The Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Cyprus v. Turkey

Leiden Journal of International Law

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 225-236

  Loucaides, Loukis G ^a  

^a European Court of Human Rights ^*  (France)

Author keywords

continuing violations; domestic remedies; missing persons; state responsibility; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011457896     PISSN: 09221565     EISSN: 14789698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0922156502000109     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Judgment, paras. 166-175.
2. Merits and Just Satisfaction, Judgment of 18 January 1978, 1978 ECHR (Ser. A) No. 25, at 90-91.
3. Judgment, para. 13.
4. Report of the Commission (appl. nos. 6780/74 and 6950/75), 10 July 1976, at 163-167.
5. Judgment, paras. 64-67.
6. Judgment, paras. 346 and 348.
7. Merits and Just Satisfaction, Jugment of 18 December 1996, 1996(VI) ECHR Reports 2216.
8. Judgment, paras. 61 and 90.
9. Id., at para. 77. The Court followed its Judgment in the Loizidou case where it held that the concept of ‘jurisdiction’ […] is not restricted to the national territory of the Contracting States […] the responsibility of Contracting States […] could also arise when as a consequence of military action-whether lawful or unlawful-[the state] exercises effective control of an area outside its national territory […]. Id., at para. 76.
10. Legal Consequences for States of the Continued presence of South Africa in Namibia notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276, Advisory Opinion, 21 June 1971, 1971 ICJ Rep. 16.
11. Judgment, paras. 90-99.
12. Cf. US Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Teheran, 1980 ICJ Rep. 90.