Advocating for English Learners: Selected Essays

Advocating for English Learners: Selected Essays

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-193

  Crawford, James ^a  

^a Institute for Language and Education Policy   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139354205     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (297)

1. Abedi, J. (2004) The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher 33 (1), 1–14.
2. Adams, J.Q. (1819) Letter to Morris de Fursten waether, Jun. 4. Niles Weekly Register, 18 (1820), 157–158.
3. American Council of Learned Societies (1931) Report of the committee on linguistic and national stocks in the population of the United States. In Annual Report of the American Historical Association. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Anderson, N. and Pyle, A. (1998) Bilingual classes a knotty issue. Los Angeles Times, May 18.
5. Angel V. v. Davis (2002) 307 F3d 1036 (9th Cir).
6. Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona (1997) 520 US 43.
7. Asian American Business Group v. City of Pomona (1989) 716 FSupp 1328 (CD Cal.).
8. Asimov, N. (2003) Number of proficient speakers tripled after Prop. 227 passed. San Francisco Chronicle, Mar. 26.
9. Associated Press (1987) Survey: Most think English is official US language. Feb. 14.
10. Associated Press (1995) Practically English-only. Sept. 27.
11. August, D. and Hakuta, K. (eds) (1997) Improving Schooling for Language-Minority Students: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Baker, K. (1997) Discussion between Keith Baker, Christine Rossell, and Delaine Eastin before the California State Board of Education, Dec. 13. Unpublished.
13. Baker, K. (1998) Structured English immersion: Breakthrough in teaching limited-English-proficient students. Phi Delta Kappan 80 (3), 199–204.
14. Baker, K.A. and de Kanter, A.A. (1981) Effectiveness of Bilingual Education: A Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation.
15. Bakke v. Regents of University of California (1978) 438 US 265.
16. Barabak, M. (1998) Bilingual education gets little support. Los AngelesTimes, Oct. 15.
17. Baron, D. (1990) The English-Only Question: An Official Language for Americans?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Bartels v. Iowa (1923) 191 Iowa 1060, 181 NW 508; rev’d, 262 US 404.
19. Bender, S.W. (1997) Direct democracy and distrust: The relationship between language law rhetoric and the language vigilantism experience. Harvard Latino Law Review 2 (1), 145–174.
20. Bennett, W.J. (1985) In defense of our common language. Speech to the Association for a Better New York, Sept. 26. Reprinted in J. Crawford (ed.) (1992) Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy (pp. 358–363). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Berliner, D.C. and Biddle, B.J. (1995) The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America’s Public Schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Bilingual Education Act (1968) PL 90–247, Jan. 2.
23. Bohning v. Ohio (1923) 102 Ohio St. 474, 132 NE 20; rev’d, 262 US 404.
24. Boston Globe (2002) Threatening language. Apr. 8.
25. Boswell, T.D. (1998) Implications of demographic changes in Florida’s public school population. In S.H. Fradd and O. Lee (eds) Creating Florida’s Multilingual Global Work Force: Educational Policies and Practices for Students Learning English as a New Language. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.
26. Broder, D. (2006) The GOP lag among Latinos. Washington Post, Jul. 23, p. B7.
27. Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 US 483.
28. Bruni, F. (1998) The ideologuewho‘fixed’ bilingual education. NewYork Times, Jun. 14.
29. Bush, G.W. (1999) No child left behind. Speech to the Latino Business Association, Los Angeles, Sept. 2.
30. California Department of Education (1995a–2007a) Annual Language Census. Online at http://www.cde.ca.gov/.
31. California Department of Education (1998b–2006b) Standardized Testing and Reporting. Online at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
32. California Department of Education (2000c) Report on the investigation of complaints against the Oceanside Unified School District. Sacramento: Author.
33. California Department of Education (2003c) Dataquest: California English Language Development Test, longitudinal analysis. Online at http://celdt.cde.ca.gov/.
34. Campbell, R.N. and Lindholm, K.J. (1987) Conservation of Language Resources. Los Angeles: University of California Center for Language Acquisition and Research.
35. Carbajal et al. v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1999) D N.M. Case No. CIV 98-279 MV/DJS, May 11.
36. Carmona v. Sheffield (1971) 325 FSupp1341(NDCal.); aff’d., 475 F2d 738 (9th Cir 1973).
37. Castañeda v. Pickard (1981) 648 F2d 989 (5th Cir).
38. Center for Applied Linguistics (2002, 2006) Two-way immersion programs: Features and statistics. Online at http://www.cal.org/twi/directory/.
39. Center on Education Policy (2007) Choices, Changes, and Challenges: Curriculum and Instruction in the NCLB Era. Washington, DC: Author.
