Omics Approaches in Biofuel Production for a Green Environment

OMICS: Applications in Biomedical, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 623-636

  Grover, Atul ^a   Yadav, Patade Vikas ^a   Kumari, Maya ^a   Gupta, Sanjay Mohan ^a   Arif, Mohommad ^a   Ahmed, Zakwan ^a  

^a Defence Institute of Bio Energy Research   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85137922163     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b14289-30     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Karp, A., and I. Shield. 2008. Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytologist 179:15-32.
2. Aghamiri, S.F., K. Kabiri, and G. Emtiazi. 2011. A novel approach for optimization of crude oil bioremediation in soil by the Taguchi Method. Journal of Petroleum and Environmental Biotechnology 2:108.
3. Ghoodjani, E., R. Kharrat, M. Vossoughi, and S.H. Bolouri. 2011. A review on thermal enhanced heavy oil recovery from fractured carbonate reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum and Environmental Biotechnology 2:109.
4. Lawrence, C.J., and V. Walbot. 2007. Traditional genomics for bioenergy production from fuelstock grasses: Maize as the model species. Plant Cell 19:2091-2094.
5. Wilhelm, W.W., J.M.F. Johnson, D.L. Karlen, and D.T. Lightle. 2007. Corn stover to sustain soil organic carbon further constrains biomass supply. Agronomy Journal 99:1665-1667.
6. Firbank, L. 2008. Assessing the ecological impacts of bioenergy. BioEnergy Research 1:12-19.
7. Fargione, J., J. Hill, D. Tilman, S. Polasky, and P. Hawthorne. 2008. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235-1238.
8. Vermerris, W. 2011. Survey of genomics approaches to improve bioenergy traits in maize, sorghum and sugarcane. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 53:106-119.
9. Price, A.H. 2006. Believe it or not, QTLs are accurate. Trends in Plant Science 11:213-216.
10. Torney, F., L. Moeller, A. Scarpa, and K. Wang. 2007. Genetic engineering approaches to improve bioethanol production from maize. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 18:193-199.
11. Gupta, P.K., R.R. Mir, A. Mohan, and J. Kumar. 2008. Wheat genomics: Present status and future prospects. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2008:896451.
12. Heaton, E.A., P. Mascia, R. Flavell, S. Thomas, P.S. Long, and F.G. Dohleman. 2008. Energy crop development: Current progress and future prospects. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19:202-209.
13. Jakob, K., F. Zhou, and A.H. Paterson. 2009. Genetic improvement of C4 grasses as cellulosic biofuel feedstocks. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology. Plant 45:291-305.
14. Wyman, C.E. 2007. What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends in Biotechnology 25:153-157.
15. Duvick, D.N., and K.G. Cassman. 1999. Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States. Crop Science 39:1622-1630.
16. Tenenbaum, D.J. 2008. Food vs fuel: Diversion of crops could cause more hunger. Environmental Health Perspectives 116:A254-A257.
17. Eveland, A.L., D.R. McCarty, and K.E. Koch. 2008. Transcript profiling by 3'-untranslated region sequencing resolves expression of gene families. Plant Physiology 146:31-44.
18. Penning, B., R. Tayengawa, C.T. Hunter, III et al. 2009. Genetic resources for functional genomics of cell wall biology. Plant Physiology 151:1703-1728.
19. Frame, B.R., H. Shou, R.K. Chikwamba et al. 2002. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of maize embryos using a standard binary vector system. Plant Physiology 129:13-22.
20. Paterson, A.H., J.E. Bowers, R. Bruggmann et al. 2009. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551-556.
21. Matsuka, S., J. Ferro, and P. Arruda. 2009. The Brazilian experience of sugarcane ethanol industry. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology Plant 45:372-381.
22. Garcia, A.A., E.A. Kido, A.N. Meza et al. 2006. Development of an integrated genetic map of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) commercial cross, based on a maximum-likelihood approach for estimation of linkage and linkage phases. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112:298-314.
23. Raboin, L.M., K.M. Oliveira, L. Lecunff et al. 2006. Genetic mapping in sugarcane, a high polyploid, using bi-parental progeny: Identification of a gene controlling stalk colour and a new rust resistance gene. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112:1382-1391.
24. Patade, V.Y., S. Bhargava, and P. Suprasanna. 2009. Halopriming imparts tolerance to salt and PEG induced drought stress in sugarcane. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 134:24-28.
25. Patade, V.Y., S. Bhargava, and P. Suprasanna. 2012. Halopriming mediated salt and iso-osmotic PEG stress tolerance and, gene expression profiling in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Molecular Biology Reports 39:9563-9572.
26. Patade, V.Y., A.N. Rai, and P. Suprasanna. 2011. Expression analysis of sugarcane shaggy-like kinase (SuSK) gene identified through cDNA subtractive hybridization in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Protoplasma 248:613-621.
