A forward-looking approach to process scale-up for solid dose manufacturing

Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms - Tablets: Manufacture and Process Control

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 119-152

  Muzzio, Fernando J ^a   Ierapetritou, Marianthi ^a   Portillo, Patricia ^a   Llusa, Marcos ^a   Levin, Michael ^b   Morris, Kenneth R ^c   Soh, Josephine L P ^c   McCann, Ryan J ^c   Alexander, Albert ^d  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^b Metropolitan Computing Corporation   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85123267812     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Muzzio FJ, Shinbrot T, and Glasser BJ. powder technology in the pharmaceutical industry: the need to catch up fast. Powder Tech 2002; 124:1.
2. Levin M, ed. Pharmaceutical Process Scale-Up. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2002.
3. SUPAC-IR: Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Scale-Up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls, in vitro Dissolution Testing, and in vivo Bioequivalence Documentation, 1995. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/cmc5.pdf).
4. SUPAC-IR Questions and Answers about SUPAC-IR Guidance, 1997. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/qaletter.htm).
5. SUPAC-SS: Nonsterile Semisolid Dosage Forms. Scale-Up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; In Vitro Release Testing and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation 1997. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/1447fnl.pdf).
6. SUPAC-MR: Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms. Scale-Up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; In Vitro Dissolution Testing and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation, 1997. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/1214fnl.pdf).
7. SUPAC-ER: Extended Release Oral Dosage Forms: Development, Evaluation, and Application of In Vitro/In Vivo Correlations, 1997. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/1306fnl.pdf).
8. SUPAC-SS: Nonsterile Semisolid Dosage Forms Manufacturing Equipment Addendum, 1998. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/1722dft.pdf)
9. SUPAC-IR/MR: Immediate Release and Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Manufacturing Equipment Addendum, 1999. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/1721fnl.pdf).
10. Changes to an Approved NDA or ANDA, 1999. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/2766fnl.pdf).
11. Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System, 2000. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/3618fnl.pdf)
12. PAT-A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Quality Assurance, 2004. (Accessed June 7, 2007, at www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/6419fnl.pdf)
13. Hicks CR and Turner KV. Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
14. Horst R, Pardalos PM, Nguyen VT. Introduction to Global Optimization. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
15. Floudas CA and Pardalos PM. A collection of test problems for constrained global optimization algorithms. New York: Springer-Verlag 1990.
16. Muzzio FJ, Robinson P, Wightman C, Brone D. Sampling practices in powder blending. Int J Pharm 1997; 155:153-78.
17. Technical Report No. 25 Blend uniformity analysis: validation and in-process testing. J Pharm Sci Tech 1997; 51(S3).
18. Carstensen JT and Patel MR. Blending of irregularly shaped particles. Powder Tech 1977; 17: 273-82.
19. Adams J and Baker A. An assessment of dry blending equipment. Trans Instit Chem Eng 1956; 34:91-107.
20. Brone D, Alexander A, Muzzio FJ. Quantitative characterization of mixing of dry powders in V-blenders. AIChE J 1998; 44(2):271-78.
21. Brone D and Muzzio FJ. Enhanced mixing in double-cone blenders. Powder Tech 2000; 110(3):179-89.
22. Wiedenbaum SS. Mixing of solids in a twin shell blender. Ceramic Age 1963; 39-43.
23. Wightman C and Muzzio FJ. Mixing of granular material in a drum mixer undergoing rotational and rocking motions i. uniform particles. Powder Tech 1998; 98:113-24.
24. Carley-Macauly KW, Donald MB. the mixing of solids in tumbling mixers-I. Chem Eng Sci 1962, 17:493-506.
25. Carley-Macauly KW, Donald MB. 1964, The mixing of solids in tumbling mixers-II. Chem Eng Sci 1964; 19:191-9.
26. Sethuraman KJ, Davies GS. studies on solids mixing in a double-cone blender. Powder Technol 1971; 5:115-8.
27. Poux M. Powder mixing: some practical rules applied to agitated systems. Powder Technol 1991; 68:213-34.
28. Lacey PMC. Developments in the theory of particulate mixing. J Appl Chem 1954; 257-68.
29. Sudah OS, Coffin-Beach D, Muzzio FJ. Quantitative characterization of mixing of free-flowing granular material in tote (bin)blenders. Powder Tech 2002; 126:166-73.
30. Wang RH, Fan LT. Methods for Scaling-Up Tumbling Mixers. Chemical Engineering. 1974; 81(11):88-94.
31. Lloyd PJ, Yeung PCM, Freshwater DC. The Mixing and Blending of Powders. J Soc Cosmetic Chemists 1970; 21:205-20.
32. Roseman B, Donald MB. mixing and de-mixing of solid particles: Part 2: Effect of varying the operating conditions of a horizontal drum mixer. British Chem Engg 1962; 7(1):823.
