Is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning New to Chemistry?

Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 197-216

  Coppola, Brian P ^a   Jacobs, Dennis C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85168881197     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003444268-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. American Chemical Society. (1999). Chemistry in Context. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Apple, T., and A. Cutler. (1999). “The Rensselear Studio General Chemistry Course.” Journal of Chemical Education 76: 462-463.
3. Bailey, C.A., K. Kingbury, K. Kulinowski, J. Paradis, and R. Schoonover. (2000). “An Integrated Lecture-Laboratory Environment for General Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education 77: 195-199.
4. Beall, H., and S. Prescott. (1994). “Concepts and Calculations in Chemistry Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Chemical Education 71: 111-112.
5. Berzelius, J.J. (1982). Berzelius und Liebig: Wire Briefe von 1831-1845. Göttington, Germany: Jürgen Cromm.
6. Bieron, J.F., and F.J. Dinan. (2000). “Not Your Ordinary Lab Day.” Journal of College Science Teaching 30(1): 44-47.
7. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
8. Brown, J.S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid. (1989). “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning.” Educational Researcher 18: 32-42.
9. Champagne, A.B., L.E. Klofper, and J.H. Anderson. (1980). “Factors Influencing the Learning of Classical Mechanics.” American Journal of Physics 48: 1074-1079.
10. Chism, N.V. (1997-98). “Developing a Philosophy of Teaching Statement.” In Essays on Teaching Excellence: Toward the Best in the Academy, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 1-2. Athens, GA: New Forums Press and the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.
11. Cognition and Technology Group, Vanderbilt University. (1990). “Anchored Instruction and Its Relationship to Situated Cognition.” Educational Researcher 19: 2-10.
12. Coppola, B.P. (2001). “Strength in Numbers: Uniting the Fronts in Higher Education (Summary of Symposium).” In College Pathways to the Science Education Standards, edited by E.D. Siebert and W.J. Mcintosh, pp. 147-150. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
13. Coppola, B.P. (forthcoming). “Writing a Statement of Teaching Philosophy.” Journal of College Science Teaching. (A publication based on this article is available from the ACS Department of Career Services, Washington, DC, and can be obtained free of charge by calling 1-800-227-5558 or by sending email to careers@acs.org.)
14. Coppola, B.P., and R.G. Lawton. (1995). '“Who Has the Same Substance That I Have?' A Blueprint for Collaborative Learning Activities.” Journal of Chemical Education 72: 1120-1122.
15. Coppola, B.P., S.N. Ege, and R.G. Lawton. (1997). “The University of Michigan Undergraduate Chemistry Curriculum: 2. Instructional Strategies and Assessment.” Journal of Chemical Education 74: 84-94.
16. Ege, S.N., B.P. Coppola, and R.G. Lawton. (1997). “The University of Michigan Undergraduate Chemistry Curriculum: 1. Philosophy, Curriculum, and the Nature of Change.” Journal of Chemical Education 74: 74-83.
17. Goodyear, G.E., and D. Allchin. (1998). “Statements of Teaching Philosophy.” In To Improve the Academy, Vol. 17, edited by M. Kaplan, pp. 103-122. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press and the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.
18. Gosser, D., and V. Roth. (1998). “The Workshop Chemistry Project: Peer-Led Team Learning.” Journal of Chemical Education 75: 2. (See also http://www.pltl.org.)
19. Hofstein A., and V.N. Lunetta. (1982). “The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research.” Review of Educational Research 52(2): 201-217.
20. Hutchings, P., and L.S. Shulman. (September/October 1999). “The Scholarship of Teaching: New Elaborations, New Developments.” Change 31(5): 10-15.
21. Jacobs, D.C. (2000). “A Chemical Mixture of Methods.” In Opening Lines: Approaches to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, edited by P. Hutchings, pp. 41-52. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
22. Knight, D. (1992). Ideas in Chemistry: A History of the Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23. Kozma, R.B. (2000). “The Use of Multiple Representations and the Social Construction of Understanding in Chemistry.” In Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education: Advanced Designs for Technologies of Learning, edited by M. Jacobson and R. Kozma, pp. 11-46. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Kozma, R.B., and J. Russell. (1997). “Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43(9): 949-968.
25. Kozma, R.B., E. Chin, J. Russell, and N. Marx. (2000). “The Role of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 9(3): 105-144.
26. Lave, J., and E. Wenger. (1991). “Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.” In Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, pp. 57-69. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.
27. Mills, P., W.V Sweeney, R. Marino, and S. Clarkson. (2000). “A New Approach to Teaching Introductory Science: The Gas Module.” Journal of Chemical Education 77: 1161-1165.
28. Nakhleh, M.B., and R.C. Mitchell. (1993). “Concept Learning Versus Problem Solving.” Journal of Chemical Education 70: 190-192.
29. Nurrenburn, S., and M. Pickering. (1987). “Concept Learning Versus Problem Solving: Is There a Difference?" Journal of Chemical Education 64: 508-510.
30. Pickering, M. (1990). “Further Studies on Concept Learning Versus Problem Solving.” Journal of Chemical Education 67: 254-255.
31. Sawrey, B.A. (1990). “Concept Learning Versus Problem Solving: Revisited.” Journal of Chemical Education 67: 253-254.
32. Tien, L.T., D. Rickey, and A.M. Stacy. (1999). “The MORE Thinking Frame: Guiding Students’ Thinking in the Laboratory.” Journal of College Science Teaching 28(5): 318-324.
33. Wegner, S.B., K.C. Holloway, and E.M. Garton. (1999). “The Effects of Internet-Based Instruction on Student Learning.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 3(2): 59-69.
34. Wright, J.C., S.B. Millar, S.A. Kosiuk, D.L. Penberthy, P.H. Williams, and B.E. Wampold. (1998). “A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence.” Journal of Chemical Education 75: 986-992.