40. Census Office, US (1897) Can not speak English. In Compendium of the Eleventh Census: 1890 (Pt. III; pp. 346–353).Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
41. Census Bureau, US (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Pt. 1, Chap. C). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
42. Chambers, J. and Parrish, T. (1992) Meeting the Challenge of Diversity: An Evaluation of Programs for Pupils with Limited Proficiency in English (Vol. IV). Cost of Programs and Services for LEP Students. Berkeley, CA: BW Associates
43. Chávez, L. (1995) Onenation, one common language. Reader’s Digest (Aug.), 87–91.
44. Cho, G. and Krashen, S. (1998) The negative consequences of heritage language loss and why we should care. In S.D. Krashen, L. Tse and J. McQuillan (eds) Heritage Language Development (pp. 31–39). Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
45. Citizens for an Educated America (1997) California’s Unz initiative on bilingual education:Summaryof focus groups and statewide voter survey. Unpublished.
46. Citizens for an Educated America (1998) Sample letter-to-the-editor points. Press release.
47. Civil Rights Act (1964) PL 88–352, Jul. 2.
48. CNN.com (2002) Elections 2002. County results: Colorado Amendment 31. Online at http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2002/pages/states/CO/I/01/county.000.html.
49. Collier, V.P. and Thomas, W.P. (1989) How quickly can immigrants become proficient in school English? Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students 5 (Fall), 26–39.
50. Combs, M.C. (1992) English Plus: Responding to English Only. In J. Crawford (ed.) Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy (pp. 216–224). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51. Cose, E. (1992) A Nation of Strangers: Prejudice, Politics, and the Populating of America. New York: William Morrow. Court Interpreters Act (1978) 28 USC 1827.
52. Crawford, J. (1986a) ‘Supporting’ comments reveal animosity toward ethnic groups. Education Week, Feb. 12, p. 20.
53. Crawford, J. (1986b) Conservative groups take aim at bilingual-education programs. Education Week, Mar. 19, p. 1.
54. Crawford, J. (1986c) US enforcement of bilingual plans declines sharply. Education Week, Jun. 4, pp. 1, 14–15.
55. Crawford, J. (1986d) Bilingual-program grantees told to cut travel, limit salary expenses. Education Week, Jun. 11.
56. Crawford, J. (1986e) Few ask to change ‘Lau’ plans. Education Week, Jun. 4, p. 15.
57. Crawford, J. (1987) Bilingual education: Language, learning, and politics. Education Week, Apr. 1, pp. 19–50.
58. Crawford, J. (1988) Split tongue: Self-appointed guardians hide Official English’s real agenda. Arizona Republic, Oct. 30, pp. C1, C3. Reprinted in J. Crawford (ed.) (1992) Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy (pp. 171–177). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Crawford, J. (1989) Bilingual Education: History, Politics, Theory, and Practice. Trenton, NJ: Crane.
60. Crawford, J. (1992) Hold your Tongue: Bilingualism and the Politics of ‘English Only.’ Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
61. Crawford, J. (1997) Best Evidence: Research Foundations of the Bilingual Education Act. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
62. Crawford, J. (2000) At War with Diversity: US Language Policy in an Age of Anxiety. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
63. Crawford, J. (2004) Educating English Learners: Language Diversity in the Classroom (5th edn). Los Angeles, CA: Bilingual Educational Services.
64. Cummins, J. (1992) Bilingual education and English immersion: The Ramírez report in theoretical perspective. Bilingual Research Journal 16 (1–2), 91–104.
65. Cummins, J. (1999) Alternative paradigms in bilingual education research: Does theory have a place? Educational Researcher (Oct.), 26–41.
66. Curiel, H., Rosenthal, J. and Richek, P. (1986) Impacts of bilingual education on school grades, attendance, retentions, and drop-out. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 8 (4), 357–367.
67. Danoff, M., Coles, G., McLaughlin, D. and Reynolds, D. (1978) Evaluation of the Impact of ESE A Title VII Spanish/English Bilingual Education Programs (Vol. 3): Year Two Impact Data, Educational Process, and In-Depth Analysis. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
68. Debates and Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of the State of California, 1878–1879 (1880–81). Sacramento, CA: Superintendent of State Printing.
69. Decker, C. (1998) Bilingual education ban widely supported. Los Angeles Times, Apr. 13.
70. Dole, B. (1995) Remarks prepared for delivery, American Legion convention, Indianapolis, Sept. 4.
71. Donovan, B. (2004) AG: Public schools not exempt from Prop. 203. Navajo Times, Feb. 19.
72. Dunkel, P. (1990) Implications of the CAI effectiveness research for limited-English proficient learners. Computers in the Schools 7, 31–52.
73. Education Amendments of 1978 (1978) PL 95–561, Nov. 1.
74. Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965) PL 89–10, Apr. 9.