33. Wiedenbaum SS, Mixing of Solids. In T.B. Drew TB, Hoopes JW, eds. Advances in Chemical Engineering. New York: Academic Press, 1958:209-324.
34. Mort PR. Scale-up of binder agglomeration processes. Powder Tech 2005; 150:86-103.
35. Faure A, York P, Rowe RC. Process control and scale-up of pharmaceutical wet granulation processes: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001; 52(3):269-77.
36. Landin M, York P, Cliff MJ, Rowe RC, Wigmore AJ. The effect of batch size on scale-up of pharmaceutical granulation in a fixed bowl mixer-granulator. Int J Pharm 1996; 134: 243-6.
37. Landin M, York P, Cliff MJ. Scale-up of a pharmaceutical granulation in fixed bowl mixer granulators. Int J Pharm 1996; 133:127-31.
38. Landin M, York P, Cliff MJ, Rowe RC. Scaleup of a pharmaceutical granulation in planetary mixers. Pharm Dev Technol 1999; 4(2):145-50.
39. Faure A, Grimsey IM, Rowe RC, York P, Cliff MJ. A methodology for the optimization of wet granulation in a model planetary mixer. Pharm Dev Tech 1998; 3(3):413-22.
40. Faure A, Grimsey IM, Rowe RC, York P, Cliff MJ. Applicability of a scale-up methodology for wet granulation processes in Collette Gral high shear mixer-granulators. Eur J Pharm Sci 1999; 8(2):85-93.
41. Shaefer T, Holm P, Kristensen HG. Melt pelletization in a high shear mixer: II. Power consumption and granule growth. Acta Pharm Nord 1992; 4.
42. Talu I, Tardos G, van Ommen JT. Use of stress fluctuations to monitor wet granulation of powders. Powder Tech 2001; 117:149-62.
43. Landin M, Rowe RC, York P. Characterization of wet powder masses with a mixer torque rheometer. 3. Nonlinear effects of shaft speed and sample weight. J Pharm Sci 1995; 84/5: 557-60.
44. Faure A, Grimsey IM, Rowe RC, York P, Cliff MJ. Importance of wet mass consistency in the control of wet granulation by mechanical agitation: a demonstration. J Pharm Pharmacol 1998; 50(12):1431-2.
45. Faure A, Grimsey IM, Rowe RC, York P, Cliff MJ. Process control in a high shear mixergranulator using wet mass consistency: The effect of formulation variables. J Pharm Sci 1999; 88(2):191-5.
46. Leuenberger H. New trends in the production of pharmaceutical granules: the classical batch concept and the problem of scale-up. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001; 52:269-77.
47. Betz G, Bürgin PJ, Leuenberger H. Power consumption profile analysis and tensile strength measurements during moist agglomeration. Int J Pharm 2003; 252(1-2):11-25.
48. Betz G, Bürgin PJ, Leuenberger H. Power consumption measurement and temperature recording during granulation. Int J Pharm 2004; 272(1-2):137-49.
49. Leuenberger H. Scale-Up in the Field of Granulation and Drying. Drugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences: Pharmaceutical Process Scale-Up. Vol. 118. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 2002:151-70.
50. Alexanderwerk AG. Compactors and Granulators page. (Accessed July, 17, 2007 at http://www.alexanderwerk.com/index.php7ILNK=Navi_Prod_Compact_WP200&iL=2).
51. Hussain AS. A collaborative Search for Efficient Methods of Ensuring Unchanged Product Quality and Performance During Scale-Up of Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms. Drugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences: Pharmaceutical Process Scale-Up. Vol. 118. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2002:325.
52. Kleinebudde P. Roller compaction/dry granulation: pharmaceutical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004; 58:317-26.
53. Fell JT, Newton JM. Effect of particle size and speed of compaction on density changes in tablets of crystalline and spray-dried lactose. J Pharm Sci 1971; 60:1866-9.
54. Rees JE, Rue PJ. Time-dependent deformation of some direct compression excipients. J Pharm Pharmacol 1978; 30:601-7.
55. Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. The effect of punch velocity on the compaction of a variety of materials. J Pharm Pharmacol 1985; 37:377-84.
56. Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. The effect of relationship between punch velocity and particle size on the compaction behaviour of materials with varying deformation mechanisms. J Pharm Pharmacol 1986; 38:567-71.
57. Newton JM, Ingham S, Onabajo OO, The effect of strain rate on mechanical strength of tablets. Acta Pharm Technol 1986; 32:61-2.
58. Armstrong NA. Time-Dependent Factors Involved in Powder Compression and Tablet Manufacture. Int J Pharm 1989; 49:1-13.
59. Holman LE, Leuenberger H. Effect of compression speed on the relationship between normalized solid fraction and mechanical properties of compacts. Int J Pharm 1989; 57:R1-R5.
