, J. (1999). Shooting for par. American Language Review, 3(6), 14-18.
35. Gordon, J. (2001, March). Measuring the Impacts of an ESP Program.Paper presented at the annual Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Convention, St. Louis, MI.
36. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed-methods practice. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed-methods in Social and Behavioral Research (pp. 91-110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
38. Hanson-Smith, E. (1997). Technology in the Classroom: Practice and Promise in the 21st Century. TESOL Publications Inc. Retrieved February 20, 2003, from http://www.tesol.edu/pubs/profpapers/techclass.html
39. Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Holden, B. (1993). Analysing corporate training needs: A three way approach. Language and Intercultural Training, 14, 4-6.
41. Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. P. (1995). Teaching with technology. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Teaching: Theory into Practice (pp. 154-170). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
42. House, E. R. (1990). Trends in evaluation. Educational Researcher, 79(3), 24-28.
43. Howatt, A. P. R. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
44. Hutchinson, T, & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Imel, S. (1998). Workforce Education or Literacy Development: Which Road Should Adult Education Take? Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, The Ohio State University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 418248).
46. Jacobs, G. M. (1994). The changing nature of workplace literacy as a rationale for the use of groups in ESP. ESP Malaysia, 2, 106-117.
47. Johns, A. M., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). English for specific purposes:International in scope, specific in purpose. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 297-314.
48. Johnson, S. D. (1997). Learning technological concepts and developing intellectual skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 161-180.
49. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Rasper, L. E (2000). Content-based CollegeESL Instruction. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Kennedy, C. (1988). Evaluation of the management of change in ELT projects. Applied Linguistics, 9(4), 329-342.
52. Kerka, S. (1989). Women, Work and Literacy. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearing House on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, The Ohio State University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED312456).
53. Kidd, J. R. (1978). How Adults Learn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
54. Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods:When stories converge. In M. M. Mark & R. L. Shetland (Eds.), Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation: New Directions for Program Evaluation 35 (pp. 57-75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Knowles, M. S. (1990). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, TX: Gulf.
56. Kolb, D. (1999). Learning Style Inventory, Version 3. Boston, MA:Hay/McBer Training Resource Group.
57. Kuchinke, K. P. (2003). Contingent HRD: Towards a theory of variation and differentiation in formal human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 2(3), 294-309.
58. Lambright, W. H., & Flynn, P. (1980). The role of local bureaucracy centered coalition in technology transfer to the city. In J. A. Agnew (Ed.), Innovation Research and Public Policy (pp. 243-282). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press (Syracuse Geographical Series, No. 5).
59. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
60. Li, S., Marquart, J. M., & Zercher, C. (2000). Conceptual issues and analytic strategies in mixed-method studies of preschool inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(2), 116-132.
61. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62. Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319-326.
63. Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 2(5(1), 27-56.
64. Markee, N. (1997). Managing Curricular Innovation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
65. Mawer, G. (1991). Language Audits and Industry Restructuring. Sydney:National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
66. McDonough, J. (1984). ESP in Perspective: A Practical Guide. London:Collins.
67. McLagan, P. A. (1989;. Models for HRD Practice. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
68. Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69. Merrifield, J. (1999). Performance accountability: For what? To whom? And how? In Focus on Basics. Washington, DC: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
70. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Mohan, B. (1986). Language and Content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
72. Munby, J. (1978). Communicative Syllabus Design: A Sociolinguistic Model for Defining the Content of Purpose-Specific Language Programmes.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Nadler, L., & Nadler, Z. (1989). Developing Human Resources: Concepts and a Model (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74. National Institute for Literacy, (n.d.). Literacy: It’s a whole new world. Fact Sheet: Workplace Literacy. Washington, DC. Retrieved November 20, 2003, from http://wplrc.losrios.edu/employers/wp-litfax.html
75. Nunan, D. H. (1993). Task-based syllabus design: Selecting, grading and sequencing tasks. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a Pedagogical Context: Integrating Theory and Practice (pp. 55-68). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
76. Nunan, D. H. (1988). Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Oliva, P. F. (1997). Developing the Curriculum (4th ed.). New York:Longman.
78. Oxford, R., Ehrman, M., & Lavine, R. (1991). Style wars: Teacherstudent style conflicts in the language classroom. In S. Magnan (Ed.), Challenges in the 1990s for College Foreign Language Programs.Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
79. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
80. Pilbeam, A. (1979). The language audit. Language Training, 1, 2.
81. Reeves, N., & Wright, C. (1996). Linguistic Auditing: A Guide to Identifying Foreign Language Needs in Corporations (Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters).
82. Reichardt, C. S., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In T. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research (pp. 7-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
83. Richards, K. (1989). Pride and prejudice: The relationship between ESP and training. English for Specific Purposes, 8, 207-222.
84. Richards, T, Platt, T, & Weber, H. (1985). A Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.
85. Robinson, P. (1991). Academic Writing: Process and Product (ELT Documents 129). London: Modern English Publications in association with The British Council.
86. Rosa, E., & Leow, R. (2004). Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. The Modern Language Journal, 55(2), 192-216.
87. Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627-643.
88. Rubdy, R. (2000). Dilemmas in ELT: Seeds of discontent or sources of transformation? System, 28, 403-418.
89. Russ-Eft, D., & Preskill, H. (2001). Evaluation in Organizations: A Systematic Approach to Enhancing Learning, Performance, and Change. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
90. Schleppegrell, M., & Royster, L. (1990). Business English: An international survey. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 3
91. Shappard, K., & Stoller, F. (1995). Guidelines for the integration of student projects into ESP classrooms. Forum, 33(2), 10-15.
92. Sifakis, N. C. (2003), Applying the adult education framework to ESP curriculum development: An integrative model. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 195-211.
93. Skehan, P. (2002). A non-marginal role for tasks. ELT Journal, 56(3), 289-295.
94. Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(1), 6-13.
95. Smith, J. K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation:The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-12.
96. Stjohn, M. J. (1996). Business is booming: Business English in the 1990s. English for Specific Purposes,75(1), 3-18.
97. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
98. Stapp, Y. F. (1998). Instructor-employer collaboration: A model for technical workplace English. English for Specific Purposes, 17(2), 169-182.
99. Swales, J. M. (1988). Episodes inESP. Kernel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International.
100. Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2001). Foundations of Human Resource Development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
101. Swanson, R. A., & Law, B. D. (1993). Whole-part-whole learning model. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(1), 43-53.
102. Trimble, L. (1985). English for Science and Technology: A Discourse Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
103. U.S. Department of Labor (1996, April). Illiteracy at work. American Demographics. Available at http://novel.nifl.gov/
104. Wallace, B., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). Disparity in learning styles and teaching styles in the ESL classroom: Does this mean war? AMTESOL Journal, 1, 45-68.
105. Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Wilson, J. M. (1991). Empowered Teams:Creating Self-directed Work Groups That Improve Quality, Productivity, and Participation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
106. Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
107. Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in Applied Linguistics. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
108. Workforce Investment Act of 1998. Available at http://usworkforce.org/
109. Yogman, J., & Kaylani, C. T (1996). ESP program design for mixed level students. English for Specific Purposes, 75(4), 311-324.