Rethinking Our War on Drugs: Candid Talk about Controversial Issues

Rethinking Our War on Drugs: Candid Talk about Controversial Issues

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-209

  Fisher, Gary L ^a   White, William L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85183274510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (196)

1. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The price and purity of illicit drugs: 1981 through the second quarter of 2003. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/price purity/.
2. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy. Chapter III. Disrupting the market: Attacking the economic basis of the drug trade. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs05/.39.
3. L. D. Johnston, P. M. O’Malley, J. G. Bachman, and J. E. Schulenberg, 2006. Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2005. NIH Publication No. 06-5882. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
4. Public Broadcasting System, 2000. Thirty years of America’s drug war: A chronology. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/cron/.
5. A. Allen. 2000. Portrait of a drug czar. Salon.com. http://dir.salon.com/health/feature/2000/08/30/czar/index.html.
6. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2006. National Drug Control Strategy FY 2007 Budget Summary: February 2006. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/07budget/.
7. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The economic costs of drug abuse in the United States 1992–2002. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/economic costs/.
8. H. Harwood, 2000. Updating estimates of the economic costs of alcohol abuse in the United States: Estimates, update, methods, and data. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/economic- 2000/alcoholcost.PDF.
9. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The economic costs of drug abuse in the United States 1992–2002. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/economic costs/.
10. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1996. State trends in alcohol problems: 1979–92. http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/alcdth96.pdf.
11. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1996. The national drug control strategy: 1996. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/strat96.pdf.
12. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: February 2005. Appendix A: National drug control budget summary. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs05/.
13. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1996. The national drug control strategy: 1996. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/strat96.pdf.
14. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1997. The national drug control strategy: 1997. http://www.ncjrs.org/htm/toc.htm.
15. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1998. The national drug control strategy: 1998. http://www.ncjrs.org/ondcppubs/publications/pdf/budget98.pdf.
16. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1999. The national drug control strategy: 1999. http://www.ncjrs.org/ondcppubs/publications/policy/99ndcs/99ndcs.pdf.
17. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2000. The national drug control strategy: 2000. http://www.ncjrs.org/ondcppubs/publications/policy/ndcs00/strategy2000.pdf.
18. John Mintz, 2005. Probe faults system for monitoring U.S. borders. The Washington Post, April 11. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/10/AR2005041001382.html (accessed August 18, 2005).
19. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2002. The President’s national drug control strategy: February 2002. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs02/.
20. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2003. The President’s national drug control strategy: February 2003. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs03/index.html.
21. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The President’s national drug control strategy: March 2004. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs04/index.html.
22. Office of National Drug Control Policy. 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: February 2005. Appendix A: National drug control budget summary. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs05/.
23. Office of National Drug Control Policy. 1999. The national drug control strategy: 1999. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/strat99.pdf.
24. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2003.National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Chapter 8: Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment. http://oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k2nsduh/2k2SoFw.pdf.
25. Center for Disease Control, 2005. Youth risk behavior surveillance survey. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/yrbs/aboutyrbss.htm.
26. Center for Disease Control, 2006. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2005. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, June 9. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/SS/SS5505.pdf.
27. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005. Results from the 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings. Chapter 5: Initiation of substance use. http://oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k4nsduh/2k4Results/2k4Results.htm#ch5.
28. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1999. The national drug control strategy: 1999. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/strat99.pd.45.
29. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, 2004. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment tables—Tables H.57 to H.70. http://oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/2k1NHSDA/vol2/appendixh 5.htm#tableh.58.
30. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005. National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health, Appendix H: Selected prevalence tables—Table H.38. http://oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k4nsduh/2k4Results/appH.htm#tabh.38.
31. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1999. The national drug control strategy: 1999. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/strat99.pdf.
32. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The President’s national drug control strategy: Data supplement. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs04/datasuppl.htm.35.
33. United States Department of Justice, National Drug Intelligence Center, 2005. National threat assessments: National drug threat assessment. http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/topics/ndtas.htm (accessed August 10, 2005).
34. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The President’s national drug control strategy: Data supplement. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs04/data suppl.htm.47.
35. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The economic costs of drug abuse in the United States 1992–2002. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/economic costs/.
36. National Institute of Justice, Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program, No date. 1997 annual report on adult and juvenile arrestees. http://www.ncjrs.org/nij/textrev.pdf 4.
37. National Institute of Justice, Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program, No date. Drug and alcohol use and related matters among arrestees 2003. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/adam/ADAM2003.pdf.
38. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The President’s national drug control strategy: Data supplement. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs04/data su ppl.htm. 41.
39. Center for Disease Control, 2006. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2005. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, June 9. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/SS/SS5505.pdf.
40. G. L. Fisher and T. C. Harrison, 2005. Substance abuse: Information for school counselors, social workers, therapists, and counselors. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.
41. U.S.Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2005. The condition of education 2005. NCES 2005-094. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42. Parents’ Resource Institute for Drug Education, 2005. PRIDE questionnaire report for grades 6 thru 12, 2003–2004 PRIDE national summary/Grades 6 thru 12. http://www.pridesurveys.com/(accessed August 11, 2005).
43. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The economic costs of drug abuse in the United States 1992–2002. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/economic costs/.
44. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. The President’s national drug control strategy: Data supplement, p. 47. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs04/data suppl.htm.
45. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2003. Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). http://dawninfo.samhsa.gov/olddawn/pubs9402/edpubs/2002final/default.asp#publishedtables.
46. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1999. The national drug control strategy: 1999. http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/strat99.pd.52–53.
47. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2002. The President’s national drug control strategy: February 2002. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs02/.11.
48. Harm Reduction Coalition. About HRC. http://www.harmreduction.org/.
49. Committee on Government Reform: Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, 2005. Letter to Honorable Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services. http://reform.house.gov/CJDPHR/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=32260 (accessed August 25, 2005).
50. Drug Policy Alliance, 2006. About the Alliance. http://www.drugpolicy.org/about/(accessed March 20, 2006).
51. G. R. Hanson, P. J. Venturelli, and A. E. Fleckenstein, 2002. Drugs and society. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett
52. Musto, D. F. 1999. The American disease: Origins of narcotic control. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press
53. B. Bullington, L. Bollinger, and T. Shelley, 2004. Trends in European drug policies: A new beginning or more of the same? Journal of Drug Issues 34(3): 481–490.
54. B. Bullington, 2004. Drug policy reform and its detractors: The United States as the elephant in the closet. Journal of Drug Issues 34(3): 696.
55. H. Schmidt-Semisch and P. Bettina, 2002. An alternative to contemporary forms of drugs control. Journal of Drug Issues 32(2): 709–720.
56. J. Uitermark, 2004. The origins and future of the Dutch approach towards drugs. Journal of Drug Issues 34(3): 511–532.
57. L. Bollinger, 2004. Drug law and policy in Germany and the European community: Recent developments. Journal of Drug Issues 34(3): 491–510.
58. N. Dorn, 2004. UK policing of drug traffickers and users: Policy implementation in the contexts of national law, European traditions, international drug conventions, and security after 2001. Journal of Drug Issues 34(3): 533–550.
59. J. McGeorge and C. K. Aitken, 1997. Effects of cannabis decriminalization in the Australian Capital Territory on university students’ patterns of use. Journal of Drug Issues 27(4): 785–793.
60. W. Hall and R. Liccardo Pacula, 2003. Cannabis use and dependence: Public health and public policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. The European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs, 2004. The European school survey project on alcohol and other drugs. http://www.espad.org/summary.html (accessed August 30, 2005).
62. B. Bullington, 2004. Drug policy reform and its detractors: The United States as the elephant in the closet. Journal of Drug Issues 34(3): 703.
63. B. Bullington, L. Bollinger, and T. Shelley, 2004. Trends in European drug policies: A new beginning or more of the same? Journal of Drug Issues 34(3): 482.
64. G. R. Hanson, P. J. Venturelli, and A. E. Fleckenstein, 2002. Drugs and society (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett
65. National Association of Drug Court Professionals. What is a drug court? http://www.nadcp.org/whatis/(accessed August 30, 2005).
66. Office National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs05/.
67. Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, AIDS Prevention Institute, University of California, San Francisco, 1998. Does HIV needle exchange work? http://www.caps.ucsf.edu/NEPrev.html (accessed August 30, 2005).
68. B. Bullington. 2004. Drug policy reform and its detractors: The United States as the elephant in the closet. Journal of Drug Issues 34(3): 696.
69. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2004. European report on drug consumption rooms. http://www.emcdda.eu.int/index.cfm?fuseaction=public.Content&nNodeID=1327&sLanguageISO=EN.
70. A. Schroers, 2002. Drug checking: Monitoring the contents of new synthetic drugs. Journal of Drug Issues 32(3): 635–646.
