INVESTIGATING FACULTY DEVELOPMENT FOR SERVICE LEARNING

Research on Service Learning: Conceptual Frameworks and Assessment: VOLUME 2A: Students and Faculty

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 187-214

  Chism, Nancy Van Note ^a   Palmer, Megan M ^b   Price, Mary F ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85166053797     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003446750-10     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Bringle, R. G., Hatcher, J. A., Jones, S. G., & Plater, W. M. (2006). Sustaining civic engagement: Faculty development, roles, and rewards. Metropolitan Universities, 17(1), 62-74.
2. Chism, N. (2004). Using a framework to engage faculty in instructional technologies. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 27(2), 39-45.
3. Kreber, C, & Brook, P. (2001). Impact evaluation of educational development programs. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 96-108.
4. Sharp, R. (2004). How do professionals learn and develop? Implications for staff and educational developers. In D. Baume & P. Kahn (Eds.), Enhancing staff and educational development (pp. 134-153). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
5. Abes, E. S., Jackson, C, & Jones, S. R. (2002). Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(1), 5-17.
6. Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Teaching and learning through critical reflection: A tutorial for service-learning students (instructor version). Raleigh, NC: Authors.
7. Baldwin, R. G. (1996). Faculty career stages and implications for professional development. In D. E. Finnegan, D. Webster, & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Faculty and faculty issues in colleges and universities (pp. 551-561). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.
8. Bannerjee, M., & Hausafus, C. (2007). Faculty use of service-learning: Perceptions, motivations, and impediments for the human services. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14(1), 32-45.
9. Baume, D. (2002). Scholarship, academic development and the future. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(2), 109-112.
10. Baume, D. (2004, June). Professional development, professional recognition and professional standards for higher education teachers and developers. Paper presented at the conference of the International Consortium for Educational Development, Ottawa, Canada.
11. Beckhard, R. (2006). What is organizational development? In J. V. Gallos (Ed.), Organizational development: A Jossey-Bass reader (pp. 3-38). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Bland, C, & Bergquist, W. (1997). The vitality of senior faculty members: Snow on the roof-fire in the furnace. ASHE Higher Education Report, 25(7). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Bloomgarden, A. H., & O’Meara, K. A. (2007). Faculty role integration and community engagement: Harmony or cacophony? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(2), 5-18.
14. Bringle, R. G., Clayton, P. H., & Price, M. F. (2009). Partnerships in service learning and civic engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service Learning & Civic Engagement, 1(1), 1-20.
15. Bringle, R. G., Games, R., Foos, C. L., Osgood, R., & Osborne, R. (2000). Faculty Fellows Program: Enhancing integrated professional development through community service. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 882-894.
16. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1995). A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2(1), 112-122.
17. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1999). Reflection in service-learning: Making meaning of experience. Educational Horizons, 7(4), 179-185.
18. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2000). Institutionalization of service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 273-290.
19. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2009). Innovative practices in service learning and curricular engagement. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 37-46. doi:10.1002/he.356
20. Bringle, R. G., Hatcher, J. A., Jones, S. G., & Plater, W. M. (2006). Sustaining civic engagement: Faculty development, roles, and rewards. Metropolitan Universities, 17(1), 62-74.
21. Butin, D. W. (2007). Focusing our aim: Strengthening faculty commitment to community engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(6), 34-37.
22. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
23. Carracelas-Juncal, C., Bossaller, J., & Yaoyuneyong, G. (2009). Integrating service-learning pedagogy: A faculty reflective process. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 4, 28-44.
24. Chism, N. (2004). Using a framework to engage faculty in instructional technologies. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 27(2), 39-45.
25. Chism, N. (2005). Evaluating approaches to faculty development in the use of learning technologies. Journal of Faculty Development, 20(1), 31-36.
26. Chism, N., & Szabo, B. (1998). How faculty development programs evaluate their services. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organization Development, 15(2), 55-62.
