Achievement of Students Using the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project’s Everyday Mathematics

Standards-Based School Mathematics Curricula: What are they? What do Students Learn?

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 79-108

  Carroll, William M ^a   Isaacs, Andrew ^b  

^a St Ignatius Preparatory High School   (United States)

^b UCSMP Everyday Mathematics Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85140521100     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003064275-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, II. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5—11.
2. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1986). The relationship between initial meaning and mechanical knowledge of arithmetic. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 75-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Begle, E. G. (1973). Some lessons learned by SMSG. The Mathematics Teacher, 66(3), 207-214.
4. Bell, M. S. (1972). Mathematical uses and models in our everyday world: Studies in mathematics (Vol. XX). Stanford, CA: School Mathematics Study Group. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 143-557)
5. Bell, M. S. (1974). What does ‘Everyman’ really need from school mathematics? Mathematics Teacher, 67, 196-202.
6. Bell, M. S. (1976). Calculators in elementary schools: Some tentative guidelines and questions based on classroom experience. Arithmetic ‘Teacher, 23, 502-509.
7. Bell, M., & Burns, J. (1981). Counting and numeration capabilities of primary school children: A preliminary report. In T. R. Post & M. P. Roberts (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 17-23). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
8. Brownell, W. A. (1968). Conceptual maturity in arithmetic under differing systems of instruction. Elementary School Journal, 69(3), 151-163.
9. Bruner, J. S. (1964). Some theorems on instruction illustrated with reference to mathematics. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction: The sixty-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 306—335). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Carpenter, T. P. (1989). Introduction. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 1-9). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
11. Carpenter, T. P, Ansell, E., Franke, M. L., Fennema, E., & Weisbeck, L. (1993). Models of problem solving: A study of kindergarten children’s problem-solving processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3), 428—441.
12. Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 179-202.
13. Carroll, W. M. (1996a). Use of invented algorithms by second graders in a reform mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 137-150.
14. Carroll, W. M. (1996b). Mental computation of students in a reform-based mathematics curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 305-311.
15. Carroll, W. M. (1997). Results of third-grade students in a reform curriculum on the Illinois state mathematics test Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 237-242.
16. Carroll, W. M. (1998). Middle school students’ reasoning about geometric situations. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 398-403.
17. Coburn, T. G. (1989). The role of computation in the changing mathematics curriculum. In P. R. Trafton (Ed.), New directions for elementary school mathematics (pp. 43-56). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
18. Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in the Schools. (1982). Mathematics Counts (The Cockcroft Report). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
19. Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of geometric thought. In M. M. Lindquist & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), Learning and leaching geometry K—I2 (pp. 1—16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
20. Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
22. Everyday Learning Corporation. (1996). Everyday Mathematics: Student achievement studies. Chicago, Chicago: Author.
23. Everyday Learning Corporation. (1998). Everyday Mathematics gels results: Student achievement studies (Vol. 2). Chicago: Author.
24. Fennema, E. H. (1972). Models in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 19(8), 635-640.
25. Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing mathematical thinking in Everyday Mathematics reform classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 148—170.
26. Fuson, K. C., Carroll, W. M., & Drueck, J. V. (2000). Achievement results for second and third graders using the standards-based curriculum Everyday Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 277-295.
27. Fuson, K. C., Ding, D., & Perry, M. (1997, March). Teacher questions in EM second-grade classes compared to teacher questions in Japanese, Taiwanese, and traditional U.S. classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
28. Fuson, K. C., & Hall, J. W. (1983). The acquisition of early number word meanings: A conceptual analysis and review. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 49-107). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
29. Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Monograph Series No. 3). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
30. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Gelman, R., Meck, E., & Merkin, S. (1986). Young children’s numerical competence. Cognitive Development, 1, 1-29.
32. Hiebert, J. (1984). Children’s mathematical learning: The struggle to link form and understanding. Elementary School Journal, 84(5), 497-513.
33. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1992). Links between teaching and learning place value with understanding in first grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 98-122.