71. J. A. Hogan, K. Reed-Gabrielsen, N. Luna, and D. Grothaus, 2003. Substance abuse prevention: The intersection of science and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
72. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration, 2005. National Survey on Drug Use and Health. http://oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k4nsduh/2k4Results/2k4Results.htm#lot.
73. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. White House Office of National Drug Control Policy National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, Marijuana Initiative. http://www.mediacampaign.org/marijuana/marijuana.html.
74. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2003. The President’s national drug control strategy: February 2003. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs03/stop use.html.
75. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. White House Drug Czar, research and mental health communities warn parents that marijuana use can lead to depression, suicidal thoughts and schizophrenia. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/news/press05/050305.html (accessed September 1, 2005).
76. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. Myths & facts: The truth behind 10 popular misperceptions. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/marijuana myths facts/index.html. 3.
77. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2003. White House Drug Czar, Chair of Congressional Black Caucus Rep. ElijahCummings andMaryland community leaders discuss harms of “medical marijuana” and warn of danger of marijuana legalization. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/news/press03/032403.html (accessed September 1, 2005).
78. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. Statement by the White House Drug Czar about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision regarding so-called medical marijuana. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/news/press05/060505.html (accessed September 1, 2005).
79. L. Zimmer and J. Morgan, 1997. Marijuana myths, marijuana facts. New York: The Lindesmith Center.
80. J. E. Joy, S. J. Watson, Jr., and J. A. Benson, Jr. (eds.), 1999. Marijuana and medicine: Assessing the science base. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
81. W. Hall and R. Liccardo Pacula, 2003. Cannabis use and dependence: Public health and public policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. P. Peretti-Watel, 2005. Cannabis use and dependence: Public health and public policy. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2995(59): 435.
83. J. E. Joy, S. J. Watson, Jr., and J. A. Benson, Jr. (eds.), 1999. Marijuana and medicine: Assessing the science base. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 7–8.
84. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2004. Myths & facts: The truth behind 10 popular misperceptions. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/marijuanamyths facts/myth1.pdf. 11.
85. Marijuana Policy Project, 2006. Another medical marijuana state. http://www.mpp.org/RInumber11.html (accessed March 20, 2006).
86. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The link between marijuana and mental illness: A survey of recent research. http://www.mediacampaign.org/pdf/marijmhealth.pdf.
87. University of Maryland, College Park, 2005. Increase in national marijuana admissions driven by increase in criminal justice referrals. Cesar Fax 14(32).
88. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2004. Drug abuse warning network, 2003: Interim national estimates of drug-related emergency department visits. http://dawninfo.samhsa.gov/files/DAWNEDInterim2003.pdf (accessed September 8, 2005).
89. W. J. Hamilton, 2003. Brewing controversy: The story behind the study on underage drinking. MADD Online. http://www.madd.org/news/0,1056,7559 print,00.html.
90. L. D. Johnston, P. M. O’Malley, J. G. Bachman, and J. E. Schulenberg, 2006. Monitoring the future: Table 4, Trends in 30-day prevalence of daily use of various drugs for eighth, tenth, and twelfth graders. http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/data/05data/pr05t4.pdf.
91. National Academy of Sciences, 2004. Reducing underage drinking: A collective responsibility. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
92. G. A. Hacker and K. Miller, 2002. NAS Testimony on Underage Drinking. Alcohol Policies Project, Center for Science in the Public Interest. http://www.cspinent.org/booze/NASTestimonyPrint.htm.
93. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2003. National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health. Chapter 2: Illicit drug use. http://oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k2nsduh/Results/2k2Results.htm# chap2.
94. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, 1994. Cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana: Gateways to illicit drug use. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
95. National Academy of Sciences, 2004. Reducing underage drinking: A collective responsibility. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
96. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: FY 2006 budget summary. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/.
97. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: FY 2006 budget summary. http://www.whitehousdrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/dhhs.pdf.
98. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2005. Statement by Ting-Kai Li, M.D., Director, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Fiscal Year 2006 President’s budget request for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/AboutNIAAA/AdvisoryCouncil/DirectorsReports/Statement305.htm.
99. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, 2003. The economic value of underage drinking and adult excessive drinking to the alcohol industry. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
100. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005. National household survey on drug use and health. Table H20. http://oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k4nsduh/2k4Results/appH.htm#tabh.20.
101. Alcohol Policies Project, Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2001. National poll shows “alcopop” drinks lure teens: Groups demand government investigate starter suds. http://www.cspinet.org/booze/alcopops press.htm.
