ENTANGLEMENT, INFORMATION, AND THE INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Frontiers Collection

Volumn Part F949, Issue , 2009, Pages 1-293

  Jaeger, Gregg ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85176270094     PISSN: 16123018     EISSN: 21976619     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-92128-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (523)

1. Abramson, N., Information theory and coding (McGraw-Hill; New York, 1963).
2. Aerts, D., “The stuff the world is made of: Physics and reality,” in D. Aerts et al. (Eds.), Einstein meets Magritte: An interdisciplinary reflection (Kluwer Academic; Dordrecht, 1999).
3. Alexandrov, A. D., “On the meaning of the wave function,” Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 85, 292 (1952).
4. Allahverdyan, A. E., A. Khrennikov, and Th. M. Nieuwenhuizen, “Brownian entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 032102 (2005).
5. Anders, J., J. Hajdusek, D. Markham, and V. Vedral, “‘How much of one-way computation is just thermodynamics?” Found. Phys. 38, 506 (2008).
6. Ann, K., and G. S. Jaeger, “Disentanglement and decoherence in two-spin and three-spin systems under dephasing,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 115307 (2007).
7. Ann, K., and G. S. Jaeger, “Generic tripartite Bell non-locality sudden death under local phase noise,” Physics Letters A (to appear; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.10.003).
8. Anscombe, F. R., “Quiet contributor: The civic career and times of John W. Tukey,” (special Tukey issue) Stat. Sci. 18 (3), 287 (2003).
9. Arndt, M., O. Nairz, J. Vos-Andrae, C. Keller, G. van der Zouw, and A. Zeilinger, “Wave-particle duality of C6o molecules,” Nature 401, 680 (1999).
10. Arrighi, P., and C. Patricot, “Conal representation of quantum states and non-trace-preserving quantum operations,” Phys. Rev. A 68, 042310 (2003).
11. Aspect, A., J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).
12. Aspect, A., P. Grangier, and G. Roger, “Experimental test of realistic theories via Bell’s inequality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).
13. Ayer, A. J. (Ed.), Logical positivism (The Free Press; New York, 1959).
14. Bacciagaluppi, G. and M. Hemmo, “Making sense of approximate decoherence,” in PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1994, Volume One: Contributed Papers (1994), p. 345.
15. Balaguer, M., “Platonism in metaphysics,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2004 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/platonism/.
16. Ballentine, L., “The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 385 (1970).
17. Barnum, H., E. Knill, and N. Linden, “On quantum fidelities and channel capacities,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 46, 1317 (2000).
18. Barnum, H., and N. Linden, “Monotones and invariants for multi-particle quantum states,” J. Phys. A 34, 6787 (2001).
19. Barrett, J. A., The quantum mechanics of minds and worlds (Oxford University Press; Oxford, 1999).
20. Barrett, J., N. Linden, S. Massar, S. Pironio, S. Popescu, and D. Roberts, “Nonlocal correlations as an information-theoretic resource,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 022101 (2005).
21. Barrett, J., and S. Pironio, “Popescu-Rohrlich correlations as a unit of nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140401 (2005).
22. Bell, J. S., “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physics 1, 195 (1964).
23. Bell, J. S., “On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).
24. Bell, J. S., Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1987).
25. Bell, J. S., “Against ‘measurement’,” in A. J. Miller (Ed.), Sixty-two years of uncertainty (Plenum; New York, 1990), pp. 17-32.
26. Beller, M., “The rhetoric of antirealism and the Copenhagen spirit,” Phil. Sci.63,183 (1996).
27. Beller, M., Quantum dialogues (University of Chicago Press; Chicago, 1999).
28. Benioff, P., “The computer as a physical system: A microscopic quantum mechanical Hamiltonian model of computers as represented by Turing machines,” J. Stat. Phys. 22, 563 (1980).
29. Benioff, P., “Models of quantum Turing machines,” Fortschr. Phys. 46, 423 (1998).
30. Bennett, C. H., “The thermodynamics of computation: A review,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 905 (1982).
31. Bennett, C. H., “Time/space trade-offs for reversible computation,” SIAM J. Comput. 18, 766 (1989).
32. Bennett, C. H., “Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121 (1992).
33. Bennett, C. H., H. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,” Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996).
34. Bennett, C. H., G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Woot-ters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
35. Bennett, C. H., G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. Smolin, and W. Wootters, “Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (1996).
36. Bennett, C. H., D. P. DiVincenzo, and J. A. Smolin, “Capacities of quantum erasure channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3217 (1997).
37. Bennett, C. H., D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, “Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824(1996).
38. Bennett, C. H., S. Popescu, D. Rohrlich, J. A. Smolin, and A. V. Thapliyal, “Exact and asymptotic measures of multipartite pure state entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 63 (2001).
39. Bennett, C. H., and P. W. Shor, “Quantum information theory,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 44, 2724 (1998).
40. Bennett, C. H., P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin and A. V. Thapliyal, “Entanglement-assisted classical capacity of noisy quantum channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3081 (1999).
41. Bennett, C. H., P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and A. V. Thapliyal, “Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel and reverse Shannon theorem,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 48, 2637 (2002).
42. Bennett, C. H., and S. J. Wiesner, “Communication via one- and two-particle operations on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).
43. Bergou, J., M. Hillery, and Y. Sun, “From unambiguous quantum state discrimination to quantum state filtering,” Fortschr. Phys. 51, 74 (2003).
44. Bernstein, H. J., D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, “Bell’s theorem without inequalities for two spinless particles,” Phys. Rev. A 47, 78 (1993).
45. Bernstein, J., Quantum profiles (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1991).
46. Beth, T., and M. Rotteler, in G. Alber, T. Beth, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, M. Rotteler, H. Weinfurter, R. Werner, and A. Zeilinger (Eds.), Quantum information, STMP 173, VII-X (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 2001).
47. Bethe, H., “Quantum theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S1 (1999).
48. Birkhoff, G., and J. von Neumann, “The logic of quantum mechanics,” Ann. Math. 37, 823 (1936).
49. Bitbol, M., Schrodinger’s philosophy of quantum mechanics (Kluwer; Dordrecht, 1996).
50. Bohm, A., Quantum mechanics: Foundations and applications (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1979).
51. Bohm, D., Quantum theory (Prentice-Hall, Inc.; Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1951).
52. Bohm, D., “A suggested interpretation of quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables I.,” Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952); II. Phys. Rev. 85, 180 (1952).
53. Bohm, D., Causality and chance in modern physics (Routledge and Kegan Paul; London, 1957).
54. Bohm, D., and Y. Aharonov, “Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Rosen and Podolsky,” Phys. Rev. 108, 1070 (1957).
55. Bohr, N., “The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory,” in Atti del congresso internationale dei Ssici, Como, 11-20 Septembre 1927 (Zanachelli; Bologna, 1928), p. 565.
56. Bohr, N., “Das Quantenpostulat die neuere Entwicklung der Atomistik,” Naturwissenschaften 16, 245 (1928); “The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory,” Nature 121, 580 (1928).
57. Bohr, N., Atomic theory and the description of nature (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1934).
58. Bohr, N., “Can the quantum mechanical description of reality be considered complete?” Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).
59. Bohr, N., “Causality and complementarity,” Phil. Sci. 4, 289 (1937).
60. Bohr, N., “The causality problem in modern physics,” in New theories in physics (International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation; Paris, 1939), p. 11.
61. Bohr, N., “On the notions of causality and complementarity,” Dialectica 2, 312 (1948).
62. Bohr, N., “Discussions with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics,” in P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist. The library of living philosophers, Volume 7, Part I (Open Court; Evanston, IL, 1949), p. 201.
63. Bohr, N., Essays 1932-1957 on atomic physics and human knowledge (Wiley; New York, 1958).
64. Bohr, N., Essays 1958-1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge (Wiley; New York, 1963).
65. Bokulich, A., and G. Jaeger (Eds.), Philosophy of quantum information and entanglement (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 2009).
