ADMISSIBILITY OF THE RORSCHACH

The Handbook of Forensic Rorschach Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 55-78

  McCann, Joseph T ^a   Barton Evans, F ^b  

^a UHS Hospitals   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145513785     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203810071-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Archer, R. P., and Newsome, C. R. (2000). Psychological test usage with adolescent clients: Survey update. Assessment, 7, 227-235.
2. Belter, R. W., and Piotrowski, C. (2001). Current status of doctoral-level training in psychological testing.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 717-726.
3. Boccaccini, M. T., and Brodsky, S. L. (1999). Diagnostic test usage by forensic psychologists in emotional injury cases. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 253-259.
4. Board of Trustees of the Society for Personality Assessment. (2005). The status of the Rorschach in clinical and forensic practice: An official statement by the Board of Trustees of the Society for Personality Assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 219-237.
5. Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., and Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141-154.
6. Dawes, R. M. (1999). Two methods for studying the incremental validity of a Rorschach variable. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 297-302.
7. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: The Free Press.
8. Erard, R. E., and Evans, F. B. (2006). Rorschach: Not what cracks and potshots claim it is. The National Psychologist, 15(4), 13.
9. Gacono, C. B., Evans, F. B., III, andViglione, D. J. (2002). The Rorschach in forensic practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 33-54.
10. Gacono, C. B., and Meloy, J. R. (1994). The Rorschach assessment of aggressive and psychopathic personalities.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Garb, H. N. (1999). Call for amoratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6, 313-315.
12. Gronnerod, C. (2006). Reanalysis of the Gronnerod (2003) Rorschach temporal stability meta-analysis data set. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 222-225.
13. Gronnerod, C. (2003). Temporal stability in the Rorschach method: Ameta-analytic review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 272-293.
14. Grove, W.M., andBarden, R. C. (1999). Protecting the integrity of the legal system: The admissibility of testimony from mental health experts under Daubert/Kumho analyses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 224-242.
15. Grove, W.M., Barden, R. C., Garb, H. N., andLilienfeld, S. O. (2002). Failure of Rorschach-comprehensive- system-based testimony to be admissible under the Daubert-Joiner-Kumho standard. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(2), 216-234.
16. Hiller, J. B., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, R. F., Berry, D. T. R., and Brunell-Neuleib, S. (1999). A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11, 278-296.
17. Hilsenroth, M. J., and Stricker, G. (2004). A consideration of challenges to psychological assessment instruments used in forensic settings: Rorschach as exemplar. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 141-152.
18. Hunsley, J., and Bailey, J. M. (1999). The clinical utility of the Rorschach: Unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 266-277.
19. Hunsley, J., andBailey, J. M. (2001).Whither the Rorschach?An analysis of the evidence. Psychological Assessment, 13(4), 472-485.
20. Lally, S. J. (2003).What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 491-498.
21. Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., andGarb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2), 27-66.
22. McCann, J. T. (1998). Defending the Rorschach in court: An analysis of admissibility using legal and professional standards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(1), 125-144.
23. McCann, J. T., and Dyer, F. J. (1996). Forensic assessment with the Millon inventories. New York:Guilford.
24. Meloy, J. R., Hansen, T. L., and Weiner, I. B. (1997). Authority of the Rorschach: legal citations during the past 50 years. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 53-62.
25. Nezworski, M. T., and Wood, J. M. (1995). Narcissism in the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2(2), 179-199.
26. Piotrowski, C., Belter, R. W., and Keller, J. W. (1998). The impact of “managed care” on the practice of psychological testing: Preliminary findings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 441-447.
27. Pope, K. S., Butcher, J. N., and Seelen, J. (2006). The MMPI, MMPI-2, and MMPI-A in court: A practical guide for expert witnesses and attorneys (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Quinnell, F. A., and Bow, J. N. (2001). Psychological tests used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 491-501.
29. Ritzler, B., Erard, R., and Pettigrew, G. (2002). A final reply to Grove and Barden: The relevance of the Rorschach Comprehensive System for expert testimony. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 235-246.
30. Ritzler, B., Erard, R., andPettigrew, G. (2002). Protecting the integrity of Rorschach expert witnesses: A reply to Grove and Barden (1999) re: The admissibility of testimony under Daubert/Kumho analyses.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 201-215.
31. Rosenthal, R., Hiller, J. B., Bornstein, R. F., Berry, D. T. R., and Brunell-Neuleib, S. (2001). Meta-analytic methods, the Rorschach, and the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 13, 449-451.
32. Viglione, D. J., and Rivera, B. (2003). Assessing personality and psychopathology with projective methods. In J. R. GrahamandJ. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 531-552). New York: Wiley.
33. Weiner, I. B. (1996). Some observations on the validity of the Rorschach Inkblot Method. Psychological Assessment, 8, 206-213.
34. Weiner, I. B., Ixner, J. E., and Sciara, A. (1966). Is the Rorschach welcome in the courtroom? Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 422-424.
35. Wood, J. M., and Lilienfeld, S. O. (1999). The Rorschach Inkblot Test: A case of overstatement? Assessment, 6(4), 341-351.
36. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Garb, H. N., and Lilienfeld, S. O. (2001a). The misperception of psychopathology: Problems with norms of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(3), 350-373.
37. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Garb, H. N., andLilienfeld, S. O. (2001b). Problemswith the norms of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach:Methodological and conceptual considerations. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(3), 397-402.
38. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., and Stejskal, W. J. (1996). The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach:A critical examination. Psychological Science, 7(1), 3-10.
39. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Stejskal, W. J., and McKinzey, R. K. (2001). Problems of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach in forensic settings: Recent developments. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1(3), 89-103.