Ecosystem services in land-use planning: An application for assessing transformation scenarios at the local scale

Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies

Volumn 178 SIST, Issue , 2021, Pages 1332-1341

  Caprioli, Caterina ^a   Bottero, Marta ^a   Zanetta, Elisa ^a   Mondini, Giulio ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Decision making; Ecosystem services; Evaluation approach; Land use planning; Scenario planning

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; LAND USE; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION;

BIOPHYSICAL ANALYSIS; COMPENSATION MEASURES; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; INTERNATIONAL POLICIES; LAND USE PLANNING; MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENTS;

ECOSYSTEMS;

EID: 85091290844     PISSN: 21903018     EISSN: 21903026     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_124     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M.: Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 1–16 (2017)
2. De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A., Boumans, R.M.J.: A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 41(3), 393–408 (2002)
3. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Living Beyond Our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-being Statement from the Board (2005)
4. Costanza, R., Arge, R., deGroot, R., Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., Neill, R.V.O., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P.: The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 38(6630), 253–260 (1997)
5. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity): Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synsthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB (2010)
6. Biodiversity Strategy. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/strategy/index_ en.htm. Accessed 18 Jan 2020
7. Geneletti, D.: Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 7(3), 143–149 (2011)
8. Partidario, M.R., Gomes, R.C.: Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 40, 36–46 (2013)
9. Bottero, M., Caprioli, C., Cotella, G., Santangelo, M.: Sustainable cities: a reflection on potentialities and limits based on existing eco-districts in Europe. Sustainability (Switzer-land) 11(20), 5794 (2019)
10. Meerow, S., Newell, J.P.: Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning. 159, 62–75 (2017)
11. Caldarice, O., Salata, S.: Ecosystem service assessment in land use planning decreasing territorial vulnerability. A critical exploration of planning problems starting from the land take regulation in Piedmont Region, Italy. Valori e Valutazioni. 22, 67–83 (2019)
12. Daily, G.C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T.H., Salzman, J., Shallenberger, R.: Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7(1), 21–28 (2009)
13. Luederitz, C., Brink, E., Gralla, F., Hermelingmeier, V., Meyer, M., Niven, L., Panzer, L., Partelow, S., Rau, A.L., Sasaki, R., Abson, D.J., Lang, D.J., Wamsler, C., von Wehrden, H.: A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research. Ecosyst. Serv. 14, 98–112 (2015)
14. Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R.S., Diaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H.M., Perrings, C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J., Whyte, A.: Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(5), 1305–1312 (2009)
15. Hubacek, K., Kronenberg, J.: Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landscape Urban Plann. 1(109), 1–6 (2013)
16. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D.N.: Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86, 235–245 (2013)
17. Bottero, M., Dell’Anna, F., Nappo, M.: Evaluating tangible and intangible aspects of cultural heritage: an application of the promethee method for the reuse project of the Ceva–Ormea railway. In: Green Energy and Technology, pp. 285–295 (2018)
18. European Environment Agency: Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion (2011)
19. Bottero, M., Bravi, M., Giaimo, C., Barbieri, C.A.: Ecosystem services: From bio-physical to economic values. In: Green Energy and Technology. pp. 37–50 (2020)
20. Assumma, V., Bottero, M., Monaco, R.: Landscape economic attractiveness: an integrated methodology for exploring the rural landscapes in piedmont (Italy). Land 8(7), 105 (2019)
21. Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Brander, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Verma, M., Armsworth, P., Christie, M., Cornelissen, H., Eppink, F., Farley, J., Loomis, J., Pearson, L., Perrings, C., Polasky, S., McNeely, J.A., Norgaard, R., Siddiqui, R., David Simpson, R., Kerry Turner, R., Simpson, R.D.: The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations (2012)
22. Larondelle, N., Haase, D.: Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities. Ecol. Ind. 29, 179–190 (2013)
23. Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., O’Neill, J.: Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 26(3), 277–286 (1998)
24. Norton, B.G., Hannon, B.: Environmental values: a place-based theory. Environ. Ethics 19 (3), 227–245 (1997)
25. Sharp, R., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Wood, S., Guerry, A., Tallis, H., Ricketts, T., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, Derric Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D.R., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Douglass, J.: InVEST User’s Guide (2018)
26. LIFE + Making Good Natura. http://www.lifemgn-serviziecosistemici.eu/IT/risultati/Pages/se0.aspx. Accessed 11 Dec 2019
27. Simulsoil web page. http://www.sam4cp.eu/en/simulsoil/. Accessed 12 Sept 2019
28. Giaimo, C., Salata, S.: Ecosystem services assessment methods for integrated processes of urban planning. The Experience of LIFE SAM4CP towards sustainable and smart communities. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, p. 012116 (2019)
29. Simulsoil User Guide. http://www.sam4cp.eu/simulsoil/. Accessed 11 Dec 2019
30. Saarikoski, H., Mustajoki, J., Barton, D.N., Geneletti, D., Langemeyer, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Marttunen, M., Antunes, P., Keune, H., Santos, R.: Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis: comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 22, 238–249 (2016)