66. Borel, E., Le Hasard (F. Alcan; Paris, 1914).
67. Born, M., “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stofivorgange,” Z. Phys. 37, 863 (1926).
68. Born, M., Natural philosophy of causality and chance (Clarendon Press; London, 1949).
69. Born, M., “Ist die klassische Mechanik tatsachlich deterministisch?” Physikalische Blaotter 2, 49 (1955).
70. Born, M., “Physics and metaphysics,” in Physics in my generation (Pergamon Press; London, 1956), p. 93.
71. Born, M., “Quantum mechanics of collision processes,” in G. Ludwig (1968), Wave mechanics (Pergamon Press; Oxford, 1968), p. 207.
72. Born, M., The Born-Einstein letters (Walker and Co.; London, 1971).
73. Born, M., W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, “Zur Quantenmechanik II,” Zeit. Phys. 35, 557 (1926).
74. Born, M., and P. Jordan, “Zur Quantenmechanik,” Zeit. Phys. 34, 858 (1926).
75. Boschi, D., S. Branca, F. De Martini, L. Hardy, and S. Popescu, “Experimental realization of teleporting an unknown pure quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998).
76. Bouwmeester, D., J. W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Experimental quantum teleportation,” Nature 390, 575 (1997).
77. Brassard, G., H. Buhrmann, N. Linden, A. A. Methot, A. Tapp, and F. Unger, “A limit on nonlocality in any world in which communication complexity is not trivial,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0508042 (4 Aug., 2005).
78. Braunstein, S. L., “Entanglement in quantum information processing,” in Akulin, V. M., A. Sarfati, G. Kurizki, and S. Pellegrin (Eds.), Decoherence, entanglement and information protection in complex quantum systems (Springer; Dordrecht, 2005).
79. Braunstein, S. L., and Pati, A. K. (Eds.), Quantum information with continuous variables (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 2003).
80. Braunstein, S. L., and P. van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005).
81. Brenner, M., and H. A. Stone, “Modern classical physics through the work of G. I. Taylor,” Physics Today, June 2000.
82. Bruckner, C., and A. Zeilinger, “Quantum physics as a science of information,” in A. Elitzur et al. (Eds.), Quo vadis quantum mechanics? (Springer; Heidelberg, 2005), p. 47.
83. Bruckner, C., M. Zukowski, and A. Zeilinger, “Quantum communication complexity protocol with two entangled qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 197901 (2002).
84. Bub, J., “Comment on the Daneri-Loinger-Prosperi quantum theory of measurement,” in T. Bastin (Ed.), Quantum theory and beyond (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1971), p. 65.
85. Bub, J., The interpretation of quantum mechanics (D. Reidel Publishing Co.; Dordrecht, 1974).
86. Bub, J., “Von Neumann’s projection postulate as a possible conditionalization rule in quantum mechanics,” J. Phil. Logic 6, 381 (1977).
87. Bub, J., Interpreting the quantum world (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1997).
88. Bub, J., “Why the quantum?” Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 35, 241 (2004).
89. Bub, J., “Quantum mechanics is about quantum information,” Found. Phys. 35, 541 (2005).
90. Bub, Jeffrey, “Quantum computation: Where does the speedup come from?” in [65] (2009).
91. Buhrman, H., R. Cleve, and W. van Dam, “Quantum entanglement and communication complexity,” SIAM J. Comput. 30, 1829 (2001).
92. Buhrman, H., W. van Dam, P. Hoyer, and A. Tapp, “Multiparty quantum communication complexity,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 2737 (1999).
93. Bunge, M. (Ed.), Quantum theory and reality (Springer; New York, 1967).
94. Busch, P., “Quantum states and generalized observables: A simple proof of Gleason’s theorem,” Phys. Rev. Lett 91, 120403 (2003).
95. Busch, P., M. Grabowski, and P. J. Lahti, Operational quantum physics (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1995).
96. Busch, P., T. Heinonen, and P. J. Lahti, “Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle: Three faces, two roles,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609185 (2006).
97. Busch, P., P. J. Lahti, and P. Mittelstaedt, The quantum theory of measurement, Second, Revised edition (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1996).
98. Busch, P. and C. Shilladay, “Complementarity and uncertainty in Mach-Zehnder interferometry and beyond,” Phys. Rep. 435, 1 (2006).
99. Callebaut, W., Taking the naturalistic turn, or how real philosophy of science is done (University of Chicago Press; Chicago, 1993).
100. Cassinelli, G., E. De Vito, and A. Levrero, “On the decompositions of a quantum state,” J. Math. Anal. App. 210, 472 (1997).
101. Caves, C., and C. A. Fuchs, “Quantum information: How much information is in a state vector?” in A. Mann and M. Revzen, Sixty years of EPR, Ann. Phys. Soc., Israel, 1996; also http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/9601025 (1996).
102. Caves, C., C. A. Fuchs, and R. Schack, “Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities,” Phys. Rev. A 65, 022305 (2002).
103. Caves, C., C. A. Fuchs, and R. Schack, “Subjective probability and quantum certainty,” Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. B 38, 255 (2007).
104. Cerf, N. J., N. Gisin, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, “Simulating maximal quantum entanglement without communication,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 220403 (2005).
105. Cerf, N. J., N. Gisin, and S. Popescu, “Simulating maximal quantum entanglement without communication,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 220403 (2005).
106. Chalmers, D., The conscious mind (Oxford University Press; New York, 1996).
107. Clauser, J. F., M. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiments to test local hidden-variable theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1973).
108. Cleve, R., and H. Buhrman, “Substituting quantum entanglement for communication,” Phys. Rev. A 56, 1201 (1997).
109. Cleve, R., W. van Dam, M. Nielsen, and A. Tapp, “Quantum entanglement and the communication complexity of the inner product function,” Lecture notes in computer science 1509, 61 (1999).
110. Clifton, R., “The subtleties of entanglement and its role in quantum information theory,” Phil. Sci. 69, S150 (2002).
111. Clifton, R., J. Bub, and H. Halvorson, “Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic constraints,” Found. Phys. 33, 1561 (2003).
112. Clifton, R., and H. Halvorson, “Bipartite-mixed-states of infinite-dimensional systems are generically nonseparable,” Phys. Rev. A 61, 02108 (2000).
113. Coffman, V., J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, “Distributed entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
114. Collins, D., N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, “Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002).
115. Cooper, L. N., and D. van Vechten, “On the interpretation of measurement within quantum theory,” Am. J. Phys. 37, 1212 (1969).
116. Cushing, J. T., A. Fine, and S. Goldstein (Eds.), Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory: An appraisal (Kluwer; Dordrecht, 1995).
117. Dalla Chiara, M., R. Giuntini, and R. Greechie, Reasoning in quantum theory: Sharp and unsharp quantum logics (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 2004).
118. Davies, E. B., Quantum theory of open systems (Academic Press; London, 1976).
119. Davies, P. C. W., and J. R. Brown (Eds.), The ghost in the atom (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1986).
120. Davis, M., The universal computer (W. W. Norton and Co.; New York, 2000).
121. de Broglie, L., “La mecanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matiere et du rayonnement,” J. Physique et du Radium 8, 225 (1927).
122. de Broglie, L., “La nouvelle mechanique des quanta,” in H. Lorentz (Ed.), Rapports et discussions du cinquieme conseil de physique Solvay (Gauthier-Villars; Paris, 1928), p. 105.
123. de Laplace, P.-S., Essai philosophique sur les probabilities (Mme Ve Courcier; Paris, 1814); English translation by E. W. Truscott and F. L. Emory, A philosophical essay on probabilities (Dover; New York, 1951).
124. Deletete, R., and R. Guy, “Einstein and EPR,” Phil. Sci. 58, 377 (1991).
125. d’Espagnat, B. Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics (Benjamin; Menlo Park, CA, 1971).
126. d’Espagnat, B. On physics and philosophy (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 2006).
127. Deutsch, D., “Quantum mechanics as a universal physical theory,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 24, 1 (1985).
