Improving Peer Feedback Prediction: The Sentence Level is Right

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 99-108

  Nguyen, Huy V ^a   Litman, Diane J ^a  

^a Learning Research and Development Ctr   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

HIGH QUALITY; PEER FEEDBACK; PEER REVIEW; PEER REVIEW SYSTEM; PREDICTION MODELLING; RECENT RESEARCHES; SENTENCE LEVEL;

FORECASTING;

EID: 85121784103     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Kwangsu Cho and Christian D. Schunn. 2007. Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers and Education, 48(3):409-426.
2. Kwangsu Cho. 2008. Machine classification of peer comments in physics. In Proceedings 1st international conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM), pages 192-196.
3. Mohammad Falakmassir, Kevin Ashley, and Christian Schunn. July 2013. Using argument diagramming to improve peer grading of writing assignments. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Massive Open Online Courses at 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Memphis, TN, pages 41-48.
4. Sarah Gielen, Elien Peeters, Filip Dochy, Patrick Onghena, and Katrien Struyven. 2010. Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4):304-315.
5. Andrew B. Goldberg, Nathanael Fillmore, David Andrzejewski, Zhiting Xu, Bryan Gibson, and Xiaojin Zhu. 2009. May all your wishes come true: A study of wishes and how to recognize them. In Proceedings Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL-HTL, pages 263-271.
6. Jordan Lippman, Mike Elfenbein, Matthew Diabes, Cori Luchau, Collin Lynch, Kevin Ashley, and Chris Schunn. 2012. To revise or not to revise: What influences undergrad authors to implement peer critiques of their argument diagrams? In International Society for the Psychology of Science and Technology 2012 Conference. Poster.
7. Melissa M. Nelson and Christian D. Schunn. 2009. The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4):375-401.
8. Huy V. Nguyen and Diane J. Litman. July 2013. Identifying localization in peer reviews of argument diagrams. In Proceedings 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Memphis, TN, pages 91-100.
9. Huy Nguyen, Wenting Xiong, and Diane Litman. June 2014. Classroom evaluation of a scaffolding intervention for improving peer review localization. In Proceedings 12th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), Honolulu, HI, pages 272-282.
10. Lakshmi Ramachandran and Edward F. Gehringer. 2011. Automated assessment of review quality using latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pages 136-138.
11. J. Ramanand, Krishna Bhavsar, and Niranjan Pedanekar. 2010. Wishful thinking: finding suggestions and 'buy' wishes from product reviews. In Proceedings the NAACL-HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pages 54-61.
12. Oliver Scheuer, Frank Loll, Niels Pinkwart, and Bruce M. McLaren. 2010. Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1):43-102.
13. Pontus Stenetorp, Sampo Pyysalo, Goran Topic, Tomoko Ohta, Sophia Ananiadou, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2012. Brat: a web-based tool for nlp-assisted text annotation. In Proceedings the Demonstrations at the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 102-107.
14. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Joint Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT-EMNLP), pages 347-354.
15. Wenting Xiong and Diane Litman. 2010. Identifying problem localization in peer-review feedback. In Proceedings 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS), Pittsburgh, PA. Poster.
16. Wenting Xiong, Diane Litman, and Christian Schunn. 2012. Natural language processing techniques for researching and improving peer feedback. Journal of Writing Research, 4(2):155-176.
17. Wenting Xiong, Diane Litman, and Christian Schunn. June 2010. Assessing reviewer's performance based on mining problem localization in peer-review data. In Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM), Pittsburgh, PA, pages 211-220.