Using Quantum Computers for Quantum Simulation

Entropy

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2268-2307

  Brown, Katherine L ^a   Munro, William J ^b,c   Kendon, Vivien M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^c Kashino Diverse Brain Research Laboratory of NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

Quantum computation; Quantum information; Quantum simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126643702     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10994300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/e12112268     Document Type: Review

References (136)

1. Raedt, K.D.; Michielsen, K.; Raedt, H.D.; Trieu, B.; Arnold, G.; Richter, M.; Lippert, T.; Watanabe, H.; Ito, N. Massive Parallel Quantum Computer Simulator. Comp. Phys. Comm. 2007, 176, 121–136.
2. Verstraete, F.; Porras, D.; Cirac, J.I. Density Matrix Renormalization Group and Periodic Boundary Conditions: A Quantum Information Perspective. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 227205.
3. Feynman, R.P. Simulating Physics wih Computers. Int. J. Theoret. Phys. 1982, 21, 467–488.
4. Deutsch, D. Quantum-theory, the Church-Turing Principle and the Universal Quantum Computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1985, 400, 97–117.
5. Shor, P.W. Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. SIAM J. Comput. 1997, 26, 1484–1509.
6. van den Nest, M. Classical Simulation of Quantum Computation, the Gottesman-Knill Theorem, and Slightly Beyond. 2008, arXiv:0811.0898. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.0898 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
7. van den Nest, M. Simulating Quantum Computers with Probabilistic Methods. 2009, arXiv:0911.1624. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.1624 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
8. Lloyd, S. Universal Quantum Simulators. Science 1996, 273, 1073–1078.
9. Aharonov, D.; Ta-Shma, A. Adiabatic Quantum State Generation and Statistical Zero Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–11 June 2003; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 20–29.
10. Vartiainen, J.J.; Mottonen, M.; Salomaa, M.M. Efficient Decomposition of Quantum Gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 177902.
11. Suzuki, M. Improved Trotter-like Formula. Phys. Lett. A 1993, 180, 232–234.
12. Trotter, H.F. On the Product of Semi-Groups of Operators. Proc. Am. Math. Phys. 1959, 10, 545.
13. Brown, K.R.; Clark, R.J.; Chuang, I.L. Limitations of Quantum Simulation Examined by a Pairing Hamiltonian Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 050504.
14. Clark, C.R.; Brown, K.R.; Metodi, T.S.; Gasster, S.D. Resource Requirements for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Simulation: The Transverse Ising Model Ground State. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 79, 062314-1–062314-9.
15. Kendon, V.M.; Nemoto, K.; Munro, W.J. Quantum analogue computing. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 2010, 368, 3609–3620.
16. Wocjan, P.; Janzing, D.; Beth, T. Simulating Arbitrary Pair-Interactions by a Given Hamiltonian: Graph-Theoretical Bounds on the Time-Complexity. Quantum Inf. Quantum Comput. 2002, 2, 117–132.
17. Wocjan, P.; Roetteler, M.; Janzing, D.; Beth, T. Universal Simulation of Hamiltonians Using a Finite Set of Control Operations. Quantum Inf. Quantum Comput. 2002, 2, 133.
18. Wocjan, P.; Rötteler, M.; Janzing, D.; Beth, T. Simulating Hamiltonians in Quantum Networks: Efficient Schemes and Complexity Bounds. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 65, 042309.
19. Dodd, J.L.; Nielsen, M.A.; Bremner, M.J.; Thew, R.T. Universal Quantum Computation and Simulation Using Any Entangling Hamiltonian and Local Unitaries. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 65, 040301.
20. Bremner, M.J.; Dawson, C.M.; Dodd, J.L.; Gilchrist, A.; Harrow, A.W.; Mortimer, D.; Nielsen, M.A.; Oscorne, T.J. Practical Scheme for Quantum Computation with Any Two-Qubit Entangling Gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 247902.
21. Nielsen, M.A.; Bremner, M.J.; Dodd, J.L.; Childs, A.M.; Dawson, C.M. Universal Simulation of Hamiltonian Dynamics for Quantum Systems with Finite-Dimensional State Spaces. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 66, 022317.
