The identification of stages in diachronic data: Variability-based neighbour clustering

Corpora

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 59-81

  Gries, Stefan T ^a   Hilpert, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85124917619     PISSN: 17495032     EISSN: 17551676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/E1749503208000075     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Biber, D. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Biber, D. 1993. 'Co-occurrence patterns among collocations: a tool for corpus-based lexical knowledge acquisition', Computational Linguistics 19 (3), pp. 531-8.
3. Carey, K. 1990. 'The role of conversational implicature in the early grammaticalization of the English Perfect', Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 371-81.
4. De Smet, H. 2005. 'A corpus of Late Modern English', ICAME Journal 29, pp. 69-82.
5. von Eye, A., E.Y. Mun and A. Indurkhya. 2004. 'Typifying developmental trajectories - a decision-making perspective', Psychology Science 46, pp. 65-98.
6. Gries, St.Th. 2004. Coll. analysis 3. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
7. Gries, St.Th. 2006. 'Exploring variability within and between corpora: some methodological considerations', Corpora 1 (2), pp. 109-51.
8. Gries, St.Th. Forthcoming. 'Corpus data in usage-based linguistics: what's the right degree of granularity for the analysis of argument structure constructions?' in M. Brda and M. ic-Fuchs (eds) Expanding Cognitive Linguistic Horizons. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Gries, St.Th. and A. Stefanowitsch. 2004. 'Extending collostructional analysis: a corpus-based perspectives on alternations ', International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1), pp. 97-129.
10. Gries, St.Th. and S. Stoll. Forthcoming. 'Finding developmental groups in acquisition data: variability-based neighbor clustering', Journal of Quantitative Linguistics.
11. Hilpert, M. 2006. 'Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony', Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2 (2), pp. 243-56.
12. Israel, M. 1996. 'The way constructions grow' in A.E. Goldberg (ed.) Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, pp. 217-30. Stanford: CSLI.
13. Kilgarriff, A. 2001. 'Comparing corpora', International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6 (1), pp. 1-37.
14. Kroch, A., B. Santorini and L. Delfs. 2004. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Moden English. Available online at: http://www.ling.upenn. edu/emodeng
15. Moisl, H. and V. Jones. 2005. 'Cluster analysis of the Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English: a comparison of methods', Literary and Linguistic Computing 20, pp. 125-46 (supplementary issue).
16. R Development Core Team. 2007. 'R: a language and environment for statistical computing', R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at: http://www.R-project.org.
17. Rayson, P. and R. Garside. 2000 'Comparing corpora using frequency profiling', Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, 38th ACL, 1-6.
18. Suzuki, R. 2006. pvclust 1.2-0. A package for R. Accessed 8 November 2007, at: http://www.is.titech.ac.jp/%7Eshimo/prog/pvclust/