DESIGNS THAT FIT: An Overview of Fit Conceptualizations in HCI

Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 205-221

  Te’eni, Dov ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Affective Fit; Cognitive Fit; Communication; Design; Fit; HCI Metaphor; Personalization; Physiological Fit

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139664465     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315703619-19     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Baecker, R.M.; Grudin, J.; Buxton, W.A.S.; and Greenberg, S. Designing to fit human capabilities. In Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Towards the Year 2000. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, 1995, pp. 667-680.
2. Buxton, W. There’s more to interaction than meets the eye: some issues in manual input. In D.A. Norman and S.W. Draper (eds.), User Centered Systems Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986, pp. 319-334.
3. Cockton, G. Doing to be: multiple routes to affective interaction. Interacting with Computers, 16, 4 (2004), 683-691.
4. Davern, M.J. (1996). When good fit is bad: the dynamics of perceived fit. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference of Information Systems. ICIS’96. Cleveland, Ohio, 1996, pp. 112-120.
5. Dennis, A.R., and Carte, T.A. Using geographical information systems for decision making: extending cognitive fit theory to map-based presentations. Information Systems Research, 9, 2 (1998), 194-203.
6. Fitts, P.M. Human engineering for an effective air-navigation and traffic control system. Ohio State University Research Foundation, Columbus, OH, 1951.
7. Goodhue, D.L. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41, 12 (1995), 1827-1844.
8. Goodhue, D.L. Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument of user evaluations of information systems. Decision Sciences, 29, 1 (1998), 105-138.
9. Grudin, J. The case against user interface consistency. Communications of the ACM, 32 (1989), 1164-1173.
10. Huber, G. Cognitive style as a basis for MIS/DSS: much ado about nothing. Management Science, 29 (1983), 567-579.
11. Jancke, G.; Venolia, G.; Grudin, J.; Cadiz, J.; and Gupta, A. Linking public spaces: technological and social issues. In Proceedings of Conference Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI2001. New York: ACM Press, 2001, pp. 530-537.
12. Jarvenpaa, S.L. The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies. Management Science, 35, 3 (1989), 285-303.
13. Kammersgaard, J. Four different perspectives on human computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 29 (1988), 343-362.
14. Karat, C.M.; Brodie, C.; Karat, J.; Vergo, J.; and Alpert, S.R. Personalizing the user experience on ibm.com. IBM Systems Journal, 42, 4 (2003), 686-701.
15. Kennedy, M.; Te’eni, D.; and Treleavan, J. Impacts of decision task, data and display on strategies for extracting information. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 48 (1998), 159-180.
16. Long, J., and Whitefield, A. (eds.). Cognitive Ergonomics and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
17. Papanikolaou, K.; Grigoriadou, M.; Kornilakis, H.; and Magoulas, G. Personalizing the interaction in a webbased educational hypermedia system: the case of Inspire. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13, 3 (2003), 213-267.
18. Paratala, T., and Surakka, V. Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59 (2003), 185-198.
19. Parush, A. Interview with Donald Norman on mental models. 2004 (available at http://www.carleton.ca/hotlab/hottopics/Articles/DonNormanInterview.html).
20. Payne, J.W.; Bettman, J.R.; and Johnson, E.J. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14 (1988), 534-552.
21. Picard, R.W. A society of models for video and image libraries. Tech. Report 360, MIT Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing, 1988.
22. Picard, R.W., and Klein, J. Computers that recognize and respond to user emotion: theoretical and practical implications. Interacting with Computers, 14, 2 (2002), 141-169.
23. Price, H.E. The allocation of functions in systems. Human Factors, 27 (1985), 33-45.
24. Sanders, M.S., and McCormick, E.J. Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
25. Sandsjö, L.; Kadefors, R.; Lundberg, U.; and the PROCID group. PROCID recommendations for healthier computer work. In D. Caldenfors, J. Eklund, and L. Kiviloog (eds.), Humans in a Complex Environment: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Congress of the Nordic Ergonomic Society. Kolmården, Sweden: Nordic Ergonomic Society, 2003, Vol. II, p. 683.
26. Silver, M.S. Systems that Support Decision Makers: Description and Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1991.
27. Smelcer, J.B., and Carmel, E. The effectiveness of different representations for managerial problem solving: comparing tables and maps. Decision Sciences, 28, 2 (1997), 391-420.
28. Te’eni, D. A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quarterly, 25, 2 (2001), 251-312.
29. Te’eni, D. Language action perspective as a basis for communication support systems. Communications of the ACM (2006).
30. Te’eni, D.; Carey, J.; and Zhang, P. Human-Computer Interaction: Designing Effective Organizational Information Systems. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2006.
31. Te’eni, D., and Feldman, R. Performance and satisfaction in adaptive websites: a laboratory experiment on search tasks within a task-adapted website. Journal of AIS, 2, 3 (2001), 1-28.
32. Tractinsky, N. Tools over solutions? Comments on interacting with computers, Interacting with Computers, 16, 4 (2004), 751-757.
33. Tractinsky, N.; Shoval-Katz, A.; and Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13 (2000), 127-145.
34. Vessey, I. The effect of information presentation on decision making: an analysis using cost-benefit theory. Information and Management, 27 (1994), 103-119.
35. Vessey, I; Cognitive fit: a theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences, 22, 2 (1991), 219-240.
36. Vessey, I., and Galletta, D. Cognitive fit: an empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Research, 2, 1 (1991), 63-84.
37. Wilson, G.M., and Sasse, M.A. From doing to being: getting closer to the user experience. Interacting with Computers, 16, 4 (2004), 697-705.