A Multidimensional Assessment of Ecosystem Services: From Grey to Green Infrastructure

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 12955 LNCS, Issue , 2021, Pages 569-581

  Caprioli, Caterina ^a   Oppio, Alessandra ^b   Baldassarre, Roberta ^b   Grassi, Riccardo ^b   Dell’Ovo, Marta ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Integrated assessment; Multidimensional values; Urban regeneration

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEMS; PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH;

CIRCULAR ECONOMY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GREEN CITIES; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; MULTIDIMENSIONAL VALUE; SOCIAL-ECONOMIC; URBAN AREAS; URBAN GREEN SPACES; URBAN REGENERATION;

BIODIVERSITY;

EID: 85116010992     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87007-2_41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Wamsler, C., Brink, E., Rivera, C.: Planning for climate change in urban areas: from theory to practice. J. Clean. Prod. 50, 68–81 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
2. UNDRR: Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives, Geneva, New York (2004)
3. UNISDR: Terminology: disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva (2009)
4. Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Dell’Anna, F., Dell’Ovo, M., Gabrielli, L.: Evaluating the urban quality through a hybrid approach: application in the Milan (Italy) city area. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12253, pp. 300–315. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58814-4_21
5. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN (2018)
6. Appiotti, F., et al.: Definition of a risk assessment model within a European interoperable database platform (EID) for cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 46, 268–277 (2020). https://doi. org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.08.001
7. Assumma, B.: Monaco: landscape economic attractiveness: an integrated methodology for exploring the rural landscapes in piedmont (Italy). Land. 8, 105 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 3390/land8070105
8. Dong, X., Guo, H., Zeng, S.: Enhancing future resilience in urban drainage system: green versus grey infrastructure. Water Res. 124, 280–289 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres. 2017.07.038
9. Pamukcu-Albers, P., Ugolini, F., La Rosa, D., Grădinaru, S.R., Azevedo, J.C., Wu, J.: Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics. Landscape Ecol. 36(3), 665–673 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01212-y
10. Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P.: Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 68, 643–653 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
11. Assessment, M.E.: Living beyond our means: natural assets and human well-being statement from the board (2005)
12. Costanza, R., et al.: The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol. Econ. 25, 3–15 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
13. Demuzere, M., et al.: Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multiscale assessment of green urban infrastructure. J. Environ. Manage. 146, 107–115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
14. Kabisch, N., et al.: Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecol. Soc. 21, art39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239
15. Faroldi, E., Fabi, V., Vettori, M.P., Gola, M., Brambilla, A., Capolongo, S.: Health tourism and thermal heritage: assessing Italian spas with innovative multidisciplinary tools. Tour. Anal. 24, 405–419 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3727/108354219X15511865533121
16. Capolongo, S., Buffoli, M., Mosca, E.I., Galeone, D., D’Elia, R., Rebecchi, A.: Public health aspects’ assessment tool for urban projects, according to the urban health approach. In: Della Torre, S., Cattaneo, S., Lenzi, C., Zanelli, A. (eds.) Regeneration of the Built Environment from a Circular Economy Perspective. RD, pp. 325–335. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-33256-3_30
17. Fusco Girard, L., Nijkamp, P.: Le valutazioni per lo sviluppo sostenibile della città e del territorio. Franco Angeli (2003)
18. Pearce, D. W., Turner, R.K.: Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Johns Hopkins University Press (1989)
19. Dell’Ovo, M., Oppio, A.: The role of the evaluation in designing ecosystem services. a literature review. In: New Metropolitan Perspectives Knowledge Dynamics and Innovation-driven Policies Towards Urban and Regional Transition, vol. 2, pp. 1359–1368 (2021)
20. Caprioli, C., Bottero, M., Zanetta, E., Mondini, G.: Ecosystem services in land-use planning: an application for assessing transformation scenarios at the local scale. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds.) NMP 2020. SIST, vol. 178, pp. 1332–1341. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_124
21. Giaimo, C., Salata, S.: Ecosystem services assessment methods for integrated processes of urban planning. the experience of LIFE SAM4CP towards sustainable and smart communities. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 290, 012116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012116
22. Oppio, A., Dell’Ovo, M.: Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and multi-criteria analysis: an integrated approach. In: Campeol, G. (ed.) Strategic Environmental Assessment and Urban Planning. GET, pp. 47–63. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46180-5_4
23. Stanganelli, M., Torrieri, F., Gerundo, C., Rossitti, M.: An integrated strategic-performative planning methodology towards enhancing the sustainable decisional regeneration of fragile territories. Sustain. Cities Soc. 53, 101920 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101920
24. Bottero, M., Dell’Anna, F., Nappo, M.: Evaluating tangible and intangible aspects of cultural heritage: an application of the PROMETHEE method for the reuse project of the Ceva-Ormea railway. In: Mondini, G., Fattinnanzi, E., Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Stanghellini, S. (eds.) Integrated Evaluation for the Management of Contemporary Cities, pp. 285–295. Springer, Cham (2018)
25. Caprioli, C., Bottero, M., Mondini, G.: Urban ecosystem services: a review of definitions and classifications for the identification of future research perspectives. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12253, pp. 332–344. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58814-4_23
26. Saarikoski, H., et al.: Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis: comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 22, 238–249 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.014
27. Barfod, M.B., Salling, K.B., Leleur, S.: Composite decision support by combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analysis. Decis. Support Syst. 51, 167–175 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.005