Superspace extrapolation reveals inductive biases in function learning

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 713-718

  Lucas, Christopher G ^a   Sterling, Douglas ^b   Kemp, Charles ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; FUNCTIONS;

FUNCTION LEARNING; FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP; INDUCTIVE BIAS; LEARN+; LIMITED OBSERVATIONS; N-DIMENSIONAL SPACE; NEW APPROACHES; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SUPERSPACE; TRAINING EXAMPLE;

EXTRAPOLATION;

EID: 85139178135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Bott, L., & Heit, E. (2004). Nonmonotonic extrapolation in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1).
2. Brehmer, B. (1974). Hypotheses about relations between scaled variables in the learning of probabilistic inference tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 11, 1-27.
3. Busemeyer, J., Myung, I. J., & McDaniel, M. (1993). Cue competition effects: Theoretical implications for adaptive network learning models. Psychological Science, 4(3), 196.
4. Carroll, J. (1963). Functional learning: The learning of continuous functional mappings relating stimulus and response continua.
5. DeLosh, E. L., Busemeyer, J. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1997). Extrapolation: The sine qua non of abstraction in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 968-986.
6. Feldman, J. (1997). The structure of perceptual categories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 145-170.
7. Griffiths, T. L., Lucas, C. G., Williams, J. J., & Kalish, M. L. (2009). Modeling human function learning with Gaussian processes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 21.
8. Juslin, P., Karlsson, L., & Olsson, H. (2008). Information integration in multiple cue judgment: A division of labor hypothesis. Cognition, 106(1), 259–298.
9. Kalish, M., Lewandowsky, S., & Kruschke, J. (2004). Population of linear experts: Knowledge partitioning and function learning. Psychological Review, 111, 1072-1099.
10. Kelley, H., & Busemeyer, J. (2008). A comparison of models for learning how to dynamically integrate multiple cues in order to forecast continuous criteria. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(4), 218–240.
11. Koh, K. (1993). Induction of combination rules in two-dimensional function learning. Memory & cognition, 21(5), 573–590.
12. Koh, K., & Meyer, D. (1991). Function learning: Induction of continuous stimulus-response relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 811–836.
13. Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 2-29.