Delivering Special Education Is a Two-Person Job: A Call for Unconventional Thinking

Achieving the Radical Reform of Special Education: Essays in Honor of James M. Kauffman

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 115-137

  Zigmond, Naomi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144363391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315097657-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Alley, G., andDeshler, D. (1979). Teaching the learning disabled adolescent: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love.
2. American Federation of Teachers. (2005). Comparison of highly qualified teacher requirements for special education teachers under NCLB and IDEA. Retrieved June 15, 2006 from www.aft.org/topics/nclb/downloads/HQTforspecialed.pdf.
3. Baker, J., and Zigmond, N. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 163-180.
4. Bauwens, J., and Hourcade, J. J. (1995). Cooperative teaching: Rebuilding the schoolhouse for all students. Austin Texas: PRO-ED.
5. Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J., and Friend, M. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 17-22.
6. Billingsley, B. (2004). Promoting teacher quality and retention in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(5), 370-376.
7. Cook, L., and Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28, 1-16.
8. Cook, L., and Friend, M. (1996). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28, 1-16.
9. Corn, A. L., Hatlen, P., Huebner, K. M., Ryan, F., and Siller, M. A. (1995). The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments including those with multiple disabilities. New York: American Foundation for the Blind Press.
10. Council for Exceptional Children. (2000). Bright futures for exceptional learners:An action to achieve quality conditions for teaching and learning. Reston, VA: Author.
11. Council for Exceptional Children. (2005). Resources on “highly qualified” requirements for special educators. Arlington, VA: Author.
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved February 8, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.
13. Darling-Hammond. L., and Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 1-13.
14. Deshler, D. D., Ellis, E. S., and Lenz, B. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love.
15. Durlak, C. M., Rose, E., andBursuck, W. D. (1994). Preparing high school students with learning disabilities for the transition to postsecondary education:Teaching the skills of self-determination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(1), 51-59.
16. Ellis, E., Deshler, D., Lenz, B., Schumaker, J., and Clark, F. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(6), 1-23.
17. Ferguson, D. L., and Ralph, G. R. (1996). The changing role of special educators:A development waiting for a trend. Contemporary Education, 68, 49-51.
18. Fuchs, D., and Fuchs, L. (1995). What’s special about special education? Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 522-530.
19. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., andFernstrom, P. (1993). A conservative approach to special education reform: Mainstreaming through transenvironmental programming and curriculum-based measurement. American Education Research Journal, 30, 149-178.
20. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., and Hamlett, C. (1989). Effects of instructional use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43-52.
21. Gately, S., and Gately, F. Jr. (2001). Understanding co-teaching components. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 40-47.
22. Graden, J. L., Casey, A., and Bonstrom, O. (1985). Implementing a prereferral intervention system: Part 2. The data. Exceptional Children, 51, 487-496.
23. Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J.W., Kauffman, J. M., Weiss, M. P., andMartinez, E. A. (2005). Learning disabilities: Foundations, characteristics and effective teaching (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
24. Hatlen, P. (1996). The core curriculum for blind and visually impaired students, including those with additional disabilities. Austin, TX: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired. Retrieved April 20, 2002, from http://www.tsbvi.edu/agenda/corecurric.htm.
25. Idol, L. (1988). A rationale and guidelines for establishing special education consultation programs. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 48-58.
26. Idol, L., and West, J. F. (1988). Consultation in special education (Part II):Training and practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 474-494.
27. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). (1997). Public Law 105-17. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). Public Law 108-446. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29. International Reading Association. (2004). The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States. Newark, DE: Author.
30. Johnson, L. J., Pugach, M. C., and Hammitte, D. J. (1988). Barriers to effective special education consultation. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 41-47.
31. Kerr, M. M., and Zigmond, N. (1986). What do high school teachers want? A study of expectations and standards. Education and Treatment of Children, 9(3), 239-249.
32. Klingner, J. K., and Vaughn, S. (2002). The changing roles and responsibilities of an LD specialist. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 25, 19-31.
33. Koenig, A. J., andHolbrook, M. C. (2000). Planning instruction in unique skills. In A. J.KoenigandM.C.Holbrook (Eds.), Foundations of education: Instructional strategies for teaching children and youths with visual impairments (2nd ed., pp 196-220). New York: American Foundations for the Blind Press.
34. Laurie, T., Buchwach, L., Silverman, R. and Zigmond, N. (1978). Teaching secondary learning disabled students in the mainstream. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1(4), 62-72.
35. Luther, M. (1517). Ninety-five theses. In A. Spaeth, L. D. Reed, H. Eyster Jacobs, et al. (Trans. and Eds.), Disputation of Doctor Martin Luther on the power and efficacy of indulgences (Vol. 1; pp. 29-38). Philadelphia: A. J. Holman Company.
36. Magiera, K., and Zigmond, N. (2004). Co-teaching in middle school classrooms under routine conditions: Does the instructional experience differ for student with disabilities in co-taught and solo-taught classes? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 79-85.
37. Mastropieri, M., and Scruggs, T. (2007). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
38. Mathews, J. (1988). Escalante: The best teacher in America, New York: Holt.
39. McLeskey, J., Henry, D., andAxelrod, N. M. (1999). Inclusion of students with LD: An examination of data from Reports to Congress. Exceptional Children, 31, 55-66.
40. McLeskey, J., Hoppey, D., Williamson, P., and Rents, T. (2004). Is inclusion an illusion? An examination of national and state trends toward the education of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19(2), 109-115.
41. McLeskey, J., and Waldron, N. (1995). Inclusive elementary programs: Must they cure students with learning disabilities to be effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 300-303.
