Intertextuality and the Study of New Literacies: Research Critique and Recommendations

Handbook of Research on New Literacies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1079-1092

  Van Meter, Peggy N ^a   Firetto, Carla ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145113022     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410618894-47     Document Type: Editorial

References (32)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131-152.
2. Bloome, D., and Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(4), 305-329.
3. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon and T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Cote, N., and Goldman, S. R. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children’s think-aloud protocols. In H. van Oostendorp and S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 169-193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language and comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Goldman, S. R., Wiley, J., and Graesser, A. C. (2005). Learning in a knowledge society: Constructing meaning from multiple information sources. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Associaton, Montreal, Canada.
7. Guthrie, J., Van Meter, P., McCann, A., and Wigfield, A. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement:Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction.Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306-332.
8. Guthrie, J., Van Meter, P., and Mitchell, A. (1995). Performance assessments in reading and language arts. Reading Teacher, 48, 266-271.
9. Hartman, D. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 520-561.
10. Hartman, D. (2000). What will be the influences of media on literacy in the next millennium? Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 281-282.
11. Hayes-Roth, B., and Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Integration of knowledge from text. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
12. Hayes-Roth, B., and Thorndyke, P. W. (1979). Integration of knowledge from text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(1), 91-108.
13. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., and Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 325-360.
14. Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H., Krajcik, J. S., and Soloway, E., (2003). The nature of middle school learners’ science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.
15. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Kozma, R. B., and Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949-968.
17. Kristeva, J. (1969/1980) Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Kulikowich, J. M., Edwards, M. N., Van Meter, P. N., and Higley, K. J. (2005). Intervening to accelerate emergent expertise: A multiple method system for principled learning in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
19. Litzinger, T., Van Meter, P., Wright, M., and Kulikowich, J. A. (2006). A cognitive study of modeling during problem solving. Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL.
20. Neumann, S. B. (2000). What will be the influences of media on literacy in the next millennium? Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 276-277.
21. O’Donnell, A. (2004). A commentary on design research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 255-260.
22. Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., and Georgi, M. C. (1995) Text-based learning and reasoning:Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Perkins, D. N., Crismond, D., Simmons, R., and Unger, C. (1995). Inside understanding. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, and M. S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school:Teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp. 70-87). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Stromso, H. I., Braten, I., and Samuelstuen, M. S. (2003). Students’ strategic use of multiple sources during expository text reading: A longitudinal think-aloud study. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 113-147.
26. Tabachneck-Schijf, H. J. M., and Simon, H. A. (1998). One person, multiple representations:An analysis of a simple, realistic multiple representation learning task. In M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, and T. deJong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 197-236). New York: Pergamon.
27. Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 129-140.
28. Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., and Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 142-166.
29. Van Meter, P., and Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing:Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 285-325.
30. Van Meter, P. N., Kulikowich, J. M., Higley, K., and Litzinger, T. (2005, April). Integrating representational systems during comprehension of expository texts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.
31. Wineburg, S., and Martin, D. (2004). Reading and rewriting history. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 42-45.
32. Wolfe, M., and Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467.