Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 321-330

  Dewulf, Art ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

ADAPTATION PROCESS; CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING BIAS; FRAME DIFFERENCES; HUMAN SECURITIES; WICKED PROBLEMS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; PLANNING PROCESS; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 84879240320     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.227     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Juhola S, Keskitalo ECH, Westerhoff L. Understanding the framings of climate change adaptation across multiple scales of governance in Europe. Environ Polit 2011, 20:445-463.
2. The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Adapting Institutions to Climate Change. 2010, 1-180.
3. Doria MF, Boyd E, Tompkins EL, Adger WN. Using expert elicitation to define successful adaptation to climate change. Environ Sci Policy 2009, 12:810-819.
4. Entman RM. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 1993, 43:51-58.
5. Chong D, Druckman JN. Framing theory. Ann Rev Polit Sci 2007, 10:103-126.
6. Schön DA, Rein M. Frame Reflection: Toward a Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books; 1994.
7. Benford RD, Snow DA. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Ann Rev Sociol 2000, 26:611-639.
8. Dewulf A, Gray B, Putnam L, Lewicki R, Aarts N, Bouwen R, van Woerkum C. Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: a meta-paradigmatic perspective. Hum Relat 2009, 62:155-193.
9. Nisbet MC. Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 2010, 2009:1-26.
10. Pielke R. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
11. Rein M, Schön D. Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowled Technol Policy 1996, 9:85-104.
12. Adger WN, Brown K, Nelson DR, Berkes F, Eakin H, Folke C, Galvin K, Gunderson L, Goulden M, O'Brien K, et al. Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change. WIREs Clim Chan 2011, 2:757-766.
13. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211:453-458.
14. Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1998, 76:149-188.
15. Zald MN, Useem B. Culture, ideology, and strategic framing. In: McAdam D, McCarthy J, Zald MN, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: University Press; 1996, 261-274.
16. Boin A, t Hart P, McConnell A. Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. J Eur Public Policy 2009, 16:81-106.
17. Vögel R. Framing and counter-framing new public management: the case of Germancy. Public Admin 2012, 90:370-392.
18. Pettenger ME. The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discourses. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company; 2007.
19. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010, 107:22026-22031.
20. Baumgartner FR, Jones BD. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1993.
21. Nisbet MC, Huge M. Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: managing power and participation through the press/policy connection. Harv Int J Press/Polit 2006, 11:3-40.
22. D'Angelo P. News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: a response to Entman. J Commun 2002, 52:870-888.
23. Phillips N, Hardy C. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
24. Alvesson M, Karreman D. Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Hum Relat 2000, 53:1125-1149.
25. Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, van der Knaap WGM. The mitigation-adaptation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat Int 2009, 33:230-237.
26. Pielke RA Jr. What is climate change? Issues Sci Technol 2004, 20:31-34.
27. Pielke R, Prins G, Rayner S, Sarewitz D. Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 2007, 445:597-598.
28. Hulme M. Governing and adapting to climate. A response to Ian Bailey's Commentary on 'Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change'. Trans Inst Brit Geograph 2008, 33:424-427.
29. Oa S, Brown HCP, Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Sonwa DJ, Arts B, Nkem J. The Congo Basin forests in a changing climate: policy discourses on adaptation and mitigation (REDD+). Glob Environ Chang 2012, 22:288-298.
30. McEvoy D, Matczak P, Banaszak I, Chorynski A. Framing adaptation to climate-related extreme events. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 2010, 15:779-795.
31. Dewulf A, Brugnach M, Termeer C, Ingram H. Bridging knowledge frames and networks in climate and water governance. In: Edelenbos J, Bressers N, Scholten P, eds. Water Governance as Connective Capacity. Farnham: Ashgate; 2013.
32. Otto-Banaszak I, Matczak P, Wesseler J, Wechsung F. Different perceptions of adaptation to climate change: a mental model approach applied to the evidence from expert interviews. Reg Environ Chan 2010, 11:217-228.
33. Gupta A, Lövbrand E, Turnhout E, Vijge MJ. In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+measuring, reporting and verification systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2012, 4:726-731.