27. Clayton, P. H., & Ash, S. L. (2004). Shifts in perspective: Capitalizing on the counter-normative nature of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 59-70.
28. Clayton, P. H., & Ash, S. L. (2005). Reflection as a key component in faculty development. On the Horizon, 73(3), 161-169.
29. Clayton, P. H., Bringle, R. G., Senor, B., Huq, J., & Morrison, M. (2010). Differentiating and assessing relationships in service-learning and civic engagement: Exploitative, transactional, and transformational. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(2), 5-21.
30. Clayton, P. H., & O’Steen, W. L. (2010). Working with faculty: Designing customized developmental strategies. In B. Jacoby & P. Mutascio (Eds.), Looking in-reaching out: A reflective guide for community service-learning professionals (pp. 95-135). Boston, MA: Campus Compact.
31. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington, MA: Heath.
32. Driscoll, A. (2000). Studying faculty and service learning: Directions for inquiry and development [Special issue]. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Fall, 35-41.
33. Driscoll, A., Holland, B. A., Gelmon, S. B., & Kerrigan, S. (1996). An assessment model for service-learning: Comprehensive case studies of impact on faculty, students, community, and institution. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 3(1), 66-71.
34. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London, UK: Routledge.
35. Eyler, J. S., Giles, D. E., Jr., Stenson, C. M., & Gray, C. J. (2001). At a glance: What we know about the effects of service learning on college students, faculty, institutions and communities, 1993-2000 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Learn and Serve America’s National Service Learning Clearinghouse.
36. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37. Hammond, C. (1994). Integrating service and academic study: Faculty motivation and satisfaction in Michigan higher education. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1(1), 21-28.
38. Harwood, A. M., Ochs, L., Currier, D., Duke, S., Hammond, J., Moulds, L., Werder, C. (2005). Communities for growth: Cultivating and sustaining service-learning teaching and scholarship in a faculty fellows program. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12(1), 41-51.
39. Henderson, S., Fair, M., Sather, P., & Dewey, B. (2008). Service learning research as a feedback loop for faculty development. In M. A. Bowdon, S. H. Billig, & B. A. Holland (Eds.), Scholarship for sustaining service learning and civic engagement (pp. 113-138). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
40. Hesser, G. (1995). Faculty assessment of student learning: Outcomes attributed to service-learning and evidence of changes in faculty attitudes about experiential education. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2(1), 33-42.
41. Hodge, G., Lewis, T., Kramer, K., & Hughes, R. (2001). Collaboration for excellence: Engaged scholarship at Collin County Community College. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23, 675-690.
42. Howard, J. (2000). Academic service learning: Myths, challenges and recommendations. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 12(3), 12-19.
43. Howard, J. (2001). Service learning course design workbook. Ann Arbor, MI: OCSL Press.
44. Jameson, J. K., Clayton, P. H., Jaeger, A. J., & Bringle, R. G. (2012). Investigating faculty learning in the context of community engaged scholarship. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 18(2), 40-55.
45. Kecskes, K. J., Gelmon, S. B., & Spring, A. (2006). Creating engaged departments: A program for organizational and faculty development. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 24, pp. 147-165). Bolton, MA: Anker.
46. Kecskes, K. J., & Spring, A. (2006). Continuums of engagement at Portland State University: An institution-wide initiative to support departmental collaboration for the common good. In K. Kecskes (Ed.), Engaging departments: Moving faculty culture fiom private to public, individual to collective focus for the common good. Bolton, MA: Anker.
47. Kirkpatrick, D. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Berrett-Koehler.
48. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
49. Kreber, C, & Brook, P. (2001). Impact evaluation of educational development programmes. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 96-108.
50. Kugel, P. (1993). How professors develop as teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 315-328.
51. Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. In T. N. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 197-211). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
52. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11.
53. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning II: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115-127.
