Designing Displays for Older Adults

Designing Displays for Older Adults

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-189

  Pak, Richard ^a   McLaughlin, Anne ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85128506299     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780429439674     Document Type: Book

References (70)

1. Craik, F. I. M. and Salthouse, T. A. (2000). The Handbook of Aging and Cognition (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Harper, S. and Yesilada, Y. (2008). Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research. Human-Computer Interaction Series, No 1, London: Springer.
3. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2009, November 19). 2006 Report on Americans and Their Cell Phones. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Americans-and-their-cell-phones.aspx
4. Adobe Systems (2010). Adobe BrowserLab. Adobe BrowserLab allows designers to see exactly how their web pages will look in a wide variety of web browser and operating system combinations. In testing and free as of January 2010. http://browserlab.adobe.com
5. Browsershot.org has similar functions as Adobe BrowserLab. http://browsershots.org.
6. Coarna, G. Readable App. (A web-based tool to enhance the readability of textheavy websites.) http://readable-app.appspot.com/
7. Jacko, J. A. and Leonard, K. V. (2006). Satisfying divergent needs in user-centered computing: Accounting for varied levels of visual function. In R. C. Williges (Ed.), Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 141–164). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
8. Perez, A. M. (2008). Common fonts to all versions of Windows & Mac equivalents (A web-based tool to visualize how fonts will appear on Mac and Windows operating systems). http://www.ampsoft.net/webdesign-l/WindowsMacFonts.html
9. Ousley, C., Sakuler, R., Siemsen, D. (1983). Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Research 23(7), 689–699.
10. Berkowitz, J. P. and Casali, S. P. (1990). Influence of age on the ability to hear telephone ringers of different spectral content. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 132–136.
11. Casali, J. G. and Gerges, S. N. Y. (2006). Protection and enhancement of hearing in noise. In R. C. Williges (Ed.), Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics Volume 2 (pp. 195–240). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12. Cavender, A. and Ladner, R. E. (2008). Hearing impairments. In S. Harper and Y. Yesilada (Eds.), Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, (pp. 25–35). London: Springer-Verlag.
13. Czaja, S. and Sharit, J. (2002). The usability of telephone voice menu systems for older adults. Gerontechnology, 2(1), 88.
14. Dillion, H. (2001). Hearing aids. Turramurra, Australia: Boomerang Press.
15. Fletcher, H. and Munson, W. A. (1933). Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 5, 82–108.
16. Glasberg, B. R. and Moore, C. J. (2004). A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Hearing Research, 188, 70–88.
17. Huey, R. W., Buckley, D. S., and Lerner, N. D. (1994). Audible performance of smoke alarm sounds. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 147–151.
18. Rossing, T. D. (2007). Springer Handbook of Acoustics. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
19. Schneider, B. A. and Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2000). Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In Craik, F. I. M. and Salthouse, T. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 155–219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Skovenborg, E. and Nielsen, S. (2004). Evaluation of Different Loudness Models with Music and Speech Material. Audio Engineering Society 117th Convention, San Francisco, CA.
21. Smith, R. A. and Prather, W. F. (1971). Phoneme discrimination in older persons under varying signal-to-noise conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14(3), 630–638.
22. Smither, J. A. (1992). The processing of synthetic speech by older and younger Adults. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 190–192.
23. Timiras, P. S. (2007). Physiological Basis of Aging and Geriatrics. New York: Informa Healthcare.
24. Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., and McCoy, S. L. (2005). Hearing loss in older adults: What it is and how it interacts with cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 144–148.
25. Zhao, H. (2001). Universal usability web design guidelines for the elderly (age 65 and older). Retrieved from http://otal.umd.edu/uupractice/elderly
26. Allaire, J. C. and Marsiske, M. (1999). Everyday cognition: Age and intellectual ability correlates. Psychology and Aging, 14, 627–644.
27. Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S., Rogans, W. A., and Sherit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21(2), 333–352.
28. Ehrlich, K. (1996). Applied mental models in human-computer interaction. In J. Oakhill and A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental Models in Cognitive Science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Morrow, D. G. and Rogers, W. A. (2008). Environmental support: An integrative framework. Human Factors, 50, 589–613.
30. Pak, R., Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Rogers, W. A., and Fisk, A. D. (2008). The role of spatial abilities and age in performance in an auditory computer navigation task. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3045–3051.
31. Pak, R. and Price, M. M. (2008). Designing an information search interface for younger and older adults. Human Factors, 50, 614–628.
32. Raven, J. (2000). The raven’s progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology 41, 1–48.
33. Stronge A. J, Rogers W. A., and Fisk A. D. (2006). Web-based information search and retrieval: Effects of strategy use and age on search success. Human Factors, 48, 434–446.
34. Ahlström, D., Hitz, M., and Leitner, G. (2006). An evaluation of sticky and force enhanced targets in multi target situations. Proceedings of NordiCHI: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, 189, 14–18.
35. CREATE. (2006). Fitts’ Law calculator for young and old. Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement. http://www.psychology.gatech.edu/create/FittsLaw_d.html