27. Menossi, M.C., M. Siva-Filho, M.A. Vincentz, and G.M. Van-Sluys. 2008. Sugarcane functional genomics: Gene discovery for agronomic trait development. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2008:1-11.
28. Rodrigues, F.A., M.L. de Laia, and S.M. Zingaretti. 2009. Analysis of gene expression profiles under water stress in tolerant and sensitive sugarcane plants. Plant Science 17:286-302.
29. Patade, V.Y., and P. Suprasanna. 2010. Short-term salt and PEG stresses regulate expression of microRNA, miR159 in sugarcane leaves. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 13:177-182.
30. Patade, V.Y., S. Bhargava, and P. Suprasanna. 2012. Transcript expression profiling of stress responsive genes in response to short-term salt or PEG stress in sugarcane leaves. Molecular Biology Reports 39:3311-3318.
31. Suprasanna, P., V.Y. Patade, and V.A. Bapat. 2008. Sugarcane biotechnology. A perspective on recent developments and emerging opportunities. In Advances in Plant Biotechnology, edited by Rao, G.P. 303-331. Studium Publication, LLC, Texas, USA.
32. Papini-Terzi, F., F.R. Rocha, R.Z.N. Vêncio et al. 2009. Sugarcane genes associated with sucrose content. BMC Genomics 10:120-141.
33. Hinchee, M., W. Rottmann, L. Mullinax et al. 2011. Short rotation woody crops for bioenergy and biofuel applications. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology. Plant 45:619-629.
34. Tuskan, G.A., S. DiFazio, S. Jansson et al. 2006. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. and Gray). Science 313:1596-1604.
35. Jansson, S., and C.J. Douglas. 2007. Populus: A model system for plant biology. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58:435-458.
36. Fabbrini, F., M. Gaudet, C. Bastien et al. 2012. Phenotypic plasticity, QTL mapping and genomic characterization of bud set in black poplar. BMC Plant Biology 12:47.
37. Du, N., X. Li, Y. Liu et al. 2012. Genetic transformation of Populus tomentosa to improve salt tolerance. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 108:181-189.
38. Ceulemans, R., A.J.S. McDonald, and J.S. Pereira. 1996. A comparison among eucalypt, poplar and willow characteristics with particular reference to a coppice, growth-modelling approach. Biomass and Bioenergy 11:215-231.
39. Costa, G.G.L., K.C. Cardoso, L.E.V. Del Bem et al. 2010. Transcriptome analysis of the oil-rich seed of the bioenergy crop Jatropha curcas L. BMC Genomics 11:462.
40. Arumugam, M., A. Agarwal, M.C. Arya, and Z. Ahmed. 2011. Microalgae: A renewable source for second generation biofuels. Current Science 100:1141-1142.
41. Grossman, A. 2005. Paths toward algal genomics. Plant Physiology 137:410-427.
42. Mus, F., A. Dubini, M. Seibert, M.C. Posewitz, and A.R. Grossman. 2007. Anaerobic adaptation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Anoxic gene expression, hydrogenase induction and metabolic pathways. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282:25475-25486.
43. Devos, K.M., and M.D. Gale. 2000. The grass model in current research. Plant Cell 12:637-646.
44. Schranz, M.E., B.H. Song, A.J. Windson, and T. Michell-Olds. 2007. Comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: A family-wide perspective. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10:168-175.
45. Hanley, S.J., M.D. Mallott, and A.T. Karp. 2006. Alignment of a Salix linkage map to the Populus genomic sequence reveals macrosynteny between willow and poplar genomes. Tree Genetics and Genomes 3:35-48.
46. Hazen, S.P., J.S. Scott-Craig, and J.D. Walton. 2002. Cellulose synthase-like genes of rice. Plant Physiology 128:336-340.
47. McIntyre, C.L., R.E. Casu, J. Drenth et al. 2005. Resistance gene analogues in sugarcane and sorghum and their association with quantitative trait loci for rust resistance. Genome 48:391-400.
48. Jang, C.S., T.L. Kamps, H. Tang et al. 2008. Evolutionary fate of rhizome-specific genes in a non-rhizomatous Sorghum genotype. Heredity 102:266-273.
49. Doebley, J.F., B.S. Gaut, and B.D. Smith. 2006. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127:1309-1321.
50. Gupta, S.M., S. Gupta, and A. Kumar. 2009. Development of bed reactor using brick dust immobilized CM-cellulase from seeds of cowpea (Vigna sinensis L). Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 18:113-116.
51. Chen, F., and R.A. Dixon. 2007. Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nature Biotechnology 25:759-761.
52. Vermerris, W., A. Saballos, G. Ejeta et al. 2007. Molecular breeding to enhance ethanol production from corn and sorghum stover. Crop Science 47:S145-S153.
