The origins and future of the Dutch approach towards drugs

Journal of Drug Issues

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 511-532

  Uitermark, Justus ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Amsterdam School of Social Science Research (ASSR)   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS; METHAMPHETAMINE;

CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG MARKETING; LAW ENFORCEMENT; NETHERLANDS; POLITICAL SYSTEM; REVIEW; SOCIAL PROBLEM;

EID: 5344255359     PISSN: 00220426     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002204260403400303     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Baan Commission 1972 Achtergronden en risico's van druggebruik. Den Haag: Staatsuitgeverij.
2. Bahrdt, H.P. 1998 Die Modernen GroBstadt: soziologische Überlegungen zum Städtebau. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
3. Bewley-Taylor, D.R. 2003 Challenging the UN drug control conventions: Problems and possibilities. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 171-179.
4. Boekhout van Solinge, T. 1997 The Swedish drug control system. Amsterdam: Cedro/Mets.
5. Boekhout van Solinge, T. 1999 Het Drugsbeleid in Zweden. Justitiële Verkenningen, 99(8), pp. 69-81.
6. Cohen, P. 1997 The case of the two Dutch drug-policy commissions: An exercise in harm reduction, 1968-1976. In P.G. Erickson, D.M. Riley, Y.W. Cheung, & P.A. O'Hare (Eds.) Harm reduction. A new direction for drug policies and programs (pp. 17-31). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
7. Cohen, P. 2003 The drug prohibition church and the adventure of reformation. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 213-215.
8. Cohen, P., & Kaal, H. 2001 The irrelevance of drug policy. Patterns and careers of experienced cannabis use in the populations of Amsterdam, San Francisco and Bremen. Amsterdam: Cedro, University of Amsterdam. Retrieved May 18, 2004, from www.cedro-uva.org.
9. Cohen, P., & van der Veen, H. 2002 Regulering ondanks verbod. Amsterdam: Cedro, University of Amsterdam. Unpublished research proposal.
10. Collins, L. 1999 Holland's half-baked drug experiment. Foreign Affairs, 78(3), 82-99.
11. Cox, R.H. 1995 The development of the Dutch welfare state. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
12. Delsen, L. 2000 Exit poldermodel. Sociaal-economische ontwikkelingen in Nederland. Assen: van Gorcum.
13. De Kort, M. 1995 Tussen patient en delinquent. Hilversum: Verloren.
14. De Kort, M., & Cramer, T. 1999 Pragmatism versus ideology: The Dutch drug policy continued. Journal of Drug Issues, 29, 473-493.
15. De Loor, A. 1998 The drug XTC does not exist. Amsterdam: Drug Consultation Bureau.
16. Drug Enforcement Administration 2001 Ecstasy: Rolling across Europe. Retrieved May 18, 2004, from http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/intel/01008/.
17. Fromberg, E. 1991 XTC, hard drug of onschadelijk genotmiddel. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
18. Hulsman, L. 1971 Ruimte in het drugbeleid. Meppel: Boom.
19. Intraval 1999 Gedogen gewogen. Groningen: Intraval.
20. Jansen, A. n.d. Hasj Coffeeshops in Amsterdam - een historisch perspectief. Amsterdam: Faculty of Economic Sciences and Econometry, University of Amsterdam.
21. Jelsma, M. 2003 Drugs in the UN system: The unwritten history of the 1998 United Nations General Assembly Special Session on drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 181-195.
22. Killias, M., & Rabasa, J. 1997 Less crime in the cities through heroin prescription? Preliminary results from the evaluation of the Swiss heroin prescription projects. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 424-429.
23. Korf, D. 1995 Dutch treat. Formal control and illicit drug use in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Thesis publishers.
24. Korf, D., Riper, H., & Bullington, B. 1999 Windmills in their minds? Drug policy and drug research in the Netherlands. Journal of Drug Issues, 29, 451-472.
25. Kriesi, H. 1989 New social movements and the new class in the Netherlands. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1078-1116.
26. Levine, H. 2003 Global drug prohibition: Its uses and crises. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 145-153.
27. Leuw, E., & Marshall, I.H. (Eds.) 1994 Between prohibition and legalization. The Dutch experiment in drug policy. Amsterdam: Kugler.
28. Lijphart, A. 1982 Verzuiling, pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek. Amsterdam: de Bussy.
29. Lofland, L. 1973 A world of strangers. Order and action in urban public space. New York: Basic Books.
30. Maris, C.W. 1999 The disasters of war: American repression versus Dutch tolerance in drug policy. Journal of Drug Issues, 29, 493-510.
31. Polak, F. 2003 Legaliseer alle drugs, PSY, tijdschrift over geestelijke gezondheidszorg. May 9.
32. Stuurman, S. 1983 Verzuiling, kapitalisme patriarchaat. Aspecten van de ontwikkeling van de moderne staat in Nederland. Nijmegen: SUN.
33. Terhorst, P., & van de Ven, J. 1998 Urban policies and the polder model: Two sides of the same coin. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 89, 467-473.
34. Tham, H. 1995 Drug control as a national project: The case of Sweden. The Journal of Drug Issues, 25, 113-128.
35. Uitermark, J. 2003 "Social mixing" and the management of disadvantaged neighbourhoods: The Dutch policy of urban restructuring revisited. Urban Studies, 40, 531-549.
36. Uitermark, J., & Cohen, P. 2004 A clash of policy approaches. The rise (and fall?) of Dutch harm reduction policies towards ecstasy. International Journal of Drug Policy, forthcoming.
37. Uitermark, J., & Cohen, P. 2003 The Netherlands as a branch of the American law enforcement industry? Amsterdam: CEDRO, University of Amsterdam. Retrieved May 18, 2004, from www.cedro-uva.org.
38. United Nations 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. Geneva: United Nations.
39. Van der Veen, H. 2002 Regulering ondanks verbod - Amsterdam is het gedogen voorbij. Rooilijn, 30, 465-470.
40. Van Oenen, G. 2001a Gedogen in duigen? Een cultuuromslag in het gedoogbeleid. Openbaar Bestuur June-July, 19-22.
41. Van Oenen, G. 2001b Gedogen heeft toekomst, De Volkskrant. September 8.
42. Van Oenen, G. 2002 Het surplus van de illegaliteit. Amsterdam: de Balie.
43. Visser, J., & Hemerijck, A. 1997 "A Dutch miracle." Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
44. Zimmer, L., & Morgan, J.P. 1997 Marijuana myths, marijuana facts: A review of scientific evidence. New York and San Francisco: The Lindesmith Center.