Learning to Teach Science

Handbook of Research on Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1151-1178

  Russell, Tom ^a   Martin, Andrea K ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145524280     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203824696-42     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York:Oxford University Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Designs for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Anderson, C. W. (2000). Challenges to science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 293-294.
5. Anderson, R. D., and Mitchener, C. P. (1996). Research on science teacher education. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3-44). New York: Macmillan.
6. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7. Baird, J. R., Gunstone, R. F., Penna, C., Fensham, P. J., and White, R. T. (1990). Researching balance between cognition and affect in science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 20, 11-20.
8. Baird, J. R., and Mitchell, I. M. (Eds.). (1986). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study-The PEEL project. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.
9. Bryan, L. A., and Abell, S. K. (1999). The development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121-139.
10. Chinn, C. A., and Brewer, W. F. (1998). Theories of knowledge acquisition. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 97-113). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.
11. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1997). Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum: Common framework of science learning outcomes K-12 (draft). Toronto: Author.
12. Crawford, B. A., Krajcik, J. S., and Marx, R. W. (1999). Elements of a community of learners in a middle school science classroom. Science Education, 83, 701-723.
13. Curriculum Corporation. (1994a). Science-A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
14. Curriculum Corporation. (1994b). A statement on science for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
15. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
16. DiSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225.
17. Driver, R. (1989). Changing conceptions. In P. Adey, J. Bliss, J. Head, and M. Shayer (Eds.), Adolescent development and school science (pp. 79-99). Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
18. Duit, R., and Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science-from behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3-26). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
19. Duschl, R. A., and Hamilton, R. J. (1998). Conceptual change in science and in the learning of science. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1047-1065). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
20. Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 69(7), S54-S64.
21. Franklin, U. (1994, November). Making connections: Science and the future of citizenship. Paper presented at the meeting of the Science Teachers Association of Ontario, Toronto.
22. Gunstone, R. F., Slattery, M., Baird, J. R., and Northfield, J. R. (1993). A case study exploration of development in pre-service science students. Science Education, 77, 47-73.
23. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., and Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 117-154.
24. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521-522.
25. Hayes, D., Symington, D., and Martin, M. (1994). Drawing during science activity in the primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 265-277.
26. Hewson, P. W., Beeth, M. E., and Thorley, N. R. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 199-218). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
27. Hewson, P. W., Tabachnick, B. R., Zeichner, K. M., and Lemberger, J. (1999). Educating prospective teachers of biology: Findings, limitations, and recommendations. Science Education, 83, 373-384.
28. Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, UK:Open University Press.
29. Iran-Nejad, A. (1990). Active and dynamic self-regulation of learning processes. Review of Educational Research, 60, 573-602.
30. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65-90.
31. Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
32. Knight, R. D. (2004). Five easy lessons: Strategies for successful physics teaching. San Francisco:Addison-Wesley.
33. Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context [electronic version]. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2), 1-12.
34. Loughran, J. J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., and Russell, T. (Eds.). (2004). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
35. Mason, C. L. (1992). Concept mapping: A tool to develop reflective science instruction. Science Education, 76, 51-63.
36. McGoey, J., and Ross, J. (1999). Research, practice, and teacher internship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 117-120.
37. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., and Novak, J. D. (1997). Meaningful learning in science: The human constructivist perspective. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 404-447). San Diego: Academic Press.
38. Munby, H., and Russell, T. (1994). The authority of experience in learning to teach: Messages from a physics method class. Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 86-95.
39. Munby, H., Russell, T., and Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877-904). Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association.
40. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41. Northfield, J. (1998). Teacher education and the practice of science teacher education. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 695-706). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
42. Novak, J. (1987). Human constructivism: Toward a unity of psychological and epistemological meaning making. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 349-360). Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Department of Education.
43. Novak, J. (1989). The use of metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. In P. Adey (Ed.), Adolescent development and school science (pp. 227-239). London: Falmer Press.
44. Novak, J. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167-193.
45. Novak, J., and Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Nussbaum, J., and Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation. Instructional Science, 11, 183-208.
47. Oosterheert, I. E., and Vermunt, J. D. (2003). Knowledge construction in learning to teach: The role of dynamic sources. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9, 157-173.
48. Pfundt, H., and Duit, R. (1994). Students’ alternative frameworks and science education. Kiel, Germany:Institute for Science Education, University of Kiel.
49. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
50. Putnam, R. T., and Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
51. Russell, T. (2000). Teaching to build on school experiences. In R. Upitis (Ed.), Who will teach? A case study of teacher education reform (pp. 227-240). San Francisco: Caddo Gap Press.
52. Russell, T., and Bullock, S. (1999). Discovering our professional knowledge as teachers: Critical dialogues about learning from experience. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 132-151). London: Falmer Press.
53. Russell, T., McPherson, S., and Martin, A. K. (2001). Coherence and collaboration in teacher-education reform. Canadian Journal of Education, 26, 37-55.
54. Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting “the culture of the school and the problem of change.” New York: Teachers College Press.
55. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
56. Schön, D. A. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27, 27-34.
57. Scott, P., Asoko, H., and Driver, R. (1992). Teaching for conceptual change: Areview of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, and H. Neidderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 310-329). Kiel, Germany: Schmidt and Klannig.
58. Scott, P. H., and Driver, R. H. (1998). Learning about science teaching: Perspectives from an action research project. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 67-80). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
59. Segall, A. (2002). Disturbing practice: Reading teacher education as text. New York: Peter Lang.
60. Tobin, K. (1997). The teaching and learning of elementary science. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 369-403). San Diego: Academic Press.
61. Tudge, J., and Scrimsher, S. (2003). Lev S. Vygotsky on education: A cultural-historical, interpersonal, and individual approach to development. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology, a century of contributions (pp. 207-228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62. Wandersee, J. (1986). Can the history of science help science educators anticipate students’ misconceptions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 581-597.
63. Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., and Novak, J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York:Macmillan.
64. White, R. (2001). The revolution in research on science teaching. In V. Richardson, (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 457-471). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
65. Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., and Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers’ science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 443-463.