A Web-Based Tutoring System for the Structure Strategy: Theoretical Background, Design, and Findings

Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 347-374

  Meyer, Bonnie J F ^a   Wijekumar, Kay ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145543214     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203810033-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., and Pelletier, R. (1995).Cognitive tutors:Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 167-207.
2. Aristotle. (1960) (L. Cooper, Trans.). The rhetoric of Aristotle. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., and Ostertag, J. (1987).Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly 22 331-346.
4. Bartlett, B. J. (1978).Top-level structure as an organizational strategy for recall of classroom text Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
5. Bloom, B. S. (1984).The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13 4-16.
6. Carrell, P. L. (1985).Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly 19 727-752.
7. Cook, L. K., and Mayer, R. E. (1988).Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology 80 448-456.
8. Corbett, A. T., and Anderson, J. R. (1991March)Feedback control and learning to program with the CMU/LISP tutor Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
9. Crothers, E. J. (1972).Memory structure and the recall of discourse. In J. B. Carroll and R. O. Freedle (Eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge 247-283 Washington, DC: Winston
10. Dee-Lucas, D., and DiVesta, F. J. (1980).Learner-generated organizational aids: Effects on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology 72 304-311.
11. Duke, N. K., and Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup and S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12. Englert, C. S., and Hiebert, E. H. (1984).Children’s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology 76 65-74.
13. Fillmore, C. J. (1968).The case for case. In E. Bach and R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory 1-81 New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
14. Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R. M., and Massoni, S. A. (1996).Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher 49 518-533.
15. Gordon, C. J. (1990).Contexts for expository text structure use. Reading Research and Instruction 29 55-72.
16. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., and Trabasso, T. (1994).Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review 101 371-395.
17. Grimes, J. E. (1975).The thread of discourse The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
18. Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., and Kolar, C. (1995).Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 4 321-364.
19. Kintsch, W. (1988).The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructionintegration model. Psychological Review 95 165-182.
20. Kintsch, W. (1998).Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R. Ruddell and N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1270-1328). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
22. Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. (1978).Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85 363-394.
23. Koedinger, K. R. (2001).Cognitive tutors as modeling tool and instructional model. In K. D. Forbus and P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), Smart machines in education: The coming revolution in educational technology 145-168 Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press
24. Lajoie, S. (Ed.). (2000). Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls. Theory change, paradigm shifts, and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes (Vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Lexile Framework for Reading. (2005).Lexile analyzer Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://www.lexile.com/DesktopDefault.aspx?view=reandtabindex=2andtabid=31andtabpageid= 358
26. Loman, N. L., and Mayer, R. E. (1983).Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology 75 402-412.
27. Long, D. L., and Lea, R. B. (2005).Have we been searching for meaning in all the wrong places? Defining the “search after meaning” principle in comprehension. Discourse Processes 39 279-298.
28. Lorch, R. F., Jr., and Lorch, E. P. (1985)Topic structure representation and text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology 77 137-148.
29. Lorch, R. F., Jr., and Lorch, E. P. (1996)Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 36-48.
30. Mandler, J. M., and Johnson, N. S. (1977).Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology 9 111-151.
31. Mayer, R. E. (2001).Multimedia learning Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Mayer, R. E., and Moreno, R. (1998).A split-attention effect in multimedia learning:Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 312-320.
33. McKeague, C. A. (1996).Effects of hypertext structure and reading activity on novices’ learning from text Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
34. McKoon, G., and Ratcliff, R. (1992).Inference during reading. Psychological Review 99 440-466.
35. McNamara, D. S. (2004January)Coh-Metrix: Automated cohesion and coherences scores to predict test readability and facilitate comprehension Paper presented at the Reading Comprehension Principal Investigators Meeting of the Institute of Educational Sciences in Washington, DC.
36. McNamara, D. S., Levinstein, I. B., and Boonthum, C. (2004).iSTART: Interactive Strategy Trainer for Active Reading and Thinking. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36 222-233.
37. Meyer, B. J. F. (1971).Idea units recalled from prose in relation to their position in the logical structure, importance, stability and order in the passage Unpublished master’s thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
38. Meyer, B. J. F. (1975).Identification of the structure of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory. Journal of Reading Behavior 7 7-47.
39. Meyer, B. J. F. (1999).The importance of text structure in everyday reading. In A. Ram and K. Moorman (Eds.), Understanding language understanding: Computational models of reading 227-252 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
40. Meyer, B. J. F. (2003).Text coherence and readability. Topics in Language Disorders 23 204-224.
41. Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., and Bluth, G. J. (1980).Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly 16 72-103.
