Evaluatingword embeddings using a representative suite of practical tasks

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 19-23

  Nayak, Neha ^a   Angeli, Gabor ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL; SEMANTICS;

DOWN-STREAM; EASE-OF-USE; EMBEDDING METHOD; EMBEDDINGS; IN-VIVO; NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING; SEMANTICS INFORMATION; SIMPLE++; SPACE BETWEEN; WORD SIMILARITY;

EMBEDDINGS;

EID: 85121209832     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Ronan Collobert, Jason Weston, Léon Bottou, Michael Karlen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa. 2011. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2493-2537.
2. Paramveer Dhillon, Jordan Rodu, Dean Foster, and Lyle Ungar. 2012. Two step cca: A new spectral method for estimating vector models of words. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.6403.
3. Manaal Faruqui and Chris Dyer. 2014. Community evaluation and exchange of word vectors at wordvectors. org. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Lev Finkelstein, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Yossi Matias, Ehud Rivlin, Zach Solan, Gadi Wolfman, and Eytan Ruppin. 2001. Placing search in context: The concept revisited. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 406- 414. ACM.
5. Juri Ganitkevitch, Benjamin Van Durme, and Chris Callison-Burch. 2013. PPDB: The paraphrase database. In HLT-NAACL.
6. Omer Levy, Yoav Goldberg, and Ido Dagan. 2015. Improving distributional similarity with lessons learned from word embeddings. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3:211-225.
7. Xin Li and Dan Roth. 2006. Learning question classifiers: The role of semantic information. Natural Language Engineering, 12(03):229-249.
8. Christopher D Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Finkel, Steven J Bethard, and David Mc- Closky. 2014. The stanford corenlp natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pages 55-60.
9. Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.
10. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proceedings of the Empiricial Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2014), 12:1532-1543.
11. Slav Petrov, Dipanjan Das, and Ryan McDonald. 2012. A universal part-of-speech tagset. In Proceedings of LREC, May.
12. Tobias Schnabel, Igor Labutov, David Mimno, and Thorsten Joachims. 2015. Evaluation methods for unsupervised word embeddings. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
13. Erik F Tjong Kim Sang and Sabine Buchholz. 2000. Introduction to the CoNLL-2000 shared task: Chunking. In CoNLL.
14. Erik F Tjong Kim Sang and Fien De Meulder. 2003. Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In HLT-NAACL.
15. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher D Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-ofspeech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology- Volume 1, pages 173-180.