Change as additive: Harnessing students’ multimodal semiotic resources in an Engineering curriculum

Academic Literacy and the Languages of Change

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 130-150

  Archer, Arlene ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85186290188     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Archer, A. (2004), ‘Access to academic practices in an engineering curriculum: drawing on students’ representational resources through a multimodal pedagogy’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cape Town.
2. Archer, A. (2006, forthcoming), ‘Opening up spaces through Symbolic Objects: harnessing students’ resources in developing academic literacy practices in Engineering’, English Studies in Africa.
3. Bernstein, B. (1981), ‘Codes, modalities and the process of cultural reproduction: a model’, Language and Society, 10: 327-63.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1991), Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Douglas, M. (1966), Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6. Foucault, M. (1970), ‘The order of discourse’, in R. Young (ed.) (1981), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. Boston/London/Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 48-79.
7. Gee, J. P. (1996), Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (2nd edn). London: Palmer Press.
8. Gough, D. (2000), ‘Discourse and students’ experience of higher education’, in B. Leibowitz and Y. Mohamed (eds), Routes to Writing in Southern Africa. Cape Town: Silk Road International Publishers, pp. 43-58.
9. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978), Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
10. Janks, H. (2000), ‘Domination, access, diversity and design: a synthesis for Critical Literacy education’, Educational Review, 52, (2), 175-86.
11. Klopper, S. (2000), ‘Hip-hop graffiti art’, in S. Nuttall and C. Michael (eds), Senses of Culture. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, pp. 178-96.
12. Kress, G. (1996), ‘Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: questions for the theoretical development of critical discourse in a multicultural society’, in C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 15-32.
13. Kress, G. (2000), ‘Multimodality’, in B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (eds), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 182-202.
14. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996), Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
15. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001), Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.
16. Lemke, J. L. (1990), Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, Language and Educational Processes.
17. McCloud, S. (1994), Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Perennial.
18. New London Group (1996), ‘A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures’, Harvard Educational Review, 66, (1), 60-92.
19. Stewart, S. (1993), On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Durham and London: Duke University Press.