42. Meyer, B. J. F., and Freedle, R. O. (1984).Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal 21 121-143.
43. Meyer, B. J. F., and McConkie, G. W. (1973).What is recalled after hearing a passage? Journal of Educational Psychology 65 109-117.
44. Meyer, B. J. F., Middlemiss, W., Theodorou, E., Brezinski, K. L., McDougall, J., and Bartlett, B. J. (2002).Older adults tutoring fifth-grade children in the structure strategy via the Internet. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 486-519.
45. Meyer, B. J. F., and Poon, L. W. (1997).Age differences in efficiency of reading comprehension from printed versus computer-displayed text. Educational Gerontology 23 789-807.
46. Meyer, B. J. F., and Poon, L. W. (2001).Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 141-159.
47. Meyer, B. J. F., and Rice, G. E. (1982).The interaction of reader strategies and the organization of text. Text, Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 2 155-192.
48. Meyer, B. J. F., and Rice, G. E. (1989).Prose processing in adulthood: The text, the reader, and the task. In L. W. Poon, D. C. Rubin, and B. A. Wilson (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and later life 157-194 New York: Cambridge University Press
49. Meyer, B. J. F., Talbot, A. P., Poon, L. W., and Johnson, M. M. (2001).Effects of structure strategy instruction on text recall of older African American Adults. In J. L. Harris, A. Kamhi, and K. E. Pollock (Eds.), Literacy in African American communities 233-263 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
50. Meyer, B. J. F, Wijekumar, K., and Middlemiss, W. (2005July)Web-based intelligent tutoring for the structure strategy Report to the U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences.
51. Meyer, B. J. F., Wijekumar, K., Middlemiss, W., Meier, C., Spielvogel, J., and Higley, K. (2006April)Impact of computer-delivered strategy instruction on student outcomes. In A. Sweet (Chair), The many faces of strategy instruction Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
52. Meyer, B. J. F., Young, C. J., and Bartlett, B. J. (1989).Memory improved: Reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structures Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
53. Myers, J. L., and O’Brien, E. J. (1989).Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes 26 131-158.
54. Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., and Lipson, M. Y. (1984).Informed strategies for learning:A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 76 1239-1252.
55. Polley, R. R. (1994).Facilitating recall through awareness of text structure Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Kentucky.
56. Pressley, M., and McCormick, C. B. (1995).Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers New York: HarperCollins.
57. Raphael, T. E., and Kirschner, B. M. (1985). The effects of instruction in comparison/ to compare/text structure on sixth-grade students’ reading comprehension and writing products (Research Series No. 161). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
58. Richgels, D. J., McGee, L. M., Lomax, R. G., and Sheard, C. (1987).Awareness of four text structures: Effects in recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly 22 177-196.
59. Samuels, S. J., Tennyson, R., Sax, L., Mulcahy, P., Schermer, N., and Hajovy, H. (1988).Adults’ use of text structure in the recall of a scientific journal article. Journal of Educational Research 81 171-174.
60. Sanders, T. J. M., and Noordman, L. G. M. (2000).The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes 29 37-60.
61. Slater, W. H., Graves, M. F., and Piche, G. L. (1985).Effects of structural organizers on ninth-grade students’ comprehension and recall of four patterns of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly 20 189-202.
62. Taylor, B. M., and Beach, R. W (1984).The effects of text structure instruction on middle grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly 19 134-146.
63. Theodorou, E. (2006).Comparing the effects of learning the structure strategy via Webbased training or classroom training on the recall of near and far transfer texts Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
64. Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., and Kintsch, W. (1988).Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory and Cognition 16 283-298.
65. van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., and Kendeou, P. (2005).Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes 39 299-316.
66. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., and Linderholm, T. (1999).The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In S. R. Goldman and H. van Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading 71-98 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
67. Wiederholt, J., and Blalock, G., (2000).Gray silent reading tests Austin TX: Pro-ed.
68. Weisberg, R., and Balajthy, E. (1989).Transfer effects of instructing poor readers to recognize expository text structure. In S. McCormick and J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction: Thirty-eighth yearbook of the National Reading Conference 279-285 Chicago: National Reading Conference
69. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., and Lauer, K. D. (2004).Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality 12 129-144.
70. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., DeSisto, L. A., and deCani, J. S. (2005).Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 97 538-550.