128. Deutsch, D., “Three connections between Everett’s interpretation and experiment,” in R. Penrose and C. J. Isham (Eds.), Quantum concepts in space and time (Clarendon Press; Oxford, 1986).
129. Deutsch, D., “Quantum computational networks,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London A425, 73 (1989).
130. Deutsch, D., The fabric of reality (Penguin; London, 1997).
131. Deutsch, D., and P. Hayden, “Information flow in entangled quantum systems,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/9906007 (1999).
132. Deutsch, D., and R. Jozsa, “Rapid solution of problems by quantum computation,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 439, 553 (1992).
133. Devitt, M., Realism and truth (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1984).
134. DeWitt, B. S., “Quantum mechanics and reality,” Physics Today 23, 30 (Sept. 1970).
135. DeWitt, B. S., and N. Graham, The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1973).
136. Dickson, W. M., “An empirical reply to empiricism: Protective measurement opens the door for quantum realism,” Phil. Sci. 62, 122 (1995).
137. Dickson, W. M., Quantum chance and non-locality (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1998).
138. Dieks, D., “Communication by EPR devices,” Phys. Lett. A 92, 271 (1982).
139. Dirac, P. A. M., The principles of quantum mechanics (Clarendon Press; Oxford, 1930).
140. Dirac, P. A. M., “The Lagrangian in quantum mechanics,” Physik. Zeits. Sow-jetunion 3, 64 (1933); republished as an appendix in [168].
141. Dirac, P. A. M., “On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 195 (1945).
142. Dirac, P. A. M., The principles of quantum mechanics, Fourth edition (Clarendon Press; Oxford, 1958).
143. Doherty, A. C., P. A. Parillo, and F. M. Spedalieri, “Distinguishing separable and entangled states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 187904 (2002).
144. Duan, L.-M., G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Inseparability criterion for continuous variable systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2722 (2000).
145. Dummett, M., Truth and other enigmas (Harvard University Press; Cambridge MA, 1978).
146. Dummett, M., “Realism,” Synthese 52, 55 (1982).
147. Dur, W., and J. I. Cirac, “Classification of multiqubit states: Separability and distillability properties,” Phys. Rev. A. 61, 042314 (2000).
148. Dur, W., G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, “Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways,” Phys. Rev. A. 62, 062314 (2000).
149. Duwell, A., “How to teach an old dog new tricks: Quantum information, quantum computation, and the philosophy of physics,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 2004.
150. Einstein, A., “Quanten-Mechanik und Wirklichkeit,” Dialectica 2, 320 (1948).
151. Einstein, A., “Autobiographical notes,” in P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist. The library of living philosophers, Volume 7, Part I (Open Court; Evanston, IL, 1949), p. 1.
152. Einstein, A., “Remarks to the essays appearing in this collective volume,” in P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist. The library of living philosophers, Volume 7, Part II (Open Court; Evanston, IL, 1949), p. 663.
153. Einstein, A., B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
154. Eisert, J. “Entanglement in quantum theory,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Potsdam, Postdam, Germany, 2001.
155. Eisert, J., and H. J. Briegel, “Schmidt measure as a tool for quantifying entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 022306 (2001).
156. Eisert, J., C. Simon, and M. B. Plenio, “On the quantification of entanglement in infinite-dimensional quantum systems,” J. Phys. A 39 3911 (2002).
157. Ekert, A. K., “Quantum interferometers as quantum computers,” Physica Scripta T76, 218 (1998).
158. Elby, A., “Why ‘modal’ interpretations of quantum mechanics don’t solve the measurement problem,” Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 737 (1993).
159. Elby, A., and J. Bub, “Triorthogonal uniqueness theorem and its relevance to the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. A 49, 4213 (1994).
160. Englert, B.-G., and J. A. Bergou, “Quantitative quantum erasure,” Opt. Comm. 179, 337 (2000).
161. Englert, B.-G., J. Schwinger, and M. Scully, “Is spin coherence like Humpty-Dumpty? I. Simplified treatment,” Found. Phys. 18, 1045 (1988).
162. Enzer, D. G., P. G. Hadley, R. J. Hughes, C. G. Peterson, and P. G. Kwiat, “Entangled-photon six-state quantum cryptography,” New J. Physics 4, 45.1 (2002).
163. Everett, H. III, “On the foundations of quantum mechanics,” Ph. D. thesis, Princeton University (1957).
164. Everett, H. III, “ ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).
165. Everett, H. III, “The theory of the universal wave function,” in B. S. DeWitt and N. Graham (Eds.), The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1973), p. 3.
166. Fevrier, P., “Les relations d’incertitude de Heisenberg et la logique,” Academie des Sciences (Paris) Comptes Rendus 204, 481 (1937).
167. Feyerabend, P. K., “Problems of microphysics,” in R. Colodny (Ed.), Frontiers of science and philosophy, v. 1 (George Allen and Unwyn Ltd.; London, 1962), pp. 189-283.
168. Feynman, R. P., “The principle of least action in quantum mechanics,” Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, 1942; reprinted in L. M. Brown (Ed.), Feynman’s thesis (World Scientific; Singapore, 2005).
169. Feynman, R. P., “Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367 (1948).
170. Feynman, R. P., The character of physical law (MIT Press; Cambridge MA 1965).
171. Feynman, R. P., The Feynman lectures on physics [A. J. G. Hey and R. W. Allen (Eds.)] (Addison-Wesley; Reading, MA, 1965).
172. Feynman, R. P., Feynman lectures on computation (Addison-Wesley; Reading, MA, 1996).
173. Feynman, R. P., “Negative probability,” in B. J. Hiley and F. D. Peat (Eds.), Quantum implications (Routledge and Kegan Paul; London, 1987), p. 235.
174. Fine, A., The shaky game (University of Chicago Press; Chicago, 1986).
175. Fleming, G., and H. Bennett, “Hyperplane dependence in relativistic quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 19, 231 (1989).
176. Folse, H. J., The philosophy of Niels Bohr (North-Holland; Amsterdam, 1985).
177. Forrest, P., Quantum metaphysics (Basil Blackwell Ltd.; Oxford, 1988).
178. Friedman, M. (Ed.), Reconsidering logical positivism (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1999).
179. Fuchs, C., “Information gain vs. state disturbance in quantum theory,” Fortschr. Phys. 46, 535 (1998).
180. Fuchs, C., “Quantum foundations in the light of quantum information,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0106166 (2001).
181. Fuchs, C., “Quantum mechanics as quantum information (and only a little more),” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0205039 (2002).
182. Fuchs, C., and A. Peres, “Quantum theory needs no interpretation,” Physics Today, 53 (3), 70 (2000).
183. Fuchs, C., and A. Peres, “Quantum theory—interpretation, formulation, inspiration: Fuchs and Peres reply,” Physics Today 53 (9), 14 (2000).
184. Gell-Mann, M., and Hartle, J. B.. “Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology,” in W. H. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information,” Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity 8 (Addison-Wesley; Redwood City, CA, 1990), p. 425. Also [185].
185. Gell-Mann, M., and Hartle, J. B., “Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology,” in S. Kobayashi, H. Ezawa, Y. Murayama, and S. Nomura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on the foundations of quantum mechanics in the light of new technology (Physical Society of Japan; Tokyo, 1990), p. 321.
186. Gershenfeld, N., The physics of information technology (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 2000).
187. Gibbins, P., Particles and paradoxes (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1987).
188. Giedke, G., B. Kraus, M. Lewenstein, and J. I. Cirac, “Entanglement criterion for all bipartite quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167904 (2001).
189. Giles, R., Mathematical foundations of thermodynamics. International series of monographs on pure and applied mathematics, Volume 53 (Pergammon; Oxford, 1964).
190. Gillespie, D. T., “Untenability of simple statistical interpretations of quantum measurement probabilities,” Am. J. Phys. 54, 4887 (1996).
191. Gisin, N., “Stochastic quantum dynamics and relativity,” Helvetica Physica Acta 62, 363 (1989).
192. Gisin, N., “Bell’s inequality holds for all non-product states,” Phys. Lett. A 154, 201 (1991).
193. Gleason, A. M., “Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space,” J. Math. Mech. 6, 885 (1957).
194. Greenberger, D. M., M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, “Bell’s theorem without inequalities,” Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990).
