Evaluating Inquiry Learning Through Recognition-Based Tasks

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 125, Issue , 2005, Pages 515-522

  Murray, Tom ^a   Rath, Kenneth ^b   Woolf, Beverly ^a   Marshall, David ^a   Bruno, Merle ^c   Dragon, Toby ^a   Kohler, Kevin ^a   Mattingly, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b Peterfreund Associates   (United States)

^c HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS METHOD; DESIGN METHOD; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER; HUMAN BIOLOGY; INQUIRY LEARNING; ITEM-BASED; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; VERBAL PROTOCOL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85139052569     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Champagne, A.B., Kouba, V.L., & Hurley, M. (2000). Assessing Inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.) Inquiry into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.
2. White, B., Shimoda, T., Frederiksen, J. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: computer support for metacognitive development. International J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education Vol. 10, 151-1182.
3. Roth, W. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The Development of Science Process Skills in Authentic Contexts. J. of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 30, No 2. pp. 127-152.
4. Edelson, D.C., D.N. Gordin, and P.D. Pea (1999). "Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design." The Journal of Learning Sciences. 8(3&4): 391-450. 1999..
5. Azevedo, R., Verona, E., Cromley, J.G. (2001). Fostering learners collaborative problem solving with RiverWeb. J.D. Moore et. al. (Eds.) Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 166-172.
6. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K.M., Fredricks, J. (1998). “Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students” J. of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), pp 313-350, 1998.
7. van Joolingen, W., & de Jong, T. (1996). Design and Implementation of Simulation Based Discovery Environments: The SMILSE Solution. Jl. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 7(3/4) p 253-276.
8. Zachos, P., Hick, T., Doane, W., & Sargent, C. (2000). Setting Theoretical and Empirical Foundations for Assessing Scientific Inquiry and Discovery in Educational Programs. J. of Research in Science Teaching 37(9), 938-962.
9. Murray, T., Winship, L., Stillings, N. (2003b). Measuring Inquiry Cycles in Simulation-Based Leaning Environments. Proceedings of Cognitive Science, July, 2003, Boston, MA.
10. Mestre J. P. (2000). Progress in Research: The interplay among theory, research questions, and measurement techniques. IN Lesh (ed)..
11. Toth, E.E., Klahr, D, Chen, Z. (2000). Bridging research and practice: A cognitively based classroom intervention for teaching experimental skills to elementary school children. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 423-495.
12. Shaffer, D.W. & Serlin R.C. (2005). What good are statistics that don't generalize? Educational Researcher 33(9), 14-25.
13. Lunsford, E. & Melear, C. T. (2004). Using Scoring Rubrics to Evaluate Inquiry. J. of College Science Teaching 34(1), 34-38.
14. Stillings, N. A., Ramirez, M. A., & Wenk, L. (1999). Assessing critical thinking in a student-active science curriculum. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Research on Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
15. Murray, T., Woolf, B. & Marshall, D. (2004). Lessons Learned from Authoring for Inquiry Learning: A tale of authoring tool evolution. J.C. Lester et al. (Eds.). ITS 2004 Proceedings, pp 197-206.
16. Bruno, M.S. & Jarvis, C.D. (2001). It's Fun, But is it Science? Goals and Strategies in a Problem-Based Learning Course. J. of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations.
17. Murray, T., Woolf, B., Marshall, D. (2003). Toward a Generic Architecture and Authoring Tools Supporting Inquiry Learning. Proceedings of AI-ED'2003, 11th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20-24 July, 2003. Sydney, pp. 488-490.
18. Woolf, B.P., Marshall, D., Mattingly, M., Lewis, J. Wright, S., Jellison. M., Murray, T. (2003). Tracking Student Propositions in an Inquiry System. Proceedings of AI-ED'2003, 11th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20-24 July, 2003. Sydney, pp. 21-28.
19. Woolf, B. P. et. al [in submission]. Critical Thinking Environments for Science Education.