75. Emergency Immigrant Education Act (1984) PL 98–511, Oct. 19.
76. English First (1986) Fundraising letter. Springfield, VA.
77. English for the Children (1997) Proposition 227: The 1998 California ‘English for the Children’ initiative. Online at http://www.onenation.org/index.html.
78. English for the Children (1998) International methods of language instruction. Online at http://www.onenation.org/0298/021698an.html.
79. English Language Empowerment Act (1996) HR123 (104th Cong., 2nd Sess.); passed House, Aug. 1.
80. English Plus Information Clearinghouse (1987) Statement of purpose. Reprinted in J. Crawford (ed.) (1992) Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy (pp. 151–153). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81. English Plus Resolution (1995) H Con. Res. 83 (104th Cong., 1st Sess.); introduced in House, Jul.13.
82. Epstein, N. (1977) Language, Ethnicity, and the Schools: Policy Alternatives for Bilingualbicultural Education. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
83. Equal Educational Opportunities Act (1974) 20 USC §§1701–20.
84. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, US (2001) EEOC settles English only suit for $2.44 million against University of Incarnate Word. Online at http://www.eeoc.gov/press/4-20-01.html.
85. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, US. (2002) Compliance Manual. Washington, DC: Author. Online at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/compliance.html.
86. Escamilla, K., Cummins, N., Garcia, J., Escamilla, M., Gutierrez, P. and Shannon, S. (2002) Colorado’s Amendment31: Anemic perspective, Nov. 11. Email to Forum for Discussion of Bilingual Education in Arizona (AZBLE) listserv.
87. Executive Order 13166 (2000) Improving access to services for persons with limited English proficiency. Aug. 11. Online at http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/cor/Pubs/eolep.htm.
88. Farkas, S. and Johnson, J. (1998) A Lot to be Thankful For: What ParentsWant Children to Learn about America. New York: Public Agenda Foundation.
89. Farrington v. Tokushige (1927) 273 US 284.
90. Feinberg, R.C. (2002) Bilingual Education: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
91. Fishman, J. (1991) Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
92. Frese, S.J. (2005) Divided by a Common Language: The Babel Proclamation and its Influence in Iowa History. Society for History Education. Online at http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ht/39.1/frese.html.
93. Galindo, R. (1997) Language wars: The ideological dimensions of the debates on bilingual education. Bilingual Research Journal 21 (2–3), 103–141.
94. Gallup Poll (1980/81) Education, September 5. In Public Opinion, 1980.Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, Inc.
95. Gallup Poll (1998/99) Bilingual education, June 6. In Public Opinion, 1998. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, Inc.
96. Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., García, E., Asato, J., Gutierrez, K., Stritikus, T. and Curry, J. (2000) The Initial Impact of Proposition 227 on the Instruction of English Learners. Davis, CA: University of California, Linguistic Minority Research Institute. Online at http://www.lmri.ucsb.edu/publications/00_prop227effects.pdf.
97. García, E.E. (2002) Bilingualism and schooling in the United States. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 155/156, 1–92.
98. García, P. (1998a) Latinos divided on bilingual education. Sacramento Bee, Mar. 15.
99. García, P. (1998b) Unz keeps focus on bilingual issue. Sacramento Bee, Jan. 19.
100. García v. Gloor (1980) 618 F2d 264 (5th Cir).
101. García v. Spun Steak Co (1993) 998 F2d 1480 (9th Cir); cert. denied, 512US1228 (1994).
102. Gary C. Lawrence Co. (1988) National telephone membership survey of US English. April. Santa Ana, CA: Author.
103. Gibson, C.J. and Lennon, E. (1999) Historical Census Statistics on the Foreign-born Population of the United States, 1850–1990. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
104. Girard, D.P. (1954) A new look at foreign languages. Teachers College Record 56 (2), 84–91.
105. Glazer, N. (1966) The process and problems of language-maintenance: An integrative review. In J.A. Fishman (ed.) Language Loyalty in the United States: The Maintenance and Perpetuation of Non-English Mother Tongues by American Ethnic and Religious Groups. The Hague: Mouton.
106. Glod, M. (2007) Fairfax resists ‘No Child’ provision.WashingtonPost, Jan. 26, p. B1.
107. Gold, M. (1999) Small voice for her parents. Los Angeles Times, May 24.
108. Gómez v. Illinois State Board of Education (1987) 811 F2d 1030 (7th Cir).
109. Gottlieb, M. (2003) Large-scale Assessment of English Language Learners. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
110. Government Accountability Office (2006) No Child Left Behind Act: Assistance from Education could Help States Better Measure Progress of Students with Limited English Proficiency. GAO-06-815, July 26. Washington, DC: Author. Online at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06815.pdf.
111. Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) 539 US 244.
112. Gray, T.C., Convery, H.S. and Fox, K.M. (1981) The Current Status of Bilingual Education Legislation. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
113. Greene, J. (1998) A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Bilingual Education. Claremont, CA: Tomás Rivera Policy Center.