102. Alcohol Policies Project, Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2003. Alcoholic-beverage advertising expenditures. Fact sheet. http://www.cspinet.org/booze/FactSheets/AlcAdExp.pdf.
103. The Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth, 2005. Alcohol advertising and youth. http://camy.org/factsheets/index.php?FactsheetID=1.
104. The Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth, 2005. Alcohol product commercials overwhelm “responsibility” messages from 2001 to 2003. http://camy.org/press/release.php?ReleaseID=29.
105. W. J. Hamilton, 2003. Brewing controversy: The story behind the study on underage drinking. MADD Online. http://www.madd.org/news/0,1056,7559print,00.html.
106. Center for Responsive Politics, 2005. Political action committees. http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/index.asp?party=R&cycle=2006 (accessed October 7, 2005).
107. P. Kuntz, 1995. Alcoholic beverage industry lobbies for bill to gut substance abuse agency seen as threat. Wall Street Journal. Monday, August 14.
108. National Academy of Sciences, 2003. Reducing underage drinking: A collective responsibility. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
109. J. Gogek, 2003. The booze lobby: No friend of America’s youth. Washington Post Weekly Edition. July 21.
110. National Academy of Sciences, 2003. Reducing underage drinking: A collective responsibility. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
111. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2002. The President’s national drug control strategy: February 2002. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs02/.9.
112. J. A. Hogan, K. Reed-Gabrielsen, N. Luna, and D. Grothaus, 2003. Substance abuse prevention: The intersection of science and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
113. J. D. Hawkins, R. F. Catalano, and J. Y. Miller, 1992. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin 112: 64–105.
114. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2004. SAMHSA unveils strategic prevention framework, $45 million available in state grants. http://alt.samhsa.gov/news/newsreleases/040429nr spf.htm.
115. Western Region Center for the Application of Prevention Technologies, No date. Developing healthy communities: A risk and protective factor approach to preventing alcohol and other drug abuse. http://captus.samhsa.gov/western/resources/prevmat/DHC-eng.pdf.
116. P. Brounstein, J. Zweig, and S. Gardner, 1998. Science-based practices in substance abuse: A guide. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
117. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2005. SAMHSA’s national registry of evidence-based programs and practices (NREPP). http://modelprograms.samhsa.gov/template.cfm?page=nreppover (accessed September 19, 2005).
118. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/dhhs.pdf.
119. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/justice.pdf.
120. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/education.pdf.
121. R. Yamaguchi, L. D. Johnston, P. M. O’Malley, 2003. The relationship between student illicit drug use and school drug-testing policies. Journal of School Health 73: 159.
122. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/dhhs.pdf.
123. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/dhhs.pdf.CSAP-7.
124. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/ondcp.pdf.
125. Office of Management and Budget, 2005. Performance assessment rating tool. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2006/pma/agencies.pdf.
126. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/ondc p.pdf 93.
127. Substance Abuse andMental Health Services Administration, 2005. SAMHSA model programs: SAMHSA national registry of evidence-based programs and practices (NREPP). http://modelprograms.samhsa.gov/template.cfm?page=nreppover.
128. Alcohol Policies Project, 2003. Fact sheet: Alcoholic-beverage advertising expenditures. http://www.cspinet.org/booze/FactSheets/AlcAdExp.pdf.
129. L. D. Johnston, P. M. O’Malley, J. G. Bachman, and J. E. Schulenberg, 2005. Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2004. NIH Publication No. 05–5726. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
130. Greater Dallas Council on Alcohol & Drug Abuse, 2005. Youth trade drugs at “pharming” parties. http://www.gdcada.org/stories/pharming.htm (accessed March 20, 2006).
131. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. Press release: Youth drug use continues to decline. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/NEWS/press05/090805.html.
132. University of Michigan, 2005. Press release: Teen drug use down but progress halts among youngest teens. http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pressreleases/05drugpr.pdf.
133. S. Suo, 2004. Lobbyists and loopholes. The Oregonian. http://www.oregonlive.com/special/oregonian/meth/stories/index.ssf?/oregonian/meth/1004 lobbyistsandloopholes.html.
134. S. M. Friedman, 2005. Inflation calculator. http://www.westegg.com/inflation/.
135. V. Colman and B. Suiter, 2002. Tobacco prevention and control inWashington State: A comprehensive report. Northwest Public Health. Fall/Winter: 6–9.
136. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, No date. Synar amendment: Protecting the nation’s youth from nicotine addiction. http://prevention.samhsa.gov/tobacco/.
