Ethical issues in the publication process

Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, Fourth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 14-28

  Smith, Richard ^a,b  

^a UnitedHealth Europe   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139631436     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780429073328-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2003; 326: 1167-70.
2. Smith R. Publishing too much and nothing: serious problems not just nuisances. In: Smith R. The Trouble with Medical Journals. London: RSM Press, 2006: 119-24.
3. Hudson A, McLellan F. Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
4. Smith R. The Trouble with Medical Journals. London: RSM Press, 2006.
5. Court C. GMC finds doctors not guilty in consent case. BMJ 1995; 311: 1245-6.
6. Smith R. Publishing information about patients. BMJ 1995; 311: 1240-1.
7. Parkin JR, Eagles JM. Blood-letting in bulimia nervosa. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 162: 246-8.
8. Smith R. Informed consent: edging forwards (and backwards). BMJ 1998; 316: 949-51.
9. Doyal L, Tobias J. Informed Consent in Medical Research. London: BMJ Books, 2000.
10. Wade DT. Ethics, audit, and research: all shades of grey. BMJ 2005; 330: 468-71.
11. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004; 291: 2457-65.
12. Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA 1990; 263: 1405-8.
13. Dickersin K, Min YI. Publication bias: the problem that won’t go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993; 703: 135-46; discussion 146-8.
14. Roberts J, Smith R. Publishing research supported by the tobacco industry. BMJ 1996; 312: 133-4.
15. Tramer MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. BMJ 1997; 315: 635-40.
16. Hussain A, Smith R. Declaring financial competing interests: survey of five general medical journals. BMJ 2001; 323: 263-4.
17. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. A systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 454-65.
18. Rothman KJ. Conflict of interest: the new McCarthyism in science. JAMA 1993; 269: 2782-4.
19. Smith R. Making progress with competing interests. BMJ 2002; 325: 1375-6.
20. Haivas I, Schroter S, Waechter F, Smith R. Editors’ declaration of their own conflicts of interest. CMAJ 2004; 171: 475-6.
21. Smith R. Peer review - a flawed process at the heart of science. J R Soc Med 2006; 99: 178-82.
22. Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 2002; 287: 2784-6.
23. Smith R. Opening up peer review. BMJ 1999; 318: 4-5.
24. Shapiro DW, Wenger WS, Shapiro ME. The contributions of authors to multi-authored biomedical research papers. JAMA 1994; 271: 438-42.
25. Goodman N. Survey of fulfilment of criteria of authorship in published medical research. BMJ 1994; 309: 1482.
26. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 1998; 280: 222-4.
27. Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ 1997; 314: 1009.
28. Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails: a proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 1997; 278: 579-85.
29. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Linnell AAJ et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998; 351: 637-41.