114. Guadalupe Organization v. Tempe (1978) 587 F2d 1022 (9th Cir).
115. Gutierrez v. Municipal Court (1988) 38 F2d 1031 (9th Cir); vacated as moot, 490 US 1016 (1989).
116. Hakuta, K. (1986) Mirror of Language: The Debate on Bilingualism. New York: Basic Books.
117. Hakuta, K. (2000) Points on SAT-9 performance and Proposition 227. Stanford University, Aug. 22. Online at http://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/www/research/SAT9/SAT9_2000/bullets.
118. Hakuta, K. (2001a) Silence from Oceanside and the future of bilingual education. Stanford University, Aug. 18. Online at http://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/www/research/SAT9/silence1.html.
119. Hakuta, K. (2001b) The education of language-minority students. Testimony to the US Commission on Civil Rights. Washington, DC, Apr. 13. Online at http://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/www/docs/CivilRightsCommission.html.
120. Hakuta, K. et al. (1993) Federal Education Programs for Limited-English-Proficient Students: A Blueprint for the Second Generation. Stanford, CA: Stanford Working Group.
121. Hakuta, K. and Beatty, A. (eds) (2000) Testing English-Language Learners in US Schools: Report and Workshop Summary. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
122. Hakuta, K., Butler, Y.G. and Witt, D. (2000) How Long Does It Take for English Learners to Attain Proficiency? Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Linguistic Minority Research Institute. Online at http://www.lmri.ucsb.edu/publications/00_hakuta.pdf.
123. Hansen, M.L. (1961) The Atlantic Migration, 1607–1860. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
124. Hargrove, T. (2001) ManyHispanics in charter schools. Rocky Mountain News, Nov. 2.
125. Hartmann, E.G. (1948) The Movement to Americanize the Immigrant. New York: Columbia University Press.
126. Harvard Law Review (1987) ‘Official English’: Federal limits on efforts to curtail bilingual services in the states. Harvard Law Review 100 (6), 1345–1362.
127. Haugen, E. (1972) The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen (Anwar S. Dil, ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
128. Hawkins-Stafford Elementary and Secondary School Improvement Amendments (1988) PL 100–297, Apr. 28.
129. Hayakawa, S.I. (1985) One Nation… Indivisible? Washington, DC: US English.
130. Hayward, E. (2002) Voters go for change in state bilingual ed. Boston Herald, Nov. 6.
131. Heath, S.B. (1976) A national language academy? Debate in the new nation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 11, 9–43.
132. Hernández v. New York (1991) 500 US 352.
133. Hernández v. Texas (1954) 347 US 475.
134. Higham, J. (1988) Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925 (2nd edn). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
135. Holm, W. (1993) A Very Preliminary Analysis of Navajo Kindergartners’ Language Abilities. Window Rock, AZ: Navajo Division of Education, Office of Diné Culture, Language, and Community Services.
136. Hopstock, P., Bucaro, B., Fleischman, H.L., Zehler, A.M. and Eu, H. (1993) Descriptive Study of Services to Limited English Proficient Students. Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
137. Houston Metropolitan Area Survey (1983) Houston, TX: Center for Public Policy, College of Social Sciences, University of Houston.
138. Huddy, L. and Sears, D.O. (1990) Qualified public support for bilingual education: Some policy implications. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 508 (March), 119–134.
139. Immigration and Naturalization Service, US (1982) Statistical Year book. Washington, DC: Author.
140. Immigration Commission, US (1911) Brief Statement of the Immigration Commission with Conclusions and Recommendations and Views of the Minority (Vol. 1).Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
141. Improving America’s Schools Act (1994) PL 103–382, Oct. 20.
142. Ingram, C. (1998) Wilson backs measure to ban bilingual education. Los Angeles Times, May 19.
143. Institute for Language and Education Policy (2006) A time for advocacy. Online at http://www.elladvocates.org/aboutus.html.
144. Jiménez, M. (1992) The educational rights of language-minority children. In J. Crawford (ed.), Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy (pp. 243–251). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
145. Johnson, E. (2005) Proposition 203: A critical metaphor analysis. Bilingual Research Journal 29 (1), 69–84.
146. Keegan, L.G. (2000) English Acquisition Services: A Summary of Bilingual Education Programs and English as a Second Language Programs for School Year 1998–99. Phoeni, AZ: Arizona Department of Education.
147. Kellogg, L.P. (1918) The Bennett law in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Magazine of History 2, 3–25.