195. Greenberger, D. M., M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, “Going beyond Bell’s theorem,” in M. Kafatos (Ed.), Bell’s theorem, quantum theory and conceptions of the universe (Kluwer Academic; Dordrecht, 1989), p. 79.
196. Greenberger, D. M., M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, “Multiparticle interfer-ometry and the superposition principle,” Physics Today, August 1993, p. 22.
197. Griffiths, R., “Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984).
198. Groenwald, H. J., “Quantal observation in statistical interpretation,” in T. Bastin (Ed.), Quantum theory and beyond (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1971), p. 43.
199. Groisman, B., S. Popescu, and A. Winter, “On the quantum, classical and total amount of correlations in a quantum state,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 032317 (2005).
200. Gudder, S., “On hidden-variables theories,” J. Math. Phys. 11, 431 (1970).
201. Hacking, I. (Ed.), Scientific revolutions (Oxford University Press; New York, 1981).
202. Hall, M. J. W., “Universal geometric approach to uncertainty, entropy, and information,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 2602 (1999).
203. Hajek, A., “Interpretations of probability,” in E. Zalka (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu .
204. Halvorson, H., “Generalization of the Hughston-Jozsa-Wootters theorem to hyperfinite von Neumann algebras,” Los Alamos Archive preprint quant-ph/031001 (2003).
205. Hanbury-Brown, R., and R. Q. Twiss, “Correlation between photons in two coherent beams of light,” Nature 177, 27 (1956).
206. Hardy, L., “Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992).
207. Hartle, J. B., “Quantum mechanics of individual systems,” Am. J. Phys. 36, 704 (1968).
208. Hartley, R. V., “Transmission of information,” Bell System Tech. J. 7, 535 (1928).
209. Hawking, S. W., “Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse,” Phys. Rev. D 14, 112 (1976).
210. Hayden, P. M., M. Horodecki, and B. M. Terhal, “The asymptotic entanglement cost of preparing a quantum state,” J. Phys. A 34, 6891 (2001).
211. Healey, R., The philosophy of quantum mechanics: An interactive interpretation (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1989).
212. Hegerfeldt, G. C.,“Remark on causality and particle localization,” Phys. Rev. D 10, 3320 (1974).
213. Hegerfeldt, G. C., and S. N. M. Ruijsenjaars, “Remarks on causality, localization, and spreading of wave packets,” Phys. Rev. D 22, 377 (1980).
214. Hegerfeldt, G. C., “Causality problems for Fermi’s two-atom system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 596 (1994).
215. Heisenberg, W., “Uber quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen,” Z. Physik 33, 879 (1925).
216. Heisenberg, W., “Uber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,” Z. Physik 43, 172 (1927).
217. Heisenberg, W. Physical principles of the quantum theory (University of Chicago Press; Chicago, 1930).
218. Heisenberg, W., “The representation of nature in contemporary physics,” Daedalus 87, 95 (1958).
219. Heisenberg, W., Physics and philosophy (Harper and Row; New York, 1958).
220. Heisenberg, W., The physicist’s conception of nature (Harcourt, Brace & Co.; New York, 1958).
221. Heisenberg, W., “Quantum theory and its interpretation,” in S. Rozental (Ed.), Niels Bohr: His life and Work (North-Holland Publishing Company; Amsterdam, 1967), p. 94.
222. Heisenberg, W., Physics and beyond (Allen and Unwin; London, 1971).
223. Heisenberg, W., “Remarks on the origin of the relations of uncertainty,” in W. C. Price and S. S. Chissick (Eds.), The uncertainty principle and foundations of quantum mechanics (J. Wiley and Sons; London, 1977), p. 6.
224. Heisenberg, W., Encounters with Einstein (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1983).
225. Henderson, L., “Measuring quantum entanglement,” in T. Placek and J. Butterfield (Eds.), Non-locality and modality (Kluwer Academic; Dordrecht, 2002), p. 137.
226. Hendry, J., The creation of quantum mechanics and the Bohr-Pauli dialogue (D. Riedel; Dordrecht, 1984).
227. Herzog, T. J., P. G. Kwiat, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Complementarity and the quantum eraser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3034 (1995).
228. Heywood, P., and M. L. G. Redhead, “Nonlocality and the Kochen-Specker paradox,” Found. Phys. 13, 481 (1983).
229. Hill, S., and W. Wootters, “Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997).
230. Holevo, A. S., “Somes estimates for the information content transmitted by a quantum communication channel,” Probl. Pered. Inform. 9, 3 (1973) [Probl. Inf. Transm. (USSR) 9, 177 (1973)].
231. Holevo, A. S., “Statistical decisions in quantum theory,” J. Multivar. Anal. 3, 337 (1973).
232. Home, D., and M. A. B. Whitaker, “Ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics: A modern perspective,” Phys. Rep. 210, 223 (1992).
233. Honner, J., The description of nature (Oxford University Press; Oxford, 1987).
234. Hooker, C., A realistic theory of science (State University of New York Press; Albany, 1987).
235. Horne, M., A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, “Two-particle interferometry,” Nature 347, 429 (1990).
236. Horodecki, P., “Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition,” Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997).
237. Horodecki, P., “Bound entanglement,” in Bruss, D. and Leuchs, G. (Eds.), Lectures on quantum information (Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, 2007), p. 209.
238. Horodecki, M., P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, “Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions,” Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
239. Horodecki, M., P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, “Inseparable two spin-1 density matrices can be distilled to a singlet form,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 574 (1997).
240. Horodecki, P., R. Horodecki and M. Horodecki, “Entanglement and thermodynamical analogies,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/9805072 (1998).
241. Horodecki, M., P. Horodecki, and J. Oppenheim, “Reversible transformations from pure to mixed states, and the unique measure of information,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0212019 (2002).
242. Horodecki, M., J. Oppenheim and R. Horodecki, “Are the laws of entanglement thermodynamical?”, http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0207177 (2002).
243. Howard, D., “Who invented the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’? A study in mythology,” Phil. Sci. 71, 669 (2004).
244. Hughes, R. I. G., The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics (Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA, 1989).
245. Hughston, L. P., “Entropy, uncertainty, and nonlinearity,” in R. Penrose and C. J. Isham (Eds.), Quantum concepts in space and time (Clarendon Press; Oxford, 1986).
246. Hughston, L. P., R. Jozsa, and W. K. Wootters, “A complete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix,” Phys. Lett. A 183, 14 (1993).
247. Isham, C., Lectures on quantum theory: Mathematical and structural foundations (Imperial College Press; London, 1995).
248. Jackiw, R., and A. Shimony, “The depth and breadth of John Bell’s physics,” Phys. Perspect. 4, 78 (2002).
249. Jaeger, G., “New quantum mechanical results in interferometry,” Ph.D. Thesis, Boston University, 1995 (UMI Dissertation Services; Ann Arbor, 1994).
250. Jaeger, G., “Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31, 105 (2000).
251. Jaeger, G., Quantum information: An overview (Springer; New York, 2007).
252. Jaeger, G., M. A. Horne, and A. Shimony, “Complementarity of one-particle and two-particle interference,” Phys. Rev. A 48, 1023 (1995).
253. Jaeger, G., and A. Shimony, “Optimal distinction between two non-orthogonal quantum states,” Phys. Lett. A 197, 83 (1995).
254. Jaeger, G., A. Shimony, and L. Vaidman, “Two interferometric complementarities,” Phys. Rev. A 51, 54 (1995).
255. Jaeger, G., M. Teodorescu-Frumosu, A. V. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, “Multiphoton Stokes-parameter invariant for entangled states,” Phys. Rev. A 67, 032307 (2003).
256. Jammer, M., The philosophy of quantum mechanics (John Wiley and Sons; New York, 1974).
257. Jarrett, J., “Bell’s inequality: A guide to the implications,” in J. Cushing and E. McMullin (Eds.), Philosophical consequences of quantum theory (Univ. Notre Dame Press; Notre Dame, IN, 1989).