42. NCEI. (2006). Alternative teacher certification: A state-by-state analysis. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
43. NCERI. (1995). National study of inclusive education (2nd ed.). New York: National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion, The Graduate Center, CUNY.
44. NCTQ. (2004). Searching the attic: How states are responding to the nation’s goal of placing a highly qualified teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
45. National Education Association/National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). What constitutes a highly qualified special education teacher under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-446.). Retrieved June 15, 2006, from www.nea.org/specialed/images/ideahqtchart.pdf.
46. Neufeld, B., and Roper, D. (June 2003). Coaching: A strategy for development of instructional capacity. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
47. Pierangelo, R.andGiuliani, G. (2006). Learning disabilities: A practical approach to foundations, assessment, diagnosis and teaching. Boston, MA: Pearson.
48. Polsgrove L., and McNeil, M. (1989). The consultation process: Research and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 10(1), 6-13.
49. Pugach, M. C., and Johnson, L. J. (1995). Collaborative practitioners: Collaborative schools. Denver, CO: Love.
50. Purkey, S. C., and Smith, M. S. (1985), School reform: The district policy implications of the effective schools literature. Elementary School Journal, 85, 353-389.
51. Reeve, P., and Hallahan, D. (1994). Practical questions about collaboration between general andspecial educators. Focus on Exceptional Children, 26(7), 1-12.
52. Rice, J. K. (2003) Teacher quality: Understanding the Effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
53. Roach, V., Salisbury, C., and McGregor, G. (2002). Applications of a policy framework to evaluate and promote large scale change. Exceptional Children, 68, 451-464.
54. Rosenshine, B., and Stevens, R. (1986). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49, 26-33.
55. Sanders, W., and Horn., S. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. 12, 247-256.
56. Scanlon, D., and Mellard, D. F. (2002). Academic and participation profiles of school age dropouts with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 239-258.
57. Shapiro, J., and Rich, R. (1999). Facing learning disabilities in the adult years. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Silverman, R., Zigmond, N., andSansone, J. (1981). Teaching coping skills: A school survival skills curriculum for adolescents with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 13(6), 1-20.
59. Skinner, M. E. (1998). Promoting self-advocacy among college students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 278-283.
60. Sparks, D., and Hirsh, S., (1997). A new vision of staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
61. Staub, F., andWest, L. (2003). Content focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
62. Thousand, J. S., and Villa, R. A. (1990). Strategies for educating learners with severe disabilities within their home schools and communities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23, 1-24.
63. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities. Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Government Printing Office.
64. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Teachers-special education. Retrieved April 28, 2006, from www.bis.bov/oco/ocos070.htm.
65. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., and Arguelles, M. E. (1997). The ABCDE’s of co-teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30, 4-10.
66. Vaughn, S., Kim, A., Sloan, C. V. M., Hughes, M. T., Elbaum, B., and Sridhar, D. (2003). Social skills intervention for young children with disabilities: A synthesis of group design studies. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 2-15.
67. Voltz, D. L., Elliot, R. N., Jr., and Cobb, H. B. (1994). Collaborative teacher roles: Special and general educators. Journal of Learning Disabilities 27(8), 527-535.
68. Walther-Thomas, C. S. (1997). Co-teaching experiences: The benefits and problems that teachers and principals report over time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 395-407.
69. Walther-Thomas, C., Korinek, L., McLaughlin, V., and Williams, B. (2000). Collaboration for inclusive education: Developing successful programs. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
70. Weiss, M., and Lloyd, J. (2002). Congruence between roles and actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. The Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 58-68.
71. Weiss, M. P., and Brigham, F. J. (2000). Co-teaching and the model of shared responsibility: What does the research support? In T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Educational interventions (Vol. 14, pp. 217-245). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
72. West, J. F., and Idol, L. (1987). School consultation (Part 1): An interdisciplinary perspective on theory, models and research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 388-408.
73. West, P.R. (2002). 21st century professional development: The job-embedded, continual learning model. American Secondary Education, 30(2), 72-86.
74. Wilson, S., Floden, R., and Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research:An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 190-204.
75. Wood, J.W. (1998). Adapting instruction to accommodate students in inclusive settings (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
76. Zigmond, N. (1978). A prototype of comprehensive services for secondary students with learning disabilities: A preliminary report. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1(1), 39-49.
77. Zigmond, N. (1996). Organization and management of general education classrooms. In D. Speece and B. Keogh (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies:Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities (pp. 163-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Zigmond, N., and Sansone, J. (1986). Designing a program for the learning disabled adolescent. Remedial and Special Education, 7(5), 13-17.
79. Zigmond, N. (2003). Where should students with disabilities receive special education services? Is one place better than another? Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 193-199.
80. Zigmond, N. (2004, April). Special education co-teachers in secondary school science classrooms: What does it look like? What does it accomplish? Presentation at the 2004 Council for Exceptional Children Annual Convention, New Orleans, LA.
81. Zigmond, N. (2006). Reading and writing in co-taught secondary school social studies classrooms: A reality check: Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22(3), 249-268.
82. Zigmond, N., and Matta, D. (2005). Value added of the special education teacher in secondary school co-taught classes. In T. M. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Research in secondary schools (pp. 55-76). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
83. Zigmond, N., Vallecorsa, A., and Silverman, R. (1983). Assessment for instructional planning in special education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.