Duties of investigation under the european convention on human rights

International and Comparative Law Quarterly

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 437-448

  Mowbray, Alastair ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960972559     PISSN: 00205893     EISSN: 14716895     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/iclq/51.2.437     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Limitations of space preclude an examination of investigation obligations under Art 13, which mandates the provision of effective domestic remedies for violations of Convention rights: see A Mowbray, Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights (London: Butterworths, 2001) 602.
2. For previous discussions see, K Starmer, European Human Rights Law (London: Legal Action Group, 1999) 204–5, 392–3
3. J.G. Merrills, Human Rights in Europe, 4th edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001) 30–1 and 196.
4. (1995) 21 EHRR 97.
5. More generally see also, FN Aolain, ‘The Evolving Jurisprudence of the European Convention Concerning the Right to Life’ 19(1) Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 21 (2001)
6. C. Buckley, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Right to Life in Turkey’ 1(1) Human Rights Law Review 35 (2001).
7. Human Rights Law Review para 161.
8. Human Rights Law Review para 82.
9. Judgment of 10 May 2001. The Court's judgments are available from .
10. Human Rights Law Review para 132.
11. Human Rights Law Review para 94.
12. Judgment of 18 May 2000.
13. Human Rights Law Review para 80.
14. Note, the same Chamber pronounced identical requirements in the simultaneous cases of Hugh Jordan v UK, paras 105–9
15. McKerr v UK, paras. 111–15
16. Shanaghan v UK, paras 88–92: judgments of 4 May 2001.
17. (1998) 28 EHRR 121.
18. Kelly and Others v UK, above n 9.
19. On the work of this body see, MD Evans and R Morgan, Preventing Torture (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
20. Preventing Torture para 83.
21. Preventing Torture para 80.
22. See Tas v Turkey, Judgment of 14 Nov 2000, para 71.
23. (1998) 28 EHRR 1.
24. EHRR para 89.
25. Judgment of 28 Mar 2000.
26. EHRR, para 104.
27. Judgment of 14 Dec 2000.
28. Judgment of 10 Apr 2001.
29. (1998) 28 EHRR 408.
30. Judgment of 11 Apr 2000.
31. Judgment of 27 June 2000.
32. Judgment of 10 Oct 2000.
33. Judgment of 23 May 2001.
34. EHRR, para 388.
35. (1998) 27 EHRR 91.
36. EHRR, para 145.
37. See, A Mowbray, ‘A New European Court of Human Rights’ [1994] Public Law 540
38. ‘The Composition and Operation of the New European Court of Human Rights’ [1999] Public Law 219.