148. Kellor, F. (1916) Americanization by industry. Immigrants in America Review 2 (1), 24.
149. Keyes v. School District No. 1 (1983) 576 FSupp 1503 (D Colo.).
150. Kloss, H. (1998) The American Bilingual Tradition. McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
151. Kossan, P. (2003) Schools chief getting tough on English fluency. Arizona Republic, Mar. 28.
152. Kozol, J. (1991) Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools. NewYork: Crown.
153. Krashen, S.D. (1996) Under Attack: The Case against Bilingual Education. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
154. Krashen, S.D. (1999) Condemned Without a Trial: Bogus Arguments against Bilingual Education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
155. Krashen, S. (2001) Why did test scores go up in California? A response to Unz/Reinhard. NYSABE Newsletter 1 (3), 21–23. Online at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jwcrawford/Krash10.htm.
156. Krashen, S. (2002a) Letter to the Boston Globe. April 8. Unpublished.
157. Krashen, S. (2002b) Evidence suggesting that public opinion is becoming more negative: A discussion of the reasons, and what we can do about it. Online at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jwcrawford/Krash11.htm.
158. Krashen, S. (2004) The acquisition of academic English by children in two-way programs: What does the research say? NABE Review of Research and Practice 3, 3–19.
159. Krashen, S. (2006) My resignation from the NABE board, Mar. 6. Online at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jwcrawford/openlet.htm.
160. Krashen, S., Crawford, J. and Kim, H. (1998) Bias in polls on bilingual education: A demonstration. Online at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jwcrawford/USCpoll.htm.
161. Krashen, S. and McField, G. (2005) What works? Reviewing the latest evidence on bilingual education. Language Learner 1 (2), 7–10, 34. Online at http://users.rcn.com/crawj/langpol/Krashen-McField.pdf.
162. Krashen, S.D., Tse, L. and McQuillan, J. (eds) (1998) Heritage Language Development. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
163. Krauss, M. (1992) Statement of Michael Krauss, representing the Linguistic Society of America. In US Senate, Native American Languages Act of 1991: Hearing before the Select Committee on Indian Affairs (pp. 18–22).Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
164. Kritz v. State of Alaska (2002) Case No. 3 DI-99-12 CI.
165. Kucera, D.W. (1955) Church–State Relationships in Education in Illinois. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
166. Lambert, W.E. (1984) Overview of issues in immersion education. In Studies on Immersion Education (pp. 8–30). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
167. Lampros, A. (1998) An incomplete translation. Contra Costa Times, Apr. 6.
168. Lau v. Nichols (1974) 414 US 563.
169. Lazarín, M. (2006) Improving Assessment and Accountability for English Language Learners in the No Child Left Behind Act. Issue Brief No. 16. Washington, DC: National Council of La Raza.
170. Lee, J. (2006) Tracking Achievement Gaps and Assessing the Impact of NCLB on the Gaps: An In-Depth Look into National and State Reading and Math Outcome Trends. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
171. Leibowitz, A.H. (1969) English literacy: Legal sanction for discrimination. Notre Dame Lawyer 45 (7), 7–67.
172. Lewis, J. (1998) Walking with the Wind: A Memoir of the Movement. NewYork: Simon&Schuster.
173. Lindholm-Leary, K.J. (2001) Dual Language Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
174. Lockwood, A.T. (1996) Caring, community, and personalization: Strategies to combat the Hispanic dropout problem. Advances in Hispanic Education 1. Online at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/hdp/advances/s96no1.htm.
175. Los Angeles Times (2002) 24% of English learners test fluent. May 1.
176. Los Angeles Times Poll (1997) Study #400: California Issues and Politics. Oct. 15. Online at http://www.latimes.com/extras/timespoll/stats/pdfs/400ss.pdf.
177. Los Angeles Times Poll (1998a) Study #410: California Politics. Apr. 13. Online at http://www.latimes.com/extras/timespoll/stats/pdfs/4 10ss.pdf.
178. Los Angeles Times Poll (1998b) Study #413: Exit Poll, California Primary Election. Jun. 2. Online at http://www.latimes.com/extras/timespoll/stats/pdfs/413ss.pdf.
179. Luebke, F.C. (1980) Legal restrictions on foreign languages in the Great Plains states, 1917–1923. In P. Schach (ed.) Languages in Conflict: Linguistic Acculturation on the Great Plains. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
180. LULAC et al. v. Florida Board of Education (1990) Case No. 90-1913 (SD Fla.).
181. Lyons, J.J. (1985) Education secretary Bennett on bilingual education: Mixed up or malicious? NABE News 9 (1), 1, 14. Reprinted in J. Crawford (ed.) (1992) Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy (pp. 363–366). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
182. MacArthur, E.K. (1993) Language Characteristics and Schooling in the United States, a Changing Picture: 1979 and 1989.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
183. Macedo, D. (2000) The colonialism of the English Only movement. Educational Researcher 29 (3), 15–24.
184. McQuillan, J. (1998) The use of self-selected and free voluntary reading in heritage language programs: A review of the research. In S.D. Krashen, L. Tse and J. McQuillan (eds) Heritage Language Development (pp. 73–87). Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
185. McQuillan, J. and Tse, L. (1996) Does research really matter? An analysis of media opinion on bilingual education, 1984–1994. Bilingual Research Journal 20 (1), 1–27.