137. J. J. Wilson, 1999. Summary of the Attorneys General Master Tobacco Settlement Agreement, National Conference of State Legislators. http://academic.udayton.edu/health/syllabi/tobacco/summary.htm.
138. American Legacy Foundation, 2004. Building a world where young people reject tobacco and anyone can stop smoking. http://www.americanlegacy.org/americanlegacy/skins/alf/display.aspx?Action=displaypage&mode=User&ModuleID =8cde2e88–3052–448c-893d-d0b4b14b31c4&ObjectID=e203e4bd-d5ac-4d5b-90ce-cfbfaf0e3db8.
139. M. C. Farrelly, K. C. Davis, M. L. Haviland, P. Messeri, and C. G. Healton, 2005. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. American Journal of Public Health 95(3): 425–431.
140. Centers for Disease Control, 1998. Guidelines for school health programs to prevent tobacco use and addiction. http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/prevguid/m0026213/m0026213.asp.
141. D. M. Gorman, 1998. The irrelevance of evidence in the development of school-based drug prevention policy, 1986–1996. Evaluation Review 22(1): 118–146.
142. G. J. Botvin, E. Dusenbury, S. Baker, E. James-Ortiz, E. Botvin, and J. Kemer, 1992. Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: Assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables. Health Psychology 11: 290–299.
143. P. Brounstein, J. Zweig, and S. Gardner, 1998. Science-based practices in substance abuse: A guide. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention.
144. M. Klitzner, 1998. Integrating environmental change theory into prevention practice. Vienna, VA: Klitzner and Associates.
145. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budg et/dhhs.pdf.
146. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budg et/justice.pdf.
147. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy, FY 2006 budget summary, February 2005. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/veterans affairs.pdf.
148. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2006. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) Highlights— 2004: National admissions to substance abuse treatment services. http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/teds04/tedshigh2k4.pdf.
149. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1999. Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide, p. 3. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Health.
150. D. Gerstein, R. Datta, J. Ingels, R. Fredson, K. Rasinski, S. Schildhaus, K. Talley, et al., 1997. National treatment improvement evaluation study: Final report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
151. Z. Zhang, P. D. Friedmann, and D. R. Gerstein, 2003. Does retention matter: Treatment duration and improvement in drug use. Addiction 98(5): 673–684.
152. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2005. NIDA notes: Economists offer program for costing out drug abuse treatment. http://www.nida.nih.gov/NIDAnotes/NNvol19N5/Economists.html.
153. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1997. NIDA notes: Study sheds new light on the state of drug abuse treatment nationwide. http://www.drugabuse.gov/NIDANotes/NNVol12N5/Study.html.
154. M. L. Predergast, D. Podus, E. C., and D. Urada, 2003. The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 67(1): 53–72.
155. S. Belenko, N. Patapis, and M. T. French, 2005. Economic benefits of drug treatment: A critical review of the evidence for policy makers. University of Pennsylvania: Treatment Research Institute.
156. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2004. National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health, Chapter 7: Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment. http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k3nsduh/2k3Results.htm#7.2.
157. A. T. McLellan, D. C. Lewis, C. P. O’Brien, and H. D. Kleber, 2000. Drug dependence, a chronic mental illness: Implications for treatment, insurance, and outcome evaluation. JAMA 284: 1689–1695.
158. Faces and Voices of Recovery, No date. Home page. http://www.facesandvoicesofrecovery.org/main/index.php.
159. E. M. Jellinek, 1960. The disease concept of alcoholism. New Haven, CT: Hillhouse Press.
160. G. L. Fisher, and T. C. Harrison, 2005. Substance abuse: Information for school counselors, social workers, therapists, and counselors. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
161. H. Fingarette, 1988.Heavy drinking: The myth of alcoholism as a disease. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
162. A. T. McLellan, D. C. Lewis, C. P. O’Brien, and H. D. Kleber, 2000. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: Implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA 284: 1689–1695.
163. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 2005. Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 42. DHHSPublicationNo. (SMA) 05-3992. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
164. D. J. Rohsenow, R. Corbett, and D. Devine, 1988. Molested as children: A hidden contribution to substance abuse? Journal of Substance Abuse 39: 13–18.
165. American Psychiatric Association, 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text revision. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
166. W. M. Compton, K. P. Conway, F. S. Stinson, J. D. Colliver, and B. F. Grant, 2005. Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity of DSM-IV Antisocial personality syndromes and alcohol and specific drug use disorders in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 66: 677–685.