22. Bremner, M.J.; Dodd, J.L.; Nielsen, M.A.; Bacon, D. Fungible Dynamics: There are Only Two Types of Entangling Multiple-Qubit Interactions. Phys. Rev. A 2004, 69, 012313.
23. McKague, M.; Mosca, M.; Gisin, N. Simulating Quantum Systems Using Real Hilbert Spaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 020505.
24. Childs, A.M.; Leung, D.; Mancinska, L.; Ozols, M. Characterization of Universal Two-Qubit Hamiltonians. Quantum Inf. Comput. 2011, 11, 19–39.
25. Berry, D.W.; Ahokas, G.; Cleve, R.; Sanders, B.C. Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Sparse Hamiltonians. Commun. Math. Phys. 2007, 270, 359–371.
26. Papageorgiou, A.; Zhang, C. On the Efficiency of Quantum Algorithms for Hamiltonian Simulation. 2010, arXiv:1005.1318. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.1318 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
27. Childs, A.M.; Kothari, R. Limitations on the Simulation of Non-Sparse Hamiltonians. Quantum Inf. Comput. 2010, 10, 669–684.
28. Childs, A.M.; Kothari, R. Simulating sparse Hamiltonians With Star Decompositions. 2010, arXiv:1003.3683. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3683 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
29. Childs, A.M. On the Relationship Between Continuous-and Discrete-Time Quantum Walk. Commun. Math. Phys. 2010, 294, 581–603.
30. Bennett, C.H.; Cirac, J.I.; Leifer, M.S.; Leung, D.W.; Linden, N.; Popescu, S.; Vidal, G. Optimal Simulation of Two-Qubit Hamiltonians Using General Local Operations. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 66, 012305.
31. Dür, W.; Bremner, M.J.; Briegel, H.J. Quantum Simulation of Interacting High-Dimensional Systems:The Influence of Noise. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 78, 052325.
32. Bravyi, S.; DiVincenzo, D.P.; Loss, D.; Terhal, B.M. Quantum Simulation of Many-Body Hamiltonians Using Perturbation Theory with Bounded-Strength Interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 070503.
33. Vidal, G.; Cirac, J.I. Nonlocal Hamiltonian Simulation Assisted by Local Operations and Classical Communication. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 66, 022315.
34. Hammerer, K.; Vidal, G.; Cirac, J.I. Characterization of Nonlocal Gates. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 66, 062321.
35. Haselgrove, H.L.; Nielsen, M.A.; Osborne, T.J. Practicality of Time-Optimal Two-Qubit Hamiltonian Simulation. Phys. Rev. A 2003, 68, 042303.
36. Leung, D. Simulation and Reversal of n-Qubit Hamiltonians Using Hadamard Matrices. J. Mod. Opt. 2002, 49, 1199–1217.
37. Wu, L.A.; Byrd, M.S.; Lidar, D.A. Polynomial-Time Simulation of Pairing Models on a Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 057904.
38. Abrams, D.S.; Lloyd, S. Quantum Algorithm Providing Exponential Speed Increase for Finding Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 5162–5165.
39. Somma, R.; Ortiz, G.; Gubernatis, J.E.; Knill, E.; Laflamme, R. Simulating Physical Phenomena by Quantum Networks. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 65, 042323.
40. O’Brien, J.L.; Pryde, G.J.; Gilchrist, A.; James, D.F.V.; Langford, N.K.; Ralph, T.C.; White, A.G. Quantum Process Tomography of a Controlled-NOT Gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 080502.
41. Mohseni, M.; Lidar, D.A. Direct Characterization of Quantum Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 170501.
42. Emerson, J.; Silva, M.; Moussa, O.; Ryan, C.; Laforest, M.; Baugh, J.; Cory, D.G.; Laflamme, R. Symmetrized Characterization of Noisy Quantum Processes. Science 2007, 317, 1893–1896.
43. Cleve, R.; Ekert, A.; Macchiavello, C.; Mosca, M. Quantum Algorithms Revisited. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 1998, 454, 339.
44. Georgeot, B.; Shepelyansky, D.L. Exponential Gain in Quantum Computing of Quantum Chaos and Localization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 2890–2893.
45. Schack, R. Using a Quantum Computer to Investigate Quantum Chaos. Phys. Rev. A 1998, 57, 1634–1635.
46. Brun, T.A.; Schack, R. Realizing the Quantum Baker’s Map on a NMR Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 59, 2649–2658.