258. Jauch, J. M., Foundations of quantum mechanics (Addison-Wesley; Reading, MA, 1968).
259. Jauch, J. M., and J. G. Baron, “Entropy, information, and Szilard’s paradox,” Helv. Phys. Acta 45, 220 (1972).
260. Jones, N., and L. Masanes, “Interconversion of nonlocal correlations,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 052312 (2005).
261. Joos, E., “Quantum theory and the appearance of a classical world,” in Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 480, 242 (1986).
262. Joos, E., “Decoherence through interaction with the environment,” in D. Giulini et al. (Eds.), Decoherence and the appearance of a classical world in quantum theory (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1996), p. 35.
263. Jordan, P., Physics of the 20th Century (Philosophical Library; New York, 1944).
264. Jordan, P., “On the process of measurement in quantum mechanics,” Phil. Sci. 16, 269 (1949).
265. Jozsa, R., “Fidelity for mixed quantum states,” J. Mod. Opt. 41, 2315 (1994).
266. Jozsa, R., and B. Schumacher, “A new proof of the quantum noiseless coding theorem,” J. Mod. Opt. 41, 2343 (1994).
267. Jozsa, R., and N. Linden, “On the role of entanglement in quantum computational speed-up,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0201143 (2002).
268. Kemeny, J., “Fair bets and inductive probabilities,” J. Symbolic Logic 20, 263 (1955).
269. Kent, A., “Against many-worlds interpretations,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5, 1745 (1990).
270. Kent, A., “Locality and reality revisited,” in T. Placek and J. Butterfield (Eds.), Non-locality and modality (Kluwer Academic; 2002), p. 163.
271. Keyl, M., “Fundamentals of quantum information theory,” Phys. Rep. 369, 431 (2002).
272. Kirkpatrick, K. A., “The Schrodinger-HJW theorem,” Found. Phys. Lett. 19, 95 (2006).
273. Kirkpatrick, K. A., “Translation of G. Luders’ Uber die Zustandsanderung durch den MeSprozeS,” Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 15, 322 (2006).
274. Klein, M. J., “Maxwell, his demon, and the second law of thermodynamics,” Am. Sci. 58, 84 (1970).
275. Klement, K., “Russell’s logical atomism,” The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2005 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-atomism/ .
276. Klyshko, D. N., “Quantum optics: quantum, classical and metaphysical aspects,” Physics-Uspekhi 37, 1097 (1994).
277. Kochen, S., and E. Specker, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).
278. Korner, S. (Ed.), Observation and interpretation; A symposium of philosophers and physicists (Constable and Co. Ltd.; London, 1957).
279. Kraus, K., et al., States, effects, and operations. Springer lecture notes in physics. SLNP 190 (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1983).
280. Kremer, I., “Quantum communication,” M.Sc. thesis, Computer Science Department, Hebrew University, 1995.
281. Krips, H., The metaphysics of quantum theory (Oxford University Press; Oxford, 1987).
282. Kronz, F., “Quantum theory: von Neumann vs. Dirac,” The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), URL=http://plato.stanford.edu/fall2008/entries/qt-nvd .
283. Kullback, S., and R. A. Leibler, “On information and sufficiency,” Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 79 (1951).
284. Kuhn, Thomas S., The structure of scientific revolutions (University of Chicago Press; Chicago, 1970).
285. Lahti, P., P. Busch, and P. Mittelstaedt, “Some important classes of quantum measurements and their information gain,” J. Math. Phys. 32, 2770 (1991).
286. Landau, L., “Das Dampfungsproblem in der Wellenmechanik,” Z. Phys. 45, 430 (1927).
287. Landau, L. J., “Empirical two-point correlation functions,” Found. Phys. 18, 449 (1988).
288. Landauer, R., “Information is physical,” Physics Today, May 1991, p. 23 (1991).
289. Landauer, R., “Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process,” IBM J. Res. Develop. 5, 183 (1961).
290. Landauer, R., in E. D. Haidemenakis (Ed.), Proceedings of the conference on fluctuation phenomena in classical and quantum systems, Chiana, Crete, Greece, August 1969 (Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers Inc.; New York, 1970).
291. Landauer, R., “The physical nature of information,” Phys. Lett. A 217, 188 (1996).
292. Lande, A., From dualism to unity in quantum physics (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1960).
293. Leff, H. S., and A. F. Rex (Eds.), Maxwell’s demon: Entropy, information, and computing (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1990), p. 15.
294. Lewenstein, M., and A. Sanpera, “Separability and entanglement of composite quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2261 (1998).
295. Linblad, G. “Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities,” Commun. Math. Phys. 40, 147 (1975).
296. Linden, N., S. Massar, and S. Popescu, “Purifying noisy entanglement requires collective measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3279 (1998).
297. Linden, N., and S. Popescu, “On multiparticle entanglement,” Fortschr. Phys. 46, 567 (1998).
298. Linden, N., S. Popescu, and W. K. Wootters, “The power of reduced quantum states,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0207109 (2002).
299. Lloyd, S., “Quantum-mechanical Maxwell’s demon,” Phys. Rev. A 56, 3374 (1997).
300. Lo, H.-K., and S. Popescu, “The classical communication cost of entanglement manipulation: Is entanglement an inter-convertible resource?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1459 (1999).
301. Lo, H.-K., S. Popescu, and T. Spiller (Eds.), Introduction to quantum computation and information (World Scientific; Singapore, 1998).
302. London, F., and E. Bauer, “The theory of observation in quantum mechanics,” in J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1983), p. 217.
303. Lorentz, H. (Ed.), Rapports et discussions du cinquieme conseil de physique Solvay (Gauthier-Villars; Paris, 1928).
304. Ludwig, G., Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer; Berlin, 1954).
305. Luders, G., “Uber die Zustandsanderung durch den Messprozess,” Annalen der Physik 8, 322 (1951).
306. MacKay, D. J. C., Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 2003).
307. Mackey, G. W., Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics (W. A. Benjamin; New York, 1963).
308. Margenau, H., “Quantum-mechanical description,” Phys. Rev. 49, 240 (1936).
309. Margenau, H., “Reality in quantum mechanics,” Phil. Sci. 16, 287 (1949).
310. Margenau, H., “Philosophical problems concerning the meaning of measurement in quantum physics,” Phil. Sci. 25, 23 (1958).
311. Masanes, L., “Tight Bell inequality for d-outcome measurements correlations,” Quant. Inf. Comp. 3, 345 (2003).
312. Masumi, B., “Realer than real: The simulacrum according to Deleuze and Guattari,” Copyright 1, 90 (1987).
313. Maudlin, T., Quantum non-locality and relativity, Second Edition (Blackwell Publishing; Malden MA, 2002).
314. Maudlin, T., “Space-time in the quantum world,” in J. T. Cushing (Ed.), Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory: An appraisal (Kluwer Academic Publishers; Dordrecht, 1996), p. 285.
315. Mermin, N. D., “The great quantum muddle.” Phil. Sci. 50, 651 (1983).
316. Mermin, N. D., “Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990).
317. Mermin, N. D., “What do these corrlations know about reality,” Found. Phys. 29, 571 (1999).
318. Mielnik, B., “Generalized quantum mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys. 37, 221 (1974).
319. Mittelstaedt, P., The interpretation of quantum mechanics and the measurement process (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1998).
320. Mittelstaedt, P., Sprache und Realitat in der modernen Physik (B. I. Wis-senschaftsverlag; Mannheim, 1986).
321. Morikoshi, F., M. Santos, and V. Vedral, “Accessibility of physical states and non-uniqueness of entanglement measure,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 5887 (2004).
322. Murdoch, D., Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1989).
323. Nielsen, M. A., “On the units of bipartite entanglement: Is sixteen ounces of entanglement always equal to one pound?” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 6987 (2001).
324. Nielsen, M. A., and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computing and quantum information (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 2000).
325. Nielsen, M. A., and J. Kempe, “Separable states are more disordered globally than locally,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5184 (2000).
