Action research in governance landscapes: Partnering with city guides and gatekeepers

Action Research for Climate Change Adaptation: Developing and Applying Knowledge for Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 35-54

  Vink, Martinus ^a   Boezeman, Daan ^b   Dewulf, Art ^a   Termeer, Catrien ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85140512734     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315780368-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Bache, I. (2000) Government within governance: network steering in Yorkshire and the Humber, Public Administration, 78(3): 575-592.
2. Bache, I., S. George and R. Rhodes (1996) The European Union, cohesion policy, and subnational authorities in the United Kingdom, in L. Hooghe (ed.) Cohesion policy and European integration, 294-321, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Barzilai Nahon, K. (2008) Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: a framework for exploring information control, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9): 1493-1512.
4. Benford, R.D. and D.A. Snow (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment, Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1): 611-639.
5. Biesbroek, G.R., J.E. Klostermann, C.J. Termeer and P. Kabat (2013) On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation, Regional Environmental Change, 13(5): 11191129.
6. Biesbroek, G.R., R.J. Swart, T.R. Carter, C. Cowan, T. Henrichs, H. Mela, M.D. Morecroft and D. Rey (2010) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies, Global Environmental Change, 20(3): 440-450.
7. Boezeman, D., M. Vink and P. Leroy (2013) The Dutch Delta Committee as a boundary organisation, Environmental Science & Policy, 27: 162-171.
8. Buuren, A. van, M.J. Vink and J. Warner (in press) Constructing authoritative answers to a latent crisis? Strategies of puzzling, powering and framing in Dutch climate adaptation practices compared, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis.
9. Checkland, P. and S. Holwell (1998) Action research: its nature and validity, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1): 9-21.
10. Clark, W.C., T.P. Tomich, M. van Noordwijk, D. Guston, N.M. Dickson, D. Catacutan and E. McNie (2011) Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108.
11. Coughlan, P. and D. Coghlan (2002) Action research for operations management, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 11(1): 220-240.
12. Culpepper, P.D. (2002) Powering, puzzling, and ‘pacting’: the informational logic of negotiated reforms, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(5): 774-790.
13. Davoudi, S., J. Crawford and A. Mehmood (2009) Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners, London: Earthscan/James & James.
14. Delta Commissie (2008) Working together with water: a living land builds for its future, findings of the Delta Commissie, The Hague: Delta Commissie.
15. Dewulf, A. (2013) Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(4): 321-330.
16. Dewulf, A., B. Gray, L. Putnam, R. Lewicki, N. Aarts, R. Bouwen and C. van Woerkum (2009) Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: a meta-paradigmatic perspective, Human Relations, 62(2): 155-193.
17. Entman, R.M. (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43(4): 51-58.
18. Ford, J.D. and L. Berrang-Ford (2011) Climate change adaptation in developed nations: from theory to practice, Dordrecht: Springer.
19. Ford, J.D., L. Berrang-Ford, A. Lesnikowski, M. Barrera and S.J. Heymann (2013) How to track climate change adaptation: a typology of approaches for national-level application, Ecology and Society, 18(3): 40.
20. Friedman, V.J. and T. Rogers (2009) There is nothing so theoretical as good action research, Action Research, 7(1): 31-47.
21. Gasking, D.A. and A.C. Jackson (1967) Wittgenstein as a teacher, in K.T. Fann Ludwig Wittgenstein: the man and his philosophy, 49-55, New York: Dell Puc. Co.
22. Gieryn, T.F. (1995) Boundaries of science, in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies, 393-443, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Goodwin, M. and J. Grix (2011) Bringing structures back in: the ‘governance narrative’, the ‘decentred approach’ and ‘asymmetrical network governance’ in the education and sport policy communities, Public Administration, 89(2): 537-556.
24. Hall, P.A. (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain, Comparative Politics, 25(3): 275-296.
25. Heclo, H. (1974) Modern social policy in Britain and. Sweden: from relief to income maintenance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. Hisschemöller, M. and R. Hoppe (1995) Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis, Knowledge and Policy, 8(4): 40-60.
27. Hovi, J., D.F. Sprinz and A. Underdal (2009) Implementing long-term climate policy: time inconsistency, domestic politics, international anarchy, Global Environmental Politics, 9(3): 20-39.
28. Hulme, M. (2009) Why we disagree about climate change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Jasanoff, S. (1994) The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Jordan, A., D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, T. Rayner and F. Berkhout (2010) Climate change policy in the European Union: confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Keskitalo, E.C.H. (2010) Developing adaptation policy and practice in Europe: multi-level governance of climate change, Dordrecht: Springer.
32. Lazarus, R.J. (2008) Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future, Cornell Law Review, 94: 1153-1233.
33. Lempert, R., J. Scheffran and D.F. Sprinz (2009) Methods for long-term environmental policy challenges, Global Environmental Politics, 9(3): 106-133.
34. Magnani, L. (2001) Abduction, reason, and science: processes of discovery and explanation, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
35. Phillips, N. and C. Hardy (2002) Discourse analysis: investigating processes of social construction, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Repetto, R.C. (2008) The climate crisis and the adaptation myth, New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.
37. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996) The new governance: governing without government, Political Studies, 44(4): 652-667.
38. Riordan, P. (1995) The philosophy of action science, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(6): 6-13.
39. Rittel, H.W.J. and M.M. Webber (1972) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40. Schön, D.A. and M. Rein (1994) Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies, New York: Basic Books.
41. Stoker, G. (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions, International Social Science Journal, 50(155): 17-28.
42. Stone, D.A. (1989) Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas, Political Science Quarterly, 104: 281-300.
43. Termeer, C., A. Dewulf and G. Breeman (2013) Governance of wicked climate adaptation problems, in J. Knieling and W.L. Filho (eds) Climate change governance, 27-39, Berlin: Springer.
44. Vink, M.J. and E. Mulligen (2013) Evaluatie lerend proces Deltaprogramma IJsselmeergebied, Lelystad: Deltaprogramma IJsselmeergebied.
45. Vink, M.J., D. Boezeman, A. Dewulf and C.J.A.M. Termeer (2013a) Changing climate, changing frames: Dutch water policy frame developments in the context of a rise and fall of attention to climate change, Environmental Science and Policy, 30: 90-101.
46. Vink, M.J., A. Dewulf and C. Termeer (2013b) The role of knowledge and power in climate change adaptation governance: a systematic literature review, Ecology and Society, 18(4): 46.
47. Wagenaar, H. (2011) Meaning in action, Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
48. Warner, J., P. Wester, M.J. Vink and A. Dewulf (in press) The politics of framing scales, ambiguity and uncertainty: flood interventions in the Netherlands, in A. Cohen and E. Watson (eds) Negotiating water governance, London: Ashgate.
49. Weick, K. E., K. M. Sutcliffe and D. Obstfeld (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking, Organization Science, 16(4): 409-421.
50. Wood, L.A. and R.O. Kroger (2000) Doing discourse analysis: methods for studying action in talk and text, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Yanow, D. (1996) How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
52. Yanow, D. and P. Schwartz-Shea (2006) Interpretation and method: empirical research methods and the interpretive turn, Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.