47. Lévi, B.; Georgeot, B. Quantum Computation of a Complex System: The Kicked Harper Model. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 70, 056218.
48. Georgeot, B. Quantum Computing of Poincaré Recurrences and Periodic Orbits. Phys. Rev. A 2004, 69, 032301.
49. Poulin, D.; Laflamme, R.; Milburn, G.J.; Paz, J.P. Testing Integrability with a Single bit of Quantum Information. Phys. Rev. A 2003, 68, 022302.
50. Poulin, D.; Blume-Kohout, R.; Laflamme, R.; Ollivier, H. Exponential Speedup with a Single Bit of Quantum Information: Measuring the Average Fidelity Decay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 177906.
51. Georgeot, B. Complexity of Chaos and Quantum Computation. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 2007, 17, 1221–1263.
52. Soklakov, A.N.; Schack, R. Efficient State Preparation for a Register of Quantum Bits. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 73, 012307.
53. Soklakov, A.N.; Schack, R. State Preparation Based on Grover’s Algorithm in the Presence of Global Information About the State. Opt. Spectrosc. 2005, 99, 211–217.
54. Plesch, M.; Brukner, C. Efficient Quantum State Preparation. 2010, arXiv:1003.5760. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5760 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
55. Poulin, D.; Wocjan, P. Preparing Ground States of Quantum Many-Body Systems on a Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 130503.
56. Ortiz, G.; Gubernatis, J.E.; Laflamme, R. Quantum Algorithms for Fermionic Simulations. Phys. Rev. A. 2001, 64, 022319.
57. Dziarmaga, J.; Rams, M.M. Adiabatic Dynamics of an Inhomogeneous Quantum Phase Transition: The Case of z > 1 Dynamical Exponent. New J. Phys. 2010, 12, 103002.
58. Oh, S. Quantum Computational Method of Finding the Ground-State Energy and Expectation Values. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 77, 012326.
59. Boixo, S.; Knill, E.; Somma, R.D. Eigenpath Traversal by Phase Randomization. Quantum Inf. Comput. 2009, 9, 0833–0855.
60. Terhal, B.M.; DiVincenzo, D.P. Problem of Equilibration and the Computation of Correlation Functions on a Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. A 2000, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.022301.
61. Poulin, D.; Wocjan, P. Sampling from the Thermal Quantum Gibbs State and Evaluating Partition Functions with a Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 220502.
62. Temme, K.; Osborne, T.J.; Vollbrecht, K.G.; Poulin, D.; Verstraete, F. Quantum Metropolis Sampling. 2009, arXiv:0911.3635. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.3635 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
63. Jozsa, R. Quantum Algorithms and the Fourier Transform. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lon. Ser. A 1998, 454, 323–337.
64. Browne, D. Efficient Classical Simulation of the Semi-Classical Quantum Fourier Transform. New J. Phys. 2007, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/9/5/146.
65. Wiesner, S. Simulations of Many-Body Quantum Systems by a Quantum Computer. 1996, arXiv:quant-ph/9603028v1. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9603028v1 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
66. Zalka, C. Efficient Simulation of Quantum Systems by Quantum Computers. Forschr. Phys. 1998, 46, 877–879.
67. Zalka, C. Simulating Quantum Systems on a Quantum Computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1998, 454, 313–322.
68. Benenti, G.; Strini, G. Quantum Simulation of the Single-Particle Schrödinger Equation. Am. J. Phys. 2008, 76, 657–662.
69. Frisch, U.; Hasslacher, B.; Pomeau, Y. Lattice-Gas Automata for the Navier-Stokes Equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 56, 1505–1508.
70. Succi, S.; Benzi, R. Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Quantum Mechanics. Phys. D 1993, 69, 327–332.
71. Meyer, D.A. From Quantum Cellular Automata to Quantum Lattice Gases. J. Stat. Phys. 1996, 85, 551–574.
72. Boghosian, B.M.; Taylor, W. Simulating Quantum Mechanics on a Quantum Computer. Phys. D 1998, 120, 30–42.
73. Boghosian, B.M.; Taylor, W. Quantum Lattice-Gas Model for the Many-Particle Schrödinger Equation in d Dimensions. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 57, 54–66.