54. Mayhew, E. (2006). Organizational change processes. In B. B. Jones & M. Brazzel (Eds.), The NTL handbook of organizational development and change: Principles, practices, and perspectives (pp. 104-120). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
55. McGuire, L., Strong, D., Lay, K., Ardemagni, E., Wittberg, P., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). A case study of faculty learning around reflection: A collaborative faculty development project. In B. E. Moeley, S. H. Billig, & B. A. Holland (Eds.), Creating our identities in service-learning and community engagement (pp. 53-72). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
56. McKay, V. C, & Rozee, P. D. (2004). Characteristics of faculty who adopt community service learning pedagogy. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 10(2), 21-33.
57. McKeachie, W. J. (1991). What theories underlie the practice of faculty development? In K. Zahorski (Ed.), To improve the academy (Vol. 10, pp. 3-8). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
58. McKinney, K. (2002). Instructional development: Relationships to teaching and learning in higher education. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 20, pp. 225-237). Bolton, MA: Anker.
59. Mundy, M. F. (2004). Faculty engagement in service learning: Individual and organizational factors at distinct institutional types. In M. Welch & S. H. Billig (Eds.), New perspectives in service-learning: Research to advance the field (pp. 169-193). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
60. O’Meara, K. A., & Niehaus, E. (2009). Service learning is …: How faculty explain their practice. Michigan Journal of Service Learning, 16(1), 17-32.
61. Piccinin, S. (1999). How individual consultation affects teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999(79), 7l-84. doi:10.1002/tl.7908
62. Piccinin, S., & Moore, J. P. (2002). The impact of individual consultation on the teaching of younger versus older faculty. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(2), 123-135.
63. Pike, G. R., Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (in press). Assessing civic engagement at Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis [Special issue]. New Directions for Institutional Research.
64. Plank, K. M., Kalish, A., Rohdieck, S. V., & Harper, K. A. (2005). A vision beyond measurement: Creating an integrated data system for teaching centers. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 23, pp. 173-190). Bolton, MA: Anker.
65. Pribbenow, D. A. (2005). The impact of service-learning pedagogy on faculty teaching and learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(2), 25-38.
66. Professional and Organizational Development Nerwork in Higher Education. (2007). What is faculty development? Retrieved from http://www.podnerwork.org/faculty_development/definitions.htm
67. Ramsden, P. (1994). Using research on student learning to enhance educational quality. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Staff Development. Retrieved from www.lon donmet.ac.uk/deliberations/ocsld-publications/isltp-ramsden.cfm
68. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
69. Rice, D., & Stacey, K. (1997). Small group dynamics as a catalyst for change: A faculty development model for academic service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4(1), 64-71.
70. Robertson, D. R. (2000). Professors in space and time: Four utilities of a new metaphor and developmental model for professors-as-teachers. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 11(1), 117-132.
71. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
72. Seldin, P. (2006). Tailoring faculty development programs to faculty career stages. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy (Vol. 24, pp. 137-146). Bolton, MA: Anker.
73. Sharp, R. (2004). How do professionals learn and develop? Implications for staff and educational developers. In D. Baume & P. Kahn (Eds.), Enhancing staff and educational development (pp. 134-153). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
74. Smith, H. J. (2004). The impact of staff development programmes and activities. In D. Baume & P. Kahn (Eds.), Enhancing staff and educational development (pp. 96-117). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
75. Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning fom the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker.
76. Stanton, T. K. (1994). The experience of faculty participants in an instructional development seminar on service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1(1), 7-20.
77. Varlotta, L. (2000). Service as text: Making the metaphor meaningful. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7(1), 76-84.
78. Wade, A., & Demb, A. (2009). A conceptual model to explore faculty community engagement. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(2), 5-16.
79. Ward, K. (1996). Service-learning and student volunteerism: Reflections on institutional commitment. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 3(1), 55-65.
80. Weimer, M. (2010). Inspired college teaching: A career-long resource for professional growth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
81. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Zlotkowski, E. (1998). A service learning approach to faculty development. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1998(73), 81-89. doi:10.1002/tl.7310
83. Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action research in higher education: Examples and reflections. London, UK: Kogan Page.