53. Molhoj, M., S. Pagant, and H. Hofte. 2002. Towards understanding the role of membrane bound endo beta1, 4-glucanases in cellulose biosynthesis. Plant and Cell Physiology 43:1399-1406.
54. Hisano, H., R. Nandakumar, and Z.Y. Wang. 2009. Genetic modification of lignin biosynthesis for improved biofuel production. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology. Plant 45:306-313.
55. Lopes, F., F. Motta, C.C.P. Andrade, M.I. Rodrigues, and F. Maugeri-Filho. 2011. Thermo-stable xylanases from nonconventional yeasts. Journal of Microbial and Biochemical Technology 3:36-42.
56. Graber, J.R., J.R. Leadbetter, and J.A. Breznak. 2004. Description of Treponema azotonutricium sp. nov. and Treponema primitia sp. nov., the first Spirochetes isolated from termite guts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70:1315-1320.
57. Aishwarya, V., A. Grover, and P.C. Sharma. 2007. EuMicrosatdb: A database for microsatellites in the sequenced genomes of eukaryotes. BMC Genomics 8:225.
58. Sharma, P.C., A. Grover, and G. Kahl. 2007. Mining microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. Trends in Biotechnology 25:490-498.
59. Grover, A., V. Aishwarya, and P.C. Sharma. 2012. Searching microsatellites in DNA sequences: Approaches used and tools developed. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 18:11-19.
60. Salvi, S., G. Sponza, M. Morgante et al. 2007. Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:11376-11381.
61. Wong, C.K., and R. Bernardo. 2008. Genome wide selection in oil palm: increasing selection gain per unit time and cost with small populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116:815-824.
62. Ming, R., S. Liu, P.H. Moore, J.E. Irvine, and A.H. Paterson. 2001. QTL analysis in a complex autopolyploid: Genetic control of sugar content in sugarcane. Genome Research 11:2075-2084.
63. Pinto, L.R., A.A.F. Garcia, M.M. Pastina et al. 2010. Analysis of genomic and functional RFLP derived markers associated with sucrose content, fiber and yield QTLs in a sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) commercial cross. Euphytica 172:313-327.
64. Alwala, S., C.A. Kimbeng, J.C. Veremis, and K.A. Gravois. 2009. Identification of molecular markers associated with sugar-related traits in a Saccharum interspecific cross. Euphytica 167:127-142.
65. Anderson, J.A., S. Chao, and S. Liu. 2007. Molecular breeding using a major QTL for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Crop Science 47:S112-S119.
66. Eathington, S.R., T.M. Crosbie, M.D. Edwards, R.S. Reiter, and J.K. Bull. 2007. Molecular markers in a commercial breeding program. Crop Science 47:S154-S163.
67. Edgerton, M.D. 2009. Increasing crop productivity to meet global needs for feed, food, and fuel. Plant Physiology 149:7-13.
68. Varshney, R.K., A. Graner, and M.E. Sorrells. 2005. Genetic microsatellites in plants: Features and applications. Trends in Biotechnology 23:48-55.
69. Gupta, P.K., S. Rustgi, and R.R. Mir. 2008. Array-based high-throughput DNA markers for crop improvement. Heredity 101:5-18.
70. Mace, E.S., L. Xia, D.R. Jordan et al. 2008. DArT markers: diversity analyses and mapping in Sorghum bicolor. BMC Genomics 9:26.
71. Aishwarya, V., and P.C. Sharma. 2008. UgMicroSatdb: Database for mining microsatellites from unigenes. Nucleic Acids Research 36:D53-D56.
72. Grover, A., B. Ramesh, and P.C. Sharma. 2009. Development of microsatellite markers in potato and their transferability in some members of Solanaceae. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 15:343-358.
73. Jain, A., R. Ghangal, A. Grover, S. Raghuvanshi, and P.C. Sharma. 2010. Development of EST-based new SSR markers in seabuckthorn. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 16:375-378.
74. Haddadi, P., A. Langlade, N.B. Ebrahimi et al. 2012. Genetic dissection of tocopherol and phytosterol in recombinant inbred lines of sunflower through quantitative trait locus analysis and the candidate gene approach. Molecular Breeding 29:717-729.
75. Rafalski, J.A. 2010. Association genetics in crop improvement. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13:174-180.
76. McMullen, M.D., S. Kresovich, H.S. Villeda et al. 2009. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325:737-740.
77. Rubin, E.M. 2008. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 454:841-845.
78. Simon, D., W.E. Tyner, and F. Jacquet. 2010. Economic analysis of the potential of cellulosic biomass available in France from agricultural residue and energy crops. Bioenergy Research 3:183-192.