167. P. W. Long, 1990. Antisocial personality disorder. Internet mental health. http://www.mentalhealth.com/rx/p23-pe04.html.
168. D.W. Black, 2000. Treatment for antisocial personality disorder. Psych Central. http://psychcentral.com/library/asp tx.htm.
169. J.W. Dilley, 2004. Antisocial personality disorder. Medlineplus medical encyclopedia. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000921.htm.
170. L. C. Sobell, J. A. Cunningham, and M. B. Sobell, 1996. Recovery from alcohol problems with or without treatment: Prevalence in two population surveys. American Journal of Public Health 86: 966–972.
171. Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) Highlights—2003: National admissions to substance abuse treatment services. http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/teds03/2003 teds highlights.pdf.
172. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1999. Homelessness: Programs and people they serve. Interagency Council on the Homeless. http://www.huduser.org/publications/homeless/homelessness/ch 2c.html#table2.4.
173. G. L. Fisher, and T. C. Harrison, 2005. Substance abuse: Information for school counselors, social workers, therapists, and other counselors. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
174. K. Humphreys, S. Wing, D. McCarty, J. Chappel, L. Gallant, B. Haberle, A. T. Horvath, et al., 2004. Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems: Toward evidence-based practice and policy. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 26: 154.
175. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. Bush cabinet officials highlight administration anti-meth programs. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/news/press05/081805.html.
176. S. Suo, 2005. Drug czar, aide face meth criticism. The Oregonian. September 29, 2005. http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/frontpage/1127991476181420.xml&coll=7&thispage=1 (accessed October 13, 2005).
177. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2006. National drug control strategy: FY 2007 budget summary. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/07budget/partiifundingtables.pdf.
178. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: FY 2006 budget summary. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/state.pdf.
179. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: FY 2006 budget summary. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/defense.pdf.
180. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: FY 2006 budget summary. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/homelandsecurity.pdf
181. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy: FY 2006 budget summary. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/06budget/justice.pdf.
182. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2005. The President’s national drug control strategy. Chapter III: Disrupting the market: Attacking the economic basis of the drug trade, pp. 39–41. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs05/index.html.
183. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1998. The national drug control strategy. Chapter III: Strategic goals and objectives. http://www.ncjrs.org/ondcppubs/pdf/strat pt2.pdf.23.
184. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 2005. Editorial: Junk this plan/The U.S. drug war in Colombia isn’t working. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette May 2. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05122/497563.stm. (accessed October 14, 2005).
185. L. Samuels, and L. Iliff, 2005. Analysts say Mexico drug fight a failure. Dallas Morning News July 4. http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/070405dnintdrugwar.6f872939.html (accessed October 14, 2005).
186. C. A. Youngers, and E. Rosin (eds.), 2004. Drugs and democracy in Latin America: The impact of U.S. policy 2.
187. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2005. 2005 world drug report. Executive summary. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/world drug report.html
188. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2005. 2005 world drug report. Chapter 2: Estimating the value of illicit drug markets. http://www.unodc.org/pdf/WDR2005/volume1 web.pdf.
189. Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2001. What America’s users spend of illegal drugs: 1988–2000. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/pdf/americanusersspend2002.pdf.
190. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2005. 2005 world drug report. Executive Summary. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/worlddrugreport.html.
191. Minutes, 2005. Afghanistan: Addicted to heroin. October 16. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/14/60minutes/main946648.shtml.
192. C. A. Youngers and E. Rosin (eds.), 2004. Drugs and democracy in Latin America: The impact of U.S. policy. http://www.wola.org/publications/ddhrexecsumbrief.pdf.12–13.
193. The Tax Foundation, 2005. Federal excise tax collections: 1940–2004. http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/240.html (accessed October 20, 2005).
194. M. F. Fleming, M. P. Mundt, M. T. French, L. Baier-Manwell, E. A. Stauffacher, and K. F. Lawton-Berry, 2002. Brief physician advice for problem drinkers: Longterm efficacy and benefit-cost analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 26: 36–43
195. A. I. Wilk, N. M. Jensen, and T. C. Havighurst, 1997. Meta-analysis of randomized control trials addressing brief interventions in heavy alcohol drinkers. Journal of General Internal Medicine 12: 274–283.
196. National Institutes of Health, 1998. NIH guide: Effectiveness of strategies for preventing DUI recidivism. PAS-99–023 http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pafiles/PAS-99–023.html (accessed October 24, 2005).