The role of initiative in tutorial dialogue

10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 67-74

  Core, Mark G ^a   Moore, Johanna D ^a   Zinn, Claus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALOGUE STRATEGY; INTERACTIVITY; MIXED-INITIATIVE; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85111842045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Jean Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the Kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2)249-254.
2. Michelene T. H. Chi, Miriam Bassok, Matthew W. Lewis, Peter Reimann, and Robert Glaser. 1989. Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2):145-182.
3. Michelene T. H. Chi, Nicholas de Leeuw, Mei-Hung Chiu, and Christian Lavancher. 1994. Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3):439-477.
4. Michelene T. H. Chi, Stephanie A. Siler, Heisawn Jeong, Takashi Yamauchi, and Robert G. Hausmann. 2001. Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25:471-533.
5. Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Michael K. Brown. 1998. An evidential model for tracking initiative in collaborative dialogue interactions. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 8:215-253.
6. Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Jill S. Nickerson. 2000. Evaluating automatic dialogue strategy adaptation for a spoken dialogue system. In Proc. of the Is' Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Seatle, pages 202-209.
7. Mark a Core, Johanna D. Moore, and Claus Zinn. 2002. Initiative in tutorial dialogue. In Proc. of the ITS '02 Workshop on Empirical Methods for Tutorial Dialogue Systems.
8. Christine Doran, John Aberdeen, Laurie Damianos, and Lynette Hirschman. 2001. Comparing several aspects of human-computer and human-human dialogues. In 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Aalborg, Denmark.
9. Barbara A. Fox. 1993. The Human Tutorial Dialogue Project: Issues in the design of instructional systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Arthur C. Graesser and Natalie K. Person. 1994. Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1):104-137.
11. Arthur C. Graesser, Natalie K. Person, and Joseph P. Magliano. 1995. Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9:495-522.
12. Barbara J. Grosz and Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intensions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175-204.
13. Curry I. Guinn. 1996. An analysis of initiative selection in collaborative task-oriented discourse. In Proc. of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 278-285.
14. Pamela W. Jordan and Barbara Di Eugenio. 1997. Control and initiative in collaborative problem solving dialogues. In AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on Computational Models fbr Mixed Initiative Interactions, Stanford, CA.
15. Pamela W. Jordan and Stephanie Siler. 2002. Control and initiative in computer-mediated human tutoring dialogues. In Proc. of the ITS'02 Workshop on Empirical Methods for Tutorial Dialogue Systems.
16. Klaus Krippendorff. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
17. Per Linell, Lennart Gustavsson, and Paivi Juvonen. 1988. Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of initiative-response analysis. Linguistics, 26:415-442.
18. Douglas C. Merrill, Brian J. Reiser, and S. Landes. 1992a. Human tutoring: Pedagogical strategies and learning outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
19. Douglas C. Merrill, Brian J. Reiser, Michael Ranney, and J. Gregory Trafton. 1992b. Effective tutoring techniques: Comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3):277-305.
20. Allen Munro. 1994. Authoring interactive graphical models. In T. de Jong, D. M. Towne, and H. Spada, editors, The Use of Computer Models for Explication, Analysis and Experimental Learning. Springer.
21. Carolyn P. Rosé, Johanna D. Moore, Kurt VanLehn, and David Allbritton. 2000. A comparative evaluation of socratic versus didactic tutoring. Technical Report LRDC-BEE-1, University of Pittsburgh.
22. Farhana Shah. 1997. Recognizing and Responding to Student Plans in an Intelligent Tutoring System: CIRCSIM-Tutor. Ph.D. thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology.
23. John M. Sinclair and R. Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.
24. Susan E. Strayer and Peter A. Heeman. 2001. Reconciling initiative and discourse structure. In 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Aalborg, Denmark, September.
25. Kurt VanLehn, Stephanie Siler, Charles Murray, and William B. Baggett. 1998. What makes a tutorial event effective? In M. A. Gernsbacher and S. Derry, editors, Proc. of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum.
26. Marilyn A. Walker and Steve Whittaker. 1990. Mixed initiative in dialogue: An investigation into discourse segmentation. In Proc. of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 70-78.
27. Steve Whittaker and Phil Stenton. 1988. Cues and control in expert-client dialogues. In Proc. of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 123-130.