186. Mears, T. (1998) Saying ‘si’ to Spanish. Boston Globe, Apr. 12.
187. Merl, J. (1998) Prop. 227 critics cite school data tomakecase. Los AngelesTimes, May 6.
188. Meyer v. Nebraska (1922, 1923) 107 Neb. 657, 187 NW 100; rev’d, 262 US 390.
189. Miller, J. (1989) Lawsuit filed over Pomona sign law. Los Angeles Times, Feb. 16, Pt. IX, p. 4.
190. Mitchell, N. (2002) Colorado hands English immersion backer his first loss. Rocky Mountain News, Nov. 6.
191. Morris, R.B. (1987) The Forging of the Union, 1781–1789.NewYork: Harper and Row.
192. Napolitano, J. (2001) Re: Application of Proposition 203 to schools serving the Navajo Nation. Arizona Attorney General Opinion I01–006 (R00–062), Feb. 15.
193. National Association for Bilingual Education (2001) Bi-partisan agreement on bilingual education ratified by Congressional panel. Press release, Nov. 30.
194. Native American Languages Act (1990) PL 101–477, Oct. 30.
195. National Foreign Language Center (2002) Critical languages in southwest Asia. Briefing on language and national security, Jan. 16. Online at http://www.nflc.org/policy_and_strategy/language_and_national_security/.
196. National Research Council (1997) Political debate interferes with research on educating children with limited English proficiency. Press release, Jan. 14.
197. New York State Association for Bilingual Education (2003) Conference program, Mar. 27–30.
198. New York Times (1918) Forbid new German classes in schools. May 25, p. 14.
199. New York Times/CBS News Poll (1987) English-only poll. May 11–14.
200. Newton, L.W. (1980) The Americanization of French Louisiana: A Study of the Process of Adjustment between the French and the Anglo-American Populations of Louisiana, 1803–1860. New York: Arno Press.
201. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2002) PL 107-110, Jan. 8.
202. Noonan, K. (2000) I believed that bilingual education was best… until the kids proved me wrong. Washington Post, Sept. 3.
203. Office for Civil Rights, US (1970) Memorandum from J.S. Pottinger to school districts with more than 5% national origin-minority group children: Identification of discrimination and denial of services on the basis of national origin. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, May 25.
204. Office for Civil Rights, US (1975) Task-force findings specifying remedies available for eliminating past educational practices ruled unlawful under Lau v. Nichols. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Summer.
205. Office of Management and Budget, US(1999) FY 2000 Budget Summary. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
206. Office of the Press Secretary, White House (2002) Remarks by President Bush and President Chirac in press availability. Transcript, May 26. Online at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020526-2.html.
207. Olagues v. Russoniello (1986) 797 F2d 1511 (9th Cir); vacated as moot, 108 SCt 52 (1987).
208. Olsen, L. (1998) Reflections on the key role of two-way bilingual immersion programs in this Proposition 227 era. Keynote speech, Two-Way Bilingual Immersion Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, Jun. 28.
209. Orr, J.E., Butler, Y.G., Bousquet, M. and Hakuta, K. (2000) What can we learn about the impact of Proposition 227 from SAT-9 scores? An analysis of results from 2000. Stanford University, Aug. 15.
210. Paine, T. (1776) Common Sense. Philadelphia: W. and T. Bradford. Online at http://www.bartleby.com/br/133.html.
211. Parrish, T.B. et al. (2006) Effects of the Implementation of Proposition 227 on the Education of English learners, K–12: Findings from a Five-year Evaluation. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research and WestEd.
212. Perlstein, L. (2004) School pushes reading, writing, reform: Sciences shelved in efforts to boost students to ‘No Child’ standards. Washington Post, May31, p. A1.
213. Piatt, B. (1986) Toward domestic recognition of a human right to language. Houston Law Review 23, 885–894.
214. Piatt, B. (1990) ¿Only English? Law and Language Policy in the United States. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
215. Pimentel, O.R. (2002) Bilingual-ed issue turns onmoney. Arizona Republic, Nov. 16.
216. Pitt, L. (1966) The Decline of the Californios: A Social History of the Spanish-Speaking Californians, 1846–1890. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
217. Plyler v. Doe (1982) 457 US 202.
218. Portes, A. and Hao L. (1998) E pluribus unum: Bilingualism and language loss in the second generation. Sociology of Education 71, 269–294.
219. Portes, A. and Hao, L. (2002) The price of uniformity: Language, family, and personality adjustment in the immigrant second generation. Ethnic and Racial Studies 25, 889–912.