36. Gillan, D. J., Holden, K., Adam, S., Rudisill, M., and Magee, L. (1990). How does Fitts’ law fit pointing and dragging? Proceedings of the CHI’90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 227–234. New York: ACM.
37. Grimes, D. (2004). Parkinson’s: Everything You Need to Know. Buffalo, NY: Firefly Books.
38. Hart, T. A., Chaparro, B. S., and Halcomb, H. C., (2004). Designing websites for older adults: The relationship between guideline compliance and usability software. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 271–274.
39. Jastrzembski, T. S. and Charness, N. (2007). The model human processor and the older adult: Parameter estimation and validation within a mobile phone task. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 13, 224–248.
40. MacKenzie, I. S. (1995). Movement time prediction in human–computer interfaces. In R. M. Baecker, W. A. S. Buxton, J. Grudin, and S. Greenberg (Eds.), Readings in Human–Computer Interaction (2nd ed.), (pp. 483–493). Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.
41. Mandryk, R. L. and Gutwin, C. (2008). Perceptibility and utility of sticky targets. GI’08: Proceedings of Graphics Interface, 65–72.
42. McLaughlin, A. C., Simon, D., and Gillan, D. G. (in press). Title of movement control chapter. Annual Reviews of Human Factors.
43. Moffatt, K., Yuen, S., and McGrenere, J. (2008). Hover or tap? Supporting penbased menu navigation for older adults. In ASSETS’08: Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 51–58.
44. Paradise, J., Trewin, S., and Keates, S. (2005). Using pointing devices: Difficulties encountered and strategies employed. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Universal Access and Human-Computer Interaction, Las Vegas, NV.
45. Welford, A. T. (1961). Age changes in the times taken by choice, discrimination and the control of movement. Gerontologia, 5, 129–145.
46. Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Kembel, J. A. (2003). EdgeWrite: A stylusbased text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. Proceedings of UIST 2003. New York: ACM, 61–70.
47. Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. (2008). Enabling Devices, empowering people: The design and evaluation of Trackball Edge Write. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 3, 35–56.
48. Zaphiris, P., Ghiawadwala, M., and Mughal, S. (2005). Age-centered research-based web design guidelines, CHI 2005 Proceedings. New York: ACM, 1897–1900.
49. Chisnell, D. E., Redish, J. C., and Lee, A. (2006). New heuristics for understanding older adults as web users. Technical Communication, 53(1), 39–59.
50. Dumas, J. S. and Salzman, M. C. (2006). Usability assessment methods. In R. C. Williges (Ed.), Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Volume 2 (pp. 109–140). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
51. Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., and Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
52. Hackos, J. T. and Redish, J. C. (1998). User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
53. Jastrzembski, T. S. and Charness, N. (2008). The model human processor and the older adult: Parameter estimation and validation within a mobile phone task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 224–248.
54. Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the User Experience. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
55. Nielsen, J. (1996). Usability Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
56. Rubin, J. (2008). Handbook of Usability Testing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
57. Stone, D., Jarrett, S., Woodroffe, M., Minocha, S. (2005). User interface design and evaluation. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
58. Ryu, Y. S., Babski-Reeves, K., Smith-Jackson, T. L., and Nussbaum, M. A. (2007). Decision models for comparative usability evaluation of mobile phones using the mobile phone usability questionnaire. Journal of Usability Studies, 3(1), 24–39.
59. Valdez, A. C., Ziefle, M., Horstmann, A., Herding, D., and Schroeder, U. (2009). Effects of aging and domain knowledge on usability in small screen devices for diabetes patients. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5889/2009, 366–386.
60. Ziefle, M. (2002). The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use, and learnability of different mobile phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21, 303–311.
61. Ziefle, M. (2008). Instruction formats and navigation aids in mobile devices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5298/2008, 339–358.
62. Eronen, L. and Vuorimaa, P. (2000). User interfaces for digital television: A navigator case study. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. Palermo, Italy: ACM.
63. Pan, Y. and Ryu, Y. S. (2009). Insights for the TV interface from the mobile phone interface. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(4), 1166–177.
64. Klein, H. A. and Meininger, A. R. (2004). Self management of medication and diabetes: Cognitive control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics— Part A: Systems and Humans, 36(6), 718–725.
65. Rogers, W. A., Mykityshyn, A. L., Campbell, R. H., and Fisk, A. D. (2001). Analysis of a “simple” medical device. Ergonomics in Design, 9, 6–14.
66. Baldwin, C. L. (2002). Designing in-vehicle technologies for older drivers: Application of sensory-cognitive interaction theory. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(4), 307–329.
67. Coren, S. (1994). Most comfortable listening level as a function of age. Ergonomics, 37, 1279–1274.
68. Kern, D., Schmidt, A., Arnsmann, J., Appelmann, T., Pararasasegaran, N., and Piepiera, B. (2009). Writing to your car: Handwritten text input while driving. CHI 2009, April, 2009, Boston, MA.
69. Llaneras, R. E. and Singer, J. P. (2002). In-Vehicle Navigation Systems: Interface Characteristics and Industry Trends. Driving Assessment 2003: 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design.
70. Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D., and Green, P. (2004). Address entry while driving: Speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard. Human Factors, 46(4), 600–610.