74. Aspuru-Guzik, A.; Dutoi, A.D.; Love, P.J.; Head-Gordon, M. Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies. Science 2005, 309, 1704–1707.
75. Wang, H.; Kais, S.; Aspuru-Guzik, A.; Hoffmann, M.R. Quantum Algorithm for Obtaining the Energy Spectrum of Molecular Systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 5388–5393.
76. Kassal, I.; Jordan, S.P.; Love, P.J.; Mohseni, M.; Aspuru-Guzik, A. Polynomial-Time Quantum Algorithm for the Simulation of Chemical Dynamics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105, 18681–18686.
77. Bacon, D.; Childs, A.M.; Chuang, I.L.; Kempe, J.; Leung, D.W.; Zhou, X. Universal Simulation of Markovian Quantum Dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 2001, 64, 062302.
78. Verstraete, F.; Cirac, J.I. Continuous Matrix Product States for Quantum Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 190405.
79. Haegeman, J.; Cirac, J.I.; Osborne, T.J.; Verschelde, H.; Verstraete, F. Applying the Variational Principle to (1+1)-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories. 2010, arXiv:1006.2409. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2409 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
80. Abrams, D.S.; Lloyd, S. Simulation of Many-Body Fermi Systems on a Universal Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 2586–2589.
81. Bardeen, J.; Cooper, L.N.; Schrieffer, J.R. Theory of Superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 1957, 108, 1175–1204.
82. Knill, E.; Laflamme, R.; Martinez, R.; Tseng, C. An Algorithmic Benchmark for Quantum Information Processing. Nature 2000, 404, 368–370.
83. Brown, K.L.; De, S.; Kendon, V.M.; Munro, W.J. Ancilla-Based Quantum Simulation. 2010, arxiv:1011.2984. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.2984 (accessed on 15 November 2010).
84. Somma, R.D.; Ortiz, G.; Knill, E.H.; Gubernatis, J. Quantum Simulations of Physics Problems. In Quantum Information and Computation; Donkor, E., Pirich, A., Brandt, H., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2003; Volume 5105, pp. 96–103.
85. Ward, N.J.; Kassal, I.; Guzik, A.A. Preparation of Many-Body States for Quantum Simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 194105.
86. Byrnes, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories on a Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 73, 022328.
87. Schützhold, R.; Mostame, S. Quantum Simulator for the O(3) Nonlinear Sigma Model. JETP Lett. 2005, 82, 248–252.
88. Tewari, S.; Scarola, V.W.; Senthil, T.; Sarma, S.D. Emergence of Artificial Photons in an Optical Lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 200401.
89. Cirac, J.I.; Maraner, P.; Pachos, J.K. Cold Atom Simulation of Interacting Relativistic Quantum Field Theories. 2010, arxiv:1006.2975. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2975 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
90. Devitt, S.J.; Nemoto, K.; Munro, W.J. The Idiots Guide to Quantum Error Correction, 2009. arXiv:0905.2794. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2794 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
91. Buluta, I.; Nori, F. Quantum Simulators. Science 2009, 326, 108–111.
92. Jones, J.A. NMR Quantum Computation: A Critical Evaluation. Fortschr. Phys. 2000, 48, 909–924.
93. Peng, X.; Du, J.; Suter, D. Quantum Phase Transition of Ground-State Entanglement in a Heisenberg Spin Chain Simulated in an NMR Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 71, 012307.
94. Peng, X.; Zhang, J.; Du, J.; Suter, D. Quantum Simulation of a System with Competing Two-and Three-Body Interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 140501.
95. Khitrin, A.K.; Fung, B.M. NMR Simulation of an Eight-State Quantum System. Phys. Rev. A 2001, 64, 032306.
96. Zhang, J.; Long, G.L.; Zhang, W.; Deng, Z.; Liu, W.; Lu, Z. Simulation of Heisenberg XY Interactions and Realization of a Perfect State Transfer in Spin Chains Using Liquid Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 72, 012331.
97. Álvarez, G.A.; Suter, D. NMR Quantum Simulation of Localization Effects Induced by Decoherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 230403.
98. Tseng, C.H.; Somaroo, S.; Sharf, Y.; Knill, E.; Laflamme, R.; Havel, T.F.; Cory, D.G. Quantum Simulation of a Three-Body-Interaction Hamiltonian on an NMR Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 61, 012302.