220. Pray, L.C. and MacSwan, J. (2002) Different question, same answer: Howlong does it take for English learners to acquire proficiency? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, NewOrleans, Apr. 4.
221. Proposition 63 (California) (1986) English as official state language, Nov. 4.
222. Proposition 106 (Arizona) (1988) Official use of English language, Nov. 8.
223. Proposition 187 (California) (1994) Illegal aliens: Ineligibility for public services, verification, and reporting, Nov. 8.
224. Proposition 203 (Arizona) (2000) An initiative measure: English language education for children in public schools, Nov. 7.
225. Proposition 227 (California) (1998) English language in public schools, Jun. 2.
226. Prucha, F.P. (1976) American Indian Policy in Crisis: Christian Reformers and the Indian, 1865–1900. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
227. Pyle, A. (1996) Boycotting Latino parents gather letters urging all-English teaching. Los Angeles Times, Feb. 17.
228. Pyle, A. (1998) Opinions vary on studies that back bilingual classes. Los Angeles Times, Mar. 2.
229. Ramírez, J.D. (1998) Performance of Redesignated Fluent-English-proficient Students. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Unified School District.
230. Ramírez, J.D., Yuen, S.D. and Ramey, D.R. (1991) Final Report: Longitudinal Study of Structured English Immersion Strategy, Early-Exit and Late-Exit Transitional Bilingual Education Programs for Language-Minority Children. San Mateo, CA: Aguirre International.
231. Report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs (1887) Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
232. Rhodes, N.C. and Branaman, L.E. (1999) Foreign Language Instruction in the United States. McHenry, IL: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics.
233. Riley, W. (2000) Excelencia para todos – Excellence for all: The progress of Hispanic education and the challenges of a new century. Speech delivered at Bell Multicultural High School, Washington, DC, Mar. 15.
234. Rippley, La Vern J. (1976) The German Americans. Boston: Twayne.
235. Rivera, C. (1998) Bilingual classes get support in poll. Los Angeles Times, Feb. 10.
236. Rocky Mountain News (2002a) The lies told about Amendment 31. Oct. 22.
237. Rocky Mountain News (2002b) Hispanics on 31. Nov. 7.
238. Roosevelt, T. (1926) Works (Memorial edn). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
239. Rossell, C. and Baker, K. (1996) The educational effectiveness of bilingual education. Research in the Teaching of English 30 (1), 7–74.
240. Ruíz, R. (1984) Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal 8 (2), 15–34.
241. Ruiz v. Hull (1998) Case No. CV-96-0493-PR, 957 P2d 984 (Ariz.).
242. Sailer, S. (2002) Analysis: Whites, not Latinos, win for GOP. United Press International, Nov. 12.
243. Saltzman, J. (2003) Reinstating ‘2-way’ bilingual ed is hailed. Boston Globe, Jul. 20.
244. Sandmeyer, E.C. (1973) The Anti-Chinese Movement in California. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
245. Sanko, J.J. (2002) Owens decries bilingual plan. Rocky Mountain News, Oct. 2.
246. Senate, US, Committee on Labor and Human Resources, Subcommittee on Education, Arts, and Humanities (1982) Bilingual Education Amendments of 1981 (97th Cong., 2nd Sess), Apr. 23.
247. Senate, US, Committee on the Judiciary (1987) Hearings on the Nomination of Robert Bork to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. 100th Cong., 1st Sess.
248. Serna v. Portales Municipal Schools (1974) 499 F2d 1147 (10th Cir).
249. Shebala, M. (1999) Council slams door on ‘English Only.’ Navajo Times, Jul. 22.
250. Shockley, J.S. (1974) Chicano Revolt in a Texas Town. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
251. Soberal-Pérez v. Schweiker (1982) 549 FSupp 1164 (ED N.Y.); aff’d., Soberal-Pérez v. Heckler, 717 F2d 575 (2d Cir 1983).
252. Statistics Canada (2003) Enrolment in second language immersion programs. Online at http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/home/index.cfm.
253. Stuart v. School District No. 1, Kalamazoo (1874) 30 Mich. 69.
254. Steinberg, J. (2000) Increase in test scores counters dire forecasts for bilingual ban. New York Times, Aug. 20.
255. Tanton, J. (1986) Memorandum to WITAN IV attendees, Oct. 10.
256. Teresa P. v. Berkeley Unified School District (1989) 724 FSupp 698 (ND Cal.).
257. Thomas, W.P. and Collier, V.P. (1997) School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Online at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/resource/effectiveness/.
258. Thomas, W.P. and Collier, V.P. (2002) A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long-Term Academic Achievement: Final Report. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence. Online at http://crede.berkeley.edu/research/llaa/1.1_final.html.
259. Thompson, M.S., DiCerbo, K.E., Mahoney, K. and MacSwan, J. (2002) ¿Exito en California? Avalidity critique of language program evaluations and analysis of English learner test scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives 10 (7). Online at http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n7/.