34. Head L. Cultural ecology: adaptation-retrofitting a concept? Prog Hum Geog 2009, 34:234-242.
35. Bisaro A, Wolf S, Hinkel J. Framing climate vulnerability and adaptation at multiple levels: addressing climate risks or institutional barriers in Lesotho? Clim Dev 2010, 2:161-175.
36. McEvoy J, Wilder M. Discourse and desalination: potential impacts of proposed climate change adaptation interventions in the Arizona-Sonora border region. Global Environ Change 2012, 22:353-363.
37. McLaughlin P. Climate change, adaptation, and vulnerability: reconceptualizing societal-environment interaction within a socially constructed adaptive landscape. Organ Environ 2011, 24:269-291.
38. Mukheibir P. Water access, water scarcity, and climate change. Environ Manage 2010, 45:1027-1039.
39. Termeer C, Dewulf A, Rijswick HV, Buuren AV, Huitema D, Rayner T, Wiering M. The regional governance of climate adaptation: a framework for developing legitimate, effective, and resilient governance arrangements. Clim Law 2011, 2:159-179.
40. O'Brien K, Eriksen S, Nygaard LP, Schjolden A. Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 2007, 7:73-88.
41. Opperman E. The discourse of adaptation to climate change and the UK Climate Impacts Programme: de-scribing the problematization of adaptation. Clim Dev 2011, 3:71-85.
42. Rittel H, Webber MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 1973, 4:155-169.
43. O'Brien K, Leichenko R. Climate change, equity and human secuirty. Die Erde 2006, 137:165-179.
44. Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O'Brien KL. Adaptation now. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O'Brien KL, eds. Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
45. Rydin Y. Conflict, Consensus, and Rationality in Environmental Planning: An Institutional Discourse Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
46. Lindseth G. Local level adaptation to climate change: discursive strategies in the Norwegian context. J Environ Policy Plan 2005, 7:61-84.
47. Detraz N, Betsill MM. Climate change and environmental security: for whom the discourse shifts. Int Stud Perspect 2009, 10:303-320.
48. Grove KJ. Insuring "Our Common Future?" Dangerous climate change and the biopolitics of environmental security. Geopolitics 2010, 15:536-563.
49. Redclift MR, Navarrete DM, Pelling M. Climate Change and Human Security: The Challenge to Local Governance Under Rapid Coastal Urbanization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2011.
50. Barnett J, Adger WN. Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Polit Geog 2007, 26:639-655.
51. Zeitoun M, Warner J. Hydro-hegemony-a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy 2006, 8:435-435.
52. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon N. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim Chang 2006, 77:73-95.
53. Vink MJ, Boezeman D, Dewulf A, Termeer CJM. Changing climate, changing frames. Environ Sci Policy 2013, 30:90-101
54. Bäckstrand K, Lövbrand E. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Glob Environ Polit 2006, 6:50-75.
55. Hulme M. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
56. Hopwood B, Mellor M, O'Brien G. Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 2005, 13:38-52.
57. O'Riordan T, Jordan A. The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental politics. Environ Values 1995, 4:191-212.
58. Dunn WN. Public Policy Analysis. London: Prentice Hall; 1994.
59. Hisschemoller M, Hoppe R. Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowled Policy 1995, 8:40-60.
60. Kurtz H. Scale frames and counter-scale frames: constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Polit Geog 2003, 22:887-916.
61. van Lieshout M, Dewulf A, Aarts MNC, Termeer CJAM. Do scale frames matter? Scale frame mismatches in the decision making process of a 'mega farm' in a small Dutch village. Ecol Soc 2011, 16:38.
62. van Lieshout M, Dewulf A, Aarts N, Termeer C. Doing scalar politics: interactive scale framing for managing accountability in complex policy processes. Crit Policy Stud 2012, 6:163-181.
63. Horstmann B. Operationalizing the Adaptation Fund: challenges in allocating funds to the vulnerable. Clim Policy 2011, 11:1086-1096.
64. Dewulf A, Mancero M, Cardenas G, Sucozhanay D. Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: a case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador. Int Rev Admin Sci 2011, 77:50-75.
65. Dewulf A, Bouwen R. Issue framing in conversations for change. J Appl Behav Sci 2012, 48:168-193.
66. Termeer C, Dewulf A, Breeman G. Governance of wicked climate adaptation problems. In: Knieling J, Leal Filho W, eds. Climate Change Governance. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013, 27-39.