326. Norsen, T., “Einstein’s boxes,” Am. J. Phys. 73, 164 (2005).
327. Norsen, T., “Against ‘Realism’,” Found. Phys. 37, 311 (2007).
328. Omnes, R., “Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 339 (1992).
329. Omnes, R., The interpretation of quantum mechanics (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1994).
330. Omnes, R., “General theory of the decoherence effect in quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. A 56, 3383 (1997).
331. Packel, E. W., and J. F. Traub, “Information-based complexity,” Nature 328, 29 (1987).
332. Pais, A., Subtle is the lord (Oxford University Press; New York, 1982).
333. Pan, J. W., D. Bouwmeester, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Experimental entanglement swapping: Entangling photons that never interacted,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891 (1998).
334. Pati, A. K., and S. L. Braunstein, “Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state,” Nature 404, 164 (2000).
335. Pauli, W., Letter to Eddington, Sept. 1923 in A. Hermann, K. V. Meyenn, and V. F. Weisskopf (Eds.), Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg u.a., Band I: 1919-1929 (Springer; Berlin, 1979).
336. Pauli, W., “Quantentheorie,” in H. Geiger and K. Scheel (Eds.), Handbuch der Physik, First Edition 23, 1 (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1926).
337. Pauli, W., “Uber Gasentartung und Paramagnetismus,” Z. Phys. 41, 81 (1927).
338. Pauli, W., “Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik,” in Geiger, H. and K. Scheel (Eds.), Handbuch der Physik, Second Edition, 24, 83 (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1933).
339. Pauli, W., “Wahrscheinlichkeit und Physik,” Dialectica 8, 112 (1954).
340. Pavicic, M., Bibliography on quantum logics and related structures, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31, 373 (1992).
341. Pearle, P., “Tales and tails and stuff and nonsense,” in R. S. Cohen et al. (Eds.), Experimental metaphysics (Kluwer Academic Publishers; Dordrecht, 1997), p. 143.
342. Peierls, R., Surprises in theoretical physics (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1979).
343. Peierls, R., “In defence of measurement,” Physics World 4, 19 (1991).
344. Penrose, R., “Gravity and state vector reduction,” in R. Penrose and C. Isham (Eds.), Quantum concepts in space and time (Clarendon Press; Oxford, 1986).
345. Penrose, R., “Quantum physics and conscious thought,” in B. J. Hiley and F. D. Peat (Eds.), Quantum implications: Essays in honour of David Bohm (Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.; London, 1987).
346. Penrose, R., The road to reality (BCA; Chatham, Kent, UK, 2004).
347. Peres, A., “Higher-order Schmidt decompositions,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/9504006 (1995).
348. Peres, A., “Separability criterion for density matrices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
349. Peres, A., “Clasical interventions in quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. A 61, 022116 (2000); ibid., 022117 (2000).
350. Peres, A., and W. K. Wootters, “Optimal detection of quantum information,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1119 (1991).
351. Pitowsky, I., “Betting on the outcomes of measurements: A Bayesian theory of quantum probability,” Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 34, 395 (2003).
352. Pitowsky, I., Quantum probability-quantum logic (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1989).
353. Plenio, M. B., and V. Vitelli, “The physics of forgetting: Landauer’s erasure principle and information theory,” Cont. Phys. 42, 25 (2001).
354. Plotnitsky, A., Reading Bohr: Physics and philosophy (Springer; Dordrecht, 2006).
355. Poincare, H., Theorie mathematique de la lumiere, II (Gauthier-Villars; Paris, 1892).
356. Popescu, S., and D. Rohrlich, “Generic quantum nonlocality,” Phys. Lett. A 166, 293 (1992).
357. Popescu, S., and D. Rohrlich, “Action and passion at a distance,” in Cohen et al. (Eds.), Potentiality, entanglement and passion-at-a-distance (Kluwer; Dordrecht, 1997); also http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/9605004 (3 May, 1996).
358. Popescu, S., and D. Rohrlich, “Thermodynamics and the measure of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 56, R3319 (1997).
359. Popescu, S., and D. Rohrlich, “The joy of entanglement,” in [301], p. 29.
360. Popper, K. R., “The propensity interpretation of probability,” Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 10, 25 (1959).
361. Popper, K. R., Quantum theory and the schism in physics (Rowan and Littlefield; Totowa, NJ, 1982).
362. Preskill, J., Physics 229: Advanced mathematical methods of physics— Quantum computation and information, California Institute of Technology, 1998. http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/ .
363. Price, H., “Probability in the Everett world: Comments on Wallace and Greaves,” http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002654 .
364. Primas, H., Chemistry, quantum mechanics and reductionism (Springer; Berlin, 1983).
365. Przibram, K. (Ed.),Letters on wave mechanics (Philosophical Libary; New York, 1967).
366. Putnam, H., “Is logic empirical?” Boston Stud. Phil. Sci. 5, 216 (1969).
367. Putnam, H., “Quantum mechanics and the observer,” Erkenntnis 16, 193 (1981).
368. Putnam, H., Realism and reason (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1983).
369. Quine, W. V. O., “Epistemology naturalized,” in Ontological relativity or other essays (Random House; New York, 1969), p. 69.
370. Raussendorf, R., and H. J. Briegel, “A one-way quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
371. Redhead, M. L. G., Incompleteness, nonlocality and realism (Oxford University Press; Oxford, 1987).
372. Redhead, M. L. G., From physics to metaphysics (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1995).
373. Reichenbach, H., Philosophic foundations of quantum mechanics (University of California; Berkeley, 1944).
374. Richter, Th., “Interference and non-classical spatial intensity correlations,” Quantum Opt. 3, 115 (1991).
375. Robertson, H. P., “The uncertainty principle,” Phys. Rev. 34, 163 (1929).
376. Rosenfeld, L., “Strife about complementarity,” Science Prog. 163, 393 (1953).
377. Rosenfeld, L., “Misunderstandings about the foundations of quantum theory,” in [278].
378. Rosenfeld, L., “Physics and metaphysics,” Nature 181, 658 (1958).
379. Rosenfeld, L., “Foundations of quantum theory and complementarity,” Nature 190, 384 (1961).
380. Rothstein, J., “Information, logic, and physics,” Phil. Sci. 23, 31 (1956); paper original presented before the American Physical Society in 1951.
381. Rothstein, J., “Information, measurement, and quantum mechanics,” Science 25, 510 (1951).
382. Rothstein, J., “Information and thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. 85, 135 (1957).
383. Rothstein, J., “Information and organization as the language of the operational viewpoint,” Phil. Sci. 29, 406 (1962).
384. Ruelle, D., Chance and chaos (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1991).
385. Rungta, P., and C. M. Caves, “Concurrence-based entanglement measures for isotropic states,” Phys. Rev. A 67, 012307 (2003).
386. Ryle, G., The concept of mind (The University of Chicago Press; Chicago, 1949).
387. Saunders, S., “Time, quantum mechanics, and decoherence,” Synthese 102, 235 (1995).
388. Saunders, S., “Time, quantum mechanics, and probability,” Synthese 114, 405 (1998).
389. Scheibe, E. (J. B. Sykes, translator), The logical analysis of quantum mechanics (Pergammon Press; Oxford, 1973).
390. Schlosshauer, M., “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1267 (2005).
391. Schlosshauer, M., Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition (Springer; New York, 2007).
392. Schmidt, E. “Zur Theorie der linearen und nichtlinearen Integralgleichungen,” Math. Annalen 63, 433 (1906).
393. Schrodinger, E. “Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem,” Annalen der Physik 81, 109 (1926).
394. Schrodinger, E., “Die gegenwaertige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,” Die Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935).
395. Schrodinger, E., “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems,” Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 32, 446 (1935).
396. Schumacher, B. W., “Quantum coding,” Phys. Rev. A 51, 2738 (1995).
397. Schumacher, B. W., “Sending entanglement through noisy quantum channels,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 2614 (1996).
398. Schumacher, B. W., and M. D. Westmoreland, “Quantum mutual information and the one-time pad,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0604207 (2006).