260. Trasviña, J. (1992) Bilingual ballots: Their history and a look forward. In J. Crawford (ed.) Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy (pp. 258–264). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
261. Trombley, W. (1986) Latino backing of ‘English-only’ a puzzle. Los Angeles Times, Oct. 25, p. 1.
262. Tse, L. (2001) Resisting and reversing language shift: Heritage-language resilience among US native biliterates. Harvard Educational Review 71, 676–708.
263. University of California Regents v. Bakke (1978) 438 US 265.
264. Unz, R. (1997a) Bilingual is a damaging myth. Los Angeles Times, Oct. 19.
265. Unz, R. (1997b) KABC/KGO radio appearance, Aug. 6.
266. Unz, R., Snow, C. and Randolph, T. (2001) Bilingual Education: A Necessary Help or a Failed Hindrance? Videotape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, Oct. 15.
267. US English (1987) Frequently used arguments against the legal protection of English. Washington, DC: Author.
268. US English (1995) Support for official English reaches all-time high. Press release, Sept. 18.
269. US ex rel. Negrón v. New York (1970) 434 F2d 386 (2d Cir).
270. US v. Carolene Products (1938) 304 US 144.
271. US v. Texas (1981) 506 FSupp 405 (ED Tex.); rev’d, 680 F2d 356 (5th Cir 1982).
272. Vaishnav, A. (2002) Backers step up bilingual ed fight. Boston Globe, Mar. 13.
273. Valeria G. v.Wilson (1998) 12 FSupp2d 1007 (CD Cal.).
274. Veltman, C. (1983) Language Shift in the United States. Berlin: Mouton.
275. Veltman, C. (1988) The Future of the Spanish language in the United States.Washington, DC: Hispanic Policy Development Project.
276. Veltman, C. (2000) The American linguistic mosaic: Understanding language shift in the United States. In S.L. McKay and S.C. Wong (eds) New Immigrants in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
277. Villeré, S.L. (1981) Jacques Philippe Villeré: First Native-Born Governor of Louisiana, 1816–1820. New Orleans: Historic New Orleans Collection.
278. Voting Rights Act (Bilingual Provisions) (1975) 42 USC 1973aa–1a.
279. Waggoner, D. (1986) Estimates of the need for bilingual education and the proportion of children in need of being served. Paper prepared for the US House Committee on Appropriations.
280. Waggoner, D. (1995) Are current home speakers of non-English languages learning English? Numbers and Needs 5 (6), 1–2.
281. Walberg, H.J. (1986) Letter to Frederick Mulhauser, Sept. 22. In US General Accounting Office (1987) Bilingual Education: ANew Look at the Research Evidence (pp. 71–72). Washington, DC: Author, 1987.
282. Washington Post (2006) Yes on bilingual ballots. Jul. 10.
283. Welchert, S. (2002) RE: bounced back. Email message to S. Krashen, Aug. 28.
284. Wildermuth, J. (1998) Diverse voices heard on race at Stanford forum. San Francisco Chronicle, Jan. 31.
285. Wiley, T.G. (1998) The imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. In T. Ricento and B. Burnaby (eds) Language and Politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and Realities (pp. 211–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
286. Willig, A.C. (1985) A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research 55, 269–317.
287. Wilson, P. (1998) Veto message for SB6, May 18.
288. Wittke, C. (1936) German-Americans and theWorldWar:With Special Emphasis on Ohio’s German-Language Press. Columbus: Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society.
289. Wong Fillmore, L. (1991) When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 6, 323–346.
290. Yñiguez v. Arizonans for Official English (1995, 1997) 69 F3d 920 (9th Cir); vacated as moot, 117 SCt 1055.
291. Yñiguez v. Mofford (1990, 1995) 730 FSupp 309 (D Ariz.); aff’d., 69 F3d 920 (9th Cir).
292. Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad (1926) 271 US 500.
293. Zamora, P. (2007) Impact of NCLB on English language learners. Testimony before the US House Committee on Education and Labor, Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education, Mar. 23.
294. Zehler, A.M., Fleishman, H.L., Hopstock, P.J., Stephenson, T.G., Pendzik, M.L. and Sapru, S. (2003) Descriptive Study of Services to LEP Students and to LEP Students with Disabilities; Policy Report: Summary of Findings Related to LEP and SpEd-LEP Students. Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
295. Zehr, M.A. (2000) Cause of higher Calif. scores sore point in bilingual ed. debate. Education Week, Sept. 6.
296. Zehr, M.A. (2006a) Spellings issues final regulations for testing of English-learners. Education Week, Sept. 20.
297. Zehr, M.A. (2006b) Reacting to reviews, states cut portfolio assessments for ELL students. Education Week, Nov. 15.