The development of positive obligations under the European convention on human rights by the European court of human rights

The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-239

  Mowbray, A R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139619510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (46)

1. H Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd edn (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1996) 167.
2. A Mowbray, Cases & Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights (London, Butterworths, 2001) ch 1.
3. On the protection of property (art 1), right to education (art 2) and right to free elections (art 3) contained in Protocol 1 to the Convention, European Treaty Series No 9 (Paris, 20 March 1952) see A Mowbray, n 5 above, chs 16-18.
4. JG Merrills and AH Robertson, Human Rights in Europe, 4th edn (Manchester, Juris Publishing/MUP, 2001) 317.
5. A Mowbray, 'The European Court of Human Rights' Approach to Just Satisfaction' [1997] Public Law 647.
6. HJ Steiner and P Alston, International Human Rights In Context, 2nd edn (Oxford, OUP, 2000) 180-81.
7. JG Merrills, The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights (Manchester, MUP, 1993) 102-3.
8. A Clapham, Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993) 345.
9. R Singh, The Future of Human Rights in the United Kingdom: Essays on Law and Practice (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1997) 54.
10. J McBride, 'Protecting Life: a Positive Obligation to Help' 24 (1999) European Law Review Human Rights Survey HR/43, at p HR/54.
11. K Starmer, European Human Rights Law (London, Legal Action Group, 1999) ch 5.
12. K Starmer, 'Positive Obligations Under the Convention' in J Jowell and J Cooper (eds) Understanding Human Rights Principles (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2001) 159.
13. D Feldman, Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales, 2nd edn (Oxford, OUP, 2002) 53.
14. C Buckley, 'The European Convention on Human Rights and the Right to Life in Turkey' (2001) 1 Human Rights Law Review 35.
15. Loukis G Loucaides, 'The Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Cyprus v Turkey' (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 225.
16. A Mowbray, 'Duties of Investigation Under the European Convention on Human Rights' (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 435.
17. A Mowbray, 'Proposals for Reform of the European Court of Human Rights' [2002] Public Law 252.
18. MD Evans and R Morgan, Preventing Torture (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998).
19. Lord Woolf, announced that this term had been misunderstood and therefore it would be replaced by the phrase 'minimum term': Practice Statement (Crime: Life Sentences) [2002] 1 WLR 1789.
20. Jacobs and White The European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd edn C Ovey and RCA White (Oxford, OUP, 2002) 139.
21. A Mowbray, Cases & Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights (London, Butterworths, 2001) 235-58.
22. E Barendt, et al, Libel and the Media: The Chilling Effect (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997).
23. A Mowbray, 'Proposals for Reform of the European Court of Human Rights' [2002] Public Law 252.
24. A Mowbray, 'The ECHR: The Abolition of Capital Punishment and Recent Cases' (2002) 2 Human Rights Law Review 319.
25. For the Court's elaboration of the autonomous concept of a criminal charge under art 6 see, Deweer v Belgium A.35 (1980) and Mowbray above n 2 pp 277-78.
26. DJ Harris and J Darcy, The European Social Charter, 2nd edn (Ardsley NY, Transnational Publishers Inc, 2001) ch 3.
27. H Steiner and P Alston, International Human Rights in Context, 2nd edn (Oxford, OUP 2000) ch 4
28. KD Ewing, 'Constitutional Reform and Human Rights: Unfinished Business?' (2000) 5(3) Edinburgh Law Review 1.
29. F Klug, Values for a Godless Age (London, Penguin Books, 2000) 9.
30. A Mowbray, 'ECHR: Institutional Developments and Recent Cases' [2001] 1 Human Rights Law Review 333, 335.
31. A Mowbray, Cases & Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights (London, Butterworths, 2001) 376-77.
32. H Yourow, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence (Dordrecht, Matinus Nijhoff, 1996).
33. N Mole, 'The Hague Convention and art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights' [2000] International Family Law 121.
34. RA Lawson and HG Schermers, Leading Cases of the European Court of Human Rights (Nijmegen, Ars Aequi Libri, 1997) 255-56.
35. A Mowbray, Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights (London, Butterworths, 2001) 449-53
36. Y Arai-Takahashi, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp, Intersentia, 2002).
37. Lord Lester QC 'Universality versus Subsidiarity: A Reply' [1998] European Human Rights Law Review 73.
38. A Mowbray, 'The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in the Promotion of Democracy' [1999] Public Law 703.
39. KD Ewing, 'The Human Rights Act and Labour Law' (1998) 27 Industrial Law Journal 275.
40. KD Ewing, 'The Implications of Wilson and Palmer' (2003) 32 Industrial Law Journal 1.
41. Case No 1852, 309th Report of the Freedom of Association Committee, Vol LXXXI, 1998, Series B, No 1.
42. S Bailey, B Jones and A Mowbray, Cases and Materials on Administrative Law, 3rd edn (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1997) ch 4.
43. H Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and US Foreign Policy, (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1980) reprinted in Second Edition (1996) 52-53.
44. H Shue, 'The Interdependence of Duties' in P Alston and K Tomasevski (eds) The Right to Food (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1984) 84-85.
45. H Shue, Basic Rights, 2nd edn (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1996), "Afterword" 155.
46. J Waldron, Liberal Rights: Collected Papers, 1981-1991 (Cambridge, CUP, 1993).