34. Hope, J. A. (1986). Mental calculation: Anachronism or basic skill. In H. L. Schoen & M. J. Zweng (Eds.), Estimation and mental computation (pp. 45-54). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
35. Hope, J. A., & Sherrill, J. M. (1987). Characteristics of unskilled and skilled mental calculators. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 98-111.
36. Illinois State Board of Education. (1989). Sample: 1989 Illinois goal assessment program, mathematics grade 3. Springfield, IL: Author.
37. Illinois State Board of Education. (1993). An overview of IGAP performance standards for reading, mathematics, writing, science, and social studies. Springfield, IL: Author.
38. Lambdin, D. V. (1993). The NCTM’s 1989 evaluation standards: Recycled ideas whose time has come? In N. L. Webb & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Assessment in the mathematics classroom (1993 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) (pp. 7-16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
39. Lesh, R., Post, T, & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representation in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33—40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Mathematics Evaluation Committee of the Hopewell Valley Regional School District. (1997). Mathematics evaluation report: Year two. Pennington, NJ: Hopewell Valley Regional School District.
41. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics. (1977). Position paper on basic skills. Arithmetic Teacher, 25(1), 19-22.
42. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics. (1988). Essential mathematics for the 21st century: The position of the National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics. Minneapolis: Author.
43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
46. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
47. Pollak, H. O. (1987). The mathematical sciences curriculum K-12: What is still fundamental and what is not. In T. A. Romberg & D. M. Stewart (Eds.), The monitoring of school mathematics: Background papers (Vol. 1). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research. (Original work published as a report from The Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, 1983.)
48. Post, T., Lesh, R., Cramer, K. A., Harel, G., & Behr, M. (1993). Curriculum implications of research on the learning, teaching, and assessing of rational number concepts. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 327-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Rathmell, E. C., & Trafton, P. R. (1990). Whole number computation. In J. N. Payne (Ed.), Mathematics for the young child (pp. 153-172). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
50. Resnick, L. B. (1983). A developmental theory of number understanding. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 109-151). New York: Academic Press.
51. Resnick, L. B., Lesgold, S., & Bill, V. (1990). From protoquantities to number sense. Paper prepared for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference, Mexico City.
52. Reys, B. J. (1986). Estimation and mental computation: It’s “about” time. Arithmetic Teacher, 34(1), 22-23.
53. Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., and Hope, J. A. (1993). Mental computation: A snapshot of second, fifth, and seventh grade student performance. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 306—315.
54. Riley, M.S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153-196). New York: Academic Press.
55. Schoen, H. L. (Ed.). (1986). Estimation and mental computation: 1986 yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
56. Sowder, J. (1992). Estimation and number sense. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 371-389). New York: Macmillan.
57. Sowder, J. T., & Wheeler, M. M. (1989). The development of concepts and strategies used in computational estimation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(2), 130-146.
58. Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learninggap. New York: Simon &Schuster.
59. Stigler, J. W., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Mathematical knowledge of Japane.se, Chinese, and American elementary school children. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
60. Stigler, J. W., & Perry, M. (1988). Mathematics learning in Japanese, Chinese, and American classrooms. In G. B. Saxe & M. Gearhart (Eds.), New directions for child development: No. 41. Children’s mathematics (pp. 27-54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61. Stodolsky, S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Suydam, M. N. (1984). Research report: Manipulative materials. Arithmetic Teacher, 31(5), 27.
63. Suydam, M. N. (1986). Research report: Manipulative materials and achievement. Arithmetic Teacher, 33(6), 10.
64. Thompson, F. (1991). Two digit addition and subtraction: What works? Arithmetic Teacher, 38(5), 10-13.
65. Thompson, P. W. (1994). Concrete materials and teaching for mathematical understanding. Arithmetic ‘Teacher, 41(9), 556—558.
66. Usiskin, Z., & Bell, M. S. (1983). Applying arithmetic: A handbook of applications of arithmetic. Chicago: University of Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Nos. SE 046 244, SE 046 245, and SE 046 246).
67. Webb, N. L. (Ed.). (1993). Assessment in the mathematics classroom: 1993 yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
68. Wood, T., & Cobb, P. (1989). The development of a cognitively-based elementary school mathematics lest: Final report. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University School Mathematics and Science Center.
69. Wood, T., & Sellers, P. (1997). Deepening the analysis: Longitudinal results of a problem-based mathematics program. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 63-186.
70. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408.