The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A Focus on Student Strengths & Interests

Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 323-352

  Reis, Sally M ^a   Renzulli, Joseph S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85168912695     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003419426-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag
2. Baum. S. M. (1985). Learning disabled students with superior cognitive abilities: A validation study of descriptive behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
3. Baum. S. M. (1988). An enrichment program for the gifted learning disabled students. Gified Child Quarterly, 32 226-230
4. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
5. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
6. Burns, D. E. (1987). The effects of group training activities on students' creative productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
7. Burns, D. E. (1998). SEM network directory. Storrs, CT: Neag Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Connecticut
8. Cooper, C. (1983). Administrators' attitudes toward gified programs based on the enrichment triad/revolving door identification model: Case studies in decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
9. Delcourt, M. A. B. (1993). Creative productivity among secondary school students: Combining energy, interest, and imagination. Gified Child Quarterly, 37 23-31
10. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. New York: Houghton Mifflin
11. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan
12. Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1977). Diagnosing learning styles: Avoiding malpractice suits against school systems. Phi Delta Kappan, 58 418-420
13. Eleck, S. (2006). Students' perceptions of Renzulli Learning Systems. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs
14. Emerick, L. (1988). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors relating to the reversal of the academic underachievement pattern. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
15. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books
16. Gubbins, E. J. (Ed.). (1995). Research related to the enrichment triad model (RM 95212). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut
17. Heal, M. M. (1989). Student perceptions of labeling the gifted: A comparative case study analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
18. Hébert, T. P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16 22-28
19. Imbeau, Μ. Β. Α. (1991). Teachers' attitudes toward curriculum compacting: A comparison of different inservice strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
20. Karafelis, P. (1986). The effects of the tri-art drama curriculum on the reading comprehension of students with varying levels of cognitive ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
21. Kettle, K, Renzulli, J. S., & Rizza, M. G. (1998). Products of mind: Exploring student preferences for product development using My Way…
22. An Expression Style Instrument. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42 49-60
23. James, W (1885). On the functions of cognition. Mind, 10 27-44
24. Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1983). Let's cut out the cut-off score in the identification of the gifted. Roeper Review, 5 6-10
25. Kirschenbaum, R. J., & Siegle, D. (1993, April). Predicting creative performance in an enrichment program. Paper presented at the Association for the Education of Gifted Underachieving Students 6th Annual Conference, Portland, OR
26. Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence (pp. 179-189). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
27. Newman, J. L. (1991). The effects of the Talents Unlimited model on students' creative productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
28. Olenchak, Ε R. (1988). The schoolwide enrichment model in the elementary schools: A study of implementation stages and effects on educational excellence. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Technical report on research studies relating to the revolving door identification model (2nd ed., pp. 201-247). Storrs, CT: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Connecticut
29. Olenchak, Ε R, & Renzulli, J. S. (1989). The effectiveness of the schoolwide enrichment model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 44-57
30. Olenchak, Ε R. (1990). School change through gifted education: Effects on elementary students' attitudes toward learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14 66-78
31. Perleth, C. H., Sierwald, W., & Heller, K. A. (1993)- Selected results of the Munich longitudinal study of giftedness: The multidimensional/typological giftedness model. Roeper Review, 15 149-155
32. Piaget, J. (1975). The development of thought: Equilibration on of cognitive structures. New York: Viking
33. Reis, S. M. (1981). An analysis of the productivity of gifted students participating in programs using the revolving door identification model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
34. Reis, S. M., Burns, D. Ε., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
35. Reis, S. M., Eckert, R. D. Schreiber, E J., Jacobs, J., Briggs, C. Gubbins, E. J., et al. (2005). The schoolwide enrichment model reading study (RM05214). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut
36. Reis, S. M., Gentry, M., & Maxfield, L. R. (1998). The application of enrichment clusters to teachers' classroom practices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21 310-324
37. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1982). A case for the broadened conception of giftedness. Phi Delta Kappan, 64 619-620
38. Reis, S. M., Schader, R, Milne, H., & Stephens, R. (2003). Music & minds: Using a talent development approach for young adults with Williams syndrome. Exceptional Children, 69 293-314
39. Reis, S. M., Westberg, Κ. L., Kulikowich, J., Caillard, E, Hébert, T. P., Plucker, J. A, et al. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January? The curriculum compacting study (Research Monograph 93106). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut
40. Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J., & Purcell, J. H. (1998). Curriculum compacting and achievement test scores: What does the research say? Gifted Child Quarterly, 42 123-129
41. Renzulli, J. S. (1976). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20 303-326
42. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
43. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60 180-184, 261
44. Renzulli, J. S. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stalking the illusive meaning of qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 147-156
45. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press
46. Renzulli, J. S. (1988a). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32 298-309
47. Renzulli, J. S. (Ed.) (1988b). Technical report of research studies related to the enrichment triad/revolving door model (3rd ed.). Storrs, CT: Teaching the Talented Program, University of Connecticut
48. Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
49. Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, (2nd ed., pp. 246-79). New York: Cambridge University Press
50. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
51. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1994). Research related to the schoolwide enrichment model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38 2-14
52. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
53. Renzulli, J. S., Reis, S. M., & Smith, L. H. (1981). The revolving door identification model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
54. Renzulli, J. S., & Smith, L. H. (1978). The compactor. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
55. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., & Reis, S. M. (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. The Elementary School Journal, 82 185-194
56. Schack, G. D. (1986). Creative productivity and self-efficacy in children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
57. Starko, A. J. (1986). The effects of the revolving door identification model on creative productivity and self-efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
58. Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7 269-287
59. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Three facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125-147). Boston: Cambridge University Press
60. Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Thinking styles: Keys to understanding student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 71 366-371
61. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press
62. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press
63. Taylor, L. A. (1992). The effects of the secondary enrichment triad model and a career counseling component on the career development of vocational-technical school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
64. Thorndike, E. L. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12 124-127
65. Torrance, Ε. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
66. Torrance, Ε. P. (1974). Norms-Technical manual: Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service
67. Ward, V. S. (1960). Systematic intensification and extensification of the school curriculum. Exceptional Children, 28, 67-71, 77
68. Westberg, K. L. (1991). The effects of instruction in the inventing process on students' development of inventions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
69. Westberg, K. L. (2002). Guiding students' independent projects. Pre-convention Institute of the annual convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Denver