399. Schumacher, B. W., M. D. Westmoreland, and W. K. Wootters, “Limitation on the amount of accessible information in a quantum channel,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3452 (1996).
400. Scully, M.O., and K. Druohl, “Quantum eraser - A proposed photon correlation experiment concerning observation and delayed choice in quantum mechanics.” Phys. Rev. A 25, 2208 (1982).
401. Scully, M. O., B.-G. Englert, and J. Schwinger, “Spin coherence and Humpty-Dumpty. III. The effects of observation,” Phys. Rev. A 40, 1775 (1989).
402. Scully, M. O., B.-G. Englert, and H. Walther, “Quantum optical tests of complementarity,” Nature 351, 111 (1991).
403. Scully, M., and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997), Section 20.1.
404. Seager, W., “A note on ‘quantum erasure’,” Phil. Sci. 63, 81 (1996).
405. Shannon, C. E., “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379 (1948); ibid., 623 (1948).
406. Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver, The mathematical theory of communication (University of Illinois; Urbana, IL, 1949).
407. Shimony, A., “Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality,”
408. S. Kamefuchi et al. (Eds.), Foundations of quantum mechanics in light of the new technology (Physical Society of Japan; Tokyo, 1983), p. 225.
409. Shimony, A., “Contextual hidden variables theories and Bell’s inequalities,” Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 35, 25 (1984).
410. Shimony, A., “Reply to Bell,” Dialectica 39, 107 (1985).
411. Shimony, A., “Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics,” in Paul Davies (Ed.), The new physics (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1989), Ch.13.
412. Shimony, A., Search for a naturalistic world view, Volume I (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1993).
413. Shimony, A., Search for a naturalistic world view, Volume II (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1993).
414. Shimony, A., in K. V. Laurikainen and C. Montonen (Eds.), Symposia on the foundations of modern physics 1992 (World Scientific; Singapore, 1993).
415. Shimony, A., “Degree of entanglement,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 755, 675 (1995).
416. Shimony, A., “The logic of EPR,” Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 26, 399 (2001).
417. Shimony, A. “Some intellectual obligations of epistemological naturalism,” in
418. D. Malament (Ed.), Reading natural philosophy (Open Court; Peru, IL, 2002).
419. Shimony, A., “Bell’s theorem,” The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2005 edition), E. N. Zalka (Ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bell-theorem .
420. Shimony, A., “Comment on Norsen’s defense of Einstein’s ‘box argument’,” Am. J. Phys. 73, 177 (2005).
421. Shimony, A., “Aspects of nonlocality in quantum mechanics,” in J. Evans and A. S. Thorndike (Eds.), Quantum mechanics at the crossroads (Springer; Heidelberg, 2007), p. 107.
422. Shimony, A., M. A. Horne, and J. F. Clauser, “An exchange on local beables,” Dialectica 39, 97; ibid., 107 (1985).
423. Shor, P. W., J. A. Smolin, and B. M. Terhal, “Nonadditivity of bipartite distillable entanglement follows from conjecture on bound entangled Werner states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2681 (2001).
424. Silverman, M. P., Quantum superposition (Springer-Verlag; Heidelberg, 2008).
425. Simon, D. R., “On the power of quantum computation,” in S. Goldwasser (Ed.), Proceedings of 35th annual symposium on the foundations of computer science (IEEE Society Press; Los Alamitos CA, 1994), p. 116.
426. Sinha, S., and R. Sorkin,“A sum-over-histories account of an EPR(B) experiment,” Found. Phys. Lett. 4, 303 (1991).
427. Slater, J. C., Solid state and molecular theory: A scientific biography (Wiley; New York, 1975).
428. Srinivas, M. D.. “Collapse postulate for observables with continuous spectra,” Comm. Math. Phys. 71, 131 (1980).
429. Stachel, J., “Do quanta need a new logic?” in R. G. Colodny (Ed.), From quarks to quasars (Univ. Pittsburgh Press; Pittsburgh, 1986), p. 229.
430. Stachel, J., “Einstein and the quantum: Fifty years of struggle,” in R. G. Colodny (Ed.), From quarks to quasars (Univ. Pittsburgh Press; Pittsburgh, 1986), p. 349.
431. Stachel, J., “Feynman paths and quantum entanglement,” in R. Cohen et al. (Eds.), Potentiality, entanglement and passion-at-a-distance (Kluwer; Dordrecht, 1997), p. 245.
432. Stachel, J., “Structure, individuality, and quantum gravity,” in D. Rickles et al. (Eds.), The structural foundations of quantum gravity (Clarendon Press; Oxford, 2006), Section 3.5.
433. Stachel, J., “Choice of variables and initial value problems in classical general relativity: Prolegomena to any future quantum gravity,” in D. Oriti (Ed.), Approaches to quantum gravity (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, to appear).
434. Stairs, A., “Quantum logic and the Luders rule,” Phil. Sci. 49, 422 (1982).
435. Stairs, A., “Quantum logic, realism, and value-definiteness,” Phil. Sci. 50, 578 (1983).
436. Stapp, H. P., “The Copenhagen interpretation,” Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098 (1972).
437. Steane, A., “Quantum computing,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 117 (1998).
438. Steane, A., “Quantum computing needs only one universe,” Stud. Hist. Phi. Mod. Phys. 34, 469 (2003).
439. Strauss, M., “Zur Begrandung der statistischen Transformationstheorie der Quantenphysik,” Berliner Berichte 1936, 382 (1936). [English translation, “The Logic of complementarity and the foundation of quantum theory,” in M. Strauss, Modern physics and its philosophy (Reidel; Dordrecht 1972), p. 186.]
440. Suppe, F. (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (University of Illinois Press; Urbana, 1977).
441. Suppes, P., “The probabilistic argument for a non-classical logic in quantum mechanics,” Phil. Sci. 33, 14 (1966).
442. Svozil, K., Quantum logic (Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1998).
443. Svozil, K., “Quantum logic. A brief outline,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/9902042 (1999).
444. Svozil, K., “The information interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Los Alamos Archive preprint quant-ph/0006033 (2000).
445. Szilard, L., “Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen,” Z. Physik 53, 840 (1929).
446. Taylor, G. I., “Interference fringes with feeble light,” Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 15, 114 (1909).
447. Teller, P., An interpretive introduction to quantum Geld theory (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1995).
448. Thapliyal, A. V., “Multipartite pure-state entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 3336 (1999).
449. Thapliyal, A. V., reported in [38].
450. Thew, R. T., K. Nemoto, A. G. White, W. J. White, and W. J. Munro, “Qudit quantum-state tomography,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 012303 (2002).
451. Timpson, C. G., “On a supposed conceptual inadequacy of the Shannon information in quantum mechanics,” Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 33, 441 (2003).
452. Timpson, C. G., “Quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics,” Ph.D. Thesis, Queen’s College, The University of Oxford, 2004; also http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0412063.
453. Timpson, C. G., “Nonlocality and information flow: The approach of Deutsch and Hayden,” Found. Phys. 35, 313 (2005).
454. Timpson, C. G., “The grammar of teleportation,” Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 57, 587 (2006).
455. Tipler, F. J., “The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics in quantum cosmology,” in R. Penrose and C. J. Isham (Eds.), Quantum concepts in space and time (Clarendon Press; Oxford, 1986), p. 204.
456. Toner, B. F., and D. Bacon, “Communication cost of simulating Bell correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187904 (2003).
457. Tsirel’son, B. S., “Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequalities,” Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980).
458. Tsirel’son, B. S., “Quantum analogues of the Bell inequalities,” J. of Sov. Math. 36, 557 (1987).
459. Turing, A. M., “On computable numbers, with an application to the Entschei-dungsproblem,” Proc. London Math. Soc. 42, 230 (1936); ibid., 43, 544 (1937).
460. Uffink, J., “Measures of uncertainty and the uncertainty principle,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Utrecht, 1990.
461. Van Brakel, J., “ The possible influence of the discovery of radio-active decay on the concept of physical probability,” Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 31, 369 (1985).
