Situated Regulation of Scientific Text Processing

The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 223-252

  Elshout Mohr, Marianne ^a   van Daalen Kapteijns, Maartje ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85136622415     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612434-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Alexander, E A., Graham, S., and Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Reviews, 10(2), 129-145.
2. Anderson, R. C, and Pearson, E D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In E D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
3. Anderson, R. C, Reder, L. M., and Lebiere, C. (1996). Working memory: Activation limitations on retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 221-256.
4. Ausubel, D. E, Novak, J. D., and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
5. Baker, L. (1985). Differences in the standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(3), 297-313.
6. Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schemadaden purposes and purpose-laden schemata. Written Communication, 2, 3-23.
7. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., and Gromoll, E. W. (1989). Learning from social study texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6(2), 99-158.
8. Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., and McKeown, M. G. (1982). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506-521.
9. Breuker, J. A., Elshout, J. J., van Someren, M. W., and Wielinga, B. J. (1986). Hardopdenken en protokolanalyse [Thinking aloud and protocol analysis]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijs Research, 11, 241-255.
10. Brown, A. L., and Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
11. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., and LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
12. Chinn, C. A., and Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
13. Coté, N., Goldman, S. R., and Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 55(1), 1-53.
14. Dall’Alba, G. (1993). The role of teaching in education: Enabling students to enter a field of study and practice. Learningand Instruction, 3(4), 299-313.
15. Elshout-Mohr, M. (1983). Communicatiepatronen: een hulpmiddel bij het bestuderen van studieteksten [Communication patterns: A tool for studying study texts]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 5, 1-18.
16. Elshout-Mohr, M. (1992). Metacognitie van lerenden in onderwijsleerprocessen [Metacognition of learners in educational learning processes.] Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 17, 273-289.
17. Elshout-Mohr, M., and van Daalen-Kapteijns, M. M. (1985). Het leren van begrippen in het bijzonder in het eerste stadium van het hoger onderwijs [Concept learning in the first year of higher education]. Pedagogische Studiën, 62, 459-470.
18. Elshout-Mohr, M., van Daalen-Kapteijns, M. M., and. Sprangers, M. (1988). The topic-comment technique to study expository text. Journal of Experimental Education, 56(2), 83-90.
19. Entwistle, N., and Marton, E (1984). Changing conceptions of learning and research. InE Marton, D. Hounsell, and N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 211-242). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
20. Garcia-Arista, E., Campanario, J. M., and Otero, J. (1996). Influence of subject matter setting on comprehension monitoring. European Journal of Psychology ofEducation, 21, 427-441.
21. Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517-529.
22. Goldman, S. R. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on 20 years of research and suggestions for new directions of inquiry. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 357-398.
23. Graesser, A. C, Millis, K. K., and Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
24. Graesser, A. C., and Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
25. Hacker, D. J. (1998). Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading. In D. G. Hacker, J. Dunklosky, and A. C. Graesser (Eds.), MetacognUion in educational theory and practice (pp. 165-192). Mahwah.NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Hallden, O. (1986). Learning history. Oxford Review of Education, 12(1), 53-66.
27. Harmon, J. M. (1999). Initial encounters with unfamiliar words in independent reading. Research in Teaching of English, 33, 304-338.
28. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.
29. Kamas, E. N., Reder, L. M., and Ayers, M. S. (1996). Partial matching in the Moses illusion: Response bias not sensitivity. Memory and Cognition, 24(6), 687-699.
30. Karau, S. J., and Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychobgy, 65, 681-706.
31. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368.
32. Kintsch, E., and Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text. In E. de Corte and F. E. Weinert (Eds.) International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 519-524). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
33. Kintsch, W (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
34. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Langer, J. A. (1986). Children reading and writing: Structure and strategies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. Locke, E. Q. (1975). A guide to effective study. New York: Springer.
37. Maki, R. H. (1998). Test predictions over text material. In D. G. Hacker, J. Dunklosky, and A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Uetacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Markman, E. M., and Gorin, L. (1981). Children’s ability to adjust their standards for evaluating comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 320-325.
39. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., and Kintsch, W (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
40. McNamara, D. S., and Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effect of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288.
41. Meyer, B. J. E, and Rice, G. E. (1982). The interaction of reader strategies and the organization of text. Text: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 2, 155-192.
42. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Fransisco: Freeman.
43. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51(2), 102-116.
44. Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to leam. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. Otero, J. (1998). Influence of knowledge activation and context on comprehension monitoring of science texts. In D. G. Hacker, J. Dunklosky, and. A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory andpractice (pp. 145-164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Palincsar, A. M., and Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, I, 117-175.
47. Pressley, M., and Afflerbach, E (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Pressley, M., van Etten, S., Yokoi, L., Freebem, G., and van Meter, R (1998). The metacognition of college studentship: A grounded theory approach. In D. G. Hacker, J. Dunklosky, and A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 347-366). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
50. Sandberg, J., and Barnard, Y. (1997). Deep learning is difficult. Instructional Science, 25, 15-36.
51. Schellings, G. L. M., and van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1995). Main points in an instructional text, as identified by students and by their teachers. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 742-756.
52. Schiefele, U, and Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(2), 141-160.
53. Schnotz, W, and Ballstaedt, S.-E (1996). Comprehension: Teaching and assessing. In E. de Corte and F. E. Weinert (Eds.) International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 492-497). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
54. Schommer, M., and Surber, J. R. (1986). Comprehension-monitoring failure in skilled adult readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 353-357.
55. van Daalen-Kapteijns, M. M., Elshout-Mohr, M., and De Glopper, K. (2001). Deriving the meaning of unknown words from multiple contexts. Language Learning, 51, 145-182.
56. van Oostendorp, H. (1988). Regulatieprocessen bij tekstverwerking [Regulation processes in text processing] Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
57. van Oostendorp, H. (1994). Processing in terms of semantic cohesion monitoring. In H. van Oostendorp and R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 35-55). Mahwah, NJ: Ablex.
58. van Oostendorp, H, and Elshout-Mohr, M. (1999). Thinking skills in reading and text studying. In J. H. M. Hamers, J. E. H. van Luit, and B. Csapo (Eds.), Thinking skills and teaching thinking (pp. 283-313). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
59. Voss, J. F. (1996). Learning and instruction of social sciences. In E. de Corte and F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 572-574). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
60. Walczyk, J. J. (1990). Relationship among error detection, sentence verification and low-level reading skills of fourth-graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 491-497.
61. Winne, E H, and Marx, R. W. (1982). Students’ and teachers’ views of thinking processes for classroom learning. Elementary School Journal, 82, 493-518.
62. Whitney, E, Budd, D., Bramuci, R. S., and Crane, R. C. (1995). On babies, bathwater, and schemata: A reconsideration of top-down processing in comprehension. Discourse processes, 20, 135-166.
63. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J., and Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.