60. Armstrong NA. Considerations of compression speed in tablet manufacture. Pharm Tech 1990; 9:106-16.
61. Garr JSM, Rubinstein MH. The effect of rate of force application on the properties of microcrystalline cellulose and dibasic calcium phosphate mixtures. Int J Pharm 1991; 73:75-80.
62. Nokhodchi A, et al. The effects of compression rate and force on the compaction properties of different viscosity grades of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2208. Int J Pharm 1996; 129:21-31.
63. Monedero M, Jimenez-Castellanos MR, Velasco MV, Munoz-Ruiz A. Effect of compression speed and pressure on the physical characteristics of maltodextrin tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1998; 24(7):613-21.
64. Garr JSM, Rubinstein MH. An investigation into the capping of paracetamol at increasing speeds of compression. Int J Pharm 1991; 72:117-22.
65. Mann SC, Roberts RJ, Rowe RC, Hunter BM, Rees JE. 1983. The effect of high speed compression at sub-atmospheric pressure on the capping tendency of pharmaceutical tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol 1983; 35:44.
66. Bateman SD, Rubinstein MH, Thacker HS. Pre- and main compression in tableting. Pharm Tech Int 1990; 2:30-6.
67. Ritter A, Sucker HB. Studies of variables that affect tablet capping. Pharm Tech 1980; March:57-62.
68. Bateman SD, Rubinstein MH, Wright P. The effect of compression speed on the properties of ibuprofen tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol 1987; 39:66.
69. Mann SC. An investigation of the effect of individual segments of tableting cycle on the capping and lamination of pharmaceutical tablets. Acta Pharm Seuc 1987; 24:54-5.
70. Zlokarnik M. 2006, Scale-Up in Chemical Engineering. New York: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 2006:174-9.
71. Tsygan L, Murphy S, Levin M. New Dimensionless Performance Factors of Rotary Tablet Presses for Scale-Up of Time-Dependent Formulations. Baltimore: Poster, AAPS General Meeting, 2004.
72. Ruegger CD. An investigation of the effect of compaction profiles on the tableting properties of pharmaceutical materials. Ph. D. Thesis, 1996.
73. Ho AYK, Jones TM. Punch travel beyond peak force during tablet compression. J Pharm Pharmacol 1988; 40:75.
74. Ho AYK, Jones TM. Rise time: a new index of tablet compression. J Pharm Pharmacol 1988; 40:74.
75. Mehrotra A, Llusa M, Faqih A, Levin M, Muzzio FJ. Influence of shear intensity and total shear on properties of blends and tablets of lactose and cellulose lubricated with magnesium stearate. Int J Pharm 2007; 336:284-91.
76. Marikh K, Berthiaux H, Mizonov V, Barantseva E. Experimental study of the stirring conditions taking place in a pilot plant continuous mixer of particulate solids. Powder Tech 2005; 157:138-43.
77. Muerza S, Berthiaux H, Massol-Chaudeur S, Thomas G. A dynamic study of static mixing using on-line image analysis. Powder Technol 2002; 128:195-204.
78. Williams J, Rahman M. Prediction of the performance of continuous mixers for particulate solids using residence time distributions, Part II: Experimental. Powder Tech 1972, 5,5;307-16.
79. Pernenkil L, Cooney C. A review on the continuous blending of powders. Chem Eng Sci 2006; 61:720-42.
80. Sudah O, Chester AW, Kowalski JA, Beeckman JW, Muzzio FJ. Quantitative characterization of mixing processes in rotary calciners. Powder Technol 2002; 126:166-73.
81. Weinkotter R, Reh L. Characterization of particulate mixtures by in-line measurments, Particle Particle Syst Charact 1994; 11(4):284-90.
82. Kehlenbeck V, Sommer K. Possibilities to improve the short-term dosing constancy of volumetric feeders. Powder Tech 2003; 138:51-6.
83. Williams JC. Segregation of particulate materials-a review. Powder Tech 1976; 15(2): 245-51.
84. Weinekotter R, Reh L. Continuous mixing of fine particles. Particle and Particle Syst Charact 1995; 12(1):46-53.
85. Harwood C, Walanski K, Luebcke E, Swanstrom C. The performance of continuous mixers for dry powders. Powder Tech 1975; 11:289-96.
86. Laurent BFC, Bridgwater J. Convection and segregation in a horizontal mixer. Powder Tech 2002; 123:9-18.
87. Portillo PM, Ierapetritou M, Muzzio FJ. Characterization of Continuous Convective Powder Mixing Processes, Powder Technology 2007; to appear.
88. Laurent BFC, Bridgwater J. Performance of single and size-bladed powder mixers. Chem Eng Sci 2002; 57:1695-709.