462. Van Dam, W., “Nonlocality and Communication complexity,” D. Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, Dept. of Physics (2000), Ch. 9. http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/ ~ vandam/publications.html
463. Van Dam, W., “Implausible consequences of superstrong nonlocality,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0501159 (27 Jan., 2005).
464. Van der Waerden, B. L., Sources of quantum mechanics (North-Holland Publishing Company; Amsterdam, 1967).
465. Van Fraassen, B., The scientific image (Clarendon Press; Oxford, 1980).
466. Van Fraassen, B., “The Charybdis of realism: Epistemological implications of Bell’s inequality,” Synthese 52, 25 (1982).465. Van Fraassen, B., Quantum mechanics (Clarendon; Oxford, 1991).
467. Vedral, V., “The role of relative entropy in quantum information processing,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 197 (2002).
468. Vedral, V., and E. Kashefi, “Uniqueness of the entanglement measure for bipartite pure states and thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 037903 (2002).
469. Vedral, V., Plenio, M. B., Rippin, and Knight, P. L., “Quantifying entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997).
470. Vidal, G., “Entanglement monotones,” J. Mod. Opt. 47, 355 (2000).
471. Vidal, G., and J. I. Cirac, “Irreversibility in asymptotic manipulations of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5803 (2001).
472. Vidal, G., D. Jonathan, and M. A. Nielsen, “Approximate transformations and robust manipulation of bipartite pure-state entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 62, 012304 (2000).
473. Vollbrecht, K.-G. H., and M. M. Wolf, “Conditional entropies and their relation to entanglement criteria,” J. Math. Phys. 43, 4299 (2002).
474. Von Neumann, J., “Mathematische Begrandung der Quantenmechanik,” Gott. Nach., Session of May 20, 1 (1927).
475. Von Neumann, J., “Allgemeine Eigenwerttheorie Hermitescher Funktionalop-eratoren,” Math. Ann. 102, 49 (1929).
476. Von Neumann, J., “Zur Algebra der Funktionaloperatoren und Theorie der normalen Operatoren,” Math. Ann. 102, 370 (1929).
477. Von Neumann, J., “Zur Theorie der unbeschrankten Matrizen,” J. Reine Angew Math. 161, 208 (1929).
478. Von Neumann, J., Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Julius Springer; Berlin, 1932) [English translation: Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics (Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ, 1955)].
479. Von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern, Theory of games and economic behavior (Princeton University Press; Princeton, 1947).
480. Von Plato, J., Creating modern probability (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1994).
481. Von Weizsacker, C. F., “Die Quantentheorie der einfachen Alternative,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung 13a, 245 (1958).
482. Von Weizsacker, C. F., “The Copenhagen interpretation,” in T. Bastin (Ed.), Quantum theory and beyond (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1971), p. 25.
483. Wallace, D., “Everettian rationality: defending Deutsch’s approach to probability in the Everett interpretation,” Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 34, 415 (2003).
484. Wallace, D., “Epistemology quantized: Circumstances in which we should come to believe in the Everett interpretation,” British J. Phil. Sci. 57, 655 (2006).
485. Wehrl, A., “General properties of entropy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 221 (1978).
486. Wei, T.-C., J. B. Altepeter, P. M. Goldbart, and W. J. Munro, “Measures of entanglement in multipartite bound entangled states,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 022322 (2004).
487. Wei, T.-C., and P. M. Goldbart, “Geometric measure of entanglement and applications to bipartite and multipartite States,” Phys. Rev. A 68, 042307 (2003).
488. Weihs, G., T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998).
489. Wentzel, L., “Types and tokens,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2006 edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/types-tokens/.
490. Werner, R. F., “Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model,” Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
491. Werner, R. F., and M. M. Wolf, “Bell inequalities and entanglement,” http://xxx.lanl.gov quant-ph/0107093.
492. Weyl, H., Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik (Hirzel; Leipzig, 1928) [English translation: The theory of groups and quantum mechanics (Methuen; London, 1931).]
493. Wheeler, J. A., “Law without law,” in [520] (1990), p. 182.
494. Wheeler, J. A., “Information, physics, quantum: The search for links,” in W. H. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information, SFI studies in the sciences of complexity, Vol. VIII (Addison-Wesley; Reading MA, 1990), p. 3.
495. Wheeler, J. A., “Sakharov revisited; It from bit,” in L. V. Keldysh and V. Yu. Fainberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international Sakharov conference on physics, Vol. 2 (Nova Science Publishers; New York, 1991), p. 751.
496. Wheeler, J. A., and W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ, 1983).
497. Whitaker, A., Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1996).
498. Whiteman, J. H. M., “The phenomenology of observation and explanation in quantum theory,” inT. Bastin (Ed.), Quantum theory and beyond (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1971), p. 71.
499. Wick, D., The infamous boundary (Birkhauser; Boston, 1995).
500. Wigner, E., “Remarks on the mind-body question,” in I. J. Good (Ed.), The scientist speculates (Heinemann; London, 1961), p. 284.
501. Wigner, E., Symmetries and reflections (Indiana University Press; Bloomington, 1967).
502. Wigner, E., “On hidden variables and quantum mechanical probabilities,” Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005 (1970).
503. Wigner, E., “The subject of our discussions,” in B. d’Espagnat (Ed.), Foundations of quantum mechanics. International school of physics “Enrico Fermi” 1970 (Academic Press; New York, 1971).
504. Wittgenstein, L., (C. K. Ogden, translator), Tractatus logico-philosophicus (Dover Publications; Mineola, NY, 1998), p. 29.
505. Wootters, W. K., “Statistical distance and Hilbert space,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 357 (1981).
506. Wootters, W. K., “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
507. Wootters, W. K., “Quantum entanglement as a resource for communication,” in J. Evans and A. S. Thorndike (Eds.), Quantum mechanics at a crossroads (Springer; Heidelberg, 2007), p. 213.
508. Wootters, W. K., and W. H. Zurek, “Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum nonseparability and a quantitative statement of Bohr’s principle,” Phys. Rev. D 19, 473 (1979).
509. Wootters, W. K., and W. H. Zurek, “A single quantum cannot be cloned,” Nature 299, 802 (1982).
510. Wu, C. S., and I. Shaknov, “The angular correlation of scattered annihilation radiation,” Phys. Rev. 77, 136 (1950).
511. Yao, A. C.,“Quantum circuit complexity,” in Proceedings of 34th annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science (IEEE Press; NewYork, 1993), p. 352.
512. Yu, T., and J. H. Eberly, “Qubit disentanglement and decoherence via de-phasing,” Phys. Rev. B 68, 165322 (2003).
513. Yuen, H. P. “Amplification of quantum states and noiseless photon amplifiers,” Phys. Lett. A 113, 405 (1986).
514. Zeh, H. D., “On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory,” Found. Phys. 1, 69 (1970).
515. Zeilinger, A., “Quantum entanglement: A fundamental concept finding its applications,” Physica Scripta T-76, 203 (1998).
516. Zeilinger, A., “A foundational principle for quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 29, 631 (1999).
517. Zeilinger, A., “Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S228 (1999).
518. Zeilinger, A., R. Gahler, C. G. Shull, W. Treimer, and W. Mampe, “Single-and double-slit diffraction of neutrons,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1067 (1988).
519. Zukowski, M., A. Zeilinger, M. A. Horne, and A. K. Ekert, “ ‘Event-ready-detectors’ Bell experiment via entanglement swapping,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993).
520. Zurek, W. H., “Maxwell’s demon, Szilard’s engine, and quantum measurements,” Los Alamos preprint LAUR 84-2751 (1984); arXiv:quant-ph/0301076v1 (2003).
521. Zurek, W. H. (Ed.), Complexity, entropy and the physics of information (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990).
522. Zurek, W. H., in J. J. Halliwell et al. (Eds.), Physical origins of time asymmetry (Cambridge Univ. Press; Cambridge, 1994), p. 175.
523. /Zurek, W., “Decoherence, einselection, and the origins of the classical,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).