99. Liu, W.; Zhang, J.; Deng, Z.; Long, G. Simulation of General Three-Body Interactions in a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Ensemble Quantum Computer. Sci. China Ser. G 2008, 51, 1089–1096.
100. Negrevergne, C.; Somma, R.; Ortiz, G.; Knill, E.; Laflamme, R. Liquid-state NMR Simulations of Quantum Many-Body Problems. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 71, 032344.
101. Somaroo, S.; Tseng, C.H.; Havel, T.F.; Laflamme, R.; Cory, D.G. Quantum Simulations on a Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 5381–5383.
102. Du, J.; Xu, N.; Peng, X.; Wang, P.; Wu, S.; Lu, D. NMR Implementation of a Molecular Hydrogen Quantum Simulation with Adiabatic State Preparation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 030502.
103. Lanyon, B.P.; Whitfield, J.D.; Gillett, G.G.; Goggin, M.E.; Almeida, M.P.; Kassal, I.; Biamonte, J.D.; Mohseni, M.; Powell, B.J.; Barbieri, M.; Aspuru-Guzik, A.; White, A.G. Towards Quantum Chemistry on a Quantum Computer. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 106–111.
104. Ma, X.; Dakic, B.; Naylor, W.; Zeilinger, A.; Walther, P. Quantum Simulation of a Frustrated Heisenberg Spin System. 2010, arXiv:1008.4116. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.4116 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
105. Kok, P.; Munro, W.J.; Nemoto, K.; Ralph, T.C.; Dowling, J.P.; Milburn, G.J. Linear Optical Quantum Computing with Photonic Qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2007, 79, 135–174.
106. O’Brien, J.L.; Furusawa, A.; Vuckovic, J. Photonic Quantum Technologies. Nat. Photonic. 2009, 3, 687–695.
107. Leibrandt, D.R.; Labaziewicz, J.; Clark, R.J.; Chuang, I.L.; Epstein, R.; Ospelkaus, C.; Wesenberg, J.; Bollinger, J.; Leibfried, D.; Wineland, D.; Stick, D.; Sterk, J.; Monroe, C.; Pai, C.S.; Low, Y.; Frahm, R.; Slusher, R.E. Demonstration of a Scalable, Multiplexed Ion Trap for Quantum Information Processing. Quantum Inf. Comput. 2009, 9, 0901–0919.
108. Schaetz, T.; Friedenauer, A.; Schmitz, H.; Petersen, L.; Kahra, S. Towards (Scalable) Quantum Simulations in Ion Traps. J. Mod. Opt. 2007, 54, 2317–2325.
109. Greiner, M.; Mandel, O.; Esslinger, T.; Hansch, T.W.; Bloch, I. Quantum Phase Transition from a Superfluid to a Mott Insulator in a Gas of Ultracold Atoms. Nature 2002, 415, 39–44.
110. Wineland, D.J. Quantum Information Processing and Quantum Control with Trapped Atomic Ions. Phys. Scr. 2009, T137, 014007.
111. Bloch, I.; Dalibard, J.; Zwerger, W. Many-Body Physics with Ultracold Gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2008, 80, 885–964.
112. Jané, E.; Vidal, G.; Dür, W.; Zoller, P.; Cirac, J.I. Simuation of Quantum Dynamics with Quantum Optical Systems. Quantum Inf. Comput. 2003, 3, 15–37.
113. Kraus, C.V.; Wolf, M.M.; Cirac, I.J. Quantum Simulations Under Translational Symmetry. Phys. Rev. A 2007, 75, 022303.
114. Clark, R.J.; Lin, T.; Brown, K.R.; Chuang, I.L. A Two-Dimensional Lattice Ion Trap for Quantum Simulation. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105, 013114.
115. Buluta, I.M.; Hasegawa, S. Designing an Ion Trap for Quantum Simulation. Quantum Inf. Comput. 2009, 9, 361–375.
116. Deng, X.L.; Porras, D.; Cirac, J.I. Effective Spin Quantum Phases in Systems of Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 72, 063407.
117. Porras, D.; Cirac, J.I. Effective Quantum Spin Systems with Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 207901.
118. Porras, D.; Cirac, J.I. Bose-Einstein Condensation and Strong-Correlation Behavior of Phonons in Ion Traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 263602.
