Neural characterization in partially observed populations of spiking neurons

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Pillow, Jonathan W ^a   Latham, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); NEURAL NETWORKS; SIGNAL ENCODING;

BRAIN AREAS; ENCODING MODELS; MODELING APPROACH; MULTIPLE STAGES; NEURAL CHARACTERIZATION; POINT PROCESS; POPULATIONS OF SPIKING NEURONS; PROCESS-MODELS; RESPONSE PROPERTIES; SENSORY STIMULUS;

NEURONS;

EID: 85162072974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. I. Hunter and M. Korenberg. The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and Hammerstein cascade models. Biological Cybernetics, 55:135-144, 1986.
2. N. Brenner, W. Bialek, and R. de Ruyter van Steveninck. Adaptive rescaling optimizes information transmission. Neuron, 26:695-702, 2000.
3. H. Plesser and W. Gerstner. Noise in integrate-and-fire neurons: From stochastic input to escape rates. Neural Computation, 12:367-384, 2000.
4. E. J. Chichilnisky. A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 12:199-213, 2001. (Pubitemid 33626943)
5. E. P. Simoncelli, L. Paninski, J. Pillow, and O. Schwartz. Characterization of neural responses with stochastic stimuli. In M. Gazzaniga, editor, The Cognitive Neurosciences, pages 327-338. MIT Press, 3rd edition, 2004.
6. M. Berry and M. Meister. Refractoriness and neural precision. Journal of Neuroscience, 18:2200-2211, 1998. (Pubitemid 28141424)
7. K. Harris, J. Csicsvari, H. Hirase, G. Dragoi, and G. Buzsaki. Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus. Nature, 424:552-556, 2003. (Pubitemid 36975776)
8. W. Truccolo, U. T. Eden, M. R. Fellows, J. P. Donoghue, and E. N. Brown. A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble and extrinsic covariate effects. J. Neurophysiol, 93(2):1074-1089, 2004.
9. L. Paninski. Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 15:243-262, 2004. (Pubitemid 39586479)
10. J. W. Pillow, J. Shlens, L. Paninski, A. Sher, A. M. Litke, and E. P. Chichilnisky, E. J. Simoncelli. Correlations and coding with multi-neuronal spike trains in primate retina. SFN abstracts, #768.9, 2007.
11. D. Nykamp. Reconstructing stimulus-driven neural networks from spike times. NIPS, 15:309-316, 2003.
12. D. Nykamp. Revealing pairwise coupling in linear-nonlinear networks. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 65:2005-2032, 2005. (Pubitemid 41802088)
13. M. Okatan, M. Wilson, and E. Brown. Analyzing functional connectivity using a network likelihood model of ensemble neural spiking activity. Neural Computation, 17:1927-1961, 2005. (Pubitemid 41057057)
14. L. Srinivasan, U. Eden, A. Willsky, and E. Brown. A state-space analysis for reconstruction of goaldirected movements using neural signals. Neural Computation, 18:2465-2494, 2006. (Pubitemid 44511771)
15. D. Nykamp. A mathematical framework for inferring connectivity in probabilistic neuronal networks. Mathematical Biosciences, 205:204-251, 2007. (Pubitemid 44894450)
16. J. E. Kulkarni and L Paninski. Common-input models for multiple neural spike-train data. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 18(4):375-407, 2007.
17. B. Yu, A. Afshar, G. Santhanam, S. Ryu, K. Shenoy, and M. Sahani. Extracting dynamical structure embedded in neural activity. NIPS, 2006.
18. S. Escola and L. Paninski. Hidden Markov models applied toward the inference of neural states and the improved estimation of linear receptive fields. COSYNE07, 2007.
19. P. McCullagh and J. Nelder. Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London, 1989.
20. A. Dempster, N. Laird, and R. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Statistical Society, B, 39(1):1-38, 1977.
21. R. Neal and G. Hinton. A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In M. I. Jordan, editor, Learning in Graphical Models, pages 355-368. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999.
22. GE Hinton, P. Dayan, BJ Frey, and RM Neal. The" wake-sleep" algorithm for unsupervised neural networks. Science, 268(5214):1158-1161, 1995.