Semantic Structure and Episodic Memory

Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 121-141

  Howard, Marc W ^a   Jing, Bing ^a   Addis, Kelly M ^b   Kahana, Michael J ^c  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Indiana University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145535632     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936399-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
2. Dennis, S., and Humphreys, M. S. (2001). Acontext noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478.
3. Glanzer, M. (1969). Distance between related words in free recall: Trace of the STS. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 105-111.
4. Griffiths, T., andSteyvers, M. (2002). Aprobabilistic approach to semantic representation. In W. Gray and C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 381-386). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
5. Griffiths, T., andSteyvers, M. (2003). Prediction and semantic association. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, and K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15 (pp. 11-18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Howard, M.W., Fotedar, M. S., Datey, A.V., andHasselmo, M. E. (2005). The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: Toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. Psychological Review, 112(1), 75-116.
7. Howard, M.W., andKahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 923-941.
8. Howard, M.W., and Kahana, M. J. (2002a). Adistributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269-299.
9. Howard, M.W., and Kahana, M. J. (2002b). When does semantic similarity help episodic retrieval? Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 85-98.
10. Howard, M. W., Kahana, M. J., and Wingfield, A. (in press). Aging and contextual binding: Modeling recency and lag-recency effects with the temporal context model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
11. Kahana, M.J. (1996). Associative retrieval processes in free recall. Memory and Cognition, 24, 103-109.
12. Kahana, M. J., and Caplan, J. B. (2002). Associative asymmetry in probed recall of serial lists. Memory and Cognition, 30, 841-849.
13. Kahana, M. J., Dolan, E. D., Sauder, C. L., andWingfield, A. (2005). Intrusions in episodic recall: Age differences in editing of overt responses. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60, 92-97.
14. Kahana, M. J., and Howard, M.W. (2005). Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 159-164.
15. Kahana, M. J., Howard, M.W., Zaromb, F., andWingfield, A. (2002). Age dissociates recency and lag-recency effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 530-540.
16. Kimball, D. R., andBjork, R. A. (2002). Influences of intentional and unintentional forgetting on false memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 116-130.
17. Kimball, D. R., Bjork, R. A., and Bjork, E. L. (2001, July). Retrieval inhibition can increase or decrease false memories. Paper presented at International Conference on Memory III, Valencia, Spain.
18. Klein, K. A., Addis, K. M., and Kahana, M. J. (2005). Acomparative analysis of serial and free recall. Memory and Cognition, 33(5), 833-839.
19. Kwantes, P. J. (2005). Using context to build semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(4), 703-710.
20. Landauer, T. K., and Dumais, S. T. (1997). Solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
21. Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482-488.
22. Murdock, B. B., and Metcalfe, J. (1978). Controlled rehearsal in single-trial free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 309-324.
23. Murdock, B. B., and Okada, R. (1970). Interresponse times in single-trial free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 86, 263-267.
24. Nelson, D. L., Bennett, D. J., Gee, N. R., Schreiber, T. A., and McKinney, V. M. (1993). Implicit memory: Effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 747-764.
25. Nelson, D. L., Bennett, D. J., and Leibert, T.W. (1997). One step is not enough: Making better use of association norms to predict cued recall. Memory and Cognition, 25, 785-796.
26. Nelson, D. L., and McEvoy, C. L. (2000). What is this thing called frequency? Memory and Cognition, 28(4), 509-522.
27. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., and Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36(3), 402-407.
28. Nelson, D. L., McKinney, V. M., Gee, N. R., andJanczura, G. A. (1998). Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. Psychological Review, 105, 299-324.
29. Nelson, D. L., and Zhang, N. (2000). The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7(4), 604-617.
30. Nelson, D. L., Zhang, N., andMcKinney, V.M. (2001). The ties that bind what is known to the recognition of what is new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1147-1159.
31. Raaijmakers, J. G.W., andShiffrin, R.M. (1980). SAM:Atheory of probabilistic search of associativememory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, p. 207-262). New York: Academic Press.
32. Roberts, W. A. (1972). Free recall of word lists varying in length and rate of presentation: A test of total-time hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 365-372.
33. Romney, A. K., Brewer, D. D., andBatchelder, W.H. (1993). Predicting clustering from semantic structure. Psychological Science, 4, 28-34.
34. Schwartz, R. M., andHumphreys, M. S. (1973). Similarity judgments and free recall of unrelated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 10-15.
35. Steyvers, M., andMalmberg, K. J. (2003). The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 760-766.
36. Steyvers, M., Shiffrin, R. M., andNelson, D. L. (2004).Word association spaces for predicting semantic similarity effects in episodic memory. In A. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications: Festschrift in honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer (pp. 237-249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37. Tehan, G., andHumphreys, M.S. (1996). Cuing effects in short-term recall. Memory and Cognition, 24(6), 719-732.
38. Tulving, E. (1966). Subjective organization and effects of repetition in multi-trial free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(2), 193-197.
39. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. NewYork: OxfordUniversity Press.
40. Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1-25.
41. Zaromb, F. M., Howard, M.W., Dolan, E. D., Sirotin, Y. B., Tully, M., Wingfield, A., et al. (in press). Temporally-based false memories in fee recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.