119. Friedenauer, A.; Schmitz, H.; Glueckert, J.T.; Porras, D.; Schaetz, T. Simulating a Quantum Magnet with Trapped Ions. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, 757–761.
120. Gerritsma, R.; Lanyon, B.; Kirchmair, G.; Zähringer, F.; Hempel, C.; Casanova, J.; García-Ripoll, J.J.; Solano, E.; Blatt, R.; Roos, C.F. Quantum Simulation of the Klein Paradox. 2010, arXiv:1007.3683. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.3683 (accessed on 10 November 2010).
121. Edwards, E.E.; Korenblit, S.; Kim, K.; Islam, R.; Chang, M.S.; Freericks, J.K.; Lin, G.D.; Duan, L.M.; Monroe, C. Quantum Simulation and Phase Diagram of the Transverse Field Ising Model with Three Atomic Spins. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 060412(R).
122. Gerritsma, R.; Kirchmair, G.; Zahringer, F.; Solano, E.; Blatt, R.; Roos, C.F. Quantum simulation of the Dirac equation. Nature 2010, 463, 68–71.
123. Trotzky, S.; Pollet, L.; Gerbier, F.; Schnorrberger, U.; Bloch, I.; Prokof’ev, N.V.; Svistunov, B.; Troyer, M. Suppression of the Critical Temperature for Superfluidity Near the Mott Transition: Validating a Quantum Simulator. Nat. Phys. Online 2010, doi: 10.1038/nphys1799.
124. Johnson, P.R.; Tiesinga, E.; Porto, J.V.; Williams, C.J. Effective Three-Body Interactions of Neutral Bosons in Optical Lattices. New J.Phys. 2009, 11, 093022.
125. Ho, A.F.; Cazalilla, M.A.; Giamarchi, T. Quantum simulation of the Hubbard model: The attractive route. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79, 033620.
126. Kinoshita, T.; Wenger, T.; Weiss, D.S. Observation of a One-Dimensional Tonks-Girardeau Gas. Science 2004, 305, 1125–1128.
127. Cho, J.; Angelakis, D.G.; Bose, S. Simulation of High-Spin Heisenberg Models in Coupled Cavities. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 78, 062338.
128. Kay, A.; Angelakis, D.G. Reproducing Spin Lattice Models in Strongly Coupled Atom-Cavity Systems. Eur. Phys. Lett. 2008, 84, 20001.
129. Chen, Z.X.; Zhou, Z.W.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, X.F.; Guo, G.C. Quantum Simulation of Heisenberg Spin Chains With Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interactions in Coupled Cavities. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 81, 022303.
130. Ivanov, P.A.; Ivanov, S.S.; Vitanov, N.V.; Mering, A.; Fleischhauer, M.; Singer, K. Simulation of a Quantum Phase Transition of Polaritons with Trapped Ions. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 80, 060301.
131. Mostame, S.; Schützhold, R. Quantum Simulator for the Ising Model with Electrons Floating on a Helium Film. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 220501.
132. Byrnes, T.; Recher, P.; Kim, N.Y.; Utsunomiya, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Quantum Simulator for the Hubbard Model with Long-Range Coulomb Interactions Using Surface Acoustic Waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 016405.
133. Smirnov, A.Y.; Savel’ev, S.; Mourokh, L.G.; Nori, F. Modelling Chemical Reactions Using Semiconductor Quantum Dots. Eur. Phys. Lett. 2007, 80, 67008.
134. Gaudreau, L.; Studenikin, S.A.; Sachrajda, A.S.; Zawadzki, P.; Kam, A.; Lapointe, J.; Korkusinski, M.; Hawrylak, P. Stability Diagram of a Few-Electron Triple Dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 036807.
135. Vidan, A.; Westervelt, R.M.; Stopa, M.; Hanson, M.; Gossard, A.C. Triple Quantum Dot Charging Rectifier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 3602–3604.
136. Pritchett, E.J.; Benjamin, C.; Galiautdinov, A.; Geller, M.R.; Sornborger, A.T.; Stancil, P.C.; Martinis, J.M. Quantum Simulation of Molecular Collisions with Superconducting Qubits. 2010, arXiv:1008.0701. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0701 (accessed on 10 November 2010).